‘That’s good’: An industrial, ethics-focused analysis of the televised works of Anthony Bourdain

Despite critical and popular acclaim, the travel/food television series of Anthony Bourdain have not received much academic attention. This paper examines the negotiations required of the series’ production team with regard to industry and ethics, including engagement with multiple forms of ‘quality...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical studies in television 2023-12, Vol.18 (4), p.350-366
1. Verfasser: Beattie, Melissa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 366
container_issue 4
container_start_page 350
container_title Critical studies in television
container_volume 18
creator Beattie, Melissa
description Despite critical and popular acclaim, the travel/food television series of Anthony Bourdain have not received much academic attention. This paper examines the negotiations required of the series’ production team with regard to industry and ethics, including engagement with multiple forms of ‘quality’ to acquire audience share, which can exist in tension with the ethical requirements of veracity and protecting factual media subjects from harm. Ultimately, this paper shows that, while the series did negotiate both industrial and ethical requirements with regard to the places and cultures they represented, they were prone to ethical slippage with regard to practitioner/subject Bourdain himself.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/17496020231168067
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2891433773</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_17496020231168067</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2891433773</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-e3ea66032393d1a64534c9e334086c94678b3ac869a3b58061019aa7dc34ba1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPElRQ769oxt1LxkipxKedo6zhNSoiLnYB662fA7_VLSCmCA-K0q9mZ0ewQcsrZgHOlLrgSWrKYxcC5TJhUe6S3xSLJQO__7DE7JEchLBgb6hhEj-Sb9fu0wGaz_gh07lzWLZd0VNOyztrQ-BKrc2qbojQhyp1pg80o1litQhmoy2lTWNrYyr6W28ub809f8KhuClev6JVrfYZlfUwOcqyCPfmeffJ4cz0d30WTh9v78WgSmViKJrJgUXaJY9CQcZRiCMJoCyBYIo0WUiUzQJNIjTAbdm9yxjWiygyIGXKEPjnb-S69e2ltaNJFl6DLG9I40VwAKAUdi-9YxrsQvM3TpS-f0a9SztJtnemfOjvNYKcJOLe_rv8LPgHulna-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2891433773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>‘That’s good’: An industrial, ethics-focused analysis of the televised works of Anthony Bourdain</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Beattie, Melissa</creator><creatorcontrib>Beattie, Melissa</creatorcontrib><description>Despite critical and popular acclaim, the travel/food television series of Anthony Bourdain have not received much academic attention. This paper examines the negotiations required of the series’ production team with regard to industry and ethics, including engagement with multiple forms of ‘quality’ to acquire audience share, which can exist in tension with the ethical requirements of veracity and protecting factual media subjects from harm. Ultimately, this paper shows that, while the series did negotiate both industrial and ethical requirements with regard to the places and cultures they represented, they were prone to ethical slippage with regard to practitioner/subject Bourdain himself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-6020</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-6039</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17496020231168067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Ethics ; Mass media ; Negotiation</subject><ispartof>Critical studies in television, 2023-12, Vol.18 (4), p.350-366</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-e3ea66032393d1a64534c9e334086c94678b3ac869a3b58061019aa7dc34ba1a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1466-8338</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/17496020231168067$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17496020231168067$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beattie, Melissa</creatorcontrib><title>‘That’s good’: An industrial, ethics-focused analysis of the televised works of Anthony Bourdain</title><title>Critical studies in television</title><description>Despite critical and popular acclaim, the travel/food television series of Anthony Bourdain have not received much academic attention. This paper examines the negotiations required of the series’ production team with regard to industry and ethics, including engagement with multiple forms of ‘quality’ to acquire audience share, which can exist in tension with the ethical requirements of veracity and protecting factual media subjects from harm. Ultimately, this paper shows that, while the series did negotiate both industrial and ethical requirements with regard to the places and cultures they represented, they were prone to ethical slippage with regard to practitioner/subject Bourdain himself.</description><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><issn>1749-6020</issn><issn>1749-6039</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPElRQ769oxt1LxkipxKedo6zhNSoiLnYB662fA7_VLSCmCA-K0q9mZ0ewQcsrZgHOlLrgSWrKYxcC5TJhUe6S3xSLJQO__7DE7JEchLBgb6hhEj-Sb9fu0wGaz_gh07lzWLZd0VNOyztrQ-BKrc2qbojQhyp1pg80o1litQhmoy2lTWNrYyr6W28ub809f8KhuClev6JVrfYZlfUwOcqyCPfmeffJ4cz0d30WTh9v78WgSmViKJrJgUXaJY9CQcZRiCMJoCyBYIo0WUiUzQJNIjTAbdm9yxjWiygyIGXKEPjnb-S69e2ltaNJFl6DLG9I40VwAKAUdi-9YxrsQvM3TpS-f0a9SztJtnemfOjvNYKcJOLe_rv8LPgHulna-</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Beattie, Melissa</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1466-8338</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>‘That’s good’: An industrial, ethics-focused analysis of the televised works of Anthony Bourdain</title><author>Beattie, Melissa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-e3ea66032393d1a64534c9e334086c94678b3ac869a3b58061019aa7dc34ba1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beattie, Melissa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Critical studies in television</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beattie, Melissa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>‘That’s good’: An industrial, ethics-focused analysis of the televised works of Anthony Bourdain</atitle><jtitle>Critical studies in television</jtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>350</spage><epage>366</epage><pages>350-366</pages><issn>1749-6020</issn><eissn>1749-6039</eissn><abstract>Despite critical and popular acclaim, the travel/food television series of Anthony Bourdain have not received much academic attention. This paper examines the negotiations required of the series’ production team with regard to industry and ethics, including engagement with multiple forms of ‘quality’ to acquire audience share, which can exist in tension with the ethical requirements of veracity and protecting factual media subjects from harm. Ultimately, this paper shows that, while the series did negotiate both industrial and ethical requirements with regard to the places and cultures they represented, they were prone to ethical slippage with regard to practitioner/subject Bourdain himself.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/17496020231168067</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1466-8338</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1749-6020
ispartof Critical studies in television, 2023-12, Vol.18 (4), p.350-366
issn 1749-6020
1749-6039
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2891433773
source Access via SAGE
subjects Ethics
Mass media
Negotiation
title ‘That’s good’: An industrial, ethics-focused analysis of the televised works of Anthony Bourdain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A21%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%98That%E2%80%99s%20good%E2%80%99:%20An%20industrial,%20ethics-focused%20analysis%20of%20the%20televised%20works%20of%20Anthony%20Bourdain&rft.jtitle=Critical%20studies%20in%20television&rft.au=Beattie,%20Melissa&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=350&rft.epage=366&rft.pages=350-366&rft.issn=1749-6020&rft.eissn=1749-6039&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17496020231168067&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2891433773%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2891433773&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_17496020231168067&rfr_iscdi=true