The interaction between motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action language: a cross-cultural study
Growing evidence has revealed the crucial role of motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action language. However, there is still a lack of understanding of how motor and spatial processes interact when there are multiple actors involved, and if embodied processes are consistent across d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Memory & cognition 2023-11, Vol.51 (8), p.1870-1880 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1880 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1870 |
container_title | Memory & cognition |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Tuena, Cosimo Di Lernia, Daniele Rodella, Claudia Bellinzona, Francesca Riva, Giuseppe Costello, Matthew C Repetto, Claudia |
description | Growing evidence has revealed the crucial role of motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action language. However, there is still a lack of understanding of how motor and spatial processes interact when there are multiple actors involved, and if embodied processes are consistent across different cultures. To address this gap, we examined the interaction between motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action-sentences comprehension, along with the consistency of embodied processes across cultures. We collected data from Italian and US English speakers using an online sentencepicture verification task. The participants completed four conditions: two congruent (i.e., the participant is the agent in the sentence and the photo; the agent is someone else interacting with the participant in both the sentence and the picture) and two incongruent (i.e., the agents of the sentence and the picture do not match). The results show that when the perspective of the picture matched that described in the sentence-processing reaction times (RTs) were faster than in the incongruent conditions. In the congruent conditions where the agent is someone else, RTs were slower compared to the condition where the participant is the agent. This has been interpreted as claiming that motor simulation and perspective-taking are independent processes interacting during sentence comprehension (e.g., motor simulation is always run in the role of the agent, but we can adopt multiple perspectives depending on the pronouns and the contextual cues). Furthermore, Bayesian analysis provided evidence that embodied processing of action language entwines a common mechanism, suggesting cross-cultural consistency of embodied processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/sl3421-023-01427-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2889411034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2889411034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_28894110343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjEtOAzEQRK2ISBk-F8jKEmtD-5fMsEUgDpBFdpGZdIZJHHtw2yBuj4VyAFZVUtV7jC0lPOi1bR_Ja6OkAKUFSKPWQs5YI61WwnZmdcUagA6EBbVdsGuiIwBY260aljYfyMeQMbk-jzHwd8zfiIGfY46J03gu3v0NLuw5TbU7zydMNGEFvlBkdxrDUB38YvAuDMUN-MQd71MkEn3xuaTKUS77n1s2PzhPeHfJG3b_-rJ5fhNTip8FKe-OsaRQp51q285ICdro_71-ATRuU7U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2889411034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The interaction between motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action language: a cross-cultural study</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tuena, Cosimo ; Di Lernia, Daniele ; Rodella, Claudia ; Bellinzona, Francesca ; Riva, Giuseppe ; Costello, Matthew C ; Repetto, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Tuena, Cosimo ; Di Lernia, Daniele ; Rodella, Claudia ; Bellinzona, Francesca ; Riva, Giuseppe ; Costello, Matthew C ; Repetto, Claudia</creatorcontrib><description>Growing evidence has revealed the crucial role of motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action language. However, there is still a lack of understanding of how motor and spatial processes interact when there are multiple actors involved, and if embodied processes are consistent across different cultures. To address this gap, we examined the interaction between motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action-sentences comprehension, along with the consistency of embodied processes across cultures. We collected data from Italian and US English speakers using an online sentencepicture verification task. The participants completed four conditions: two congruent (i.e., the participant is the agent in the sentence and the photo; the agent is someone else interacting with the participant in both the sentence and the picture) and two incongruent (i.e., the agents of the sentence and the picture do not match). The results show that when the perspective of the picture matched that described in the sentence-processing reaction times (RTs) were faster than in the incongruent conditions. In the congruent conditions where the agent is someone else, RTs were slower compared to the condition where the participant is the agent. This has been interpreted as claiming that motor simulation and perspective-taking are independent processes interacting during sentence comprehension (e.g., motor simulation is always run in the role of the agent, but we can adopt multiple perspectives depending on the pronouns and the contextual cues). Furthermore, Bayesian analysis provided evidence that embodied processing of action language entwines a common mechanism, suggesting cross-cultural consistency of embodied processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-502X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/sl3421-023-01427-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cultural differences ; Embodied cognition ; Language ; Simulation</subject><ispartof>Memory & cognition, 2023-11, Vol.51 (8), p.1870-1880</ispartof><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Nov 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tuena, Cosimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Lernia, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodella, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellinzona, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riva, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costello, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repetto, Claudia</creatorcontrib><title>The interaction between motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action language: a cross-cultural study</title><title>Memory & cognition</title><description>Growing evidence has revealed the crucial role of motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action language. However, there is still a lack of understanding of how motor and spatial processes interact when there are multiple actors involved, and if embodied processes are consistent across different cultures. To address this gap, we examined the interaction between motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action-sentences comprehension, along with the consistency of embodied processes across cultures. We collected data from Italian and US English speakers using an online sentencepicture verification task. The participants completed four conditions: two congruent (i.e., the participant is the agent in the sentence and the photo; the agent is someone else interacting with the participant in both the sentence and the picture) and two incongruent (i.e., the agents of the sentence and the picture do not match). The results show that when the perspective of the picture matched that described in the sentence-processing reaction times (RTs) were faster than in the incongruent conditions. In the congruent conditions where the agent is someone else, RTs were slower compared to the condition where the participant is the agent. This has been interpreted as claiming that motor simulation and perspective-taking are independent processes interacting during sentence comprehension (e.g., motor simulation is always run in the role of the agent, but we can adopt multiple perspectives depending on the pronouns and the contextual cues). Furthermore, Bayesian analysis provided evidence that embodied processing of action language entwines a common mechanism, suggesting cross-cultural consistency of embodied processes.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Embodied cognition</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjEtOAzEQRK2ISBk-F8jKEmtD-5fMsEUgDpBFdpGZdIZJHHtw2yBuj4VyAFZVUtV7jC0lPOi1bR_Ja6OkAKUFSKPWQs5YI61WwnZmdcUagA6EBbVdsGuiIwBY260aljYfyMeQMbk-jzHwd8zfiIGfY46J03gu3v0NLuw5TbU7zydMNGEFvlBkdxrDUB38YvAuDMUN-MQd71MkEn3xuaTKUS77n1s2PzhPeHfJG3b_-rJ5fhNTip8FKe-OsaRQp51q285ICdro_71-ATRuU7U</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Tuena, Cosimo</creator><creator>Di Lernia, Daniele</creator><creator>Rodella, Claudia</creator><creator>Bellinzona, Francesca</creator><creator>Riva, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Costello, Matthew C</creator><creator>Repetto, Claudia</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>The interaction between motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action language: a cross-cultural study</title><author>Tuena, Cosimo ; Di Lernia, Daniele ; Rodella, Claudia ; Bellinzona, Francesca ; Riva, Giuseppe ; Costello, Matthew C ; Repetto, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28894110343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Embodied cognition</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tuena, Cosimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Lernia, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodella, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellinzona, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riva, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costello, Matthew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Repetto, Claudia</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tuena, Cosimo</au><au>Di Lernia, Daniele</au><au>Rodella, Claudia</au><au>Bellinzona, Francesca</au><au>Riva, Giuseppe</au><au>Costello, Matthew C</au><au>Repetto, Claudia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The interaction between motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action language: a cross-cultural study</atitle><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1870</spage><epage>1880</epage><pages>1870-1880</pages><issn>0090-502X</issn><eissn>1532-5946</eissn><abstract>Growing evidence has revealed the crucial role of motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action language. However, there is still a lack of understanding of how motor and spatial processes interact when there are multiple actors involved, and if embodied processes are consistent across different cultures. To address this gap, we examined the interaction between motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action-sentences comprehension, along with the consistency of embodied processes across cultures. We collected data from Italian and US English speakers using an online sentencepicture verification task. The participants completed four conditions: two congruent (i.e., the participant is the agent in the sentence and the photo; the agent is someone else interacting with the participant in both the sentence and the picture) and two incongruent (i.e., the agents of the sentence and the picture do not match). The results show that when the perspective of the picture matched that described in the sentence-processing reaction times (RTs) were faster than in the incongruent conditions. In the congruent conditions where the agent is someone else, RTs were slower compared to the condition where the participant is the agent. This has been interpreted as claiming that motor simulation and perspective-taking are independent processes interacting during sentence comprehension (e.g., motor simulation is always run in the role of the agent, but we can adopt multiple perspectives depending on the pronouns and the contextual cues). Furthermore, Bayesian analysis provided evidence that embodied processing of action language entwines a common mechanism, suggesting cross-cultural consistency of embodied processes.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.3758/sl3421-023-01427-1</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-502X |
ispartof | Memory & cognition, 2023-11, Vol.51 (8), p.1870-1880 |
issn | 0090-502X 1532-5946 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2889411034 |
source | Business Source Complete; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Bayesian analysis Cognition & reasoning Cultural differences Embodied cognition Language Simulation |
title | The interaction between motor simulation and spatial perspective-taking in action language: a cross-cultural study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T10%3A28%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20interaction%20between%20motor%20simulation%20and%20spatial%20perspective-taking%20in%20action%20language:%20a%20cross-cultural%20study&rft.jtitle=Memory%20&%20cognition&rft.au=Tuena,%20Cosimo&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1870&rft.epage=1880&rft.pages=1870-1880&rft.issn=0090-502X&rft.eissn=1532-5946&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/sl3421-023-01427-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2889411034%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2889411034&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |