Systematic Insights into a Textile Industry: Reviewing Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-Design
The worldwide textile sector is one of the most polluting and consuming natural resource value chains. In recent years, trends have demonstrated a linear model driven by fast fashion, increasing the sustainability problems of this sector. The European market and industry are changing the paradigm an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2023-10, Vol.15 (21), p.15267 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 15267 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Fonseca, Ana Ramalho, Edgar Gouveia, Ana Henriques, Rita Figueiredo, Filipa Nunes, João |
description | The worldwide textile sector is one of the most polluting and consuming natural resource value chains. In recent years, trends have demonstrated a linear model driven by fast fashion, increasing the sustainability problems of this sector. The European market and industry are changing the paradigm and promoting some actions towards a sustainable value chain. This paper applies a systematic approach to reviewing scientific research, where Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is implemented as a tool to understand the impacts considering a holistic life cycle framework, from raw materials to the end-of-life of textile products. The methodology and criteria applied resulted in 73 articles used for qualitative analysis, of which 39 met the criteria for quantitative analysis. The quantitative results reported in the studies were organized and presented by phase of the garment production life cycle (production of fiber, yarn, fabric, manufacturing, and recovery/end of life). From a cradle-to-gate perspective, wool yarn production, by worsted processing, was the material with the highest values (95.70 kg CO2 eq/kg) for climate change/global warming potential, closely followed by silk fabric (80.90 kg CO2 eq/kg). Extending to a cradle-to-grave boundary, polyester had the highest values for the previously mentioned category, reaching a potential release of 40.28 kg CO2 eq per kilogram of polyester textile. When data was available, the user phase predominantly contributed to climate change/global warming potential. Additionally, there were significant differences in maximum and minimum values for some of the materials, which were related to methodological considerations, database inventory, and frequency of use and care considered by the different authors. The study also addresses the considerations and limitations of diverse LCA impact assessment tools. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su152115267 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2888384550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A772536413</galeid><sourcerecordid>A772536413</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-9a4c8310b6f0cae2914d9106f086b76ef18e724562449f1061c92d29259a9b663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhhdRsNSe_AMBTyKr-djNbryV-lUoCG09eQhpdramtNm6k1X7743UQzthSCbzvBMmkySXjN4KoegddiznLLosTpIepwVLGc3p6cH5PBkgrmg0IZhispe8z3YYYGOCs2Ts0S0_AhLnQ0MMmcNPcGuI91WHod3dkyl8Ofh2fkkmrgYy2tmYHiIC4gZ8IMZX5NE26QPESv4iOavNGmHwv_eTt6fH-eglnbw-j0fDSWp5rkKqTGZLwehC1tQa4IpllWI0RqVcFBJqVkLBs1zyLFN1TDCreMVVFBu1kFL0k6t93W3bfHaAQa-arvXxSc3LshRlluc0Urd7amnWoJ2vm9AaG1cFG2cbD3XsVQ-LgudCZkxEwfWRIDIh_sjSdIh6PJseszd71rYNYgu13rZuY9qdZlT_TUcfTEf8ApDvftU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2888384550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic Insights into a Textile Industry: Reviewing Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-Design</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Fonseca, Ana ; Ramalho, Edgar ; Gouveia, Ana ; Henriques, Rita ; Figueiredo, Filipa ; Nunes, João</creator><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Ana ; Ramalho, Edgar ; Gouveia, Ana ; Henriques, Rita ; Figueiredo, Filipa ; Nunes, João</creatorcontrib><description>The worldwide textile sector is one of the most polluting and consuming natural resource value chains. In recent years, trends have demonstrated a linear model driven by fast fashion, increasing the sustainability problems of this sector. The European market and industry are changing the paradigm and promoting some actions towards a sustainable value chain. This paper applies a systematic approach to reviewing scientific research, where Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is implemented as a tool to understand the impacts considering a holistic life cycle framework, from raw materials to the end-of-life of textile products. The methodology and criteria applied resulted in 73 articles used for qualitative analysis, of which 39 met the criteria for quantitative analysis. The quantitative results reported in the studies were organized and presented by phase of the garment production life cycle (production of fiber, yarn, fabric, manufacturing, and recovery/end of life). From a cradle-to-gate perspective, wool yarn production, by worsted processing, was the material with the highest values (95.70 kg CO2 eq/kg) for climate change/global warming potential, closely followed by silk fabric (80.90 kg CO2 eq/kg). Extending to a cradle-to-grave boundary, polyester had the highest values for the previously mentioned category, reaching a potential release of 40.28 kg CO2 eq per kilogram of polyester textile. When data was available, the user phase predominantly contributed to climate change/global warming potential. Additionally, there were significant differences in maximum and minimum values for some of the materials, which were related to methodological considerations, database inventory, and frequency of use and care considered by the different authors. The study also addresses the considerations and limitations of diverse LCA impact assessment tools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su152115267</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Design ; Environmental impact ; Inventory ; Literature reviews ; Plastic pollution ; Product development ; Product life cycle ; Quantitative analysis ; Raw materials ; Recycling ; Software ; Strategic planning ; Sustainability ; Systematic review ; Textile industry</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-10, Vol.15 (21), p.15267</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-9a4c8310b6f0cae2914d9106f086b76ef18e724562449f1061c92d29259a9b663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6054-1074 ; 0000-0002-0778-4296 ; 0000-0002-3501-1864 ; 0000-0001-5389-1853</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramalho, Edgar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gouveia, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriques, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Filipa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, João</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic Insights into a Textile Industry: Reviewing Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-Design</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The worldwide textile sector is one of the most polluting and consuming natural resource value chains. In recent years, trends have demonstrated a linear model driven by fast fashion, increasing the sustainability problems of this sector. The European market and industry are changing the paradigm and promoting some actions towards a sustainable value chain. This paper applies a systematic approach to reviewing scientific research, where Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is implemented as a tool to understand the impacts considering a holistic life cycle framework, from raw materials to the end-of-life of textile products. The methodology and criteria applied resulted in 73 articles used for qualitative analysis, of which 39 met the criteria for quantitative analysis. The quantitative results reported in the studies were organized and presented by phase of the garment production life cycle (production of fiber, yarn, fabric, manufacturing, and recovery/end of life). From a cradle-to-gate perspective, wool yarn production, by worsted processing, was the material with the highest values (95.70 kg CO2 eq/kg) for climate change/global warming potential, closely followed by silk fabric (80.90 kg CO2 eq/kg). Extending to a cradle-to-grave boundary, polyester had the highest values for the previously mentioned category, reaching a potential release of 40.28 kg CO2 eq per kilogram of polyester textile. When data was available, the user phase predominantly contributed to climate change/global warming potential. Additionally, there were significant differences in maximum and minimum values for some of the materials, which were related to methodological considerations, database inventory, and frequency of use and care considered by the different authors. The study also addresses the considerations and limitations of diverse LCA impact assessment tools.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Inventory</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Plastic pollution</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Product life cycle</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Textile industry</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LAzEQhhdRsNSe_AMBTyKr-djNbryV-lUoCG09eQhpdramtNm6k1X7743UQzthSCbzvBMmkySXjN4KoegddiznLLosTpIepwVLGc3p6cH5PBkgrmg0IZhispe8z3YYYGOCs2Ts0S0_AhLnQ0MMmcNPcGuI91WHod3dkyl8Ofh2fkkmrgYy2tmYHiIC4gZ8IMZX5NE26QPESv4iOavNGmHwv_eTt6fH-eglnbw-j0fDSWp5rkKqTGZLwehC1tQa4IpllWI0RqVcFBJqVkLBs1zyLFN1TDCreMVVFBu1kFL0k6t93W3bfHaAQa-arvXxSc3LshRlluc0Urd7amnWoJ2vm9AaG1cFG2cbD3XsVQ-LgudCZkxEwfWRIDIh_sjSdIh6PJseszd71rYNYgu13rZuY9qdZlT_TUcfTEf8ApDvftU</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Fonseca, Ana</creator><creator>Ramalho, Edgar</creator><creator>Gouveia, Ana</creator><creator>Henriques, Rita</creator><creator>Figueiredo, Filipa</creator><creator>Nunes, João</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6054-1074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0778-4296</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3501-1864</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5389-1853</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Systematic Insights into a Textile Industry: Reviewing Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-Design</title><author>Fonseca, Ana ; Ramalho, Edgar ; Gouveia, Ana ; Henriques, Rita ; Figueiredo, Filipa ; Nunes, João</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-9a4c8310b6f0cae2914d9106f086b76ef18e724562449f1061c92d29259a9b663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Inventory</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Plastic pollution</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Product life cycle</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Textile industry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fonseca, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramalho, Edgar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gouveia, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henriques, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueiredo, Filipa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes, João</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fonseca, Ana</au><au>Ramalho, Edgar</au><au>Gouveia, Ana</au><au>Henriques, Rita</au><au>Figueiredo, Filipa</au><au>Nunes, João</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic Insights into a Textile Industry: Reviewing Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-Design</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>15267</spage><pages>15267-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The worldwide textile sector is one of the most polluting and consuming natural resource value chains. In recent years, trends have demonstrated a linear model driven by fast fashion, increasing the sustainability problems of this sector. The European market and industry are changing the paradigm and promoting some actions towards a sustainable value chain. This paper applies a systematic approach to reviewing scientific research, where Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is implemented as a tool to understand the impacts considering a holistic life cycle framework, from raw materials to the end-of-life of textile products. The methodology and criteria applied resulted in 73 articles used for qualitative analysis, of which 39 met the criteria for quantitative analysis. The quantitative results reported in the studies were organized and presented by phase of the garment production life cycle (production of fiber, yarn, fabric, manufacturing, and recovery/end of life). From a cradle-to-gate perspective, wool yarn production, by worsted processing, was the material with the highest values (95.70 kg CO2 eq/kg) for climate change/global warming potential, closely followed by silk fabric (80.90 kg CO2 eq/kg). Extending to a cradle-to-grave boundary, polyester had the highest values for the previously mentioned category, reaching a potential release of 40.28 kg CO2 eq per kilogram of polyester textile. When data was available, the user phase predominantly contributed to climate change/global warming potential. Additionally, there were significant differences in maximum and minimum values for some of the materials, which were related to methodological considerations, database inventory, and frequency of use and care considered by the different authors. The study also addresses the considerations and limitations of diverse LCA impact assessment tools.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su152115267</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6054-1074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0778-4296</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3501-1864</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5389-1853</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2023-10, Vol.15 (21), p.15267 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2888384550 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Climate change Design Environmental impact Inventory Literature reviews Plastic pollution Product development Product life cycle Quantitative analysis Raw materials Recycling Software Strategic planning Sustainability Systematic review Textile industry |
title | Systematic Insights into a Textile Industry: Reviewing Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-Design |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T05%3A39%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20Insights%20into%20a%20Textile%20Industry:%20Reviewing%20Life%20Cycle%20Assessment%20and%20Eco-Design&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Fonseca,%20Ana&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=15267&rft.pages=15267-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su152115267&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA772536413%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2888384550&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A772536413&rfr_iscdi=true |