Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania
The effective management of soil organic carbon (SOC) is highlighted as one of the strategies and cost-effective options for mitigating climate change, while soil nitrogen (N) often is specified as an essential element for plant growth. This study was conducted to evaluate basic soil physical, chemi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2023-11, Vol.15 (22), p.16042 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 22 |
container_start_page | 16042 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Muraškienė, Milda Armolaitis, Kęstutis Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta Baliuckas, Virgilijus Aleinikovienė, Jūratė |
description | The effective management of soil organic carbon (SOC) is highlighted as one of the strategies and cost-effective options for mitigating climate change, while soil nitrogen (N) often is specified as an essential element for plant growth. This study was conducted to evaluate basic soil physical, chemical, and microbial indicators in three major soil types dominated in Lithuania—Arenosols, Retisols, and Cambisols—under forest land, perennial grassland, and arable land. Furthermore, soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and nitrogen (SMBN), their ratio, and soil microbial respiration (microbial CO2) next to SOC and total N were hypothesized to be important measures for assessing SOC stability under different land uses. Therefore, selected soil indicators were evaluated in the surface 0–10 and 10–20 cm mineral soil layers. The study results showed higher concentrations of SOC, N, SMBC, and SMBN, and soil microbial CO2 in forest land and perennial grasslands than in arable land. The higher SMBC/SOC and SNBN/TN ratios indicated a higher ability to accumulate SOC and N in forest land and grasslands. Higher SOC immobilization in forest land and higher N immobilization in arable land were both specified by the obtained SMBC:SMBN ratio. This study identified forest land followed by grassland as the best land management practice that addresses soil C sequestration through higher C immobilisation. Assessing soil in forest land as a control land use next to the agricultural land could be a reasonable soil management practice to evaluate C sequestration in the region. Additionally, it was assumed that evaluation of the SMBC and SMBN concentrations together with soil physical and chemical indicators allow for a more effective assessment of SOC stability. Taken together, these findings support recommendation to develop grassland (and especially forest land systems) through afforestation or within agroforestry system, without reducing the importance of the agricultural sector. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su152216042 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2893366896</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A774374313</galeid><sourcerecordid>A774374313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-7507abbebea13e178e42519fc0b78152cb292d2648cdf3e4f9e05105a57df1333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMoWGpP_oGAJ5HWfOxudo-lVi0sFKw9h2w2qSnbpCZZsf_elHpoZwZmeHlmhmEAuMdoQmmFnkOPc0JwgTJyBQYEMTzGKEfXZ_UtGIWwRckoxRUuBmA5_xFdL6JxFjoNV850cOk3whoJZ8I3SV5F0ZjOxAM0Fr4YrZVXNsJa2BaugwpHuTbxq09N4g7caNEFNfrPQ7B-nX_O3sf18m0xm9ZjSfIqjlmOmGga1SiBqcKsVBnJcaUlaliZzpANqUhLiqyUraYq05VCebpA5KzVmFI6BA-nuXvvvnsVIt-63tu0kpOyorQoyqpI1OREbUSnuLHaRS9k8lbtjHRWaZP0KWMZTYGPYx8vGhIT1W_ciD4Evlh9XLJPJ1Z6F4JXmu-92Ql_4Bjx40f42UfoH-qPewY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2893366896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Muraškienė, Milda ; Armolaitis, Kęstutis ; Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta ; Baliuckas, Virgilijus ; Aleinikovienė, Jūratė</creator><creatorcontrib>Muraškienė, Milda ; Armolaitis, Kęstutis ; Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta ; Baliuckas, Virgilijus ; Aleinikovienė, Jūratė</creatorcontrib><description>The effective management of soil organic carbon (SOC) is highlighted as one of the strategies and cost-effective options for mitigating climate change, while soil nitrogen (N) often is specified as an essential element for plant growth. This study was conducted to evaluate basic soil physical, chemical, and microbial indicators in three major soil types dominated in Lithuania—Arenosols, Retisols, and Cambisols—under forest land, perennial grassland, and arable land. Furthermore, soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and nitrogen (SMBN), their ratio, and soil microbial respiration (microbial CO2) next to SOC and total N were hypothesized to be important measures for assessing SOC stability under different land uses. Therefore, selected soil indicators were evaluated in the surface 0–10 and 10–20 cm mineral soil layers. The study results showed higher concentrations of SOC, N, SMBC, and SMBN, and soil microbial CO2 in forest land and perennial grasslands than in arable land. The higher SMBC/SOC and SNBN/TN ratios indicated a higher ability to accumulate SOC and N in forest land and grasslands. Higher SOC immobilization in forest land and higher N immobilization in arable land were both specified by the obtained SMBC:SMBN ratio. This study identified forest land followed by grassland as the best land management practice that addresses soil C sequestration through higher C immobilisation. Assessing soil in forest land as a control land use next to the agricultural land could be a reasonable soil management practice to evaluate C sequestration in the region. Additionally, it was assumed that evaluation of the SMBC and SMBN concentrations together with soil physical and chemical indicators allow for a more effective assessment of SOC stability. Taken together, these findings support recommendation to develop grassland (and especially forest land systems) through afforestation or within agroforestry system, without reducing the importance of the agricultural sector.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su152216042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Analysis ; Analytical chemistry ; Biomass ; Carbon ; Carbon content ; Climate change ; Forest soils ; Grasslands ; Land use ; Microorganisms ; Nitrogen ; Precipitation ; Respiration ; Soil management ; Soils ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-11, Vol.15 (22), p.16042</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-7507abbebea13e178e42519fc0b78152cb292d2648cdf3e4f9e05105a57df1333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6733-5302 ; 0000-0003-4014-9507</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muraškienė, Milda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armolaitis, Kęstutis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baliuckas, Virgilijus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleinikovienė, Jūratė</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The effective management of soil organic carbon (SOC) is highlighted as one of the strategies and cost-effective options for mitigating climate change, while soil nitrogen (N) often is specified as an essential element for plant growth. This study was conducted to evaluate basic soil physical, chemical, and microbial indicators in three major soil types dominated in Lithuania—Arenosols, Retisols, and Cambisols—under forest land, perennial grassland, and arable land. Furthermore, soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and nitrogen (SMBN), their ratio, and soil microbial respiration (microbial CO2) next to SOC and total N were hypothesized to be important measures for assessing SOC stability under different land uses. Therefore, selected soil indicators were evaluated in the surface 0–10 and 10–20 cm mineral soil layers. The study results showed higher concentrations of SOC, N, SMBC, and SMBN, and soil microbial CO2 in forest land and perennial grasslands than in arable land. The higher SMBC/SOC and SNBN/TN ratios indicated a higher ability to accumulate SOC and N in forest land and grasslands. Higher SOC immobilization in forest land and higher N immobilization in arable land were both specified by the obtained SMBC:SMBN ratio. This study identified forest land followed by grassland as the best land management practice that addresses soil C sequestration through higher C immobilisation. Assessing soil in forest land as a control land use next to the agricultural land could be a reasonable soil management practice to evaluate C sequestration in the region. Additionally, it was assumed that evaluation of the SMBC and SMBN concentrations together with soil physical and chemical indicators allow for a more effective assessment of SOC stability. Taken together, these findings support recommendation to develop grassland (and especially forest land systems) through afforestation or within agroforestry system, without reducing the importance of the agricultural sector.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon content</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Soil management</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMoWGpP_oGAJ5HWfOxudo-lVi0sFKw9h2w2qSnbpCZZsf_elHpoZwZmeHlmhmEAuMdoQmmFnkOPc0JwgTJyBQYEMTzGKEfXZ_UtGIWwRckoxRUuBmA5_xFdL6JxFjoNV850cOk3whoJZ8I3SV5F0ZjOxAM0Fr4YrZVXNsJa2BaugwpHuTbxq09N4g7caNEFNfrPQ7B-nX_O3sf18m0xm9ZjSfIqjlmOmGga1SiBqcKsVBnJcaUlaliZzpANqUhLiqyUraYq05VCebpA5KzVmFI6BA-nuXvvvnsVIt-63tu0kpOyorQoyqpI1OREbUSnuLHaRS9k8lbtjHRWaZP0KWMZTYGPYx8vGhIT1W_ciD4Evlh9XLJPJ1Z6F4JXmu-92Ql_4Bjx40f42UfoH-qPewY</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Muraškienė, Milda</creator><creator>Armolaitis, Kęstutis</creator><creator>Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta</creator><creator>Baliuckas, Virgilijus</creator><creator>Aleinikovienė, Jūratė</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6733-5302</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-9507</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania</title><author>Muraškienė, Milda ; Armolaitis, Kęstutis ; Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta ; Baliuckas, Virgilijus ; Aleinikovienė, Jūratė</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-7507abbebea13e178e42519fc0b78152cb292d2648cdf3e4f9e05105a57df1333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon content</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Soil management</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muraškienė, Milda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armolaitis, Kęstutis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baliuckas, Virgilijus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleinikovienė, Jūratė</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muraškienė, Milda</au><au>Armolaitis, Kęstutis</au><au>Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta</au><au>Baliuckas, Virgilijus</au><au>Aleinikovienė, Jūratė</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>16042</spage><pages>16042-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The effective management of soil organic carbon (SOC) is highlighted as one of the strategies and cost-effective options for mitigating climate change, while soil nitrogen (N) often is specified as an essential element for plant growth. This study was conducted to evaluate basic soil physical, chemical, and microbial indicators in three major soil types dominated in Lithuania—Arenosols, Retisols, and Cambisols—under forest land, perennial grassland, and arable land. Furthermore, soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and nitrogen (SMBN), their ratio, and soil microbial respiration (microbial CO2) next to SOC and total N were hypothesized to be important measures for assessing SOC stability under different land uses. Therefore, selected soil indicators were evaluated in the surface 0–10 and 10–20 cm mineral soil layers. The study results showed higher concentrations of SOC, N, SMBC, and SMBN, and soil microbial CO2 in forest land and perennial grasslands than in arable land. The higher SMBC/SOC and SNBN/TN ratios indicated a higher ability to accumulate SOC and N in forest land and grasslands. Higher SOC immobilization in forest land and higher N immobilization in arable land were both specified by the obtained SMBC:SMBN ratio. This study identified forest land followed by grassland as the best land management practice that addresses soil C sequestration through higher C immobilisation. Assessing soil in forest land as a control land use next to the agricultural land could be a reasonable soil management practice to evaluate C sequestration in the region. Additionally, it was assumed that evaluation of the SMBC and SMBN concentrations together with soil physical and chemical indicators allow for a more effective assessment of SOC stability. Taken together, these findings support recommendation to develop grassland (and especially forest land systems) through afforestation or within agroforestry system, without reducing the importance of the agricultural sector.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su152216042</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6733-5302</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-9507</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2023-11, Vol.15 (22), p.16042 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2893366896 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
subjects | Agricultural land Analysis Analytical chemistry Biomass Carbon Carbon content Climate change Forest soils Grasslands Land use Microorganisms Nitrogen Precipitation Respiration Soil management Soils Sustainability |
title | Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T12%3A39%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Soil%20Organic%20Carbon%20Stability%20in%20Different%20Land%20Uses%20in%20Lithuania&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Mura%C5%A1kien%C4%97,%20Milda&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=16042&rft.pages=16042-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su152216042&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA774374313%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2893366896&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A774374313&rfr_iscdi=true |