Knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in the community of Zoquital, Morelos, Mexico
Through their traditional productive activities, peasant and indigenous communities have generated knowledge on the use and management of wildlife to satisfy their needs for food, medicine or even to complement their basic food basket through the marketing of the species. The objective of this resea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ethnobiology and Conservation 2023-01, Vol.12, p.1-18 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 18 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Ethnobiology and Conservation |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Bello Román, Mónica García Flores, Alejandro Pino Moreno, José Manuel |
description | Through their traditional productive activities, peasant and indigenous communities have generated knowledge on the use and management of wildlife to satisfy their needs for food, medicine or even to complement their basic food basket through the marketing of the species. The objective of this research was to analyze the knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in a rural community in the southwestern part of the state of Morelos, Mexico. The methodology included participant observation, semistructured interviews and guided tours and methods for obtaining and analyzing quantitative data “such as analysis of variance, a Mann‒Whitney U test and X2 test”. The interviewees recognized a total of 57 species of wildlife, of which 22 are used as food, medicine, ornament, amulets, furs and agricultural tools in four traditional production units. In addition, eight species were reported in the oral tradition. Four hunting techniques and five weapons were documented, with the shotgun being the most commonly used. Two factors regulate hunting in the community: the closed season and religion. A total of 62,454 kg of useful biomass was recorded, with mammals being the group that contributed the most kilograms, followed by reptiles and birds. There were no significant differences in species consumption, across months or rainy and dry seasons due to factors regulating hunting. Based on the total value index of the species, Odocoileus virginianus was the most important for the inhabitants of the community. |
doi_str_mv | 10.15451/ec2023-03-12.08-1-18 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2886644581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2886644581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-1746767b6eda310c2699104b10883cce1609c574ccb9b9e75987dc1e6b0a7d1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUM1OwzAYqxBITGOPgBSJ6zLyJW2SHtHEnxjiAhcuUZp-HZnaZjSZxt6ewjhwsiVblu0suwS2gCIv4BodZ1xQJijwBdMUKOiTbMK50DRXmp_-4-fZLMYNYwwEL4QqJpl76sO-xXqNc7KLSGxfkzTY2icfetuSzvZ2jR32iYSG7H1bt75B4nuSPpC40HW73qfDj_gePnc-2XZOnsOAbYgjwS_vwkV21tg24uwPp9nb3e3r8oGuXu4flzcr6riGREHlUklVSaytAOa4LEtgeQVMa-EcgmSlK1TuXFVWJaqi1Kp2gLJiVtXQiGl2dczdDmMVjMlswm4YV0TDtZYyzwsNo6s4utwQYhywMdvBd3Y4GGDm91JzvNQwYYAbpg0Y0OIbGA1pxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2886644581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in the community of Zoquital, Morelos, Mexico</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bello Román, Mónica ; García Flores, Alejandro ; Pino Moreno, José Manuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Bello Román, Mónica ; García Flores, Alejandro ; Pino Moreno, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><description>Through their traditional productive activities, peasant and indigenous communities have generated knowledge on the use and management of wildlife to satisfy their needs for food, medicine or even to complement their basic food basket through the marketing of the species. The objective of this research was to analyze the knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in a rural community in the southwestern part of the state of Morelos, Mexico. The methodology included participant observation, semistructured interviews and guided tours and methods for obtaining and analyzing quantitative data “such as analysis of variance, a Mann‒Whitney U test and X2 test”. The interviewees recognized a total of 57 species of wildlife, of which 22 are used as food, medicine, ornament, amulets, furs and agricultural tools in four traditional production units. In addition, eight species were reported in the oral tradition. Four hunting techniques and five weapons were documented, with the shotgun being the most commonly used. Two factors regulate hunting in the community: the closed season and religion. A total of 62,454 kg of useful biomass was recorded, with mammals being the group that contributed the most kilograms, followed by reptiles and birds. There were no significant differences in species consumption, across months or rainy and dry seasons due to factors regulating hunting. Based on the total value index of the species, Odocoileus virginianus was the most important for the inhabitants of the community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2238-4782</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2238-4782</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15451/ec2023-03-12.08-1-18</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Recife: Ethnobiology and Conservation</publisher><subject>Chi-square test ; Dry season ; Food ; Hunting ; Indigenous peoples ; Predation ; Rainy season ; Reptiles ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Shotguns ; Species ; Variance analysis ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Ethnobiology and Conservation, 2023-01, Vol.12, p.1-18</ispartof><rights>Copyright Ethnobiology and Conservation 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-1746767b6eda310c2699104b10883cce1609c574ccb9b9e75987dc1e6b0a7d1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-1746767b6eda310c2699104b10883cce1609c574ccb9b9e75987dc1e6b0a7d1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bello Román, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Flores, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pino Moreno, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in the community of Zoquital, Morelos, Mexico</title><title>Ethnobiology and Conservation</title><description>Through their traditional productive activities, peasant and indigenous communities have generated knowledge on the use and management of wildlife to