Technological diversification, technology portfolio properties, and R&D productivity
This study aims to examine the differential effect of technological diversification on research and development (R&D) productivity based on the qualitative properties of technology portfolios (i.e., the direction of technological diversification). Using the U.S. patent database from 1980 to 2010...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of technology transfer 2023-12, Vol.48 (6), p.2074-2105 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2105 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2074 |
container_title | The Journal of technology transfer |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Yoo, Seh-Hyun Lee, Chang-Yang |
description | This study aims to examine the differential effect of technological diversification on research and development (R&D) productivity based on the qualitative properties of technology portfolios (i.e., the direction of technological diversification). Using the U.S. patent database from 1980 to 2010, we divided overall technological diversification into related and unrelated technological diversification; furthermore, the two potential moderating factors of technology portfolio centrality and R&D consistency were tested across the different types of technological diversification. The notable findings are as follows: First, technology portfolio centrality has a positive moderating effect that is more pronounced as the degree of technological diversification increases. Second, R&D consistency has a positive and linear moderating effect. Third, the positive (negative) effect of technological diversification is more pronounced under related (unrelated) technological diversification. Consequently, firms can better utilize the R&D-productivity-enhancing effect of technological diversification by considering both the current degree of technological diversification and the properties of their technology portfolios. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10961-022-09953-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2890162455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2890162455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-50fddc4d00cad5df5026b08cad85bca554905f64915efc7c6069a0db407a54073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNOC4Kmrk-xmszlK_QsFQeo5pEm2pqybNUlL--1NXUVPXiYzmffmwQ-hcwxXGIBdBwy8wjkQkgPntMi3B2gENSc555gc_umP0UkIKwAogbARms-Neutc65ZWyTbTdmN8sE0aonXdJIs_613WOx8b11qX9d71xkdrwiSTnc5eLm_3f3qtot3YuDtFR41sgzn7fsfo9f5uPn3MZ88PT9ObWa4KxmJOodFalRpASU11Q4FUC6jTUNOFkpSWHGhTlRxT0yimKqi4BL0ogUmaSjFGF8PdFP6xNiGKlVv7LkUKUnPAFSkpTSoyqJR3IXjTiN7bd-l3AoPY0xMDPZHoiS96YptM2WAyynU2_FpqVieMnBVJUgySkJbd0vjf9H8OfwKit37G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2890162455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technological diversification, technology portfolio properties, and R&D productivity</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yoo, Seh-Hyun ; Lee, Chang-Yang</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Seh-Hyun ; Lee, Chang-Yang</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to examine the differential effect of technological diversification on research and development (R&D) productivity based on the qualitative properties of technology portfolios (i.e., the direction of technological diversification). Using the U.S. patent database from 1980 to 2010, we divided overall technological diversification into related and unrelated technological diversification; furthermore, the two potential moderating factors of technology portfolio centrality and R&D consistency were tested across the different types of technological diversification. The notable findings are as follows: First, technology portfolio centrality has a positive moderating effect that is more pronounced as the degree of technological diversification increases. Second, R&D consistency has a positive and linear moderating effect. Third, the positive (negative) effect of technological diversification is more pronounced under related (unrelated) technological diversification. Consequently, firms can better utilize the R&D-productivity-enhancing effect of technological diversification by considering both the current degree of technological diversification and the properties of their technology portfolios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0892-9912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0892-9912</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7047</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10961-022-09953-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Commercial Law ; Consistency ; Diversification ; Economic Growth ; Industrial Organization ; Innovation/Technology Management ; Management ; Productivity ; R&D ; Research & development ; Technology ; Technology adoption</subject><ispartof>The Journal of technology transfer, 2023-12, Vol.48 (6), p.2074-2105</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-50fddc4d00cad5df5026b08cad85bca554905f64915efc7c6069a0db407a54073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-50fddc4d00cad5df5026b08cad85bca554905f64915efc7c6069a0db407a54073</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6893-4297</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10961-022-09953-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10961-022-09953-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Seh-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang-Yang</creatorcontrib><title>Technological diversification, technology portfolio properties, and R&D productivity</title><title>The Journal of technology transfer</title><addtitle>J Technol Transf</addtitle><description>This study aims to examine the differential effect of technological diversification on research and development (R&D) productivity based on the qualitative properties of technology portfolios (i.e., the