Forecasting Ionospheric foF2 Using Bidirectional LSTM and Attention Mechanism
The critical frequency of ionospheric F2 layer (foF2) is an important ionospheric characteristic parameter. In this paper, a deep learning model based on Bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM) and attention mechanism is implemented for predicting the foF2 parameter. The inputs of models are t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Space Weather 2023-11, Vol.21 (11), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Space Weather |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Tang, Jun Yang, Dengpan Ding, Mingfei |
description | The critical frequency of ionospheric F2 layer (foF2) is an important ionospheric characteristic parameter. In this paper, a deep learning model based on Bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM) and attention mechanism is implemented for predicting the foF2 parameter. The inputs of models are the foF2 of globally available ionospheric ionosonde stations, geographic longitude and latitude, world time (UT), geomagnetic activity index, and solar activity index from 2015 to 2017. The superiority of the model is analyzed from different latitudes, seasons, and geomagnetic conditions. The results show that the prediction performance of the Bidirectional long short‐term memory model based on attention mechanism (BiLSTM‐Attention) is better than other models. The performance of the prediction model is optimal at high latitudes. The root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (R) of the BiLSTM‐Attention model are 0.539 MHZ and 0.908 MHz at high latitudes, respectively. In terms of RMSE, it is 25.243%, 18.209%, and 11.203% lower than those of the international reference ionosphere (IRI), LSTM, and BiLSTM models, respectively. The prediction results of the four seasons show that the models are more applicable in winter. Compared with the IRI model, the RMSE of the BiLSTM‐Attention model in spring, summer, autumn, and winter is reduced by 24.344%, 21.181%, 25.058%, and 30.948%, respectively. The prediction effect of the BiLSTM‐Attention model is improved in the magnetic quiet period, the magnetic moderate period and the magnetic storm period. Also, the improvement effect is more obvious in the magnetostatic day, and the RMSE is reduced by 27.462% compared with the IRI model.
Plain Language Summary
The critical frequency of ionospheric F2 layer (foF2) is an important parameter to characterize the variability of the ionosphere. In this study, we present an effective method to predict the foF2 based on ionosonde stations distributed around the world. The inputs to these models are the foF2 values, geographic longitude and latitude, world time (UT), geomagnetic activity index, and solar activity index from 2015 to 2017. Compared with the international reference ionosphere (IRI‐2016) model, long short‐term memory (LSTM) model, and Bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM) model, the Bidirectional long short‐term memory model based on attention mechanism (BiLSTM‐Attention) can achieve better performance under different latitudes, seasons and geomagneti |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2023SW003508 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2893955531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A774449944</galeid><sourcerecordid>A774449944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3408-76d60d09368e8b6bea65c5b829cca72abb042bda7ea0ba3c4f0fdd9bdb68d4033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtrwkAUhUNpodZ21x8Q6LaxN_NIMksr2gpKFyouh3lFR3TGzkSK_76RdOGq3MW9HL5zuJwkec5hkANibwgQXqwBMIXqJunllKCsxAxur-775CHGHQAiFJFeMp_4YJSIjXWbdOqdj8etCValtZ-gdBUv8rvVtoUa653Yp7PFcp4Kp9Nh0xh3EdO5UVvhbDw8Jne12Efz9Lf7yWoyXo4-s9nXx3Q0nGUKE6iystAFaGC4qEwlC2lEQRWVFWJKiRIJKYEgqUVpBEiBFamh1ppJLYtKE8C4n7x0ucfgv08mNnznT6H9LnJUMcwopThvqUFHbcTecOtq3wSh2tHmYJV3pratPixLQghjhLSG186ggo8xmJofgz2IcOY58EvD_LrhFkcd_tPmnP9l-WI9RjllFf4Fh5N8HA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2893955531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forecasting Ionospheric foF2 Using Bidirectional LSTM and Attention Mechanism</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Tang, Jun ; Yang, Dengpan ; Ding, Mingfei</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jun ; Yang, Dengpan ; Ding, Mingfei</creatorcontrib><description>The critical frequency of ionospheric F2 layer (foF2) is an important ionospheric characteristic parameter. In this paper, a deep learning model based on Bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM) and attention mechanism is implemented for predicting the foF2 parameter. The inputs of models are the foF2 of globally available ionospheric ionosonde stations, geographic longitude and latitude, world time (UT), geomagnetic activity index, and solar activity index from 2015 to 2017. The superiority of the model is analyzed from different latitudes, seasons, and geomagnetic conditions. The results show that the prediction performance of the Bidirectional long short‐term memory model based on attention mechanism (BiLSTM‐Attention) is better than other models. The performance of the prediction model is optimal at high latitudes. The root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (R) of the BiLSTM‐Attention model are 0.539 MHZ and 0.908 MHz at high latitudes, respectively. In terms of RMSE, it is 25.243%, 18.209%, and 11.203% lower than those of the international reference ionosphere (IRI), LSTM, and BiLSTM models, respectively. The prediction results of the four seasons show that the models are more applicable in winter. Compared with the IRI model, the RMSE of the BiLSTM‐Attention model in spring, summer, autumn, and winter is reduced by 24.344%, 21.181%, 25.058%, and 30.948%, respectively. The prediction effect of the BiLSTM‐Attention model is improved in the magnetic quiet period, the magnetic moderate period and the magnetic storm period. Also, the improvement effect is more obvious in the magnetostatic day, and the RMSE is reduced by 27.462% compared with the IRI model.
Plain Language Summary
The critical frequency of ionospheric F2 layer (foF2) is an important parameter to characterize the variability of the ionosphere. In this study, we present an effective method to predict the foF2 based on ionosonde stations distributed around the world. The inputs to these models are the foF2 values, geographic longitude and latitude, world time (UT), geomagnetic activity index, and solar activity index from 2015 to 2017. Compared with the international reference ionosphere (IRI‐2016) model, long short‐term memory (LSTM) model, and Bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM) model, the Bidirectional long short‐term memory model based on attention mechanism (BiLSTM‐Attention) can achieve better performance under different latitudes, seasons and geomagnetic conditions.
Key Points
The Bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM)‐Attention model is first used to predict the foF2 based on ionosonde stations distributed around the world
Geomagnetic activity index and solar activity index are added for the foF2 prediction of these models
The BiLSTM‐Attention prediction model shows better performance than the IRI‐2016, LSTM, and BiLSTM prediction models under different latitudes, seasons and geomagnetic conditions</description><identifier>ISSN: 1542-7390</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1539-4964</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-7390</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2023SW003508</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>attention mechanism ; BiLSTM ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; F 2 region ; foF2 ; forecasting ; Geomagnetic activity ; Geomagnetic storms ; Geomagnetism ; Ionosondes ; Ionosphere ; Ionospheric forecasting ; Ionospheric models ; Latitude ; Longitude ; LSTM ; Magnetic storms ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Parameters ; Performance prediction ; Prediction models ; Root-mean-square errors ; Seasons ; Solar activity ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Space Weather, 2023-11, Vol.21 (11), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023. The Authors.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3408-76d60d09368e8b6bea65c5b829cca72abb042bda7ea0ba3c4f0fdd9bdb68d4033</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1292-6746</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2023SW003508$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2023SW003508$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Dengpan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Mingfei</creatorcontrib><title>Forecasting Ionospheric foF2 Using Bidirectional LSTM and Attention Mechanism</title><title>Space Weather</title><description>The critical frequency of ionospheric F2 layer (foF2) is an important ionospheric characteristic parameter. In this paper, a deep learning model based on Bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM) and attention mechanism is implemented for predicting the foF2 parameter. The inputs of models are the foF2 of globally available ionospheric ionosonde stations, geographic longitude and latitude, world time (UT), geomagnetic activity index, and solar activity index from 2015 to 2017. The superiority of the model is analyzed from different latitudes, seasons, and geomagnetic conditions. The results show that the prediction performance of the Bidirectional long short‐term memory model based on attention mechanism (BiLSTM‐Attention) is better than other models. The performance of the prediction model is optimal at high latitudes. The root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (R) of the BiLSTM‐Attention model are 0.539 MHZ and 0.908 MHz at high latitudes, respectively. In terms of RMSE, it is 25.243%, 18.209%, and 11.203% lower than those of the international reference ionosphere (IRI), LSTM, and BiLSTM models, respectively. The prediction results of the four seasons show that the models are more applicable in winter. Compared with the IRI model, the RMSE of the BiLSTM‐Attention model in spring, summer, autumn, and winter is reduced by 24.344%, 21.181%, 25.058%, and 30.948%, respectively. The prediction effect of the BiLSTM‐Attention model is improved in the magnetic quiet period, the magnetic moderate period and the magnetic storm period. Also, the improvement effect is more obvious in the magnetostatic day, and the RMSE is reduced by 27.462% compared with the IRI model.
Plain Language Summary
The critical frequency of ionospheric F2 layer (foF2) is an important parameter to characterize the variability of the ionosphere. In this study, we present an effective method to predict the foF2 based on ionosonde stations distributed around the world. The inputs to these models are the foF2 values, geographic longitude and latitude, world time (UT), geomagnetic activity index, and solar activity index from 2015 to 2017. Compared with the international reference ionosphere (IRI‐2016) model, long short‐term memory (LSTM) model, and Bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM) model, the Bidirectional long short‐term memory model based on attention mechanism (BiLSTM‐Attention) can achieve better performance under different latitudes, seasons and geomagnetic conditions.
Key Points
The Bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM)‐Attention model is first used to predict the foF2 based on ionosonde stations distributed around the world
Geomagnetic activity index and solar activity index are added for the foF2 prediction of these models
The BiLSTM‐Attention prediction model shows better performance than the IRI‐2016, LSTM, and BiLSTM prediction models under different latitudes, seasons and geomagnetic conditions</description><subject>attention mechanism</subject><subject>BiLSTM</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>F 2 region</subject><subject>foF2</subject><subject>forecasting</subject><subject>Geomagnetic activity</subject><subject>Geomagnetic storms</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Ionosondes</subject><subject>Ionosphere</subject><subject>Ionospheric forecasting</subject><subject>Ionospheric models</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>Longitude</subject><subject>LSTM</subject><subject>Magnetic storms</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Root-mean-square errors</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Solar activity</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>1542-7390</issn><issn>1539-4964</issn><issn>1542-7390</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtrwkAUhUNpodZ21x8Q6LaxN_NIMksr2gpKFyouh3lFR3TGzkSK_76RdOGq3MW9HL5zuJwkec5hkANibwgQXqwBMIXqJunllKCsxAxur-775CHGHQAiFJFeMp_4YJSIjXWbdOqdj8etCValtZ-gdBUv8rvVtoUa653Yp7PFcp4Kp9Nh0xh3EdO5UVvhbDw8Jne12Efz9Lf7yWoyXo4-s9nXx3Q0nGUKE6iystAFaGC4qEwlC2lEQRWVFWJKiRIJKYEgqUVpBEiBFamh1ppJLYtKE8C4n7x0ucfgv08mNnznT6H9LnJUMcwopThvqUFHbcTecOtq3wSh2tHmYJV3pratPixLQghjhLSG186ggo8xmJofgz2IcOY58EvD_LrhFkcd_tPmnP9l-WI9RjllFf4Fh5N8HA</recordid><startdate>202311</startdate><enddate>202311</enddate><creator>Tang, Jun</creator><creator>Yang, Dengpan</creator><creator>Ding, Mingfei</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1292-6746</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202311</creationdate><title>Forecasting Ionospheric foF2 Using Bidirectional LSTM and Attention Mechanism</title><author>Tang, Jun ; Yang, Dengpan ; Ding, Mingfei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3408-76d60d09368e8b6bea65c5b829cca72abb042bda7ea0ba3c4f0fdd9bdb68d4033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>attention mechanism</topic><topic>BiLSTM</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>F 2 region</topic><topic>foF2</topic><topic>forecasting</topic><topic>Geomagnetic activity</topic><topic>Geomagnetic storms</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Ionosondes</topic><topic>Ionosphere</topic><topic>Ionospheric forecasting</topic><topic>Ionospheric models</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>Longitude</topic><topic>LSTM</topic><topic>Magnetic storms</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Root-mean-square errors</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Solar activity</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Dengpan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Mingfei</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Space Weather</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Jun</au><au>Yang, Dengpan</au><au>Ding, Mingfei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forecasting Ionospheric foF2 Using Bidirectional LSTM and Attention Mechanism</atitle><jtitle>Space Weather</jtitle><date>2023-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>11</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1542-7390</issn><issn>1539-4964</issn><eissn>1542-7390</eissn><abstract>The critical frequency of ionospheric F2 layer (foF2) is an