Meta-governance, uncertainty and self-organization in corporatist social service sectors: The case of Hong Kong
This article explores the relationship between meta-governance, uncertainty and governance network responses. A social network analysis was conducted on the interlocking directorate network among nonprofits before and after a market-oriented collibration triggered by a new public management reform t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International review of administrative sciences 2023-12, Vol.89 (4), p.1186-1202 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1202 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1186 |
container_title | International review of administrative sciences |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Wang, Xiao Lu |
description | This article explores the relationship between meta-governance, uncertainty and governance network responses. A social network analysis was conducted on the interlocking directorate network among nonprofits before and after a market-oriented collibration triggered by a new public management reform to the corporatist social service provision system in Hong Kong. By unpacking and showing the distinct processes of network formation in response to substantive and strategic uncertainty arising from the market-oriented collibration, the study shows that although more nonprofit actors were directly included in the formalized policy venues after the reform, the network density and clustering coefficient dropped after the reform, potentially reducing the self-coordinating capacity of the governance network. However, for some nonprofit actors, node betweenness centrality increased and node degree centrality decreased, creating an enabling condition for adaption.
Points for practitioners
The uncertainties in meta-governance may bring about network processes at variance with the original intentions of public meta-governors that actors with complementary resources and competences combine their efforts in the provision of services and service innovation.
To manage substantive and strategic uncertainties, public meta-governors need to find ways to increase the shared understandings of social problems, enhance the clarity of policy goals, and find a balance when collaborating between collaborative and market modes of governance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00208523221147617 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2886964649</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00208523221147617</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2886964649</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-76076e4f4033444e3c1e8915ef6452beedb0622e41b76f3c978de1353859db223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wFvAq1szSTbJepOiVqx4qeclm51dt9RNTbaF-utNqeBBvMxjmO89mEfIJbAJgNY3jHFmci44B5BagT4iI5AKMs25Oiaj_T3bA6fkLMYlYyANmBHxLzjYrPVbDL3tHV7TTZphsF0_7Kjtaxpx1WQ-tLbvvuzQ-Z52PXU-rH1Iaxxo9K6zq8SFbecwqRt8iLd08Y7U2YjUN3Tm-5Y-p3FOThq7injxo2Py9nC_mM6y-evj0_RunjkBfMi0YlqhbCQTQkqJwgGaAnJslMx5hVhXTHGOEiqtGuEKbWoEkQuTF3XFuRiTq0PuOvjPDcahXPpNenEVS26MKpRUskgUHCgXfIwBm3Idug8bdiWwct9r-afX5JkcPNG2-Jv6v-Eb8e53rw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2886964649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meta-governance, uncertainty and self-organization in corporatist social service sectors: The case of Hong Kong</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Wang, Xiao Lu</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao Lu</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores the relationship between meta-governance, uncertainty and governance network responses. A social network analysis was conducted on the interlocking directorate network among nonprofits before and after a market-oriented collibration triggered by a new public management reform to the corporatist social service provision system in Hong Kong. By unpacking and showing the distinct processes of network formation in response to substantive and strategic uncertainty arising from the market-oriented collibration, the study shows that although more nonprofit actors were directly included in the formalized policy venues after the reform, the network density and clustering coefficient dropped after the reform, potentially reducing the self-coordinating capacity of the governance network. However, for some nonprofit actors, node betweenness centrality increased and node degree centrality decreased, creating an enabling condition for adaption.
Points for practitioners
The uncertainties in meta-governance may bring about network processes at variance with the original intentions of public meta-governors that actors with complementary resources and competences combine their efforts in the provision of services and service innovation.
To manage substantive and strategic uncertainties, public meta-governors need to find ways to increase the shared understandings of social problems, enhance the clarity of policy goals, and find a balance when collaborating between collaborative and market modes of governance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-8523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-7226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00208523221147617</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Clustering ; Collaboration ; Density ; Governance ; Governors ; Innovations ; Interconnections ; Markets ; Network centrality ; New public management ; Nonprofit organizations ; Public administration ; Reforms ; Social network analysis ; Social problems ; Social reform ; Social response ; Social services delivery ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>International review of administrative sciences, 2023-12, Vol.89 (4), p.1186-1202</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-76076e4f4033444e3c1e8915ef6452beedb0622e41b76f3c978de1353859db223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-76076e4f4033444e3c1e8915ef6452beedb0622e41b76f3c978de1353859db223</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4192-5195</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00208523221147617$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00208523221147617$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,33773,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao Lu</creatorcontrib><title>Meta-governance, uncertainty and self-organization in corporatist social service sectors: The case of Hong Kong</title><title>International review of administrative sciences</title><addtitle>International Review of Administrative Sciences</addtitle><description>This article explores the relationship between meta-governance, uncertainty and governance network responses. A social network analysis was conducted on the interlocking directorate network among nonprofits before and after a market-oriented collibration triggered by a new public management reform to the corporatist social service provision system in Hong Kong. By unpacking and showing the distinct processes of network formation in response to substantive and strategic uncertainty arising from the market-oriented collibration, the study shows that although more nonprofit actors were directly included in the formalized policy venues after the reform, the network density and clustering coefficient dropped after the reform, potentially reducing the self-coordinating capacity of the governance network. However, for some nonprofit actors, node betweenness centrality increased and node degree centrality decreased, creating an enabling condition for adaption.
