Tracing Undergraduate Science Learners’ Digital Cognitive Strategy Use and Relation to Performance

Digital environments like learning management systems can afford opportunities for students to engage in cognitive learning strategies including preparatory reading of advance organizers including lecture outlines and self-testing using ungraded quizzes. When timed appropriately, self-testing can af...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of science education and technology 2023-12, Vol.32 (6), p.837-857
Hauptverfasser: Mefferd, Kyle Castro, Bernacki, Matthew L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 857
container_issue 6
container_start_page 837
container_title Journal of science education and technology
container_volume 32
creator Mefferd, Kyle Castro
Bernacki, Matthew L.
description Digital environments like learning management systems can afford opportunities for students to engage in cognitive learning strategies including preparatory reading of advance organizers including lecture outlines and self-testing using ungraded quizzes. When timed appropriately, self-testing can afford distributed practice, an optimal approach to self-testing that confers additional benefits. At a large, public university in the southwestern USA, we examined the frequency and timing of digital learning behaviors that reflect these practices in a large gateway science course and how these event types predicted exam performance of 220 undergraduates’ exam grades in the first unit of a 16-week anatomy and physiology course. Coursework over this 31-day span included lessons on cytology, histology, the integumentary system, and osteology; we observed the timing and frequency of students’ use of the lecture outline, ungraded self-testing quizzes, and hypothesized that those who self-regulated by downloading advance organizers before lecture (i.e., pre-reading) and utilizing quizzes to self-test (i.e., retrieval practice) and distributed this practice would achieve superior performances. Whereas students massed self-testing prior to the exam, a regression model that also included pre-reading, self-testing, and its distribution predicted achievement over and above massed practice. In authentic contexts, students used digital resources and benefitted from early lecture access or pre-reading advance organizers, and self-testing despite challenges to distribute practice and to self-test frequently and on recommended schedules.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10956-022-10018-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2891360866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A773375070</galeid><ericid>EJ1400594</ericid><sourcerecordid>A773375070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e546a44e30ba0fca09d0050127f9033ace87b46c85f985bc054d204641de06673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UN1KHDEUHopC_ekLFAqBXo-eTP4vZatVWahY9zpkM2eGyG5ik1nBu75GX88nMXZKvZNzkXPy_STna5rPFE4ogDotFIyQLXRdW2eqW_OhOaBCsZZqZvZqD8K0QLn42ByWcg8ARhs4aPq77HyII1nFHvOYXb9zE5KfPmD0SJbocsRcnn__Id_CGCa3IYs0xjCFx8qaciWPT2RVkLjYk1vcuCmkSKZEbjAPKW9dtTlu9ge3Kfjp33nUrC7O7xaX7fLH96vF2bL1TMPUouDScY4M1g4G78D0AAJopwYDjDmPWq259FoMRou1B8H7DrjktEeQUrGj5uvs-5DTrx2Wyd6nXY71SdtpQ5kELWVlncys0W3Qhjikuoav1eM2-BRxCPX-TCnGlAAFVdDNAp9TKRkH-5DD1uUnS8G-xm_n-G2N3_6N35oq-jKLMAf_X3B-TXndyfCKsxkvFYsj5re_vuP6AkVPkZY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2891360866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tracing Undergraduate Science Learners’ Digital Cognitive Strategy Use and Relation to Performance</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mefferd, Kyle Castro ; Bernacki, Matthew L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mefferd, Kyle Castro ; Bernacki, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><description>Digital environments like learning management systems can afford opportunities for students to engage in cognitive learning strategies including preparatory reading of advance organizers including lecture outlines and self-testing using ungraded quizzes. When timed appropriately, self-testing can afford distributed practice, an optimal approach to self-testing that confers additional benefits. At a large, public university in the southwestern USA, we examined the frequency and timing of digital learning behaviors that reflect these practices in a large gateway science course and how these event types predicted exam performance of 220 undergraduates’ exam grades in the first unit of a 16-week anatomy and physiology course. Coursework over this 31-day span included lessons on cytology, histology, the integumentary system, and osteology; we observed the timing and frequency of students’ use of the lecture outline, ungraded self-testing quizzes, and hypothesized that those who self-regulated by downloading advance organizers before lecture (i.e., pre-reading) and utilizing quizzes to self-test (i.e., retrieval practice) and distributed this practice would achieve superior performances. Whereas students massed self-testing prior to the exam, a regression model that also included pre-reading, self-testing, and its distribution predicted achievement over and above massed practice. In authentic contexts, students used digital resources and benefitted from early lecture access or pre-reading advance organizers, and self-testing despite challenges to distribute practice and to self-test frequently and on recommended schedules.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-0145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1839</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10956-022-10018-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Advance Organizers ; Anatomy ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive learning ; Cognitive Processes ; College Science ; College students ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Cytology ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Electronic Learning ; Grade Prediction ; Histology ; Introductory Courses ; Language ; Learning ; Learning Management Systems ; Learning Strategies ; Lecture Method ; Management Systems ; Physiology ; Reading ; Regression models ; Science Curriculum ; Science Education ; Self testing ; Students ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Journal of science education and technology, 2023-12, Vol.32 (6), p.837-857</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e546a44e30ba0fca09d0050127f9033ace87b46c85f985bc054d204641de06673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e546a44e30ba0fca09d0050127f9033ace87b46c85f985bc054d204641de06673</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5106-9452</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10956-022-10018-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10956-022-10018-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1400594$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mefferd, Kyle Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernacki, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><title>Tracing Undergraduate Science Learners’ Digital Cognitive Strategy Use and Relation to Performance</title><title>Journal of science education and technology</title><addtitle>J Sci Educ Technol</addtitle><description>Digital environments like learning management systems can afford opportunities for students to engage in cognitive learning strategies including preparatory reading of advance organizers including lecture outlines and self-testing using ungraded quizzes. When timed appropriately, self-testing can afford distributed practice, an optimal approach to self-testing that confers additional benefits. At a large, public university in the southwestern USA, we examined the frequency and timing of digital learning behaviors that reflect these practices in a large gateway science course and how these event types predicted exam performance of 220 undergraduates’ exam grades in the first unit of a 16-week anatomy and physiology course. Coursework over this 31-day span included lessons on cytology, histology, the integumentary system, and osteology; we observed the timing and frequency of students’ use of the lecture outline, ungraded self-testing quizzes, and hypothesized that those who self-regulated by downloading advance organizers before lecture (i.e., pre-reading) and utilizing quizzes to self-test (i.e., retrieval practice) and distributed this practice would achieve superior performances. Whereas students massed self-testing prior to the exam, a regression model that also included pre-reading, self-testing, and its distribution predicted achievement over and above massed practice. In authentic contexts, students used digital resources and benefitted from early lecture access or pre-reading advance organizers, and self-testing despite challenges to distribute practice and to self-test frequently and on recommended schedules.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Advance Organizers</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive learning</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Grade Prediction</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Introductory Courses</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Management Systems</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Lecture Method</subject><subject>Management Systems</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Self testing</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1059-0145</issn><issn>1573-1839</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UN1KHDEUHopC_ekLFAqBXo-eTP4vZatVWahY9zpkM2eGyG5ik1nBu75GX88nMXZKvZNzkXPy_STna5rPFE4ogDotFIyQLXRdW2eqW_OhOaBCsZZqZvZqD8K0QLn42ByWcg8ARhs4aPq77HyII1nFHvOYXb9zE5KfPmD0SJbocsRcnn__Id_CGCa3IYs0xjCFx8qaciWPT2RVkLjYk1vcuCmkSKZEbjAPKW9dtTlu9ge3Kfjp33nUrC7O7xaX7fLH96vF2bL1TMPUouDScY4M1g4G78D0AAJopwYDjDmPWq259FoMRou1B8H7DrjktEeQUrGj5uvs-5DTrx2Wyd6nXY71SdtpQ5kELWVlncys0W3Qhjikuoav1eM2-BRxCPX-TCnGlAAFVdDNAp9TKRkH-5DD1uUnS8G-xm_n-G2N3_6N35oq-jKLMAf_X3B-TXndyfCKsxkvFYsj5re_vuP6AkVPkZY</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Mefferd, Kyle Castro</creator><creator>Bernacki, Matthew L.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5106-9452</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Tracing Undergraduate Science Learners’ Digital Cognitive Strategy Use and Relation to Performance</title><author>Mefferd, Kyle Castro ; Bernacki, Matthew L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-e546a44e30ba0fca09d0050127f9033ace87b46c85f985bc054d204641de06673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Advance Organizers</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive learning</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Grade Prediction</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Introductory Courses</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Management Systems</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Lecture Method</topic><topic>Management Systems</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Self testing</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mefferd, Kyle Castro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernacki, Matthew L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of science education and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mefferd, Kyle Castro</au><au>Bernacki, Matthew L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1400594</ericid><atitle>Tracing Undergraduate Science Learners’ Digital Cognitive Strategy Use and Relation to Performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of science education and technology</jtitle><stitle>J Sci Educ Technol</stitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>837</spage><epage>857</epage><pages>837-857</pages><issn>1059-0145</issn><eissn>1573-1839</eissn><abstract>Digital environments like learning management systems can afford opportunities for students to engage in cognitive learning strategies including preparatory reading of advance organizers including lecture outlines and self-testing using ungraded quizzes. When timed appropriately, self-testing can afford distributed practice, an optimal approach to self-testing that confers additional benefits. At a large, public university in the southwestern USA, we examined the frequency and timing of digital learning behaviors that reflect these practices in a large gateway science course and how these event types predicted exam performance of 220 undergraduates’ exam grades in the first unit of a 16-week anatomy and physiology course. Coursework over this 31-day span included lessons on cytology, histology, the integumentary system, and osteology; we observed the timing and frequency of students’ use of the lecture outline, ungraded self-testing quizzes, and hypothesized that those who self-regulated by downloading advance organizers before lecture (i.e., pre-reading) and utilizing quizzes to self-test (i.e., retrieval practice) and distributed this practice would achieve superior performances. Whereas students massed self-testing prior to the exam, a regression model that also included pre-reading, self-testing, and its distribution predicted achievement over and above massed practice. In authentic contexts, students used digital resources and benefitted from early lecture access or pre-reading advance organizers, and self-testing despite challenges to distribute practice and to self-test frequently and on recommended schedules.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10956-022-10018-9</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5106-9452</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-0145
ispartof Journal of science education and technology, 2023-12, Vol.32 (6), p.837-857
issn 1059-0145
1573-1839
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2891360866
source EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Academic Achievement
Advance Organizers
Anatomy
Cognitive ability
Cognitive learning
Cognitive Processes
College Science
College students
Colleges & universities
Cytology
Education
Educational Technology
Electronic Learning
Grade Prediction
Histology
Introductory Courses
Language
Learning
Learning Management Systems
Learning Strategies
Lecture Method
Management Systems
Physiology
Reading
Regression models
Science Curriculum
Science Education
Self testing
Students
Undergraduate Students
title Tracing Undergraduate Science Learners’ Digital Cognitive Strategy Use and Relation to Performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T22%3A54%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tracing%20Undergraduate%20Science%20Learners%E2%80%99%20Digital%20Cognitive%20Strategy%20Use%20and%20Relation%20to%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20science%20education%20and%20technology&rft.au=Mefferd,%20Kyle%20Castro&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=837&rft.epage=857&rft.pages=837-857&rft.issn=1059-0145&rft.eissn=1573-1839&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10956-022-10018-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA773375070%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2891360866&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A773375070&rft_ericid=EJ1400594&rfr_iscdi=true