direction of technological diversification). Using the U.S. patent database from 1980 to 2010, we divided overall technological diversification into related and unrelated technological diversification; furthermore, the two potential moderating factors of technology portfolio centrality and R&D consistency were tested across the different types of technological diversification. The notable findings are as follows: First, technology portfolio centrality has a positive moderating effect that is more pronounced as the degree of technological diversification increases. Second, R&D consistency has a positive and linear moderating effect. Third, the positive (negative) effect of technological diversification is more pronounced under related (unrelated) technological diversification. Consequently, firms can better utilize the R&D-productivity-enhancing effect of technological diversification by considering both the current degree of technological diversification and the properties of their technology portfolios.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Commercial Law</subject><subject>Consistency</subject><subject>Diversification</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Industrial Organization</subject><subject>Innovation/Technology Management</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><issn>0892-9912</issn><issn>0892-9912</issn><issn>1573-7047</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwNOC4Kmrk-xmszlK_QsFQeo5pEm2pqybNUlL--1NXUVPXiYzmffmwQ-hcwxXGIBdBwy8wjkQkgPntMi3B2gENSc555gc_umP0UkIKwAogbARms-Neutc65ZWyTbTdmN8sE0aonXdJIs_613WOx8b11qX9d71xkdrwiSTnc5eLm_3f3qtot3YuDtFR41sgzn7fsfo9f5uPn3MZ88PT9ObWa4KxmJOodFalRpASU11Q4FUC6jTUNOFkpSWHGhTlRxT0yimKqi4BL0ogUmaSjFGF8PdFP6xNiGKlVv7LkUKUnPAFSkpTSoyqJR3IXjTiN7bd-l3AoPY0xMDPZHoiS96YptM2WAyynU2_FpqVieMnBVJUgySkJbd0vjf9H8OfwKit37G</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Yoo, Seh-Hyun</creator><creator>Lee, Chang-Yang</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6893-4297</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Technological diversification, technology portfolio properties, and R&D productivity</title><author>Yoo, Seh-Hyun ; Lee, Chang-Yang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-50fddc4d00cad5df5026b08cad85bca554905f64915efc7c6069a0db407a54073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Commercial Law</topic><topic>Consistency</topic><topic>Diversification</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Industrial Organization</topic><topic>Innovation/Technology Management</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Seh-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Chang-Yang</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of technology transfer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoo, Seh-Hyun</au><au>Lee, Chang-Yang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technological diversification, technology portfolio properties, and R&D productivity</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of technology transfer</jtitle><stitle>J Technol Transf</stitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2074</spage><epage>2105</epage><pages>2074-2105</pages><issn>0892-9912</issn><eissn>0892-9912</eissn><eissn>1573-7047</eissn><abstract>This study aims to examine the differential effect of technological diversification on research and development (R&D) productivity based on the qualitative properties of technology portfolios (i.e., the direction of technological diversification). Using the U.S. patent database from 1980 to 2010, we divided overall technological diversification into related and unrelated technological diversification; furthermore, the two potential moderating factors of technology portfolio centrality and R&D consistency were tested across the different types of technological diversification. The notable findings are as follows: First, technology portfolio centrality has a positive moderating effect that is more pronounced as the degree of technological diversification increases. Second, R&D consistency has a positive and linear moderating effect. Third, the positive (negative) effect of technological diversification is more pronounced under related (unrelated) technological diversification. Consequently, firms can better utilize the R&D-productivity-enhancing effect of technological diversification by considering both the current degree of technological diversification and the properties of their technology portfolios.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10961-022-09953-x</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6893-4297</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0892-9912 |
ispartof | The Journal of technology transfer, 2023-12, Vol.48 (6), p.2074-2105 |
issn | 0892-9912 0892-9912 1573-7047 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2890162455 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Business and Management Commercial Law Consistency Diversification Economic Growth Industrial Organization Innovation/Technology Management Management Productivity R&D Research & development Technology Technology adoption |
title | Technological diversification, technology portfolio properties, and R&D productivity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T11%3A33%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technological%20diversification,%20technology%20portfolio%20properties,%20and%20R&D%20productivity&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20technology%20transfer&rft.au=Yoo,%20Seh-Hyun&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2074&rft.epage=2105&rft.pages=2074-2105&rft.issn=0892-9912&rft.eissn=0892-9912&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10961-022-09953-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2890162455%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2890162455&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |