Meta-governance, uncertainty and self-organization in corporatist social service sectors: The case of Hong Kong

This article explores the relationship between meta-governance, uncertainty and governance network responses. A social network analysis was conducted on the interlocking directorate network among nonprofits before and after a market-oriented collibration triggered by a new public management reform t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International review of administrative sciences 2023-12, Vol.89 (4), p.1186-1202
1. Verfasser: Wang, Xiao Lu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1202
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1186
container_title International review of administrative sciences
container_volume 89
creator Wang, Xiao Lu
description This article explores the relationship between meta-governance, uncertainty and governance network responses. A social network analysis was conducted on the interlocking directorate network among nonprofits before and after a market-oriented collibration triggered by a new public management reform to the corporatist social service provision system in Hong Kong. By unpacking and showing the distinct processes of network formation in response to substantive and strategic uncertainty arising from the market-oriented collibration, the study shows that although more nonprofit actors were directly included in the formalized policy venues after the reform, the network density and clustering coefficient dropped after the reform, potentially reducing the self-coordinating capacity of the governance network. However, for some nonprofit actors, node betweenness centrality increased and node degree centrality decreased, creating an enabling condition for adaption. Points for practitioners The uncertainties in meta-governance may bring about network processes at variance with the original intentions of public meta-governors that actors with complementary resources and competences combine their efforts in the provision of services and service innovation. To manage substantive and strategic uncertainties, public meta-governors need to find ways to increase the shared understandings of social problems, enhance the clarity of policy goals, and find a balance when collaborating between collaborative and market modes of governance.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00208523221147617
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2886964649</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00208523221147617</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2886964649</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-76076e4f4033444e3c1e8915ef6452beedb0622e41b76f3c978de1353859db223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wFvAq1szSTbJepOiVqx4qeclm51dt9RNTbaF-utNqeBBvMxjmO89mEfIJbAJgNY3jHFmci44B5BagT4iI5AKMs25Oiaj_T3bA6fkLMYlYyANmBHxLzjYrPVbDL3tHV7TTZphsF0_7Kjtaxpx1WQ-tLbvvuzQ-Z52PXU-rH1Iaxxo9K6zq8SFbecwqRt8iLd08Y7U2YjUN3Tm-5Y-p3FOThq7injxo2Py9nC_mM6y-evj0_RunjkBfMi0YlqhbCQTQkqJwgGaAnJslMx5hVhXTHGOEiqtGuEKbWoEkQuTF3XFuRiTq0PuOvjPDcahXPpNenEVS26MKpRUskgUHCgXfIwBm3Idug8bdiWwct9r-afX5JkcPNG2-Jv6v-Eb8e53rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2886964649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meta-governance, uncertainty and self-organization in corporatist social service sectors: The case of Hong Kong</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Wang, Xiao Lu</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao Lu</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the relationship between meta-governance, uncertainty and governance network responses. A social network analysis was conducted on the interlocking directorate network among nonprofits before and after a market-oriented collibration triggered by a new public management reform to the corporatist social service provision system in Hong Kong. By unpacking and showing the distinct processes of network formation in response to substantive and strategic uncertainty arising from the market-oriented collibration, the study shows that although more nonprofit actors were directly included in the formalized policy venues after the reform, the network density and clustering coefficient dropped after the reform, potentially reducing the self-coordinating capacity of the governance network. However, for some nonprofit actors, node betweenness centrality increased and node degree centrality decreased, creating an enabling condition for adaption. Points for practitioners The uncertainties in meta-governance may bring about network processes at variance with the original intentions of public meta-governors that actors with complementary resources and competences combine their efforts in the provision of services and service innovation. To manage substantive and strategic uncertainties, public meta-governors need to find ways to increase the shared understandings of social problems, enhance the clarity of policy goals, and find a balance when collaborating between collaborative and market modes of governance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-8523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00208523221147617</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Clustering ; Collaboration ; Density ; Governance ; Governors ; Innovations ; Interconnections ; Markets ; Network centrality ; New public management ; Nonprofit organizations ; Public administration ; Reforms ; Social network analysis ; Social problems ; Social reform ; Social response ; Social services delivery ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>International review of administrative sciences, 2023-12, Vol.89 (4), p.1186-1202</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-76076e4f4033444e3c1e8915ef6452beedb0622e41b76f3c978de1353859db223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-76076e4f4033444e3c1e8915ef6452beedb0622e41b76f3c978de1353859db223</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4192-5195</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00208523221147617$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00208523221147617$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,33773,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao Lu</creatorcontrib><title>Meta-governance, uncertainty and self-organization in corporatist social service sectors: The case of Hong Kong</title><title>International review of administrative sciences</title><addtitle>International Review of Administrative Sciences</addtitle><description>This article explores the relationship between meta-governance, uncertainty and governance network responses. A social network analysis was conducted on the interlocking directorate network among nonprofits before and after a market-oriented collibration triggered by a new public management reform to the corporatist social service provision system in Hong Kong. By unpacking and showing the distinct processes of network formation in response to substantive and strategic uncertainty arising from the market-oriented collibration, the study shows that although more nonprofit actors were directly included in the formalized policy venues after the reform, the network density and clustering coefficient dropped after the reform, potentially reducing the self-coordinating capacity of the governance network. However, for some nonprofit actors, node betweenness centrality increased and node degree centrality decreased, creating an enabling condition for adaption. Points for practitioners The uncertainties in meta-governance may bring about network processes at variance with the original intentions of public meta-governors that actors with complementary resources and competences combine their efforts in the provision of services and service innovation. To manage substantive and strategic uncertainties, public meta-governors need to find ways to increase the shared understandings of social problems, enhance the clarity of policy goals, and find a balance when collaborating between collaborative and market modes of governance.</description><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Interconnections</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Network centrality</subject><subject>New public management</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Social network analysis</subject><subject>Social problems</subject><subject>Social reform</subject><subject>Social response</subject><subject>Social services delivery</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0020-8523</issn><issn>1461-7226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wFvAq1szSTbJepOiVqx4qeclm51dt9RNTbaF-utNqeBBvMxjmO89mEfIJbAJgNY3jHFmci44B5BagT4iI5AKMs25Oiaj_T3bA6fkLMYlYyANmBHxLzjYrPVbDL3tHV7TTZphsF0_7Kjtaxpx1WQ-tLbvvuzQ-Z52PXU-rH1Iaxxo9K6zq8SFbecwqRt8iLd08Y7U2YjUN3Tm-5Y-p3FOThq7injxo2Py9nC_mM6y-evj0_RunjkBfMi0YlqhbCQTQkqJwgGaAnJslMx5hVhXTHGOEiqtGuEKbWoEkQuTF3XFuRiTq0PuOvjPDcahXPpNenEVS26MKpRUskgUHCgXfIwBm3Idug8bdiWwct9r-afX5JkcPNG2-Jv6v-Eb8e53rw</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Wang, Xiao Lu</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4192-5195</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Meta-governance, uncertainty and self-organization in corporatist social service sectors: The case of Hong Kong</title><author>Wang, Xiao Lu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-76076e4f4033444e3c1e8915ef6452beedb0622e41b76f3c978de1353859db223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Interconnections</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Network centrality</topic><topic>New public management</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Social network analysis</topic><topic>Social problems</topic><topic>Social reform</topic><topic>Social response</topic><topic>Social services delivery</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao Lu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International review of administrative sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Xiao Lu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meta-governance, uncertainty and self-organization in corporatist social service sectors: The case of Hong Kong</atitle><jtitle>International review of administrative sciences</jtitle><addtitle>International Review of Administrative Sciences</addtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1186</spage><epage>1202</epage><pages>1186-1202</pages><issn>0020-8523</issn><eissn>1461-7226</eissn><abstract>This article explores the relationship between meta-governance, uncertainty and governance network responses. A social network analysis was conducted on the interlocking directorate network among nonprofits before and after a market-oriented collibration triggered by a new public management reform to the corporatist social service provision system in Hong Kong. By unpacking and showing the distinct processes of network formation in response to substantive and strategic uncertainty arising from the market-oriented collibration, the study shows that although more nonprofit actors were directly included in the formalized policy venues after the reform, the network density and clustering coefficient dropped after the reform, potentially reducing the self-coordinating capacity of the governance network. However, for some nonprofit actors, node betweenness centrality increased and node degree centrality decreased, creating an enabling condition for adaption. Points for practitioners The uncertainties in meta-governance may bring about network processes at variance with the original intentions of public meta-governors that actors with complementary resources and competences combine their efforts in the provision of services and service innovation. To manage substantive and strategic uncertainties, public meta-governors need to find ways to increase the shared understandings of social problems, enhance the clarity of policy goals, and find a balance when collaborating between collaborative and market modes of governance.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00208523221147617</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4192-5195</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-8523
ispartof International review of administrative sciences, 2023-12, Vol.89 (4), p.1186-1202
issn 0020-8523
1461-7226
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2886964649
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Clustering
Collaboration
Density
Governance
Governors
Innovations
Interconnections
Markets
Network centrality
New public management
Nonprofit organizations
Public administration
Reforms
Social network analysis
Social problems
Social reform
Social response
Social services delivery
Uncertainty
title Meta-governance, uncertainty and self-organization in corporatist social service sectors: The case of Hong Kong
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T04%3A53%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meta-governance,%20uncertainty%20and%20self-organization%20in%20corporatist%20social%20service%20sectors:%20The%20case%20of%20Hong%20Kong&rft.jtitle=International%20review%20of%20administrative%20sciences&rft.au=Wang,%20Xiao%20Lu&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1186&rft.epage=1202&rft.pages=1186-1202&rft.issn=0020-8523&rft.eissn=1461-7226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00208523221147617&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2886964649%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2886964649&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00208523221147617&rfr_iscdi=true