P.055 Does age matter in the CaRMS neurology match?
Background: The Canadian Resident Matching Services (CaRMS) collects comprehensive data on residency applicants. However, match outcomes by age were not reported. It was unclear whether older applicants found it more difficult to match to the specialties of their choice, i.e. does age influence matc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of neurological sciences 2023-06, Vol.50 (s2), p.S73-S73 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S73 |
---|---|
container_issue | s2 |
container_start_page | S73 |
container_title | Canadian journal of neurological sciences |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Young, A Ng, M |
description | Background: The Canadian Resident Matching Services (CaRMS) collects comprehensive data on residency applicants. However, match outcomes by age were not reported. It was unclear whether older applicants found it more difficult to match to the specialties of their choice, i.e. does age influence match? We ask in particular, does age affect the neurology match? Methods: In response to written request, CaRMS provided pre-pandemic age data for 2015-2019 inclusive, divided into group 1 (30 or younger) and group 2 (31-40 inclusive). Results: In 2019, 39 of the 69 group 1 and 6 of the 23 group 2 neurology applicants were matched into neurology (odds ratio (OR)=2.2|p=0.01). In contrast, urology (OR=6|p=0.001) had the worst odds and family medicine (OR=1.2|p=0.002) had the best odds for older applicants in 2019. Average OR (2015-2019) was 1.6 for neurology, 3.1 for urology, 1.3 for family medicine, and between 1.3 and 3.1 for nearly all other specialties. Conclusions: Older neurology applicants were less likely to match than younger peers while match probability was statistically significantly lower in nearly all specialties for older applicants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/cjn.2023.159 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2887050655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_cjn_2023_159</cupid><sourcerecordid>2887050655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1429-71bc76f3fd094b491315cc1b832187b25771e6a9e7dd50c0f69b7893e5e4955b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4wMssSVhxs7Y8Qqh8pSKQDzWluM4fahNipMs-vekaiU2rO5iztwrHcYuEVIE1Dd-WacChEyRzBEbCSCdABIdsxFI1AkqjafsrG2XAEKRykZMvqdAxO-b0HI3C3ztui5Evqh5Nw984j5eP3kd-tismtl2d_Xz23N2UrlVGy4OOWbfjw9fk-dk-vb0MrmbJh4zYRKNhdeqklUJJisygxLJeyxyKTDXhSCtMShngi5LAg-VMoXOjQwUMkNUyDG72vduYvPTh7azy6aP9TBpRZ5rIFBEA3W9p3xs2jaGym7iYu3i1iLYnRY7aLE7LXbQMuDpAXfrIi7KWfhr_ffhF0buYK8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2887050655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>P.055 Does age matter in the CaRMS neurology match?</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Young, A ; Ng, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, A ; Ng, M</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The Canadian Resident Matching Services (CaRMS) collects comprehensive data on residency applicants. However, match outcomes by age were not reported. It was unclear whether older applicants found it more difficult to match to the specialties of their choice, i.e. does age influence match? We ask in particular, does age affect the neurology match? Methods: In response to written request, CaRMS provided pre-pandemic age data for 2015-2019 inclusive, divided into group 1 (30 or younger) and group 2 (31-40 inclusive). Results: In 2019, 39 of the 69 group 1 and 6 of the 23 group 2 neurology applicants were matched into neurology (odds ratio (OR)=2.2|p=0.01). In contrast, urology (OR=6|p=0.001) had the worst odds and family medicine (OR=1.2|p=0.002) had the best odds for older applicants in 2019. Average OR (2015-2019) was 1.6 for neurology, 3.1 for urology, 1.3 for family medicine, and between 1.3 and 3.1 for nearly all other specialties. Conclusions: Older neurology applicants were less likely to match than younger peers while match probability was statistically significantly lower in nearly all specialties for older applicants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0317-1671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2057-0155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2023.159</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Abstracts ; Adult Neurology (CNS/CSC) ; Neurology ; Other Adult Neurology ; Poster Presentations ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of neurological sciences, 2023-06, Vol.50 (s2), p.S73-S73</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0317167123001592/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, M</creatorcontrib><title>P.055 Does age matter in the CaRMS neurology match?</title><title>Canadian journal of neurological sciences</title><addtitle>Can. J. Neurol. Sci</addtitle><description>Background: The Canadian Resident Matching Services (CaRMS) collects comprehensive data on residency applicants. However, match outcomes by age were not reported. It was unclear whether older applicants found it more difficult to match to the specialties of their choice, i.e. does age influence match? We ask in particular, does age affect the neurology match? Methods: In response to written request, CaRMS provided pre-pandemic age data for 2015-2019 inclusive, divided into group 1 (30 or younger) and group 2 (31-40 inclusive). Results: In 2019, 39 of the 69 group 1 and 6 of the 23 group 2 neurology applicants were matched into neurology (odds ratio (OR)=2.2|p=0.01). In contrast, urology (OR=6|p=0.001) had the worst odds and family medicine (OR=1.2|p=0.002) had the best odds for older applicants in 2019. Average OR (2015-2019) was 1.6 for neurology, 3.1 for urology, 1.3 for family medicine, and between 1.3 and 3.1 for nearly all other specialties. Conclusions: Older neurology applicants were less likely to match than younger peers while match probability was statistically significantly lower in nearly all specialties for older applicants.</description><subject>Abstracts</subject><subject>Adult Neurology (CNS/CSC)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Other Adult Neurology</subject><subject>Poster Presentations</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0317-1671</issn><issn>2057-0155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMtOwzAQRS0EEqWw4wMssSVhxs7Y8Qqh8pSKQDzWluM4fahNipMs-vekaiU2rO5iztwrHcYuEVIE1Dd-WacChEyRzBEbCSCdABIdsxFI1AkqjafsrG2XAEKRykZMvqdAxO-b0HI3C3ztui5Evqh5Nw984j5eP3kd-tismtl2d_Xz23N2UrlVGy4OOWbfjw9fk-dk-vb0MrmbJh4zYRKNhdeqklUJJisygxLJeyxyKTDXhSCtMShngi5LAg-VMoXOjQwUMkNUyDG72vduYvPTh7azy6aP9TBpRZ5rIFBEA3W9p3xs2jaGym7iYu3i1iLYnRY7aLE7LXbQMuDpAXfrIi7KWfhr_ffhF0buYK8</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Young, A</creator><creator>Ng, M</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>P.055 Does age matter in the CaRMS neurology match?</title><author>Young, A ; Ng, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1429-71bc76f3fd094b491315cc1b832187b25771e6a9e7dd50c0f69b7893e5e4955b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abstracts</topic><topic>Adult Neurology (CNS/CSC)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Other Adult Neurology</topic><topic>Poster Presentations</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of neurological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, A</au><au>Ng, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P.055 Does age matter in the CaRMS neurology match?</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of neurological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Can. J. Neurol. Sci</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>s2</issue><spage>S73</spage><epage>S73</epage><pages>S73-S73</pages><issn>0317-1671</issn><eissn>2057-0155</eissn><abstract>Background: The Canadian Resident Matching Services (CaRMS) collects comprehensive data on residency applicants. However, match outcomes by age were not reported. It was unclear whether older applicants found it more difficult to match to the specialties of their choice, i.e. does age influence match? We ask in particular, does age affect the neurology match? Methods: In response to written request, CaRMS provided pre-pandemic age data for 2015-2019 inclusive, divided into group 1 (30 or younger) and group 2 (31-40 inclusive). Results: In 2019, 39 of the 69 group 1 and 6 of the 23 group 2 neurology applicants were matched into neurology (odds ratio (OR)=2.2|p=0.01). In contrast, urology (OR=6|p=0.001) had the worst odds and family medicine (OR=1.2|p=0.002) had the best odds for older applicants in 2019. Average OR (2015-2019) was 1.6 for neurology, 3.1 for urology, 1.3 for family medicine, and between 1.3 and 3.1 for nearly all other specialties. Conclusions: Older neurology applicants were less likely to match than younger peers while match probability was statistically significantly lower in nearly all specialties for older applicants.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/cjn.2023.159</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0317-1671 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of neurological sciences, 2023-06, Vol.50 (s2), p.S73-S73 |
issn | 0317-1671 2057-0155 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2887050655 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Abstracts Adult Neurology (CNS/CSC) Neurology Other Adult Neurology Poster Presentations Urology |
title | P.055 Does age matter in the CaRMS neurology match? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T23%3A23%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P.055%20Does%20age%20matter%20in%20the%20CaRMS%20neurology%20match?&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20neurological%20sciences&rft.au=Young,%20A&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=s2&rft.spage=S73&rft.epage=S73&rft.pages=S73-S73&rft.issn=0317-1671&rft.eissn=2057-0155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/cjn.2023.159&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2887050655%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2887050655&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_cjn_2023_159&rfr_iscdi=true |