Tracing Undergraduate Science Learners’ Digital Cognitive Strategy Use and Relation to Performance
Digital environments like learning management systems can afford opportunities for students to engage in cognitive learning strategies including preparatory reading of advance organizers including lecture outlines and self-testing using ungraded quizzes. When timed appropriately, self-testing can af...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of science education and technology 2023-12, Vol.32 (6), p.837-857 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 857 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 837 |
container_title | Journal of science education and technology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Mefferd, Kyle Castro Bernacki, Matthew L. |
description | Digital environments like learning management systems can afford opportunities for students to engage in cognitive learning strategies including preparatory reading of advance organizers including lecture outlines and self-testing using ungraded quizzes. When timed appropriately, self-testing can afford distributed practice, an optimal approach to self-testing that confers additional benefits. At a large, public university in the southwestern USA, we examined the frequency and timing of digital learning behaviors that reflect these practices in a large gateway science course and how these event types predicted exam performance of 220 undergraduates’ exam grades in the first unit of a 16-week anatomy and physiology course. Coursework over this 31-day span included lessons on cytology, histology, the integumentary system, and osteology; we observed the timing and frequency of students’ use of the lecture outline, ungraded self-testing quizzes, and hypothesized that those who self-regulated by downloading advance organizers before lecture (i.e., pre-reading) and utilizing quizzes to self-test (i.e., retrieval practice) and distributed this practice would achieve superior performances. Whereas students massed self-testing prior to the exam, a regression model that also included pre-reading, self-testing, and its distribution predicted achievement over and above massed practice. In authentic contexts, students used digital resources and benefitted from early lecture access or pre-reading advance organizers, and self-testing despite challenges to distribute practice and to self-test frequently and on recommended schedules. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10956-022-10018-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2891360866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A773375070</galeid><ericid>EJ1400594</ericid><sourcerecordid>A773375070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e546a44e30ba0fca09d0050127f9033ace87b46c85f985bc054d204641de06673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UN1KHDEUHopC_ekLFAqBXo-eTP4vZatVWahY9zpkM2eGyG5ik1nBu75GX88nMXZKvZNzkXPy_STna5rPFE4ogDotFIyQLXRdW2eqW_OhOaBCsZZqZvZqD8K0QLn42ByWcg8ARhs4aPq77HyII1nFHvOYXb9zE5KfPmD0SJbocsRcnn__Id_CGCa3IYs0xjCFx8qaciWPT2RVkLjYk1vcuCmkSKZEbjAPKW9dtTlu9ge3Kfjp33nUrC7O7xaX7fLH96vF2bL1TMPUouDScY4M1g4G78D0AAJopwYDjDmPWq259FoMRou1B8H7DrjktEeQUrGj5uvs-5DTrx2Wyd6nXY71SdtpQ5kELWVlncys0W3Qhjikuoav1eM2-BRxCPX-TCnGlAAFVdDNAp9TKRkH-5DD1uUnS8G-xm_n-G2N3_6N35oq-jKLMAf_X3B-TXndyfCKsxkvFYsj5re_vuP6AkVPkZY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2891360866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tracing Undergraduate Science Learners’ Digital Cognitive Strategy Use and Relation to Performance</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mefferd, Kyle Castro ; Bernacki, Matthew L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mefferd, Kyle Castro ; Bernacki, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><description>Digital environments like learning management systems can afford opportunities for students to engage in cognitive learning strategies including preparatory reading of advance organizers including lecture outlines and self-testing using ungraded quizzes. When timed appropriately, self-testing can afford distributed practice, an optimal approach to self-testing that confers additional benefits. At a large, public university in the southwestern USA, we examined the frequency and timing of digital learning behaviors that reflect these practices in a large gateway science course and how these event types predicted exam performance of 220 undergraduates’ exam grades in the first unit of a 16-week anatomy and physiology course. Coursework over this 31-day span included lessons on cytology, histology, the integumentary system, and osteology; we observed the timing and frequency of students’ use of the lecture outline, ungraded self-testing quizzes, and hypothesized that those who self-regulated by downloading advance organizers before lecture (i.e., pre-reading) and utilizing quizzes to self-test (i.e., retrieval practice) and distributed this practice would achieve superior performances. Whereas students massed self-testing prior to the exam, a regression model that also included pre-reading, self-testing, and its distribution predicted achievement over and above massed practice. In authentic contexts, students used digital resources and benefitted from early lecture access or pre-reading advance organizers, and self-testing despite challenges to distribute practice and to self-test frequently and on recommended schedules.