satisfy their needs for food, medicine or even to complement their basic food basket through the marketing of the species. The objective of this research was to analyze the knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in a rural community in the southwestern part of the state of Morelos, Mexico. The methodology included participant observation, semistructured interviews and guided tours and methods for obtaining and analyzing quantitative data “such as analysis of variance, a Mann‒Whitney U test and X2 test”. The interviewees recognized a total of 57 species of wildlife, of which 22 are used as food, medicine, ornament, amulets, furs and agricultural tools in four traditional production units. In addition, eight species were reported in the oral tradition. Four hunting techniques and five weapons were documented, with the shotgun being the most commonly used. Two factors regulate hunting in the community: the closed season and religion. A total of 62,454 kg of useful biomass was recorded, with mammals being the group that contributed the most kilograms, followed by reptiles and birds. There were no significant differences in species consumption, across months or rainy and dry seasons due to factors regulating hunting. Based on the total value index of the species, Odocoileus virginianus was the most important for the inhabitants of the community.</description><subject>Chi-square test</subject><subject>Dry season</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Rainy season</subject><subject>Reptiles</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Shotguns</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>2238-4782</issn><issn>2238-4782</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUM1OwzAYqxBITGOPgBSJ6zLyJW2SHtHEnxjiAhcuUZp-HZnaZjSZxt6ewjhwsiVblu0suwS2gCIv4BodZ1xQJijwBdMUKOiTbMK50DRXmp_-4-fZLMYNYwwEL4QqJpl76sO-xXqNc7KLSGxfkzTY2icfetuSzvZ2jR32iYSG7H1bt75B4nuSPpC40HW73qfDj_gePnc-2XZOnsOAbYgjwS_vwkV21tg24uwPp9nb3e3r8oGuXu4flzcr6riGREHlUklVSaytAOa4LEtgeQVMa-EcgmSlK1TuXFVWJaqi1Kp2gLJiVtXQiGl2dczdDmMVjMlswm4YV0TDtZYyzwsNo6s4utwQYhywMdvBd3Y4GGDm91JzvNQwYYAbpg0Y0OIbGA1pxA</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Bello Román, Mónica</creator><creator>García Flores, Alejandro</creator><creator>Pino Moreno, José Manuel</creator><general>Ethnobiology and Conservation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in the community of Zoquital, Morelos, Mexico</title><author>Bello Román, Mónica ; García Flores, Alejandro ; Pino Moreno, José Manuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-1746767b6eda310c2699104b10883cce1609c574ccb9b9e75987dc1e6b0a7d1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Chi-square test</topic><topic>Dry season</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Rainy season</topic><topic>Reptiles</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Shotguns</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bello Román, Mónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García Flores, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pino Moreno, José Manuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ethnobiology and Conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bello Román, Mónica</au><au>García Flores, Alejandro</au><au>Pino Moreno, José Manuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in the community of Zoquital, Morelos, Mexico</atitle><jtitle>Ethnobiology and Conservation</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>1-18</pages><issn>2238-4782</issn><eissn>2238-4782</eissn><abstract>Through their traditional productive activities, peasant and indigenous communities have generated knowledge on the use and management of wildlife to satisfy their needs for food, medicine or even to complement their basic food basket through the marketing of the species. The objective of this research was to analyze the knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in a rural community in the southwestern part of the state of Morelos, Mexico. The methodology included participant observation, semistructured interviews and guided tours and methods for obtaining and analyzing quantitative data “such as analysis of variance, a Mann‒Whitney U test and X2 test”. The interviewees recognized a total of 57 species of wildlife, of which 22 are used as food, medicine, ornament, amulets, furs and agricultural tools in four traditional production units. In addition, eight species were reported in the oral tradition. Four hunting techniques and five weapons were documented, with the shotgun being the most commonly used. Two factors regulate hunting in the community: the closed season and religion. A total of 62,454 kg of useful biomass was recorded, with mammals being the group that contributed the most kilograms, followed by reptiles and birds. There were no significant differences in species consumption, across months or rainy and dry seasons due to factors regulating hunting. Based on the total value index of the species, Odocoileus virginianus was the most important for the inhabitants of the community.</abstract><cop>Recife</cop><pub>Ethnobiology and Conservation</pub><doi>10.15451/ec2023-03-12.08-1-18</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2238-4782 |
ispartof | Ethnobiology and Conservation, 2023-01, Vol.12, p.1-18 |
issn | 2238-4782 2238-4782 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2886644581 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Chi-square test Dry season Food Hunting Indigenous peoples Predation Rainy season Reptiles Rural areas Rural communities Shotguns Species Variance analysis Wildlife Wildlife management |
title | Knowledge, use and traditional management of wildlife in the community of Zoquital, Morelos, Mexico |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T09%3A48%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge,%20use%20and%20traditional%20management%20of%20wildlife%20in%20the%20community%20of%20Zoquital,%20Morelos,%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=Ethnobiology%20and%20Conservation&rft.au=Bello%20Rom%C3%A1n,%20M%C3%B3nica&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=1-18&rft.issn=2238-4782&rft.eissn=2238-4782&rft_id=info:doi/10.15451/ec2023-03-12.08-1-18&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2886644581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2886644581&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |