Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania

The effective management of soil organic carbon (SOC) is highlighted as one of the strategies and cost-effective options for mitigating climate change, while soil nitrogen (N) often is specified as an essential element for plant growth. This study was conducted to evaluate basic soil physical, chemi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2023-11, Vol.15 (22), p.16042
Hauptverfasser: Muraškienė, Milda, Armolaitis, Kęstutis, Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta, Baliuckas, Virgilijus, Aleinikovienė, Jūratė
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 22
container_start_page 16042
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 15
creator Muraškienė, Milda
Armolaitis, Kęstutis
Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta
Baliuckas, Virgilijus
Aleinikovienė, Jūratė
description The effective management of soil organic carbon (SOC) is highlighted as one of the strategies and cost-effective options for mitigating climate change, while soil nitrogen (N) often is specified as an essential element for plant growth. This study was conducted to evaluate basic soil physical, chemical, and microbial indicators in three major soil types dominated in Lithuania—Arenosols, Retisols, and Cambisols—under forest land, perennial grassland, and arable land. Furthermore, soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and nitrogen (SMBN), their ratio, and soil microbial respiration (microbial CO2) next to SOC and total N were hypothesized to be important measures for assessing SOC stability under different land uses. Therefore, selected soil indicators were evaluated in the surface 0–10 and 10–20 cm mineral soil layers. The study results showed higher concentrations of SOC, N, SMBC, and SMBN, and soil microbial CO2 in forest land and perennial grasslands than in arable land. The higher SMBC/SOC and SNBN/TN ratios indicated a higher ability to accumulate SOC and N in forest land and grasslands. Higher SOC immobilization in forest land and higher N immobilization in arable land were both specified by the obtained SMBC:SMBN ratio. This study identified forest land followed by grassland as the best land management practice that addresses soil C sequestration through higher C immobilisation. Assessing soil in forest land as a control land use next to the agricultural land could be a reasonable soil management practice to evaluate C sequestration in the region. Additionally, it was assumed that evaluation of the SMBC and SMBN concentrations together with soil physical and chemical indicators allow for a more effective assessment of SOC stability. Taken together, these findings support recommendation to develop grassland (and especially forest land systems) through afforestation or within agroforestry system, without reducing the importance of the agricultural sector.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su152216042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2893366896</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A774374313</galeid><sourcerecordid>A774374313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-7507abbebea13e178e42519fc0b78152cb292d2648cdf3e4f9e05105a57df1333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMoWGpP_oGAJ5HWfOxudo-lVi0sFKw9h2w2qSnbpCZZsf_elHpoZwZmeHlmhmEAuMdoQmmFnkOPc0JwgTJyBQYEMTzGKEfXZ_UtGIWwRckoxRUuBmA5_xFdL6JxFjoNV850cOk3whoJZ8I3SV5F0ZjOxAM0Fr4YrZVXNsJa2BaugwpHuTbxq09N4g7caNEFNfrPQ7B-nX_O3sf18m0xm9ZjSfIqjlmOmGga1SiBqcKsVBnJcaUlaliZzpANqUhLiqyUraYq05VCebpA5KzVmFI6BA-nuXvvvnsVIt-63tu0kpOyorQoyqpI1OREbUSnuLHaRS9k8lbtjHRWaZP0KWMZTYGPYx8vGhIT1W_ciD4Evlh9XLJPJ1Z6F4JXmu-92Ql_4Bjx40f42UfoH-qPewY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2893366896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Muraškienė, Milda ; Armolaitis, Kęstutis ; Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta ; Baliuckas, Virgilijus ; Aleinikovienė, Jūratė</creator><creatorcontrib>Muraškienė, Milda ; Armolaitis, Kęstutis ; Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta ; Baliuckas, Virgilijus ; Aleinikovienė, Jūratė</creatorcontrib><description>The effective management of soil organic carbon (SOC) is highlighted as one of the strategies and cost-effective options for mitigating climate change, while soil nitrogen (N) often is specified as an essential element for plant growth. This study was conducted to evaluate basic soil physical, chemical, and microbial indicators in three major soil types dominated in Lithuania—Arenosols, Retisols, and Cambisols—under forest land, perennial grassland, and arable land. Furthermore, soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and nitrogen (SMBN), their ratio, and soil microbial respiration (microbial CO2) next to SOC and total N were hypothesized to be important measures for assessing SOC stability under different land uses. Therefore, selected soil indicators were evaluated in the surface 0–10 and 10–20 cm mineral soil layers. The study results showed higher concentrations of SOC, N, SMBC, and SMBN, and soil microbial CO2 in forest land and perennial grasslands than in arable land. The higher SMBC/SOC and SNBN/TN ratios indicated a higher ability to accumulate SOC and N in forest land and grasslands. Higher SOC immobilization in forest land and higher N immobilization in arable land were both specified by the obtained SMBC:SMBN ratio. This study identified forest land followed by grassland as the best land management practice that addresses soil C sequestration through higher C immobilisation. Assessing soil in forest land as a control land use next to the agricultural land could be a reasonable soil management practice to evaluate C sequestration in the region. Additionally, it was assumed that evaluation of the SMBC and SMBN concentrations together with soil physical and chemical indicators allow for a more effective assessment of SOC stability. Taken together, these findings support recommendation to develop grassland (and especially forest land systems) through afforestation or within agroforestry system, without reducing the importance of the agricultural sector.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su152216042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Analysis ; Analytical chemistry ; Biomass ; Carbon ; Carbon content ; Climate change ; Forest soils ; Grasslands ; Land use ; Microorganisms ; Nitrogen ; Precipitation ; Respiration ; Soil management ; Soils ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-11, Vol.15 (22), p.16042</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-7507abbebea13e178e42519fc0b78152cb292d2648cdf3e4f9e05105a57df1333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6733-5302 ; 0000-0003-4014-9507</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muraškienė, Milda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armolaitis, Kęstutis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baliuckas, Virgilijus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleinikovienė, Jūratė</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The effective management of soil organic carbon (SOC) is highlighted as one of the strategies and cost-effective options for mitigating climate change, while soil nitrogen (N) often is specified as an essential element for plant growth. This study was conducted to evaluate basic soil physical, chemical, and microbial indicators in three major soil types dominated in Lithuania—Arenosols, Retisols, and Cambisols—under forest land, perennial grassland, and arable land. Furthermore, soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and nitrogen (SMBN), their ratio, and soil microbial respiration (microbial CO2) next to SOC and total N were hypothesized to be important measures for assessing SOC stability under different land uses. Therefore, selected soil indicators were evaluated in the surface 0–10 and 10–20 cm mineral soil layers. The study results showed higher concentrations of SOC, N, SMBC, and SMBN, and soil microbial CO2 in forest land and perennial grasslands than in arable land. The higher SMBC/SOC and SNBN/TN ratios indicated a higher ability to accumulate SOC and N in forest land and grasslands. Higher SOC immobilization in forest land and higher N immobilization in arable land were both specified by the obtained SMBC:SMBN ratio. This study identified forest land followed by grassland as the best land management practice that addresses soil C sequestration through higher C immobilisation. Assessing soil in forest land as a control land use next to the agricultural land could be a reasonable soil management practice to evaluate C sequestration in the region. Additionally, it was assumed that evaluation of the SMBC and SMBN concentrations together with soil physical and chemical indicators allow for a more effective assessment of SOC stability. Taken together, these findings support recommendation to develop grassland (and especially forest land systems) through afforestation or within agroforestry system, without reducing the importance of the agricultural sector.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon content</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Soil management</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhoMoWGpP_oGAJ5HWfOxudo-lVi0sFKw9h2w2qSnbpCZZsf_elHpoZwZmeHlmhmEAuMdoQmmFnkOPc0JwgTJyBQYEMTzGKEfXZ_UtGIWwRckoxRUuBmA5_xFdL6JxFjoNV850cOk3whoJZ8I3SV5F0ZjOxAM0Fr4YrZVXNsJa2BaugwpHuTbxq09N4g7caNEFNfrPQ7B-nX_O3sf18m0xm9ZjSfIqjlmOmGga1SiBqcKsVBnJcaUlaliZzpANqUhLiqyUraYq05VCebpA5KzVmFI6BA-nuXvvvnsVIt-63tu0kpOyorQoyqpI1OREbUSnuLHaRS9k8lbtjHRWaZP0KWMZTYGPYx8vGhIT1W_ciD4Evlh9XLJPJ1Z6F4JXmu-92Ql_4Bjx40f42UfoH-qPewY</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Muraškienė, Milda</creator><creator>Armolaitis, Kęstutis</creator><creator>Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta</creator><creator>Baliuckas, Virgilijus</creator><creator>Aleinikovienė, Jūratė</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6733-5302</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-9507</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania</title><author>Muraškienė, Milda ; Armolaitis, Kęstutis ; Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta ; Baliuckas, Virgilijus ; Aleinikovienė, Jūratė</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-7507abbebea13e178e42519fc0b78152cb292d2648cdf3e4f9e05105a57df1333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon content</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Soil management</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muraškienė, Milda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armolaitis, Kęstutis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baliuckas, Virgilijus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aleinikovienė, Jūratė</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muraškienė, Milda</au><au>Armolaitis, Kęstutis</au><au>Varnagirytė-Kabašinskienė, Iveta</au><au>Baliuckas, Virgilijus</au><au>Aleinikovienė, Jūratė</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>16042</spage><pages>16042-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The effective management of soil organic carbon (SOC) is highlighted as one of the strategies and cost-effective options for mitigating climate change, while soil nitrogen (N) often is specified as an essential element for plant growth. This study was conducted to evaluate basic soil physical, chemical, and microbial indicators in three major soil types dominated in Lithuania—Arenosols, Retisols, and Cambisols—under forest land, perennial grassland, and arable land. Furthermore, soil microbial biomass carbon (SMBC) and nitrogen (SMBN), their ratio, and soil microbial respiration (microbial CO2) next to SOC and total N were hypothesized to be important measures for assessing SOC stability under different land uses. Therefore, selected soil indicators were evaluated in the surface 0–10 and 10–20 cm mineral soil layers. The study results showed higher concentrations of SOC, N, SMBC, and SMBN, and soil microbial CO2 in forest land and perennial grasslands than in arable land. The higher SMBC/SOC and SNBN/TN ratios indicated a higher ability to accumulate SOC and N in forest land and grasslands. Higher SOC immobilization in forest land and higher N immobilization in arable land were both specified by the obtained SMBC:SMBN ratio. This study identified forest land followed by grassland as the best land management practice that addresses soil C sequestration through higher C immobilisation. Assessing soil in forest land as a control land use next to the agricultural land could be a reasonable soil management practice to evaluate C sequestration in the region. Additionally, it was assumed that evaluation of the SMBC and SMBN concentrations together with soil physical and chemical indicators allow for a more effective assessment of SOC stability. Taken together, these findings support recommendation to develop grassland (and especially forest land systems) through afforestation or within agroforestry system, without reducing the importance of the agricultural sector.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su152216042</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6733-5302</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-9507</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2023-11, Vol.15 (22), p.16042
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2893366896
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
subjects Agricultural land
Analysis
Analytical chemistry
Biomass
Carbon
Carbon content
Climate change
Forest soils
Grasslands
Land use
Microorganisms
Nitrogen
Precipitation
Respiration
Soil management
Soils
Sustainability
title Evaluation of Soil Organic Carbon Stability in Different Land Uses in Lithuania
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T12%3A39%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Soil%20Organic%20Carbon%20Stability%20in%20Different%20Land%20Uses%20in%20Lithuania&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Mura%C5%A1kien%C4%97,%20Milda&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=16042&rft.pages=16042-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su152216042&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA774374313%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2893366896&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A774374313&rfr_iscdi=true