Electric discharge by sulphide shuttling bacteria
BACKGROUNDIn biodesulphurisation processes, sulphide oxidising bacteria (SOB) convert toxic sulphide to sulphur. Haloalkalophilic SOB are known to anaerobically remove sulphide from solution and release electrons when subsequently exposed to an electrode. This makes SOB able to spatially decouple su...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986) 2023-12, Vol.98 (12), p.2971-2980 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2980 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2971 |
container_title | Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986) |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Linssen, Rikke ter Heijne, Annemiek |
description | BACKGROUNDIn biodesulphurisation processes, sulphide oxidising bacteria (SOB) convert toxic sulphide to sulphur. Haloalkalophilic SOB are known to anaerobically remove sulphide from solution and release electrons when subsequently exposed to an electrode. This makes SOB able to spatially decouple sulphide removal and current production, thereby acting as sulphide shuttles. Little is known about the kinetics of electron release by sulphide shuttling SOB. To gain more insight into the sulphide shuttling mechanism and electron release, current production of abiotic sulphide and sulphide shuttling SOB was compared.RESULTSSOB communities dominated by Thioalkalivibrio sulfidophilus were incubated with sulphide in batch experiments. After sulphide was removed, SOB were discharged in an electrochemical cell. Anode potential, sulphide load and biomass concentration were varied. Current was produced at potentials of −0.2 V versus Ag/AgCl and higher, and at a potential of 0.1 V a coulombic efficiency of 70% was reached in 30 min. The maximum charge recovered from biologically stored sulphide was 4900 ± 810 mC mgN−1. Discharge kinetics were not affected by biomass concentration or degree of sulphide removal and kinetics of biotic and abiotic current production were similar.CONCLUSIONCurrent production of sulphide shuttling SOB and abiotic sulphide was highly similar. This implies that sulphide shuttling is based on sorption to the biomass, and that shuttled sulphide converts to sulphur directly at the electrode surface. Therefore, the sulphide shuttling strategy is not sufficient to prevent electrode passivation, and different strategies need to be applied in the design of a sulphur‐producing bioelectrochemical desulphurisation process. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jctb.7505 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2889091645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2889091645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-17f312e39eb5ea0d5ccb374575befd989faf95b8b7e2c9eea47c7e2fe06e68143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkD1PwzAYhC0EEqEw8A8iMTGkvHbirxFVpSBVYoHZsp3XTaLQFtsZ-u9JVaa74XR3egh5pLCkAOxl8NktJQd-RQoKWlaNEHBNCmBCVYxLfkvuUhoAQCgmCkLXI_oce1-2ffKdjTss3alM03js-hbL1E05j_1-VzrrM8be3pObYMeED_-6IN9v66_Ve7X93HysXreVZ5rlispQU4a1RsfRQsu9d7Vs5gcOQ6uVDjZo7pSTyLxGtI30sw0IAoWiTb0gT5feYzz8TpiyGQ5T3M-ThimlQVPR8Dn1fEn5eEgpYjDH2P_YeDIUzJmIORMxZyL1H9ruVA4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2889091645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electric discharge by sulphide shuttling bacteria</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Linssen, Rikke ; ter Heijne, Annemiek</creator><creatorcontrib>Linssen, Rikke ; ter Heijne, Annemiek</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDIn biodesulphurisation processes, sulphide oxidising bacteria (SOB) convert toxic sulphide to sulphur. Haloalkalophilic SOB are known to anaerobically remove sulphide from solution and release electrons when subsequently exposed to an electrode. This makes SOB able to spatially decouple sulphide removal and current production, thereby acting as sulphide shuttles. Little is known about the kinetics of electron release by sulphide shuttling SOB. To gain more insight into the sulphide shuttling mechanism and electron release, current production of abiotic sulphide and sulphide shuttling SOB was compared.RESULTSSOB communities dominated by Thioalkalivibrio sulfidophilus were incubated with sulphide in batch experiments. After sulphide was removed, SOB were discharged in an electrochemical cell. Anode potential, sulphide load and biomass concentration were varied. Current was produced at potentials of −0.2 V versus Ag/AgCl and higher, and at a potential of 0.1 V a coulombic efficiency of 70% was reached in 30 min. The maximum charge recovered from biologically stored sulphide was 4900 ± 810 mC mgN−1. Discharge kinetics were not affected by biomass concentration or degree of sulphide removal and kinetics of biotic and abiotic current production were similar.CONCLUSIONCurrent production of sulphide shuttling SOB and abiotic sulphide was highly similar. This implies that sulphide shuttling is based on sorption to the biomass, and that shuttled sulphide converts to sulphur directly at the electrode surface. Therefore, the sulphide shuttling strategy is not sufficient to prevent electrode passivation, and different strategies need to be applied in the design of a sulphur‐producing bioelectrochemical desulphurisation process. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-2575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jctb.7505</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Biomass ; Electric discharges ; Electrochemical cells ; Electrochemistry ; Electrodes ; Electrons ; Kinetics ; Silver chloride ; Sulfides ; Sulfur</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986), 2023-12, Vol.98 (12), p.2971-2980</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-17f312e39eb5ea0d5ccb374575befd989faf95b8b7e2c9eea47c7e2fe06e68143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-17f312e39eb5ea0d5ccb374575befd989faf95b8b7e2c9eea47c7e2fe06e68143</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8583-7365 ; 0000-0002-6882-8395</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Linssen, Rikke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ter Heijne, Annemiek</creatorcontrib><title>Electric discharge by sulphide shuttling bacteria</title><title>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986)</title><description>BACKGROUNDIn biodesulphurisation processes, sulphide oxidising bacteria (SOB) convert toxic sulphide to sulphur. Haloalkalophilic SOB are known to anaerobically remove sulphide from solution and release electrons when subsequently exposed to an electrode. This makes SOB able to spatially decouple sulphide removal and current production, thereby acting as sulphide shuttles. Little is known about the kinetics of electron release by sulphide shuttling SOB. To gain more insight into the sulphide shuttling mechanism and electron release, current production of abiotic sulphide and sulphide shuttling SOB was compared.RESULTSSOB communities dominated by Thioalkalivibrio sulfidophilus were incubated with sulphide in batch experiments. After sulphide was removed, SOB were discharged in an electrochemical cell. Anode potential, sulphide load and biomass concentration were varied. Current was produced at potentials of −0.2 V versus Ag/AgCl and higher, and at a potential of 0.1 V a coulombic efficiency of 70% was reached in 30 min. The maximum charge recovered from biologically stored sulphide was 4900 ± 810 mC mgN−1. Discharge kinetics were not affected by biomass concentration or degree of sulphide removal and kinetics of biotic and abiotic current production were similar.CONCLUSIONCurrent production of sulphide shuttling SOB and abiotic sulphide was highly similar. This implies that sulphide shuttling is based on sorption to the biomass, and that shuttled sulphide converts to sulphur directly at the electrode surface. Therefore, the sulphide shuttling strategy is not sufficient to prevent electrode passivation, and different strategies need to be applied in the design of a sulphur‐producing bioelectrochemical desulphurisation process. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Electric discharges</subject><subject>Electrochemical cells</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Silver chloride</subject><subject>Sulfides</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><issn>0268-2575</issn><issn>1097-4660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkD1PwzAYhC0EEqEw8A8iMTGkvHbirxFVpSBVYoHZsp3XTaLQFtsZ-u9JVaa74XR3egh5pLCkAOxl8NktJQd-RQoKWlaNEHBNCmBCVYxLfkvuUhoAQCgmCkLXI_oce1-2ffKdjTss3alM03js-hbL1E05j_1-VzrrM8be3pObYMeED_-6IN9v66_Ve7X93HysXreVZ5rlispQU4a1RsfRQsu9d7Vs5gcOQ6uVDjZo7pSTyLxGtI30sw0IAoWiTb0gT5feYzz8TpiyGQ5T3M-ThimlQVPR8Dn1fEn5eEgpYjDH2P_YeDIUzJmIORMxZyL1H9ruVA4</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Linssen, Rikke</creator><creator>ter Heijne, Annemiek</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8583-7365</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6882-8395</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Electric discharge by sulphide shuttling bacteria</title><author>Linssen, Rikke ; ter Heijne, Annemiek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-17f312e39eb5ea0d5ccb374575befd989faf95b8b7e2c9eea47c7e2fe06e68143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Electric discharges</topic><topic>Electrochemical cells</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Silver chloride</topic><topic>Sulfides</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linssen, Rikke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ter Heijne, Annemiek</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linssen, Rikke</au><au>ter Heijne, Annemiek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electric discharge by sulphide shuttling bacteria</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986)</jtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2971</spage><epage>2980</epage><pages>2971-2980</pages><issn>0268-2575</issn><eissn>1097-4660</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDIn biodesulphurisation processes, sulphide oxidising bacteria (SOB) convert toxic sulphide to sulphur. Haloalkalophilic SOB are known to anaerobically remove sulphide from solution and release electrons when subsequently exposed to an electrode. This makes SOB able to spatially decouple sulphide removal and current production, thereby acting as sulphide shuttles. Little is known about the kinetics of electron release by sulphide shuttling SOB. To gain more insight into the sulphide shuttling mechanism and electron release, current production of abiotic sulphide and sulphide shuttling SOB was compared.RESULTSSOB communities dominated by Thioalkalivibrio sulfidophilus were incubated with sulphide in batch experiments. After sulphide was removed, SOB were discharged in an electrochemical cell. Anode potential, sulphide load and biomass concentration were varied. Current was produced at potentials of −0.2 V versus Ag/AgCl and higher, and at a potential of 0.1 V a coulombic efficiency of 70% was reached in 30 min. The maximum charge recovered from biologically stored sulphide was 4900 ± 810 mC mgN−1. Discharge kinetics were not affected by biomass concentration or degree of sulphide removal and kinetics of biotic and abiotic current production were similar.CONCLUSIONCurrent production of sulphide shuttling SOB and abiotic sulphide was highly similar. This implies that sulphide shuttling is based on sorption to the biomass, and that shuttled sulphide converts to sulphur directly at the electrode surface. Therefore, the sulphide shuttling strategy is not sufficient to prevent electrode passivation, and different strategies need to be applied in the design of a sulphur‐producing bioelectrochemical desulphurisation process. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/jctb.7505</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8583-7365</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6882-8395</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-2575 |
ispartof | Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986), 2023-12, Vol.98 (12), p.2971-2980 |
issn | 0268-2575 1097-4660 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2889091645 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Bacteria Biomass Electric discharges Electrochemical cells Electrochemistry Electrodes Electrons Kinetics Silver chloride Sulfides Sulfur |
title | Electric discharge by sulphide shuttling bacteria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T13%3A45%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electric%20discharge%20by%20sulphide%20shuttling%20bacteria&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20technology%20and%20biotechnology%20(1986)&rft.au=Linssen,%20Rikke&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2971&rft.epage=2980&rft.pages=2971-2980&rft.issn=0268-2575&rft.eissn=1097-4660&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jctb.7505&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2889091645%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2889091645&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |