Irish Nationalist and Republican Attitudes to the Good Friday Agreement: Sell-Out or Steppingstone?
This article examines attitudes across Irish republicanism and nationalism to the 1998 Good Friday Agreement (GFA). The research draws on qualitative interviews conducted between 2009–2018, throughout the nationalist and republican spectrum, charting evolving attitudes across this green base. Interv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Razprave in gradivo - Institut za narodnostna vprasanja (1990) 2023-06, Vol.90 (90), p.79-95 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 95 |
---|---|
container_issue | 90 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | Razprave in gradivo - Institut za narodnostna vprasanja (1990) |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | McGlinchey, Marisa |
description | This article examines attitudes across Irish republicanism and nationalism to the 1998 Good Friday Agreement (GFA). The research draws on qualitative interviews conducted between 2009–2018, throughout the nationalist and republican spectrum, charting evolving attitudes across this green base. Interviewees include GFA negotiators, including the SDLP, a key architect of the Agreement, and Sinn Féin, the party that went on to claim ownership of the GFA. Interviews were also conducted with dissident Irish republicans who have never accepted the GFA. This article puts a particular focus on nationalist and republican attitudes to armed actions in pursuit of Irish unity. Further, it examines attitudes across the Irish republican/nationalist spectrum to a potential border-poll, resulting from the central principle of the GFA (consent); and analyses positions on the required 50 % plus one for Irish unity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2478/tdjes-2023-0006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2885623812</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2885623812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2339-53d518204745cd17b6d65996b51f269a98b2e33f626fc1c737852e058ffacc6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAcxYMoOKdnrwHPdfnRpKkgMoabg-HA6blkybdbR9fUJEX239s5wZOn7zu893jfD0K3lNyzNFOjaHcQEkYYTwgh8gwNqBJpIqii52hAeK8JU_ISXYWwI0RkhKcDZOa-Clv8qmPlGl1XIWLdWPwGbbeuK6MbPI6xip2FgKPDcQt45pzFU19ZfcDjjQfYQxMf8ArqOll2ETuPVxHatmo2IboGnq7RRanrADe_d4g-ps_vk5dksZzNJ-NFYhjneSK47ccykmapMJZma2mlyHO5FrRkMte5WjPgvJRMloaajGdKMCBClaU2Rmo-RHen3ta7zw5CLHau8_1XoWBKCcm4oqx3jU4u410IHsqi9dVe-0NBSXEkWfyQLI4kiyPJPvF4SnzpOoK3sPHdoRd_9f8kc5KTLOffLdF7Wg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2885623812</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Irish Nationalist and Republican Attitudes to the Good Friday Agreement: Sell-Out or Steppingstone?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>McGlinchey, Marisa</creator><creatorcontrib>McGlinchey, Marisa</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines attitudes across Irish republicanism and nationalism to the 1998 Good Friday Agreement (GFA). The research draws on qualitative interviews conducted between 2009–2018, throughout the nationalist and republican spectrum, charting evolving attitudes across this green base. Interviewees include GFA negotiators, including the SDLP, a key architect of the Agreement, and Sinn Féin, the party that went on to claim ownership of the GFA. Interviews were also conducted with dissident Irish republicans who have never accepted the GFA. This article puts a particular focus on nationalist and republican attitudes to armed actions in pursuit of Irish unity. Further, it examines attitudes across the Irish republican/nationalist spectrum to a potential border-poll, resulting from the central principle of the GFA (consent); and analyses positions on the required 50 % plus one for Irish unity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0354-0286</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1854-5181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/tdjes-2023-0006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ljubljana: Sciendo</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Architecture ; Attitudes ; Dissent ; dissident republican ; Interviews ; IRA ; Irish nationalism ; Irish republicanism ; Nationalism ; Nobel prizes ; Ownership ; Political leadership ; Political parties ; Republicanism ; SDLP ; Sinn Féin ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Razprave in gradivo - Institut za narodnostna vprasanja (1990), 2023-06, Vol.90 (90), p.79-95</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute for Ethnic Studies Jun 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2339-53d518204745cd17b6d65996b51f269a98b2e33f626fc1c737852e058ffacc6a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824,27321,27901,27902,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McGlinchey, Marisa</creatorcontrib><title>Irish Nationalist and Republican Attitudes to the Good Friday Agreement: Sell-Out or Steppingstone?</title><title>Razprave in gradivo - Institut za narodnostna vprasanja (1990)</title><description>This article examines attitudes across Irish republicanism and nationalism to the 1998 Good Friday Agreement (GFA). The research draws on qualitative interviews conducted between 2009–2018, throughout the nationalist and republican spectrum, charting evolving attitudes across this green base. Interviewees include GFA negotiators, including the SDLP, a key architect of the Agreement, and Sinn Féin, the party that went on to claim ownership of the GFA. Interviews were also conducted with dissident Irish republicans who have never accepted the GFA. This article puts a particular focus on nationalist and republican attitudes to armed actions in pursuit of Irish unity. Further, it examines attitudes across the Irish republican/nationalist spectrum to a potential border-poll, resulting from the central principle of the GFA (consent); and analyses positions on the required 50 % plus one for Irish unity.