The Effects of Operational Efficiency and Environmental Risk on the Adoption of Environmental Management Practices
Given that prior research has provided inconsistent findings on the relationship between financial performance and the adoption of environmental management practices (EMPs), we aim to resolve the inconsistency by positing that the firm may consider different components of financial performance when...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2023-11, Vol.15 (22), p.15869 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 22 |
container_start_page | 15869 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Lee, Jiung Chung, Hakjin Cho, Na-Eun |
description | Given that prior research has provided inconsistent findings on the relationship between financial performance and the adoption of environmental management practices (EMPs), we aim to resolve the inconsistency by positing that the firm may consider different components of financial performance when making decisions. Specifically, we maintain that operational efficiency, measured based on net profit margin, is a key determinant of a firm’s decision to adopt EMPs. Additionally, we aim to examine environmental risk as one contingency that moderates the relationship between operational efficiency and EMP adoption. Employing a firm-fixed effect model to examine the effects of various measures of financial performance, including the net profit margin, return on asset (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and asset turnover, on the adoption rates of EMPs by firms, we find that firms with higher operational efficiency measured based on net profit margin are more inclined to adopt EMPs, while measures such as ROA, ROE, and asset turnover do not demonstrate any substantial effect. This study also finds that while environmental risk increases the possibility of adopting EMPs, it weakens the impact of operational efficiency on the adoption rates of EMPs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su152215869 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2893384418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A774374635</galeid><sourcerecordid>A774374635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-f71d2a115ae4d1d88892daeb6573a9ef1be35958c4865aaa1370eb45e032bc323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhhdRsNSe_AMLnkRa87HZzR5LqVpQKlXPyzQ7qdE2qUkq-u_NUg_tzGEyk-d9SZgsu6RkxHlNbsOOCsaokGV9kvUYqeiQEkFOD87n2SCED5KCc1rTspf513fMp1qjiiF3Op9v0UM0zsK6Gxtl0KrfHGybT-238c5u0MZ0uTDhM3c2j0k_bt2203QGx9QTWFhh1-TPHlQ0CsNFdqZhHXDwX_vZ2930dfIwfJzfzybjx6Fioo5DXdGWAaUCsGhpK6WsWQu4LEXFoUZNl8hFLaQqZCkAgPKK4LIQSDhbKs54P7va-269-9phiM2H2_n0sdAwWXMui4LKRI321ArW2BirXUwPTdnixihnUZs0H1dVwaui5CIJro8EiYn4E1ewC6GZvSyO2Zs9q7wLwaNutt5swP82lDTd0pqDpfE_vAeJDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2893384418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Operational Efficiency and Environmental Risk on the Adoption of Environmental Management Practices</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Lee, Jiung ; Chung, Hakjin ; Cho, Na-Eun</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jiung ; Chung, Hakjin ; Cho, Na-Eun</creatorcontrib><description>Given that prior research has provided inconsistent findings on the relationship between financial performance and the adoption of environmental management practices (EMPs), we aim to resolve the inconsistency by positing that the firm may consider different components of financial performance when making decisions. Specifically, we maintain that operational efficiency, measured based on net profit margin, is a key determinant of a firm’s decision to adopt EMPs. Additionally, we aim to examine environmental risk as one contingency that moderates the relationship between operational efficiency and EMP adoption. Employing a firm-fixed effect model to examine the effects of various measures of financial performance, including the net profit margin, return on asset (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and asset turnover, on the adoption rates of EMPs by firms, we find that firms with higher operational efficiency measured based on net profit margin are more inclined to adopt EMPs, while measures such as ROA, ROE, and asset turnover do not demonstrate any substantial effect. This study also finds that while environmental risk increases the possibility of adopting EMPs, it weakens the impact of operational efficiency on the adoption rates of EMPs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su152215869</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Chemical industry ; Competitive advantage ; Decision-making ; Decomposition ; Efficiency ; Environmental management ; Environmental protection ; Environmental risk ; Environmental sustainability ; Financial statements ; Herbicides ; Management decisions ; Pesticides industry ; Profit margins ; Return on assets ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability ; Turnover</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-11, Vol.15 (22), p.15869</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-f71d2a115ae4d1d88892daeb6573a9ef1be35958c4865aaa1370eb45e032bc323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jiung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Hakjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Na-Eun</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Operational Efficiency and Environmental Risk on the Adoption of Environmental Management Practices</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Given that prior research has provided inconsistent findings on the relationship between financial performance and the adoption of environmental management practices (EMPs), we aim to resolve the inconsistency by positing that the firm may consider different components of financial performance when making decisions. Specifically, we maintain that operational efficiency, measured based on net profit margin, is a key determinant of a firm’s decision to adopt EMPs. Additionally, we aim to examine environmental risk as one contingency that moderates the relationship between operational efficiency and EMP adoption. Employing a firm-fixed effect model to examine the effects of various measures of financial performance, including the net profit margin, return on asset (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and asset turnover, on the adoption rates of EMPs by firms, we find that firms with higher operational efficiency measured based on net profit margin are more inclined to adopt EMPs, while measures such as ROA, ROE, and asset turnover do not demonstrate any substantial effect. This study also finds that while environmental risk increases the possibility of adopting EMPs, it weakens the impact of operational efficiency on the adoption rates of EMPs.</description><subject>Chemical industry</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Decision-making</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Environmental sustainability</subject><subject>Financial statements</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Management decisions</subject><subject>Pesticides industry</subject><subject>Profit margins</subject><subject>Return on assets</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Turnover</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhhdRsNSe_AMLnkRa87HZzR5LqVpQKlXPyzQ7qdE2qUkq-u_NUg_tzGEyk-d9SZgsu6RkxHlNbsOOCsaokGV9kvUYqeiQEkFOD87n2SCED5KCc1rTspf513fMp1qjiiF3Op9v0UM0zsK6Gxtl0KrfHGybT-238c5u0MZ0uTDhM3c2j0k_bt2203QGx9QTWFhh1-TPHlQ0CsNFdqZhHXDwX_vZ2930dfIwfJzfzybjx6Fioo5DXdGWAaUCsGhpK6WsWQu4LEXFoUZNl8hFLaQqZCkAgPKK4LIQSDhbKs54P7va-269-9phiM2H2_n0sdAwWXMui4LKRI321ArW2BirXUwPTdnixihnUZs0H1dVwaui5CIJro8EiYn4E1ewC6GZvSyO2Zs9q7wLwaNutt5swP82lDTd0pqDpfE_vAeJDg</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Lee, Jiung</creator><creator>Chung, Hakjin</creator><creator>Cho, Na-Eun</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>The Effects of Operational Efficiency and Environmental Risk on the Adoption of Environmental Management Practices</title><author>Lee, Jiung ; Chung, Hakjin ; Cho, Na-Eun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-f71d2a115ae4d1d88892daeb6573a9ef1be35958c4865aaa1370eb45e032bc323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Chemical industry</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Decision-making</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Environmental sustainability</topic><topic>Financial statements</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Management decisions</topic><topic>Pesticides industry</topic><topic>Profit margins</topic><topic>Return on assets</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Turnover</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jiung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Hakjin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Na-Eun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Jiung</au><au>Chung, Hakjin</au><au>Cho, Na-Eun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Operational Efficiency and Environmental Risk on the Adoption of Environmental Management Practices</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>15869</spage><pages>15869-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Given that prior research has provided inconsistent findings on the relationship between financial performance and the adoption of environmental management practices (EMPs), we aim to resolve the inconsistency by positing that the firm may consider different components of financial performance when making decisions. Specifically, we maintain that operational efficiency, measured based on net profit margin, is a key determinant of a firm’s decision to adopt EMPs. Additionally, we aim to examine environmental risk as one contingency that moderates the relationship between operational efficiency and EMP adoption. Employing a firm-fixed effect model to examine the effects of various measures of financial performance, including the net profit margin, return on asset (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and asset turnover, on the adoption rates of EMPs by firms, we find that firms with higher operational efficiency measured based on net profit margin are more inclined to adopt EMPs, while measures such as ROA, ROE, and asset turnover do not demonstrate any substantial effect. This study also finds that while environmental risk increases the possibility of adopting EMPs, it weakens the impact of operational efficiency on the adoption rates of EMPs.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su152215869</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2023-11, Vol.15 (22), p.15869 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2893384418 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Chemical industry Competitive advantage Decision-making Decomposition Efficiency Environmental management Environmental protection Environmental risk Environmental sustainability Financial statements Herbicides Management decisions Pesticides industry Profit margins Return on assets Stakeholders Sustainability Turnover |
title | The Effects of Operational Efficiency and Environmental Risk on the Adoption of Environmental Management Practices |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T15%3A17%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Operational%20Efficiency%20and%20Environmental%20Risk%20on%20the%20Adoption%20of%20Environmental%20Management%20Practices&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Lee,%20Jiung&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=15869&rft.pages=15869-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su152215869&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA774374635%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2893384418&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A774374635&rfr_iscdi=true |