Viability of Living Moss for Indoor Green Walls: A Study on Temperature, Humidity, and Irrigation

There is an increasing demand for green plant walls in indoor environments because of their multifaced benefits, such as aesthetic appeal, indoor air quality improvement, or psychological well-being. Mosses are believed to be excellent for these walls due to their easy application and maintenance. H...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2023-11, Vol.15 (21), p.15625
Hauptverfasser: Zechmeister, Harald G, Möslinger, Leonie, Korjenic, Azra, Streit, Erich, Sulejmanovski, Abdulah, Frank, Patrick Niklas, Hummel, Esther
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 21
container_start_page 15625
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 15
creator Zechmeister, Harald G
Möslinger, Leonie
Korjenic, Azra
Streit, Erich
Sulejmanovski, Abdulah
Frank, Patrick Niklas
Hummel, Esther
description There is an increasing demand for green plant walls in indoor environments because of their multifaced benefits, such as aesthetic appeal, indoor air quality improvement, or psychological well-being. Mosses are believed to be excellent for these walls due to their easy application and maintenance. However, so far there is no evidence for their indoor survival. In this study, we tested the moss species Hypnum cupressiforme, Bryachythecium rutabulum, Eurrhynchium angustirete, Thuidium tamariscinum, Streblotrichum convolutum, Syntrichia ruralis, and Ceratodon purpureus for indoor use in living moss walls. We evaluated their vitality through the monitoring of leaf coloration over a twelve month period, subjecting them to varying temperature ranges (14–20 °C), humidity levels (60–100%), and diverse irrigation methods (drip and spray irrigation, 300–1500 mL per day) within controlled climate chambers. Depending on the combination of these variables, mosses survived up to six months. Hypnum cupressiforme and Ceratodon purpureus performed best. However, as the time span of survival was limited, the use of living mosses for indoor purposes at the current stage cannot be recommended. An additional problem is that the requisition of living material such as in the culturing of moss under horticultural conditions is difficult and harvesting from natural environments is detrimental to most habitats.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su152115625
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2888389131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A772536778</galeid><sourcerecordid>A772536778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-e4da9c7c097683b3af312b2244eb575d95d43ba1201d2004b624314af798a2853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd9LwzAQx4soOHRP_gMBn8R15kfTtL6NoVthIripjyVt0pLRJjNJxf33RubDdvfwPY7P9w7uougGwSkhOXxwA6IYIZpiehaNMGQoRpDC86P6Mho7t4UhCEE5SkcR_1C8Up3ye2AasFLfSrfgxTgHGmNBoYUJsrBSavDJu849ghlY-0EEXION7HfScj9YOQHLoVcizJkArgUorFUt98ro6-ii4Z2T43-9it6fnzbzZbx6XRTz2SquCUQ-longec1qmLM0IxXhDUG4wjhJZEUZFTkVCak4whAJDGFSpTghKOENyzOOM0quotvD3J01X4N0vtyaweqwssRZlpEsRwQFanqgWt7JUunGeMvrkEL2qjZaNir0Z4xhSlLGsmC4OzEExssf3_LBubJYv52y9we2tuGCVjblzqqe232JYPn3o_LoR-QXJeuAiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2888389131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Viability of Living Moss for Indoor Green Walls: A Study on Temperature, Humidity, and Irrigation</title><source>Electronic Journals Library</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Zechmeister, Harald G ; Möslinger, Leonie ; Korjenic, Azra ; Streit, Erich ; Sulejmanovski, Abdulah ; Frank, Patrick Niklas ; Hummel, Esther</creator><creatorcontrib>Zechmeister, Harald G ; Möslinger, Leonie ; Korjenic, Azra ; Streit, Erich ; Sulejmanovski, Abdulah ; Frank, Patrick Niklas ; Hummel, Esther</creatorcontrib><description>There is an increasing demand for green plant walls in indoor environments because of their multifaced benefits, such as aesthetic appeal, indoor air quality improvement, or psychological well-being. Mosses are believed to be excellent for these walls due to their easy application and maintenance. However, so far there is no evidence for their indoor survival. In this study, we tested the moss species Hypnum cupressiforme, Bryachythecium rutabulum, Eurrhynchium angustirete, Thuidium tamariscinum, Streblotrichum convolutum, Syntrichia ruralis, and Ceratodon purpureus for indoor use in living moss walls. We evaluated their vitality through the monitoring of leaf coloration over a twelve month period, subjecting them to varying temperature ranges (14–20 °C), humidity levels (60–100%), and diverse irrigation methods (drip and spray irrigation, 300–1500 mL per day) within controlled climate chambers. Depending on the combination of these variables, mosses survived up to six months. Hypnum cupressiforme and Ceratodon purpureus performed best. However, as the time span of survival was limited, the use of living mosses for indoor purposes at the current stage cannot be recommended. An additional problem is that the requisition of living material such as in the culturing of moss under horticultural conditions is difficult and harvesting from natural environments is detrimental to most habitats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su152115625</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Aesthetics ; Air pollution ; Air quality ; Humidity ; Indoor air quality ; Mosses ; Outdoor air quality ; Physiology ; Temperature</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-11, Vol.15 (21), p.15625</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-e4da9c7c097683b3af312b2244eb575d95d43ba1201d2004b624314af798a2853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-e4da9c7c097683b3af312b2244eb575d95d43ba1201d2004b624314af798a2853</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2904-9532 ; 0000-0001-6578-7244</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zechmeister, Harald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möslinger, Leonie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korjenic, Azra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streit, Erich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulejmanovski, Abdulah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Patrick Niklas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hummel, Esther</creatorcontrib><title>Viability of Living Moss for Indoor Green Walls: A Study on Temperature, Humidity, and Irrigation</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>There is an increasing demand for green plant walls in indoor environments because of their multifaced benefits, such as aesthetic appeal, indoor air quality improvement, or psychological well-being. Mosses are believed to be excellent for these walls due to their easy application and maintenance. However, so far there is no evidence for their indoor survival. In this study, we tested the moss species Hypnum cupressiforme, Bryachythecium rutabulum, Eurrhynchium angustirete, Thuidium tamariscinum, Streblotrichum convolutum, Syntrichia ruralis, and Ceratodon purpureus for indoor use in living moss walls. We evaluated their vitality through the monitoring of leaf coloration over a twelve month period, subjecting them to varying temperature ranges (14–20 °C), humidity levels (60–100%), and diverse irrigation methods (drip and spray irrigation, 300–1500 mL per day) within controlled climate chambers. Depending on the combination of these variables, mosses survived up to six months. Hypnum cupressiforme and Ceratodon purpureus performed best. However, as the time span of survival was limited, the use of living mosses for indoor purposes at the current stage cannot be recommended. An additional problem is that the requisition of living material such as in the culturing of moss under horticultural conditions is difficult and harvesting from natural environments is detrimental to most habitats.</description><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Air pollution</subject><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Humidity</subject><subject>Indoor air quality</subject><subject>Mosses</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkd9LwzAQx4soOHRP_gMBn8R15kfTtL6NoVthIripjyVt0pLRJjNJxf33RubDdvfwPY7P9w7uougGwSkhOXxwA6IYIZpiehaNMGQoRpDC86P6Mho7t4UhCEE5SkcR_1C8Up3ye2AasFLfSrfgxTgHGmNBoYUJsrBSavDJu849ghlY-0EEXION7HfScj9YOQHLoVcizJkArgUorFUt98ro6-ii4Z2T43-9it6fnzbzZbx6XRTz2SquCUQ-longec1qmLM0IxXhDUG4wjhJZEUZFTkVCak4whAJDGFSpTghKOENyzOOM0quotvD3J01X4N0vtyaweqwssRZlpEsRwQFanqgWt7JUunGeMvrkEL2qjZaNir0Z4xhSlLGsmC4OzEExssf3_LBubJYv52y9we2tuGCVjblzqqe232JYPn3o_LoR-QXJeuAiw</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Zechmeister, Harald G</creator><creator>Möslinger, Leonie</creator><creator>Korjenic, Azra</creator><creator>Streit, Erich</creator><creator>Sulejmanovski, Abdulah</creator><creator>Frank, Patrick Niklas</creator><creator>Hummel, Esther</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2904-9532</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6578-7244</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Viability of Living Moss for Indoor Green Walls: A Study on Temperature, Humidity, and Irrigation</title><author>Zechmeister, Harald G ; Möslinger, Leonie ; Korjenic, Azra ; Streit, Erich ; Sulejmanovski, Abdulah ; Frank, Patrick Niklas ; Hummel, Esther</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-e4da9c7c097683b3af312b2244eb575d95d43ba1201d2004b624314af798a2853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Air pollution</topic><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Humidity</topic><topic>Indoor air quality</topic><topic>Mosses</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zechmeister, Harald G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möslinger, Leonie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korjenic, Azra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streit, Erich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulejmanovski, Abdulah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, Patrick Niklas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hummel, Esther</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Science (Gale in Context)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zechmeister, Harald G</au><au>Möslinger, Leonie</au><au>Korjenic, Azra</au><au>Streit, Erich</au><au>Sulejmanovski, Abdulah</au><au>Frank, Patrick Niklas</au><au>Hummel, Esther</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Viability of Living Moss for Indoor Green Walls: A Study on Temperature, Humidity, and Irrigation</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>15625</spage><pages>15625-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>There is an increasing demand for green plant walls in indoor environments because of their multifaced benefits, such as aesthetic appeal, indoor air quality improvement, or psychological well-being. Mosses are believed to be excellent for these walls due to their easy application and maintenance. However, so far there is no evidence for their indoor survival. In this study, we tested the moss species Hypnum cupressiforme, Bryachythecium rutabulum, Eurrhynchium angustirete, Thuidium tamariscinum, Streblotrichum convolutum, Syntrichia ruralis, and Ceratodon purpureus for indoor use in living moss walls. We evaluated their vitality through the monitoring of leaf coloration over a twelve month period, subjecting them to varying temperature ranges (14–20 °C), humidity levels (60–100%), and diverse irrigation methods (drip and spray irrigation, 300–1500 mL per day) within controlled climate chambers. Depending on the combination of these variables, mosses survived up to six months. Hypnum cupressiforme and Ceratodon purpureus performed best. However, as the time span of survival was limited, the use of living mosses for indoor purposes at the current stage cannot be recommended. An additional problem is that the requisition of living material such as in the culturing of moss under horticultural conditions is difficult and harvesting from natural environments is detrimental to most habitats.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su152115625</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2904-9532</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6578-7244</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2023-11, Vol.15 (21), p.15625
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2888389131
source Electronic Journals Library; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
subjects Aesthetics
Air pollution
Air quality
Humidity
Indoor air quality
Mosses
Outdoor air quality
Physiology
Temperature
title Viability of Living Moss for Indoor Green Walls: A Study on Temperature, Humidity, and Irrigation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A01%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Viability%20of%20Living%20Moss%20for%20Indoor%20Green%20Walls:%20A%20Study%20on%20Temperature,%20Humidity,%20and%20Irrigation&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Zechmeister,%20Harald%20G&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=15625&rft.pages=15625-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su152115625&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA772536778%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2888389131&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A772536778&rfr_iscdi=true