An introduction to reinforcement learning for neuroscience

Reinforcement learning (RL) has a rich history in neuroscience, from early work on dopamine as a reward prediction error signal (Schultz et al., 1997) to recent work proposing that the brain could implement a form of 'distributional reinforcement learning' popularized in machine learning (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2024-12
1. Verfasser: Jensen, Kristopher T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Jensen, Kristopher T
description Reinforcement learning (RL) has a rich history in neuroscience, from early work on dopamine as a reward prediction error signal (Schultz et al., 1997) to recent work proposing that the brain could implement a form of 'distributional reinforcement learning' popularized in machine learning (Dabney et al., 2020). There has been a close link between theoretical advances in reinforcement learning and neuroscience experiments throughout this literature, and the theories describing the experimental data have therefore become increasingly complex. Here, we provide an introduction and mathematical background to many of the methods that have been used in systems neroscience. We start with an overview of the RL problem and classical temporal difference algorithms, followed by a discussion of 'model-free', 'model-based', and intermediate RL algorithms. We then introduce deep reinforcement learning and discuss how this framework has led to new insights in neuroscience. This includes a particular focus on meta-reinforcement learning (Wang et al., 2018) and distributional RL (Dabney et al., 2020). Finally, we discuss potential shortcomings of the RL formalism for neuroscience and highlight open questions in the field. Code that implements the methods discussed and generates the figures is also provided.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2889798122</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2889798122</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_28897981223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNikEKwjAQAIMgWLR_CHgutBtrU28iig_wXkq6lZS6q5vk__bgAzwNzMxKZWBMVdgDwEblIUxlWcKxgbo2mTqdSXuKwkNy0TPpyFrQ08ji8IUU9Yy9kKenXpQmTMLBeSSHO7Ue-zlg_uNW7W_Xx-VevIU_CUPsJk5CS-rA2rZpbQVg_ru-GZ03rg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2889798122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An introduction to reinforcement learning for neuroscience</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Jensen, Kristopher T</creator><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Kristopher T</creatorcontrib><description>Reinforcement learning (RL) has a rich history in neuroscience, from early work on dopamine as a reward prediction error signal (Schultz et al., 1997) to recent work proposing that the brain could implement a form of 'distributional reinforcement learning' popularized in machine learning (Dabney et al., 2020). There has been a close link between theoretical advances in reinforcement learning and neuroscience experiments throughout this literature, and the theories describing the experimental data have therefore become increasingly complex. Here, we provide an introduction and mathematical background to many of the methods that have been used in systems neroscience. We start with an overview of the RL problem and classical temporal difference algorithms, followed by a discussion of 'model-free', 'model-based', and intermediate RL algorithms. We then introduce deep reinforcement learning and discuss how this framework has led to new insights in neuroscience. This includes a particular focus on meta-reinforcement learning (Wang et al., 2018) and distributional RL (Dabney et al., 2020). Finally, we discuss potential shortcomings of the RL formalism for neuroscience and highlight open questions in the field. Code that implements the methods discussed and generates the figures is also provided.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Deep learning ; Dopamine ; Error signals ; Machine learning ; Neurosciences</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-12</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Kristopher T</creatorcontrib><title>An introduction to reinforcement learning for neuroscience</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Reinforcement learning (RL) has a rich history in neuroscience, from early work on dopamine as a reward prediction error signal (Schultz et al., 1997) to recent work proposing that the brain could implement a form of 'distributional reinforcement learning' popularized in machine learning (Dabney et al., 2020). There has been a close link between theoretical advances in reinforcement learning and neuroscience experiments throughout this literature, and the theories describing the experimental data have therefore become increasingly complex. Here, we provide an introduction and mathematical background to many of the methods that have been used in systems neroscience. We start with an overview of the RL problem and classical temporal difference algorithms, followed by a discussion of 'model-free', 'model-based', and intermediate RL algorithms. We then introduce deep reinforcement learning and discuss how this framework has led to new insights in neuroscience. This includes a particular focus on meta-reinforcement learning (Wang et al., 2018) and distributional RL (Dabney et al., 2020). Finally, we discuss potential shortcomings of the RL formalism for neuroscience and highlight open questions in the field. Code that implements the methods discussed and generates the figures is also provided.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Dopamine</subject><subject>Error signals</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNikEKwjAQAIMgWLR_CHgutBtrU28iig_wXkq6lZS6q5vk__bgAzwNzMxKZWBMVdgDwEblIUxlWcKxgbo2mTqdSXuKwkNy0TPpyFrQ08ji8IUU9Yy9kKenXpQmTMLBeSSHO7Ue-zlg_uNW7W_Xx-VevIU_CUPsJk5CS-rA2rZpbQVg_ru-GZ03rg</recordid><startdate>20241218</startdate><enddate>20241218</enddate><creator>Jensen, Kristopher T</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241218</creationdate><title>An introduction to reinforcement learning for neuroscience</title><author>Jensen, Kristopher T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28897981223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Dopamine</topic><topic>Error signals</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Kristopher T</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jensen, Kristopher T</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>An introduction to reinforcement learning for neuroscience</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-12-18</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Reinforcement learning (RL) has a rich history in neuroscience, from early work on dopamine as a reward prediction error signal (Schultz et al., 1997) to recent work proposing that the brain could implement a form of 'distributional reinforcement learning' popularized in machine learning (Dabney et al., 2020). There has been a close link between theoretical advances in reinforcement learning and neuroscience experiments throughout this literature, and the theories describing the experimental data have therefore become increasingly complex. Here, we provide an introduction and mathematical background to many of the methods that have been used in systems neroscience. We start with an overview of the RL problem and classical temporal difference algorithms, followed by a discussion of 'model-free', 'model-based', and intermediate RL algorithms. We then introduce deep reinforcement learning and discuss how this framework has led to new insights in neuroscience. This includes a particular focus on meta-reinforcement learning (Wang et al., 2018) and distributional RL (Dabney et al., 2020). Finally, we discuss potential shortcomings of the RL formalism for neuroscience and highlight open questions in the field. Code that implements the methods discussed and generates the figures is also provided.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2024-12
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2889798122
source Free E- Journals
subjects Algorithms
Deep learning
Dopamine
Error signals
Machine learning
Neurosciences
title An introduction to reinforcement learning for neuroscience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A42%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=An%20introduction%20to%20reinforcement%20learning%20for%20neuroscience&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Jensen,%20Kristopher%20T&rft.date=2024-12-18&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2889798122%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2889798122&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true