Listing, delisting, and financial norms: a quantile decomposition of firm balance sheets

In this paper, we show that the churning generated by listing and delisting is a key mechanism for disseminating new financial norms regarding cash and debt among listed nonfinancial firms in the U.S. after 1980. Over this period, cash holdings have grown markedly across the distribution of listed U...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of evolutionary economics 2023-09, Vol.33 (4), p.1259-1302
Hauptverfasser: Davis, Leila E., de Souza, Joao Paulo A., Hernandez, Gonzalo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1302
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1259
container_title Journal of evolutionary economics
container_volume 33
creator Davis, Leila E.
de Souza, Joao Paulo A.
Hernandez, Gonzalo
description In this paper, we show that the churning generated by listing and delisting is a key mechanism for disseminating new financial norms regarding cash and debt among listed nonfinancial firms in the U.S. after 1980. Over this period, cash holdings have grown markedly across the distribution of listed U.S. nonfinancial corporations, while indebtedness has fallen in less indebted firms. Surprisingly, these trends are particularly dramatic among the most financially fragile listed firms, which generate insufficient cash flows to service their financial obligations (what Minsky terms ‘Ponzi’ firms). In this paper, we use quantile decompositions to show that these long-term trends in cash and debt are driven by churning among listed firms during the 1980s and 1990s, when listing and delisting rates are high. The reason is that firms list with more cash and less debt, and delist with less cash and more debt, than continuing firms. This mechanism is particularly strong among listed Ponzi firms. Our results highlight the importance of institutional changes surrounding access to equity finance and Initial Public Offerings, rather than changing behavior within continuing firms, for trends in listed firms’ financing behavior since 1980.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00191-023-00815-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2887143688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2887143688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-1637b6fa16ec0dcc4ce0a33993309dc2d7cdccae3319b1712336024260c91a243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAyEURYnRxPrxB1yRuBV98KbM4M40fiVN3GjijlCGqTRTaGG68N-LjqY7VxA49z44hFxwuOYA9U0G4IozEMgAGj5l6oBMeIWCcWzkIZmAQsmUwvqYnOS8AoCpgHpC3uc-Dz4sr2jr-r-tCS3tfDDBetPTENM631JDtzsTBt-7gtq43sTsBx8DjV2B05ouTF8SjuYP54Z8Ro4602d3_ruekreH-9fZE5u_PD7P7ubMVqAGxiXWC9kZLp2F1trKOjCI5aUIqrWirW05NQ6RqwWvuUCUICohwSpuRIWn5HLs3aS43bk86FXcpVBGatE0dXEgm6ZQYqRsijkn1-lN8muTPjUH_W1QjwZ1Mah_DGpVQnQMle8Gn_eRUqgaiYAFwRHJ5TIsXdpP_6f4C1jRfZc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2887143688</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Listing, delisting, and financial norms: a quantile decomposition of firm balance sheets</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Davis, Leila E. ; de Souza, Joao Paulo A. ; Hernandez, Gonzalo</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Leila E. ; de Souza, Joao Paulo A. ; Hernandez, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we show that the churning generated by listing and delisting is a key mechanism for disseminating new financial norms regarding cash and debt among listed nonfinancial firms in the U.S. after 1980. Over this period, cash holdings have grown markedly across the distribution of listed U.S. nonfinancial corporations, while indebtedness has fallen in less indebted firms. Surprisingly, these trends are particularly dramatic among the most financially fragile listed firms, which generate insufficient cash flows to service their financial obligations (what Minsky terms ‘Ponzi’ firms). In this paper, we use quantile decompositions to show that these long-term trends in cash and debt are driven by churning among listed firms during the 1980s and 1990s, when listing and delisting rates are high. The reason is that firms list with more cash and less debt, and delist with less cash and more debt, than continuing firms. This mechanism is particularly strong among listed Ponzi firms. Our results highlight the importance of institutional changes surrounding access to equity finance and Initial Public Offerings, rather than changing behavior within continuing firms, for trends in listed firms’ financing behavior since 1980.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-9937</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00191-023-00815-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Companies ; Debt ; Economic Growth ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Entrepreneurship ; Equity ; Finance ; Institutional/Evolutionary Economics ; Microeconomics ; R &amp; D/Technology Policy ; Regular Article ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Journal of evolutionary economics, 2023-09, Vol.33 (4), p.1259-1302</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-1637b6fa16ec0dcc4ce0a33993309dc2d7cdccae3319b1712336024260c91a243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-1637b6fa16ec0dcc4ce0a33993309dc2d7cdccae3319b1712336024260c91a243</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3109-9547</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00191-023-00815-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00191-023-00815-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Leila E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Joao Paulo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><title>Listing, delisting, and financial norms: a quantile decomposition of firm balance sheets</title><title>Journal of evolutionary economics</title><addtitle>J Evol Econ</addtitle><description>In this paper, we show that the churning generated by listing and delisting is a key mechanism for disseminating new financial norms regarding cash and debt among listed nonfinancial firms in the U.S. after 1980. Over this period, cash holdings have grown markedly across the distribution of listed U.S. nonfinancial corporations, while indebtedness has fallen in less indebted firms. Surprisingly, these trends are particularly dramatic among the most financially fragile listed firms, which generate insufficient cash flows to service their financial obligations (what Minsky terms ‘Ponzi’ firms). In this paper, we use quantile decompositions to show that these long-term trends in cash and debt are driven by churning among listed firms during the 1980s and 1990s, when listing and delisting rates are high. The reason is that firms list with more cash and less debt, and delist with less cash and more debt, than continuing firms. This mechanism is particularly strong among listed Ponzi firms. Our results highlight the importance of institutional changes surrounding access to equity finance and Initial Public Offerings, rather than changing behavior within continuing firms, for trends in listed firms’ financing behavior since 1980.</description><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Debt</subject><subject>Economic Growth</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Institutional/Evolutionary Economics</subject><subject>Microeconomics</subject><subject>R &amp; D/Technology Policy</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0936-9937</issn><issn>1432-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PAyEURYnRxPrxB1yRuBV98KbM4M40fiVN3GjijlCGqTRTaGG68N-LjqY7VxA49z44hFxwuOYA9U0G4IozEMgAGj5l6oBMeIWCcWzkIZmAQsmUwvqYnOS8AoCpgHpC3uc-Dz4sr2jr-r-tCS3tfDDBetPTENM631JDtzsTBt-7gtq43sTsBx8DjV2B05ouTF8SjuYP54Z8Ro4602d3_ruekreH-9fZE5u_PD7P7ubMVqAGxiXWC9kZLp2F1trKOjCI5aUIqrWirW05NQ6RqwWvuUCUICohwSpuRIWn5HLs3aS43bk86FXcpVBGatE0dXEgm6ZQYqRsijkn1-lN8muTPjUH_W1QjwZ1Mah_DGpVQnQMle8Gn_eRUqgaiYAFwRHJ5TIsXdpP_6f4C1jRfZc</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Davis, Leila E.</creator><creator>de Souza, Joao Paulo A.</creator><creator>Hernandez, Gonzalo</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A3</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3109-9547</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Listing, delisting, and financial norms: a quantile decomposition of firm balance sheets</title><author>Davis, Leila E. ; de Souza, Joao Paulo A. ; Hernandez, Gonzalo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-1637b6fa16ec0dcc4ce0a33993309dc2d7cdccae3319b1712336024260c91a243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Debt</topic><topic>Economic Growth</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Institutional/Evolutionary Economics</topic><topic>Microeconomics</topic><topic>R &amp; D/Technology Policy</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Leila E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Souza, Joao Paulo A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Gonzalo</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Leila E.</au><au>de Souza, Joao Paulo A.</au><au>Hernandez, Gonzalo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Listing, delisting, and financial norms: a quantile decomposition of firm balance sheets</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evolutionary economics</jtitle><stitle>J Evol Econ</stitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1259</spage><epage>1302</epage><pages>1259-1302</pages><issn>0936-9937</issn><eissn>1432-1386</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we show that the churning generated by listing and delisting is a key mechanism for disseminating new financial norms regarding cash and debt among listed nonfinancial firms in the U.S. after 1980. Over this period, cash holdings have grown markedly across the distribution of listed U.S. nonfinancial corporations, while indebtedness has fallen in less indebted firms. Surprisingly, these trends are particularly dramatic among the most financially fragile listed firms, which generate insufficient cash flows to service their financial obligations (what Minsky terms ‘Ponzi’ firms). In this paper, we use quantile decompositions to show that these long-term trends in cash and debt are driven by churning among listed firms during the 1980s and 1990s, when listing and delisting rates are high. The reason is that firms list with more cash and less debt, and delist with less cash and more debt, than continuing firms. This mechanism is particularly strong among listed Ponzi firms. Our results highlight the importance of institutional changes surrounding access to equity finance and Initial Public Offerings, rather than changing behavior within continuing firms, for trends in listed firms’ financing behavior since 1980.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00191-023-00815-9</doi><tpages>44</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3109-9547</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-9937
ispartof Journal of evolutionary economics, 2023-09, Vol.33 (4), p.1259-1302
issn 0936-9937
1432-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2887143688
source SpringerLink Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Companies
Debt
Economic Growth
Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods
Economics
Economics and Finance
Entrepreneurship
Equity
Finance
Institutional/Evolutionary Economics
Microeconomics
R & D/Technology Policy
Regular Article
Trends
title Listing, delisting, and financial norms: a quantile decomposition of firm balance sheets
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T08%3A39%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Listing,%20delisting,%20and%20financial%20norms:%20a%20quantile%20decomposition%20of%20firm%20balance%20sheets&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evolutionary%20economics&rft.au=Davis,%20Leila%20E.&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1259&rft.epage=1302&rft.pages=1259-1302&rft.issn=0936-9937&rft.eissn=1432-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00191-023-00815-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2887143688%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2887143688&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true