Cavendish’s Aesthetic Realism

This paper offers a new interpretation of Margaret Cavendish’s remarks on beauty. According to it, Cavendish takes beauty to be a real, response-independent quality of objects. In this sense, Cavendish is an aesthetic realist. In broad outline, I argue, this position remains constant throughout her...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophers' imprint 2023, Vol.23, p.1-17
1. Verfasser: Whiting, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Philosophers' imprint
container_volume 23
creator Whiting, Daniel
description This paper offers a new interpretation of Margaret Cavendish’s remarks on beauty. According to it, Cavendish takes beauty to be a real, response-independent quality of objects. In this sense, Cavendish is an aesthetic realist. In broad outline, I argue, this position remains constant throughout her writings. While there are passages in Cavendish’s work that might seem to count against this reading—specifically, passages on disagreement in aesthetic judgement, on the power of beauty to elicit the passions, and on our inability to specify the nature of beauty—I show that, when situated against the background of Cavendish’s broader metaphysical views, those passages in fact support the realist interpretation.
doi_str_mv 10.3998/phimp.1538
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2886645561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2886645561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-ddc7d90254a11f97534743f6f091ac65bc56cd2ba813051b6a04d357f456b2e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMlKA0EARBtRMEYv_oABb8LE3pdjGNwgIIiCt6anF6ZDJjN2TwRv_oa_55fYMR48VR2KquIBcI7gnCglr4c2dsMcMSIPwKQIqTiWr4f__DE4yXkFIRZQ4Am4qM2737iY2-_Przxb-Dy2fox29uTNOubuFBwFs87-7E-n4OX25rm-r5aPdw_1YllZzOhYOWeFU7B4g1BQghEqKAk8QIWM5ayxjFuHGyMRgQw13EDqCBOBMt5gz8kUXO57h9S_bcsLveq3aVMmNZaSc8oYRyV1tU_Z1OecfNBDip1JHxpBvQOgfwHoHQDyAxTtTcs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2886645561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cavendish’s Aesthetic Realism</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Whiting, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Whiting, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>This paper offers a new interpretation of Margaret Cavendish’s remarks on beauty. According to it, Cavendish takes beauty to be a real, response-independent quality of objects. In this sense, Cavendish is an aesthetic realist. In broad outline, I argue, this position remains constant throughout her writings. While there are passages in Cavendish’s work that might seem to count against this reading—specifically, passages on disagreement in aesthetic judgement, on the power of beauty to elicit the passions, and on our inability to specify the nature of beauty—I show that, when situated against the background of Cavendish’s broader metaphysical views, those passages in fact support the realist interpretation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-628X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-628X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3998/phimp.1538</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press</publisher><ispartof>Philosophers' imprint, 2023, Vol.23, p.1-17</ispartof><rights>Copyright University of Michigan Press 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-ddc7d90254a11f97534743f6f091ac65bc56cd2ba813051b6a04d357f456b2e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whiting, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Cavendish’s Aesthetic Realism</title><title>Philosophers' imprint</title><description>This paper offers a new interpretation of Margaret Cavendish’s remarks on beauty. According to it, Cavendish takes beauty to be a real, response-independent quality of objects. In this sense, Cavendish is an aesthetic realist. In broad outline, I argue, this position remains constant throughout her writings. While there are passages in Cavendish’s work that might seem to count against this reading—specifically, passages on disagreement in aesthetic judgement, on the power of beauty to elicit the passions, and on our inability to specify the nature of beauty—I show that, when situated against the background of Cavendish’s broader metaphysical views, those passages in fact support the realist interpretation.</description><issn>1533-628X</issn><issn>1533-628X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMlKA0EARBtRMEYv_oABb8LE3pdjGNwgIIiCt6anF6ZDJjN2TwRv_oa_55fYMR48VR2KquIBcI7gnCglr4c2dsMcMSIPwKQIqTiWr4f__DE4yXkFIRZQ4Am4qM2737iY2-_Przxb-Dy2fox29uTNOubuFBwFs87-7E-n4OX25rm-r5aPdw_1YllZzOhYOWeFU7B4g1BQghEqKAk8QIWM5ayxjFuHGyMRgQw13EDqCBOBMt5gz8kUXO57h9S_bcsLveq3aVMmNZaSc8oYRyV1tU_Z1OecfNBDip1JHxpBvQOgfwHoHQDyAxTtTcs</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Whiting, Daniel</creator><general>University of Michigan Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Cavendish’s Aesthetic Realism</title><author>Whiting, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-ddc7d90254a11f97534743f6f091ac65bc56cd2ba813051b6a04d357f456b2e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whiting, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Philosophers' imprint</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whiting, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cavendish’s Aesthetic Realism</atitle><jtitle>Philosophers' imprint</jtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>1-17</pages><issn>1533-628X</issn><eissn>1533-628X</eissn><abstract>This paper offers a new interpretation of Margaret Cavendish’s remarks on beauty. According to it, Cavendish takes beauty to be a real, response-independent quality of objects. In this sense, Cavendish is an aesthetic realist. In broad outline, I argue, this position remains constant throughout her writings. While there are passages in Cavendish’s work that might seem to count against this reading—specifically, passages on disagreement in aesthetic judgement, on the power of beauty to elicit the passions, and on our inability to specify the nature of beauty—I show that, when situated against the background of Cavendish’s broader metaphysical views, those passages in fact support the realist interpretation.</abstract><cop>Ann Arbor</cop><pub>University of Michigan Press</pub><doi>10.3998/phimp.1538</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1533-628X
ispartof Philosophers' imprint, 2023, Vol.23, p.1-17
issn 1533-628X
1533-628X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2886645561
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Cavendish’s Aesthetic Realism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T13%3A47%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cavendish%E2%80%99s%20Aesthetic%20Realism&rft.jtitle=Philosophers'%20imprint&rft.au=Whiting,%20Daniel&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=23&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=1-17&rft.issn=1533-628X&rft.eissn=1533-628X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3998/phimp.1538&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2886645561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2886645561&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true