Points for practitioners
The uncertainties in meta-governance may bring about network processes at variance with the original intentions of public meta-governors that actors with complementary resources and competences combine their efforts in the provision of services and service innovation.
To manage substantive and strategic uncertainties, public meta-governors need to find ways to increase the shared understandings of social problems, enhance the clarity of policy goals, and find a balance when collaborating between collaborative and market modes of governance.</description><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Governors</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Interconnections</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Network centrality</subject><subject>New public management</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Social network analysis</subject><subject>Social problems</subject><subject>Social reform</subject><subject>Social response</subject><subject>Social services delivery</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0020-8523</issn><issn>1461-7226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_wFvAq1szSTbJepOiVqx4qeclm51dt9RNTbaF-utNqeBBvMxjmO89mEfIJbAJgNY3jHFmci44B5BagT4iI5AKMs25Oiaj_T3bA6fkLMYlYyANmBHxLzjYrPVbDL3tHV7TTZphsF0_7Kjtaxpx1WQ-tLbvvuzQ-Z52PXU-rH1Iaxxo9K6zq8SFbecwqRt8iLd08Y7U2YjUN3Tm-5Y-p3FOThq7injxo2Py9nC_mM6y-evj0_RunjkBfMi0YlqhbCQTQkqJwgGaAnJslMx5hVhXTHGOEiqtGuEKbWoEkQuTF3XFuRiTq0PuOvjPDcahXPpNenEVS26MKpRUskgUHCgXfIwBm3Idug8bdiWwct9r-afX5JkcPNG2-Jv6v-Eb8e53rw</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Wang, Xiao Lu</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4192-5195</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>Meta-governance, uncertainty and self-organization in corporatist social service sectors: The case of Hong Kong</title><author>Wang, Xiao Lu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-76076e4f4033444e3c1e8915ef6452beedb0622e41b76f3c978de1353859db223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Governors</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Interconnections</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Network centrality</topic><topic>New public management</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Social network analysis</topic><topic>Social problems</topic><topic>Social reform</topic><topic>Social response</topic><topic>Social services delivery</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao Lu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International review of administrative sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Xiao Lu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meta-governance, uncertainty and self-organization in corporatist social service sectors: The case of Hong Kong</atitle><jtitle>International review of administrative sciences</jtitle><addtitle>International Review of Administrative Sciences</addtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1186</spage><epage>1202</epage><pages>1186-1202</pages><issn>0020-8523</issn><eissn>1461-7226</eissn><abstract>This article explores the relationship between meta-governance, uncertainty and governance network responses. A social network analysis was conducted on the interlocking directorate network among nonprofits before and after a market-oriented collibration triggered by a new public management reform to the corporatist social service provision system in Hong Kong. By unpacking and showing the distinct processes of network formation in response to substantive and strategic uncertainty arising from the market-oriented collibration, the study shows that although more nonprofit actors were directly included in the formalized policy venues after the reform, the network density and clustering coefficient dropped after the reform, potentially reducing the self-coordinating capacity of the governance network. However, for some nonprofit actors, node betweenness centrality increased and node degree centrality decreased, creating an enabling condition for adaption.
Points for practitioners
The uncertainties in meta-governance may bring about network processes at variance with the original intentions of public meta-governors that actors with complementary resources and competences combine their efforts in the provision of services and service innovation.
To manage substantive and strategic uncertainties, public meta-governors need to find ways to increase the shared understandings of social problems, enhance the clarity of policy goals, and find a balance when collaborating between collaborative and market modes of governance.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00208523221147617</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4192-5195</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-8523 |
ispartof | International review of administrative sciences, 2023-12, Vol.89 (4), p.1186-1202 |
issn | 0020-8523 1461-7226 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2886964649 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Clustering Collaboration Density Governance Governors Innovations Interconnections Markets Network centrality New public management Nonprofit organizations Public administration Reforms Social network analysis Social problems Social reform Social response Social services delivery Uncertainty |
title | Meta-governance, uncertainty and self-organization in corporatist social service sectors: The case of Hong Kong |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T04%3A53%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meta-governance,%20uncertainty%20and%20self-organization%20in%20corporatist%20social%20service%20sectors:%20The%20case%20of%20Hong%20Kong&rft.jtitle=International%20review%20of%20administrative%20sciences&rft.au=Wang,%20Xiao%20Lu&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1186&rft.epage=1202&rft.pages=1186-1202&rft.issn=0020-8523&rft.eissn=1461-7226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00208523221147617&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2886964649%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2886964649&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00208523221147617&rfr_iscdi=true |