Knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in the community of Zoquital, Morelos, Mexico

Through their traditional productive activities, peasant and indigenous communities have generated knowledge on the use and management of wildlife to satisfy their needs for food, medicine or even to complement their basic food basket through the marketing of the species. The objective of this resea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ethnobiology and Conservation 2023-01, Vol.12, p.1-18
Hauptverfasser: Bello Román, Mónica, García Flores, Alejandro, Pino Moreno, José Manuel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 18
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Ethnobiology and Conservation
container_volume 12
creator Bello Román, Mónica
García Flores, Alejandro
Pino Moreno, José Manuel
description Through their traditional productive activities, peasant and indigenous communities have generated knowledge on the use and management of wildlife to satisfy their needs for food, medicine or even to complement their basic food basket through the marketing of the species. The objective of this research was to analyze the knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in a rural community in the southwestern part of the state of Morelos, Mexico. The methodology included participant observation, semistructured interviews and guided tours and methods for obtaining and analyzing quantitative data “such as analysis of variance, a Mann‒Whitney U test and X2 test”. The interviewees recognized a total of 57 species of wildlife, of which 22 are used as food, medicine, ornament, amulets, furs and agricultural tools in four traditional production units. In addition, eight species were reported in the oral tradition. Four hunting techniques and five weapons were documented, with the shotgun being the most commonly used. Two factors regulate hunting in the community: the closed season and religion. A total of 62,454 kg of useful biomass was recorded, with mammals being the group that contributed the most kilograms, followed by reptiles and birds. There were no significant differences in species consumption, across months or rainy and dry seasons due to factors regulating hunting. Based on the total value index of the species, Odocoileus virginianus was the most important for the inhabitants of the community.
doi_str_mv 10.15451/ec2023-03-12.08-1-18
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2886644581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2886644581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-1746767b6eda310c2699104b10883cce1609c574ccb9b9e75987dc1e6b0a7d1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUM1OwzAYqxBITGOPgBSJ6zLyJW2SHtHEnxjiAhcuUZp-HZnaZjSZxt6ewjhwsiVblu0suwS2gCIv4BodZ1xQJijwBdMUKOiTbMK50DRXmp_-4-fZLMYNYwwEL4QqJpl76sO-xXqNc7KLSGxfkzTY2icfetuSzvZ2jR32iYSG7H1bt75B4nuSPpC40HW73qfDj_gePnc-2XZOnsOAbYgjwS_vwkV21tg24uwPp9nb3e3r8oGuXu4flzcr6riGREHlUklVSaytAOa4LEtgeQVMa-EcgmSlK1TuXFVWJaqi1Kp2gLJiVtXQiGl2dczdDmMVjMlswm4YV0TDtZYyzwsNo6s4utwQYhywMdvBd3Y4GGDm91JzvNQwYYAbpg0Y0OIbGA1pxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2886644581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in the community of Zoquital, Morelos, Mexico</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bello Román, Mónica ; García Flores, Alejandro ; Pino Moreno, José Manuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Bello Román, Mónica ; García Flores, Alejandro ; Pino Moreno, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><description>Through their traditional productive activities, peasant and indigenous communities have generated knowledge on the use and management of wildlife to satisfy their needs for food, medicine or even to complement their basic food basket through the marketing of the species. The objective of this research was to analyze the knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in a rural community in the southwestern part of the state of Morelos, Mexico. The methodology included participant observation, semistructured interviews and guided tours and methods for obtaining and analyzing quantitative data “such as analysis of variance, a Mann‒Whitney U test and X2 test”. The interviewees recognized a total of 57 species of wildlife, of which 22 are used as food, medicine, ornament, amulets, furs and agricultural tools in four traditional production units. In addition, eight species were reported in the oral tradition. Four hunting techniques and five weapons were documented, with the shotgun being the most commonly used. Two factors regulate hunting in the community: the closed season and religion. A total of 62,454 kg of useful biomass was recorded, with mammals being the group that contributed the most kilograms, followed by reptiles and birds. There were no significant differences in species consumption, across months or rainy and dry seasons due to factors regulating hunting. Based on the total value index of the species, Odocoileus virginianus was the most important for the inhabitants of the community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2238-4782</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2238-4782</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15451/ec2023-03-12.08-1-18</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Recife: Ethnobiology and Conservation</publisher><subject>Chi-square test ; Dry season ; Food ; Hunting ; Indigenous peoples ; Predation ; Rainy season ; Reptiles ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Shotguns ; Species ; Variance analysis ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Ethnobiology and Conservation, 2023-01, Vol.12, p.1-18</ispartof><rights>Copyright Ethnobiology and Conservation 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-1746767b6eda310c2699104b10883cce1609c574ccb9b9e75987dc1e6b0a7d1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-1746767b6eda310c2699104b10883cce1609c574ccb9b9e75987dc1e6b0a7d1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bello Román, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Flores, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pino Moreno, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in the community of Zoquital, Morelos, Mexico</title><title>Ethnobiology and Conservation</title><description>Through their traditional productive activities, peasant and indigenous communities have generated knowledge on the use and management of wildlife to satisfy their needs for food, medicine or even to complement their basic food basket through the marketing of the species. The objective of this research was to analyze the knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in a rural community in the southwestern part of the state of Morelos, Mexico. The methodology included participant observation, semistructured interviews and guided tours and methods for obtaining and analyzing quantitative data “such as analysis of variance, a Mann‒Whitney U test and X2 test”. The interviewees recognized a total of 57 species of wildlife, of which 22 are used as food, medicine, ornament, amulets, furs and agricultural tools in four traditional production units. In addition, eight species were reported in the oral tradition. Four hunting techniques and five weapons were documented, with the shotgun being the most commonly used. Two factors regulate hunting in the community: the closed season and religion. A total of 62,454 kg of useful biomass was recorded, with mammals being the group that contributed the most kilograms, followed by reptiles and birds. There were no significant differences in species consumption, across months or rainy and dry seasons due to factors regulating hunting. Based on the total value index of the species, Odocoileus virginianus was the most important for the inhabitants of the community.</description><subject>Chi-square test</subject><subject>Dry season</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Rainy season</subject><subject>Reptiles</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Shotguns</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>2238-4782</issn><issn>2238-4782</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUM1OwzAYqxBITGOPgBSJ6zLyJW2SHtHEnxjiAhcuUZp-HZnaZjSZxt6ewjhwsiVblu0suwS2gCIv4BodZ1xQJijwBdMUKOiTbMK50DRXmp_-4-fZLMYNYwwEL4QqJpl76sO-xXqNc7KLSGxfkzTY2icfetuSzvZ2jR32iYSG7H1bt75B4nuSPpC40HW73qfDj_gePnc-2XZOnsOAbYgjwS_vwkV21tg24uwPp9nb3e3r8oGuXu4flzcr6riGREHlUklVSaytAOa4LEtgeQVMa-EcgmSlK1TuXFVWJaqi1Kp2gLJiVtXQiGl2dczdDmMVjMlswm4YV0TDtZYyzwsNo6s4utwQYhywMdvBd3Y4GGDm91JzvNQwYYAbpg0Y0OIbGA1pxA</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Bello Román, Mónica</creator><creator>García Flores, Alejandro</creator><creator>Pino Moreno, José Manuel</creator><general>Ethnobiology and Conservation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in the community of Zoquital, Morelos, Mexico</title><author>Bello Román, Mónica ; García Flores, Alejandro ; Pino Moreno, José Manuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-1746767b6eda310c2699104b10883cce1609c574ccb9b9e75987dc1e6b0a7d1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Chi-square test</topic><topic>Dry season</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Rainy season</topic><topic>Reptiles</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Shotguns</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bello Román, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Flores, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pino Moreno, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ethnobiology and Conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bello Román, Mónica</au><au>García Flores, Alejandro</au><au>Pino Moreno, José Manuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in the community of Zoquital, Morelos, Mexico</atitle><jtitle>Ethnobiology and Conservation</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>1-18</pages><issn>2238-4782</issn><eissn>2238-4782</eissn><abstract>Through their traditional productive activities, peasant and indigenous communities have generated knowledge on the use and management of wildlife to satisfy their needs for food, medicine or even to complement their basic food basket through the marketing of the species. The objective of this research was to analyze the knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in a rural community in the southwestern part of the state of Morelos, Mexico. The methodology included participant observation, semistructured interviews and guided tours and methods for obtaining and analyzing quantitative data “such as analysis of variance, a Mann‒Whitney U test and X2 test”. The interviewees recognized a total of 57 species of wildlife, of which 22 are used as food, medicine, ornament, amulets, furs and agricultural tools in four traditional production units. In addition, eight species were reported in the oral tradition. Four hunting techniques and five weapons were documented, with the shotgun being the most commonly used. Two factors regulate hunting in the community: the closed season and religion. A total of 62,454 kg of useful biomass was recorded, with mammals being the group that contributed the most kilograms, followed by reptiles and birds. There were no significant differences in species consumption, across months or rainy and dry seasons due to factors regulating hunting. Based on the total value index of the species, Odocoileus virginianus was the most important for the inhabitants of the community.</abstract><cop>Recife</cop><pub>Ethnobiology and Conservation</pub><doi>10.15451/ec2023-03-12.08-1-18</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2238-4782
ispartof Ethnobiology and Conservation, 2023-01, Vol.12, p.1-18
issn 2238-4782
2238-4782
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2886644581
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Chi-square test
Dry season
Food
Hunting
Indigenous peoples
Predation
Rainy season
Reptiles
Rural areas
Rural communities
Shotguns
Species
Variance analysis
Wildlife
Wildlife management
title Knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in the community of Zoquital, Morelos, Mexico
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T09%3A48%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge,%20use%20and%20traditional%20management%20of%20wildlife%20in%20the%20community%20of%20Zoquital,%20Morelos,%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=Ethnobiology%20and%20Conservation&rft.au=Bello%20Rom%C3%A1n,%20M%C3%B3nica&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=1-18&rft.issn=2238-4782&rft.eissn=2238-4782&rft_id=info:doi/10.15451/ec2023-03-12.08-1-18&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2886644581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2886644581&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true