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Architecture</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Dissent</subject><subject>dissident republican</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>IRA</subject><subject>Irish nationalism</subject><subject>Irish republicanism</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Nobel prizes</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Political leadership</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Republicanism</subject><subject>SDLP</subject><subject>Sinn Féin</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0354-0286</issn><issn>1854-5181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>LD-</sourceid><sourceid>LD.</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAcxYMoOKdnrwHPdfnRpKkgMoabg-HA6blkybdbR9fUJEX239s5wZOn7zu893jfD0K3lNyzNFOjaHcQEkYYTwgh8gwNqBJpIqii52hAeK8JU_ISXYWwI0RkhKcDZOa-Clv8qmPlGl1XIWLdWPwGbbeuK6MbPI6xip2FgKPDcQt45pzFU19ZfcDjjQfYQxMf8ArqOll2ETuPVxHatmo2IboGnq7RRanrADe_d4g-ps_vk5dksZzNJ-NFYhjneSK47ccykmapMJZma2mlyHO5FrRkMte5WjPgvJRMloaajGdKMCBClaU2Rmo-RHen3ta7zw5CLHau8_1XoWBKCcm4oqx3jU4u410IHsqi9dVe-0NBSXEkWfyQLI4kiyPJPvF4SnzpOoK3sPHdoRd_9f8kc5KTLOffLdF7Wg</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>McGlinchey, Marisa</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>Institute for Ethnic Studies</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LD.</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PETBT</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PHNHU</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PMKZF</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Irish Nationalist and Republican Attitudes to the Good Friday Agreement: Sell-Out or Steppingstone?</title><author>McGlinchey, Marisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2339-53d518204745cd17b6d65996b51f269a98b2e33f626fc1c737852e058ffacc6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Architecture</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Dissent</topic><topic>dissident republican</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>IRA</topic><topic>Irish nationalism</topic><topic>Irish republicanism</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Nobel prizes</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Political leadership</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Republicanism</topic><topic>SDLP</topic><topic>Sinn Féin</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McGlinchey, Marisa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch (Alumni)</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest Global & International Studies Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Global Studies & International Relations</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Digital Collections</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Razprave in gradivo - Institut za narodnostna vprasanja (1990)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McGlinchey, Marisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Irish Nationalist and Republican Attitudes to the Good Friday Agreement: Sell-Out or Steppingstone?</atitle><jtitle>Razprave in gradivo - Institut za narodnostna vprasanja (1990)</jtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>90</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>95</epage><pages>79-95</pages><issn>0354-0286</issn><eissn>1854-5181</eissn><abstract>This article examines attitudes across Irish republicanism and nationalism to the 1998 Good Friday Agreement (GFA). The research draws on qualitative interviews conducted between 2009–2018, throughout the nationalist and republican spectrum, charting evolving attitudes across this green base. Interviewees include GFA negotiators, including the SDLP, a key architect of the Agreement, and Sinn Féin, the party that went on to claim ownership of the GFA. Interviews were also conducted with dissident Irish republicans who have never accepted the GFA. This article puts a particular focus on nationalist and republican attitudes to armed actions in pursuit of Irish unity. Further, it examines attitudes across the Irish republican/nationalist spectrum to a potential border-poll, resulting from the central principle of the GFA (consent); and analyses positions on the required 50 % plus one for Irish unity.</abstract><cop>Ljubljana</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><doi>10.2478/tdjes-2023-0006</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0354-0286 |
ispartof | Razprave in gradivo - Institut za narodnostna vprasanja (1990), 2023-06, Vol.90 (90), p.79-95 |
issn | 0354-0286 1854-5181 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2885623812 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Agreements Architecture Attitudes Dissent dissident republican Interviews IRA Irish nationalism Irish republicanism Nationalism Nobel prizes Ownership Political leadership Political parties Republicanism SDLP Sinn Féin Violence |
title | Irish Nationalist and Republican Attitudes to the Good Friday Agreement: Sell-Out or Steppingstone? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T22%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Irish%20Nationalist%20and%20Republican%20Attitudes%20to%20the%20Good%20Friday%20Agreement:%20Sell-Out%20or%20Steppingstone?&rft.jtitle=Razprave%20in%20gradivo%20-%20Institut%20za%20narodnostna%20vprasanja%20(1990)&rft.au=McGlinchey,%20Marisa&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=90&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=95&rft.pages=79-95&rft.issn=0354-0286&rft.eissn=1854-5181&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/tdjes-2023-0006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2885623812%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2885623812&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |