Native grass sod and plug production as an alternative technique to restore neotropical rupestrian grassland after mining
Despite the importance of grasses in the structure and functioning of tropical grasslands, there is still a lack of efficient and economically viable techniques to produce and introduce grasses in restoration projects. Here, we evaluated the sod and plug‐plant production and planting of a native gra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Restoration ecology 2023-11, Vol.31 (8) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Restoration ecology |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Figueiredo, Maurílio A. Messias, Maria C. T. B. Leite, Mariangela G. P. Kozovits, Alessandra R. |
description | Despite the importance of grasses in the structure and functioning of tropical grasslands, there is still a lack of efficient and economically viable techniques to produce and introduce grasses in restoration projects. Here, we evaluated the sod and plug‐plant production and planting of a native grass from Brazilian rupestrian grasslands,
Sporobolus metallicolus
, in a post‐bauxite mining. To produce the sod, we used post‐mining substrate and its mixture with commercial substrate. Then, we sowed 270 seeds of
S. metallicolus
on a 4‐cm layer of substrate in 144‐cm
2
trays. Eighty days after sowing, we subdivided the contents of each tray (substrate + plant) into 4 × 3–cm plug‐plants. Plug‐plants were planted in the degraded area with and without the incorporation of litter from an adjacent conserved rupestrian grassland. We also evaluated the cost of production of each plug‐plant. The mixture of substrates provided greater plant growth and rooting, obtaining plug‐plants with an average of 13 individuals, dry mass of 270 mg, and estimated cost of US$ 0.0045. In the degraded area, the addition of litter increased shoot biomass gain. Plant survival was 100% with and without litter addition and the plants started seed dispersal at 7 months after planting. The production of
S. metallicolus
plugs with the mixed substrate and the growth of plants in the post‐mined area showed promising results and reduced costs, indicating technical and financial feasibility. The presented techniques can be an option for introducing grasses in degraded areas and optimize the use of seeds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/rec.13966 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2890648177</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2890648177</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-fa21d3b0d7f3b122d642a286af071cc02b32c19d34554ac822e73fbdf228b7463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUE1LAzEUDKJgrR78BwFPHrYmL7vJ7lGKVqHoRcHbks1HTdlu1iQr9N-btr7LG4Z5w5tB6JaSBc3zEIxaUNZwfoZmtAJeUEK-zjMmnBbQCHqJrmLcEkKrumYztH-Tyf0avAkyRhy9xnLQeOynDR6D15NKzg9Yxkxj2ScThpM-GfU9uJ8pI4-DickHgwfjU_CjU7LHYRozG1y-O3r3B19pswPeucENm2t0YWUfzc3_nqPP56eP5Uuxfl-9Lh_XhYJKpMJKoJp1RAvLOgqgeQkSai4tEVQpAh0DRRvNyqoqpaoBjGC20xag7kTJ2RzdnXxznvxvTO3WTzlGH1uoG8LLmgqRVfcnlQo-xmBsOwa3k2HfUtIemm1zs-2xWfYHivFuOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2890648177</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Native grass sod and plug production as an alternative technique to restore neotropical rupestrian grassland after mining</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Figueiredo, Maurílio A. ; Messias, Maria C. T. B. ; Leite, Mariangela G. P. ; Kozovits, Alessandra R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Maurílio A. ; Messias, Maria C. T. B. ; Leite, Mariangela G. P. ; Kozovits, Alessandra R.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the importance of grasses in the structure and functioning of tropical grasslands, there is still a lack of efficient and economically viable techniques to produce and introduce grasses in restoration projects. Here, we evaluated the sod and plug‐plant production and planting of a native grass from Brazilian rupestrian grasslands,
Sporobolus metallicolus
, in a post‐bauxite mining. To produce the sod, we used post‐mining substrate and its mixture with commercial substrate. Then, we sowed 270 seeds of
S. metallicolus
on a 4‐cm layer of substrate in 144‐cm
2
trays. Eighty days after sowing, we subdivided the contents of each tray (substrate + plant) into 4 × 3–cm plug‐plants. Plug‐plants were planted in the degraded area with and without the incorporation of litter from an adjacent conserved rupestrian grassland. We also evaluated the cost of production of each plug‐plant. The mixture of substrates provided greater plant growth and rooting, obtaining plug‐plants with an average of 13 individuals, dry mass of 270 mg, and estimated cost of US$ 0.0045. In the degraded area, the addition of litter increased shoot biomass gain. Plant survival was 100% with and without litter addition and the plants started seed dispersal at 7 months after planting. The production of
S. metallicolus
plugs with the mixed substrate and the growth of plants in the post‐mined area showed promising results and reduced costs, indicating technical and financial feasibility. The presented techniques can be an option for introducing grasses in degraded areas and optimize the use of seeds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-2971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-100X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rec.13966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bauxite ; Bayer process ; Degradation ; Dispersal ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Litter ; Mining ; Mixtures ; Plant growth ; Plant production ; Planting ; Plants ; Plugs ; Production costs ; Restoration ; Seed dispersal ; Seeds ; Sod ; Substrates ; Survival ; Trays</subject><ispartof>Restoration ecology, 2023-11, Vol.31 (8)</ispartof><rights>2023 Society for Ecological Restoration</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-fa21d3b0d7f3b122d642a286af071cc02b32c19d34554ac822e73fbdf228b7463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-fa21d3b0d7f3b122d642a286af071cc02b32c19d34554ac822e73fbdf228b7463</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9789-3786 ; 0000-0002-7312-0076 ; 0000-0003-2095-4680 ; 0000-0003-0300-9038</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Maurílio A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messias, Maria C. T. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Mariangela G. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozovits, Alessandra R.</creatorcontrib><title>Native grass sod and plug production as an alternative technique to restore neotropical rupestrian grassland after mining</title><title>Restoration ecology</title><description>Despite the importance of grasses in the structure and functioning of tropical grasslands, there is still a lack of efficient and economically viable techniques to produce and introduce grasses in restoration projects. Here, we evaluated the sod and plug‐plant production and planting of a native grass from Brazilian rupestrian grasslands,
Sporobolus metallicolus
, in a post‐bauxite mining. To produce the sod, we used post‐mining substrate and its mixture with commercial substrate. Then, we sowed 270 seeds of
S. metallicolus
on a 4‐cm layer of substrate in 144‐cm
2
trays. Eighty days after sowing, we subdivided the contents of each tray (substrate + plant) into 4 × 3–cm plug‐plants. Plug‐plants were planted in the degraded area with and without the incorporation of litter from an adjacent conserved rupestrian grassland. We also evaluated the cost of production of each plug‐plant. The mixture of substrates provided greater plant growth and rooting, obtaining plug‐plants with an average of 13 individuals, dry mass of 270 mg, and estimated cost of US$ 0.0045. In the degraded area, the addition of litter increased shoot biomass gain. Plant survival was 100% with and without litter addition and the plants started seed dispersal at 7 months after planting. The production of
S. metallicolus
plugs with the mixed substrate and the growth of plants in the post‐mined area showed promising results and reduced costs, indicating technical and financial feasibility. The presented techniques can be an option for introducing grasses in degraded areas and optimize the use of seeds.</description><subject>Bauxite</subject><subject>Bayer process</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Mixtures</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant production</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plugs</subject><subject>Production costs</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Seed dispersal</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Sod</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Trays</subject><issn>1061-2971</issn><issn>1526-100X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotUE1LAzEUDKJgrR78BwFPHrYmL7vJ7lGKVqHoRcHbks1HTdlu1iQr9N-btr7LG4Z5w5tB6JaSBc3zEIxaUNZwfoZmtAJeUEK-zjMmnBbQCHqJrmLcEkKrumYztH-Tyf0avAkyRhy9xnLQeOynDR6D15NKzg9Yxkxj2ScThpM-GfU9uJ8pI4-DickHgwfjU_CjU7LHYRozG1y-O3r3B19pswPeucENm2t0YWUfzc3_nqPP56eP5Uuxfl-9Lh_XhYJKpMJKoJp1RAvLOgqgeQkSai4tEVQpAh0DRRvNyqoqpaoBjGC20xag7kTJ2RzdnXxznvxvTO3WTzlGH1uoG8LLmgqRVfcnlQo-xmBsOwa3k2HfUtIemm1zs-2xWfYHivFuOw</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Figueiredo, Maurílio A.</creator><creator>Messias, Maria C. T. B.</creator><creator>Leite, Mariangela G. P.