Electric discharge by sulphide shuttling bacteria

BACKGROUNDIn biodesulphurisation processes, sulphide oxidising bacteria (SOB) convert toxic sulphide to sulphur. Haloalkalophilic SOB are known to anaerobically remove sulphide from solution and release electrons when subsequently exposed to an electrode. This makes SOB able to spatially decouple su...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986) 2023-12, Vol.98 (12), p.2971-2980
Hauptverfasser: Linssen, Rikke, ter Heijne, Annemiek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2980
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2971
container_title Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986)
container_volume 98
creator Linssen, Rikke
ter Heijne, Annemiek
description BACKGROUNDIn biodesulphurisation processes, sulphide oxidising bacteria (SOB) convert toxic sulphide to sulphur. Haloalkalophilic SOB are known to anaerobically remove sulphide from solution and release electrons when subsequently exposed to an electrode. This makes SOB able to spatially decouple sulphide removal and current production, thereby acting as sulphide shuttles. Little is known about the kinetics of electron release by sulphide shuttling SOB. To gain more insight into the sulphide shuttling mechanism and electron release, current production of abiotic sulphide and sulphide shuttling SOB was compared.RESULTSSOB communities dominated by Thioalkalivibrio sulfidophilus were incubated with sulphide in batch experiments. After sulphide was removed, SOB were discharged in an electrochemical cell. Anode potential, sulphide load and biomass concentration were varied. Current was produced at potentials of −0.2 V versus Ag/AgCl and higher, and at a potential of 0.1 V a coulombic efficiency of 70% was reached in 30 min. The maximum charge recovered from biologically stored sulphide was 4900 ± 810 mC mgN−1. Discharge kinetics were not affected by biomass concentration or degree of sulphide removal and kinetics of biotic and abiotic current production were similar.CONCLUSIONCurrent production of sulphide shuttling SOB and abiotic sulphide was highly similar. This implies that sulphide shuttling is based on sorption to the biomass, and that shuttled sulphide converts to sulphur directly at the electrode surface. Therefore, the sulphide shuttling strategy is not sufficient to prevent electrode passivation, and different strategies need to be applied in the design of a sulphur‐producing bioelectrochemical desulphurisation process. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jctb.7505
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2889091645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2889091645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-17f312e39eb5ea0d5ccb374575befd989faf95b8b7e2c9eea47c7e2fe06e68143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkD1PwzAYhC0EEqEw8A8iMTGkvHbirxFVpSBVYoHZsp3XTaLQFtsZ-u9JVaa74XR3egh5pLCkAOxl8NktJQd-RQoKWlaNEHBNCmBCVYxLfkvuUhoAQCgmCkLXI_oce1-2ffKdjTss3alM03js-hbL1E05j_1-VzrrM8be3pObYMeED_-6IN9v66_Ve7X93HysXreVZ5rlispQU4a1RsfRQsu9d7Vs5gcOQ6uVDjZo7pSTyLxGtI30sw0IAoWiTb0gT5feYzz8TpiyGQ5T3M-ThimlQVPR8Dn1fEn5eEgpYjDH2P_YeDIUzJmIORMxZyL1H9ruVA4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2889091645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electric discharge by sulphide shuttling bacteria</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Linssen, Rikke ; ter Heijne, Annemiek</creator><creatorcontrib>Linssen, Rikke ; ter Heijne, Annemiek</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDIn biodesulphurisation processes, sulphide oxidising bacteria (SOB) convert toxic sulphide to sulphur. Haloalkalophilic SOB are known to anaerobically remove sulphide from solution and release electrons when subsequently exposed to an electrode. This makes SOB able to spatially decouple sulphide removal and current production, thereby acting as sulphide shuttles. Little is known about the kinetics of electron release by sulphide shuttling SOB. To gain more insight into the sulphide shuttling mechanism and electron release, current production of abiotic sulphide and sulphide shuttling SOB was compared.RESULTSSOB communities dominated by Thioalkalivibrio sulfidophilus were incubated with sulphide in batch experiments. After sulphide was removed, SOB were discharged in an electrochemical cell. Anode potential, sulphide load and biomass concentration were varied. Current was produced at potentials of −0.2 V versus Ag/AgCl and higher, and at a potential of 0.1 V a coulombic efficiency of 70% was reached in 30 min. The maximum charge recovered from biologically stored sulphide was 4900 ± 810 mC mgN−1. Discharge kinetics were not affected by biomass concentration or degree of sulphide removal and kinetics of biotic and abiotic current production were similar.CONCLUSIONCurrent production of sulphide shuttling SOB and abiotic sulphide was highly similar. This implies that sulphide shuttling is based on sorption to the biomass, and that shuttled sulphide converts to sulphur directly at the electrode surface. Therefore, the sulphide shuttling strategy is not sufficient to prevent electrode passivation, and different strategies need to be applied in the design of a sulphur‐producing bioelectrochemical desulphurisation process. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-2575</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jctb.7505</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Biomass ; Electric discharges ; Electrochemical cells ; Electrochemistry ; Electrodes ; Electrons ; Kinetics ; Silver chloride ; Sulfides ; Sulfur</subject><ispartof>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986), 2023-12, Vol.98 (12), p.2971-2980</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-17f312e39eb5ea0d5ccb374575befd989faf95b8b7e2c9eea47c7e2fe06e68143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-17f312e39eb5ea0d5ccb374575befd989faf95b8b7e2c9eea47c7e2fe06e68143</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8583-7365 ; 0000-0002-6882-8395</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Linssen, Rikke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ter Heijne, Annemiek</creatorcontrib><title>Electric discharge by sulphide shuttling bacteria</title><title>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986)</title><description>BACKGROUNDIn biodesulphurisation processes, sulphide oxidising bacteria (SOB) convert toxic sulphide to sulphur. Haloalkalophilic SOB are known to anaerobically remove sulphide from solution and release electrons when subsequently exposed to an electrode. This makes SOB able to spatially decouple sulphide removal and current production, thereby acting as sulphide shuttles. Little is known about the kinetics of electron release by sulphide shuttling SOB. To gain more insight into the sulphide shuttling mechanism and electron release, current production of abiotic sulphide and sulphide shuttling SOB was compared.RESULTSSOB communities dominated by Thioalkalivibrio sulfidophilus were incubated with sulphide in batch experiments. After sulphide was removed, SOB were discharged in an electrochemical cell. Anode potential, sulphide load and biomass concentration were varied. Current was produced at potentials of −0.2 V versus Ag/AgCl and higher, and at a potential of 0.1 V a coulombic efficiency of 70% was reached in 30 min. The maximum charge recovered from biologically stored sulphide was 4900 ± 810 mC mgN−1. Discharge kinetics were not affected by biomass concentration or degree of sulphide removal and kinetics of biotic and abiotic current production were similar.CONCLUSIONCurrent production of sulphide shuttling SOB and abiotic sulphide was highly similar. This implies that sulphide shuttling is based on sorption to the biomass, and that shuttled sulphide converts to sulphur directly at the electrode surface. Therefore, the sulphide shuttling strategy is not sufficient to prevent electrode passivation, and different strategies need to be applied in the design of a sulphur‐producing bioelectrochemical desulphurisation process. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Electric discharges</subject><subject>Electrochemical cells</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Silver chloride</subject><subject>Sulfides</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><issn>0268-2575</issn><issn>1097-4660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkD1PwzAYhC0EEqEw8A8iMTGkvHbirxFVpSBVYoHZsp3XTaLQFtsZ-u9JVaa74XR3egh5pLCkAOxl8NktJQd-RQoKWlaNEHBNCmBCVYxLfkvuUhoAQCgmCkLXI_oce1-2ffKdjTss3alM03js-hbL1E05j_1-VzrrM8be3pObYMeED_-6IN9v66_Ve7X93HysXreVZ5rlispQU4a1RsfRQsu9d7Vs5gcOQ6uVDjZo7pSTyLxGtI30sw0IAoWiTb0gT5feYzz8TpiyGQ5T3M-ThimlQVPR8Dn1fEn5eEgpYjDH2P_YeDIUzJmIORMxZyL1H9ruVA4</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Linssen, Rikke</creator><creator>ter Heijne, Annemiek</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8583-7365</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6882-8395</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Electric discharge by sulphide shuttling bacteria</title><author>Linssen, Rikke ; ter Heijne, Annemiek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-17f312e39eb5ea0d5ccb374575befd989faf95b8b7e2c9eea47c7e2fe06e68143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Electric discharges</topic><topic>Electrochemical cells</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Silver chloride</topic><topic>Sulfides</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linssen, Rikke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ter Heijne, Annemiek</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linssen, Rikke</au><au>ter Heijne, Annemiek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electric discharge by sulphide shuttling bacteria</atitle><jtitle>Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986)</jtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2971</spage><epage>2980</epage><pages>2971-2980</pages><issn>0268-2575</issn><eissn>1097-4660</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDIn biodesulphurisation processes, sulphide oxidising bacteria (SOB) convert toxic sulphide to sulphur. Haloalkalophilic SOB are known to anaerobically remove sulphide from solution and release electrons when subsequently exposed to an electrode. This makes SOB able to spatially decouple sulphide removal and current production, thereby acting as sulphide shuttles. Little is known about the kinetics of electron release by sulphide shuttling SOB. To gain more insight into the sulphide shuttling mechanism and electron release, current production of abiotic sulphide and sulphide shuttling SOB was compared.RESULTSSOB communities dominated by Thioalkalivibrio sulfidophilus were incubated with sulphide in batch experiments. After sulphide was removed, SOB were discharged in an electrochemical cell. Anode potential, sulphide load and biomass concentration were varied. Current was produced at potentials of −0.2 V versus Ag/AgCl and higher, and at a potential of 0.1 V a coulombic efficiency of 70% was reached in 30 min. The maximum charge recovered from biologically stored sulphide was 4900 ± 810 mC mgN−1. Discharge kinetics were not affected by biomass concentration or degree of sulphide removal and kinetics of biotic and abiotic current production were similar.CONCLUSIONCurrent production of sulphide shuttling SOB and abiotic sulphide was highly similar. This implies that sulphide shuttling is based on sorption to the biomass, and that shuttled sulphide converts to sulphur directly at the electrode surface. Therefore, the sulphide shuttling strategy is not sufficient to prevent electrode passivation, and different strategies need to be applied in the design of a sulphur‐producing bioelectrochemical desulphurisation process. © 2023 Society of Chemical Industry.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/jctb.7505</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8583-7365</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6882-8395</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-2575
ispartof Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (1986), 2023-12, Vol.98 (12), p.2971-2980
issn 0268-2575
1097-4660
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2889091645
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Bacteria
Biomass
Electric discharges
Electrochemical cells
Electrochemistry
Electrodes
Electrons
Kinetics
Silver chloride
Sulfides
Sulfur
title Electric discharge by sulphide shuttling bacteria
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T13%3A45%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electric%20discharge%20by%20sulphide%20shuttling%20bacteria&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20chemical%20technology%20and%20biotechnology%20(1986)&rft.au=Linssen,%20Rikke&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2971&rft.epage=2980&rft.pages=2971-2980&rft.issn=0268-2575&rft.eissn=1097-4660&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jctb.7505&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2889091645%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2889091645&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true