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-0145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1839</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10956-022-10018-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Advance Organizers ; Anatomy ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive learning ; Cognitive Processes ; College Science ; College students ; Colleges & universities ; Cytology ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Electronic Learning ; Grade Prediction ; Histology ; Introductory Courses ; Language ; Learning ; Learning Management Systems ; Learning Strategies ; Lecture Method ; Management Systems ; Physiology ; Reading ; Regression models ; Science Curriculum ; Science Education ; Self testing ; Students ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Journal of science education and technology, 2023-12, Vol.32 (6), p.837-857</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e546a44e30ba0fca09d0050127f9033ace87b46c85f985bc054d204641de06673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e546a44e30ba0fca09d0050127f9033ace87b46c85f985bc054d204641de06673</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5106-9452</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10956-022-10018-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10956-022-10018-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1400594$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mefferd, Kyle Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernacki, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><title>Tracing Undergraduate Science Learners’ Digital Cognitive Strategy Use and Relation to Performance</title><title>Journal of science education and technology</title><addtitle>J Sci Educ Technol</addtitle><description>Digital environments like learning management systems can afford opportunities for students to engage in cognitive learning strategies including preparatory reading of advance organizers including lecture outlines and self-testing using ungraded quizzes. When timed appropriately, self-testing can afford distributed practice, an optimal approach to self-testing that confers additional benefits. At a large, public university in the southwestern USA, we examined the frequency and timing of digital learning behaviors that reflect these practices in a large gateway science course and how these event types predicted exam performance of 220 undergraduates’ exam grades in the first unit of a 16-week anatomy and physiology course. Coursework over this 31-day span included lessons on cytology, histology, the integumentary system, and osteology; we observed the timing and frequency of students’ use of the lecture outline, ungraded self-testing quizzes, and hypothesized that those who self-regulated by downloading advance organizers before lecture (i.e., pre-reading) and utilizing quizzes to self-test (i.e., retrieval practice) and distributed this practice would achieve superior performances. Whereas students massed self-testing prior to the exam, a regression model that also included pre-reading, self-testing, and its distribution predicted achievement over and above massed practice. In authentic contexts, students used digital resources and benefitted from early lecture access or pre-reading advance organizers, and self-testing despite challenges to distribute practice and to self-test frequently and on recommended schedules.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Advance Organizers</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive learning</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Grade Prediction</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Introductory Courses</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Management Systems</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Lecture Method</subject><subject>Management Systems</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Self testing</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1059-0145</issn><issn>1573-1839</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UN1KHDEUHopC_ekLFAqBXo-eTP4vZatVWahY9zpkM2eGyG5ik1nBu75GX88nMXZKvZNzkXPy_STna5rPFE4ogDotFIyQLXRdW2eqW_OhOaBCsZZqZvZqD8K0QLn42ByWcg8ARhs4aPq77HyII1nFHvOYXb9zE5KfPmD0SJbocsRcnn__Id_CGCa3IYs0xjCFx8qaciWPT2RVkLjYk1vcuCmkSKZEbjAPKW9dtTlu9ge3Kfjp33nUrC7O7xaX7fLH96vF2bL1TMPUouDScY4M1g4G78D0AAJopwYDjDmPWq259FoMRou1B8H7DrjktEeQUrGj5uvs-5DTrx2Wyd6nXY71SdtpQ5kELWVlncys0W3Qhjikuoav1eM2-BRxCPX-TCnGlAAFVdDNAp9TKRkH-5DD1uUnS8G-xm_n-G2N3_6N35oq-jKLMAf_X3B-TXndyfCKsxkvFYsj5re_vuP6AkVPkZY</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Mefferd, Kyle Castro</creator><creator>Bernacki, Matthew L.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5106-9452</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Tracing Undergraduate Science Learners’ Digital Cognitive Strategy Use and Relation to Performance</title><author>Mefferd, Kyle Castro ; Bernacki, Matthew L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e546a44e30ba0fca09d0050127f9033ace87b46c85f985bc054d204641de06673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Advance Organizers</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive learning</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Grade Prediction</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Introductory Courses</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Management Systems</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Lecture Method</topic><topic>Management Systems</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Self testing</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mefferd, Kyle Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernacki, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of science education and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mefferd, Kyle Castro</au><au>Bernacki, Matthew L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1400594</ericid><atitle>Tracing Undergraduate Science Learners’ Digital Cognitive Strategy Use and Relation to Performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of science education and technology</jtitle><stitle>J Sci Educ Technol</stitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>837</spage><epage>857</epage><pages>837-857</pages><issn>1059-0145</issn><eissn>1573-1839</eissn><abstract>Digital environments like learning management systems can afford opportunities for students to engage in cognitive learning strategies including preparatory reading of advance organizers including lecture outlines and self-testing using ungraded quizzes. When timed appropriately, self-testing can afford distributed practice, an optimal approach to self-testing that confers additional benefits. At a large, public university in the southwestern USA, we examined the frequency and timing of digital learning behaviors that reflect these practices in a large gateway science course and how these event types predicted exam performance of 220 undergraduates’ exam grades in the first unit of a 16-week anatomy and physiology course. Coursework over this 31-day span included lessons on cytology, histology, the integumentary system, and osteology; we observed the timing and frequency of students’ use of the lecture outline, ungraded self-testing quizzes, and hypothesized that those who self-regulated by downloading advance organizers before lecture (i.e., pre-reading) and utilizing quizzes to self-test (i.e., retrieval practice) and distributed this practice would achieve superior performances. Whereas students massed self-testing prior to the exam, a regression model that also included pre-reading, self-testing, and its distribution predicted achievement over and above massed practice. In authentic contexts, students used digital resources and benefitted from early lecture access or pre-reading advance organizers, and self-testing despite challenges to distribute practice and to self-test frequently and on recommended schedules.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10956-022-10018-9</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5106-9452</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1059-0145 |
ispartof | Journal of science education and technology, 2023-12, Vol.32 (6), p.837-857 |
issn | 1059-0145 1573-1839 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2891360866 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Academic Achievement Advance Organizers Anatomy Cognitive ability Cognitive learning Cognitive Processes College Science College students Colleges & universities Cytology Education Educational Technology Electronic Learning Grade Prediction Histology Introductory Courses Language Learning Learning Management Systems Learning Strategies Lecture Method Management Systems Physiology Reading Regression models Science Curriculum Science Education Self testing Students Undergraduate Students |
title | Tracing Undergraduate Science Learners’ Digital Cognitive Strategy Use and Relation to Performance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A54%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tracing%20Undergraduate%20Science%20Learners%E2%80%99%20Digital%20Cognitive%20Strategy%20Use%20and%20Relation%20to%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20science%20education%20and%20technology&rft.au=Mefferd,%20Kyle%20Castro&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=837&rft.epage=857&rft.pages=837-857&rft.issn=1059-0145&rft.eissn=1573-1839&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10956-022-10018-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA773375070%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2891360866&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A773375070&rft_ericid=EJ1400594&rfr_iscdi=true |