</creator><creator>Kozovits, Alessandra R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9789-3786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7312-0076</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2095-4680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-9038</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Native grass sod and plug production as an alternative technique to restore neotropical rupestrian grassland after mining</title><author>Figueiredo, Maurílio A. ; Messias, Maria C. T. B. ; Leite, Mariangela G. P. ; Kozovits, Alessandra R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-fa21d3b0d7f3b122d642a286af071cc02b32c19d34554ac822e73fbdf228b7463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bauxite</topic><topic>Bayer process</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Mixtures</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant production</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plugs</topic><topic>Production costs</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Seed dispersal</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Sod</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Trays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Maurílio A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messias, Maria C. T. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Mariangela G. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozovits, Alessandra R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Figueiredo, Maurílio A.</au><au>Messias, Maria C. T. B.</au><au>Leite, Mariangela G. P.</au><au>Kozovits, Alessandra R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Native grass sod and plug production as an alternative technique to restore neotropical rupestrian grassland after mining</atitle><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>1061-2971</issn><eissn>1526-100X</eissn><abstract>Despite the importance of grasses in the structure and functioning of tropical grasslands, there is still a lack of efficient and economically viable techniques to produce and introduce grasses in restoration projects. Here, we evaluated the sod and plug‐plant production and planting of a native grass from Brazilian rupestrian grasslands,
Sporobolus metallicolus
, in a post‐bauxite mining. To produce the sod, we used post‐mining substrate and its mixture with commercial substrate. Then, we sowed 270 seeds of
S. metallicolus
on a 4‐cm layer of substrate in 144‐cm
2
trays. Eighty days after sowing, we subdivided the contents of each tray (substrate + plant) into 4 × 3–cm plug‐plants. Plug‐plants were planted in the degraded area with and without the incorporation of litter from an adjacent conserved rupestrian grassland. We also evaluated the cost of production of each plug‐plant. The mixture of substrates provided greater plant growth and rooting, obtaining plug‐plants with an average of 13 individuals, dry mass of 270 mg, and estimated cost of US$ 0.0045. In the degraded area, the addition of litter increased shoot biomass gain. Plant survival was 100% with and without litter addition and the plants started seed dispersal at 7 months after planting. The production of
S. metallicolus
plugs with the mixed substrate and the growth of plants in the post‐mined area showed promising results and reduced costs, indicating technical and financial feasibility. The presented techniques can be an option for introducing grasses in degraded areas and optimize the use of seeds.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/rec.13966</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9789-3786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7312-0076</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2095-4680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0300-9038</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1061-2971 |
ispartof | Restoration ecology, 2023-11, Vol.31 (8) |
issn | 1061-2971 1526-100X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2890648177 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | Bauxite Bayer process Degradation Dispersal Grasses Grasslands Litter Mining Mixtures Plant growth Plant production Planting Plants Plugs Production costs Restoration Seed dispersal Seeds Sod Substrates Survival Trays |
title | Native grass sod and plug production as an alternative technique to restore neotropical rupestrian grassland after mining |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T04%3A23%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Native%20grass%20sod%20and%20plug%20production%20as%20an%20alternative%20technique%20to%20restore%20neotropical%20rupestrian%20grassland%20after%20mining&rft.jtitle=Restoration%20ecology&rft.au=Figueiredo,%20Maur%C3%ADlio%20A.&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=1061-2971&rft.eissn=1526-100X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rec.13966&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2890648177%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2890648177&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |