Reflections on the Customary Laws of Benin Kingdom and Its Living Cultural Objects in the Discourse of Ownership and Restitution
The British punitive expedition of 1897 led to the theft and vandalization of the cultural heritage of the Benin kingdom. The plunder included more than 3,000 cultural objects made of bronzes, ivories, beads, and other objects, which were produced since the 1st century AD to commemorate historical m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Santander Art & Culture Law Review 2022, Vol.8 (2), p.29-48 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 48 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 29 |
container_title | Santander Art & Culture Law Review |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Sogbesan, Oluwatoyin Laotan-Brown, Tokie |
description | The British punitive expedition of 1897 led to the theft and vandalization of the cultural heritage of the Benin kingdom. The plunder included more than 3,000 cultural objects made of bronzes, ivories, beads, and other objects, which were produced since the 1st century AD to commemorate historical moments, political transitions, and ritual purposes. This theft dishonoured the spiritual and ritual significance of these living cultural objects, and has turned them into museum artefacts. As international debates on restitution and the return of Benin Bronzes intensify, two pertinent questions which arise are: Who will be the custodians of the returned artefacts?; and How will they be conserved? In this article, we address these two questions through the lens of Benin customary laws and practices. We argue that within this local jurisprudence, the Emwin Arre– the living cultural heritage described above –belong to the Oba of Benin and should be returned to the royal Palace, where they will be preserved, protected, and shared with the present and future generations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4467/2450050XSNR.22.011.17024 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2894347425</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1134605</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>1134605</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2744-f33785200cdb31cfe8115c87916c23face160564e9ffdc1fb56e6ebe10e839473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkN1LwzAUxYsoOHR_ghDwuTVfbdpHnV_D4WAq-Bba9MZldMlsWodv_umm20CfEu4953cuJ4oQwQnnmbiiPMU4xe8vz4uE0gQTkhCBKT-KRsMqHnbH4c8KEouiEKfR2PsVxpgWGcE8G0U_C9ANqM4465GzqFsCmvS-c-uy_UazchumGt2ANRY9GftRuzUqbY2mnUcz8xUmQd50fVs2aF6tAskjs8fcGq9c33oYCPOthdYvzWbnXoDvTNcPqefRiS4bD-PDexa93d-9Th7j2fxhOrmexYoKzmPNmMhTirGqK0aUhpyQVOWiIJmiTJcKSIbTjEOhda2IrtIMMqiAYMhZwQU7iy733E3rPvuQL1fhOBsiJc0LzrjgNA2qfK9SrfO-BS03rRmqkATLoXL5r3JJqQyVy13lwXpxsAK45o9OCOPhNPYLq_Z_bw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2894347425</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reflections on the Customary Laws of Benin Kingdom and Its Living Cultural Objects in the Discourse of Ownership and Restitution</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sogbesan, Oluwatoyin ; Laotan-Brown, Tokie</creator><creatorcontrib>Sogbesan, Oluwatoyin ; Laotan-Brown, Tokie</creatorcontrib><description>The British punitive expedition of 1897 led to the theft and vandalization of the cultural heritage of the Benin kingdom. The plunder included more than 3,000 cultural objects made of bronzes, ivories, beads, and other objects, which were produced since the 1st century AD to commemorate historical moments, political transitions, and ritual purposes. This theft dishonoured the spiritual and ritual significance of these living cultural objects, and has turned them into museum artefacts. As international debates on restitution and the return of Benin Bronzes intensify, two pertinent questions which arise are: Who will be the custodians of the returned artefacts?; and How will they be conserved? In this article, we address these two questions through the lens of Benin customary laws and practices. We argue that within this local jurisprudence, the Emwin Arre– the living cultural heritage described above –belong to the Oba of Benin and should be returned to the royal Palace, where they will be preserved, protected, and shared with the present and future generations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2391-7997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2450-050X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4467/2450050XSNR.22.011.17024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Krakow: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego</publisher><subject>Civil Law ; Cultural heritage ; Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence ; Library and Information Science ; Museology Heritage Studies</subject><ispartof>Santander Art & Culture Law Review, 2022, Vol.8 (2), p.29-48</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2744-f33785200cdb31cfe8115c87916c23face160564e9ffdc1fb56e6ebe10e839473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2744-f33785200cdb31cfe8115c87916c23face160564e9ffdc1fb56e6ebe10e839473</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4243-3299 ; 0000-0001-8668-130X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2022_74609.