important ionospheric characteristic parameter. In this paper, a deep learning model based on Bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM) and attention mechanism is implemented for predicting the foF2 parameter. The inputs of models are the foF2 of globally available ionospheric ionosonde stations, geographic longitude and latitude, world time (UT), geomagnetic activity index, and solar activity index from 2015 to 2017. The superiority of the model is analyzed from different latitudes, seasons, and geomagnetic conditions. The results show that the prediction performance of the Bidirectional long short‐term memory model based on attention mechanism (BiLSTM‐Attention) is better than other models. The performance of the prediction model is optimal at high latitudes. The root mean square error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (R) of the BiLSTM‐Attention model are 0.539 MHZ and 0.908 MHz at high latitudes, respectively. In terms of RMSE, it is 25.243%, 18.209%, and 11.203% lower than those of the international reference ionosphere (IRI), LSTM, and BiLSTM models, respectively. The prediction results of the four seasons show that the models are more applicable in winter. Compared with the IRI model, the RMSE of the BiLSTM‐Attention model in spring, summer, autumn, and winter is reduced by 24.344%, 21.181%, 25.058%, and 30.948%, respectively. The prediction effect of the BiLSTM‐Attention model is improved in the magnetic quiet period, the magnetic moderate period and the magnetic storm period. Also, the improvement effect is more obvious in the magnetostatic day, and the RMSE is reduced by 27.462% compared with the IRI model.
Plain Language Summary
The critical frequency of ionospheric F2 layer (foF2) is an important parameter to characterize the variability of the ionosphere. In this study, we present an effective method to predict the foF2 based on ionosonde stations distributed around the world. The inputs to these models are the foF2 values, geographic longitude and latitude, world time (UT), geomagnetic activity index, and solar activity index from 2015 to 2017. Compared with the international reference ionosphere (IRI‐2016) model, long short‐term memory (LSTM) model, and Bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM) model, the Bidirectional long short‐term memory model based on attention mechanism (BiLSTM‐Attention) can achieve better performance under different latitudes, seasons and geomagnetic conditions.
Key Points
The Bidirectional long short‐term memory (BiLSTM)‐Attention model is first used to predict the foF2 based on ionosonde stations distributed around the world
Geomagnetic activity index and solar activity index are added for the foF2 prediction of these models
The BiLSTM‐Attention prediction model shows better performance than the IRI‐2016, LSTM, and BiLSTM prediction models under different latitudes, seasons and geomagnetic conditions</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2023SW003508</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1292-6746</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1542-7390 |
ispartof | Space Weather, 2023-11, Vol.21 (11), p.n/a |
issn | 1542-7390 1539-4964 1542-7390 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2893955531 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | attention mechanism BiLSTM Correlation coefficient Correlation coefficients F 2 region foF2 forecasting Geomagnetic activity Geomagnetic storms Geomagnetism Ionosondes Ionosphere Ionospheric forecasting Ionospheric models Latitude Longitude LSTM Magnetic storms Mathematical models Modelling Parameters Performance prediction Prediction models Root-mean-square errors Seasons Solar activity Winter |
title | Forecasting Ionospheric foF2 Using Bidirectional LSTM and Attention Mechanism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A34%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forecasting%20Ionospheric%20foF2%20Using%20Bidirectional%20LSTM%20and%20Attention%20Mechanism&rft.jtitle=Space%20Weather&rft.au=Tang,%20Jun&rft.date=2023-11&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=11&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1542-7390&rft.eissn=1542-7390&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2023SW003508&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA774449944%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2893955531&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A774449944&rfr_iscdi=true |