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,4022,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sogbesan, Oluwatoyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laotan-Brown, Tokie</creatorcontrib><title>Reflections on the Customary Laws of Benin Kingdom and Its Living Cultural Objects in the Discourse of Ownership and Restitution</title><title>Santander Art & Culture Law Review</title><addtitle>Santander Art and Culture Law Review</addtitle><description>The British punitive expedition of 1897 led to the theft and vandalization of the cultural heritage of the Benin kingdom. The plunder included more than 3,000 cultural objects made of bronzes, ivories, beads, and other objects, which were produced since the 1st century AD to commemorate historical moments, political transitions, and ritual purposes. This theft dishonoured the spiritual and ritual significance of these living cultural objects, and has turned them into museum artefacts. As international debates on restitution and the return of Benin Bronzes intensify, two pertinent questions which arise are: Who will be the custodians of the returned artefacts?; and How will they be conserved? In this article, we address these two questions through the lens of Benin customary laws and practices. We argue that within this local jurisprudence, the Emwin Arre– the living cultural heritage described above –belong to the Oba of Benin and should be returned to the royal Palace, where they will be preserved, protected, and shared with the present and future generations.</description><subject>Civil Law</subject><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Library and Information Science</subject><subject>Museology Heritage Studies</subject><issn>2391-7997</issn><issn>2450-050X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkN1LwzAUxYsoOHR_ghDwuTVfbdpHnV_D4WAq-Bba9MZldMlsWodv_umm20CfEu4953cuJ4oQwQnnmbiiPMU4xe8vz4uE0gQTkhCBKT-KRsMqHnbH4c8KEouiEKfR2PsVxpgWGcE8G0U_C9ANqM4465GzqFsCmvS-c-uy_UazchumGt2ANRY9GftRuzUqbY2mnUcz8xUmQd50fVs2aF6tAskjs8fcGq9c33oYCPOthdYvzWbnXoDvTNcPqefRiS4bD-PDexa93d-9Th7j2fxhOrmexYoKzmPNmMhTirGqK0aUhpyQVOWiIJmiTJcKSIbTjEOhda2IrtIMMqiAYMhZwQU7iy733E3rPvuQL1fhOBsiJc0LzrjgNA2qfK9SrfO-BS03rRmqkATLoXL5r3JJqQyVy13lwXpxsAK45o9OCOPhNPYLq_Z_bw</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Sogbesan, Oluwatoyin</creator><creator>Laotan-Brown, Tokie</creator><general>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego</general><general>Jagiellonian University Press</general><general>Jagiellonian University-Jagiellonian University Press</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4243-3299</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8668-130X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Reflections on the Customary Laws of Benin Kingdom and Its Living Cultural Objects in the Discourse of Ownership and Restitution</title><author>Sogbesan, Oluwatoyin ; Laotan-Brown, Tokie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2744-f33785200cdb31cfe8115c87916c23face160564e9ffdc1fb56e6ebe10e839473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Civil Law</topic><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Library and Information Science</topic><topic>Museology Heritage Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sogbesan, Oluwatoyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laotan-Brown, Tokie</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Santander Art & Culture Law Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sogbesan, Oluwatoyin</au><au>Laotan-Brown, Tokie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reflections on the Customary Laws of Benin Kingdom and Its Living Cultural Objects in the Discourse of Ownership and Restitution</atitle><jtitle>Santander Art & Culture Law Review</jtitle><addtitle>Santander Art and Culture Law Review</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>29-48</pages><issn>2391-7997</issn><eissn>2450-050X</eissn><abstract>The British punitive expedition of 1897 led to the theft and vandalization of the cultural heritage of the Benin kingdom. The plunder included more than 3,000 cultural objects made of bronzes, ivories, beads, and other objects, which were produced since the 1st century AD to commemorate historical moments, political transitions, and ritual purposes. This theft dishonoured the spiritual and ritual significance of these living cultural objects, and has turned them into museum artefacts. As international debates on restitution and the return of Benin Bronzes intensify, two pertinent questions which arise are: Who will be the custodians of the returned artefacts?; and How will they be conserved? In this article, we address these two questions through the lens of Benin customary laws and practices. We argue that within this local jurisprudence, the Emwin Arre– the living cultural heritage described above –belong to the Oba of Benin and should be returned to the royal Palace, where they will be preserved, protected, and shared with the present and future generations.</abstract><cop>Krakow</cop><pub>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego</pub><doi>10.4467/2450050XSNR.22.011.17024</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4243-3299</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8668-130X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2391-7997 |
ispartof | Santander Art & Culture Law Review, 2022, Vol.8 (2), p.29-48 |
issn | 2391-7997 2450-050X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2894347425 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Civil Law Cultural heritage Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Library and Information Science Museology Heritage Studies |
title | Reflections on the Customary Laws of Benin Kingdom and Its Living Cultural Objects in the Discourse of Ownership and Restitution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T22%3A50%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reflections%20on%20the%20Customary%20Laws%20of%20Benin%20Kingdom%20and%20Its%20Living%20Cultural%20Objects%20in%20the%20Discourse%20of%20Ownership%20and%20Restitution&rft.jtitle=Santander%20Art%20&%20Culture%20Law%20Review&rft.au=Sogbesan,%20Oluwatoyin&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=29-48&rft.issn=2391-7997&rft.eissn=2450-050X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4467/2450050XSNR.22.011.17024&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E1134605%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2894347425&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1134605&rfr_iscdi=true |