The suitability of common reed (Phragmites australis) for load-bearing structural materials
Besides wood, the most widely used natural structural material, dicotyledonous fibre plants such as flax or hemp, and monocotyledonous grasses such as cereal straw or bamboo have been shown to be suitable for application in materials. Common reed is a less well-characterised plant resource in this r...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of materials science 2023-10, Vol.58 (39), p.15411-15420 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 15420 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 39 |
| container_start_page | 15411 |
| container_title | Journal of materials science |
| container_volume | 58 |
| creator | Albrecht, Kaspar Neudecker, Felix Veigel, Stefan Bodner, Sabine Keckes, Jozef Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang |
| description | Besides wood, the most widely used natural structural material, dicotyledonous fibre plants such as flax or hemp, and monocotyledonous grasses such as cereal straw or bamboo have been shown to be suitable for application in materials. Common reed is a less well-characterised plant resource in this regard. Therefore, common reed stems were characterised in uniaxial tension in the present study, aiming at acquiring basic information about the mechanical characteristics of this material. Furthermore, laboratory-scale composite beams were manufactured and tested in bending. Compared to wood species with similar density, common reed stem walls showed a comparable average modulus of elasticity of 8 GPa and a very good average tensile strength of 150 MPa. After a mild alkali pre-treatment, reed showed excellent adhesive bonding, enabling the manufacture of high-density composite beams with roughly 130 MPa bending strength and 12–13 GPa modulus of elasticity. Same as untreated common reed stem walls, also reed biocomposite beams compared very favourably with established wood-based materials of similar structure, density, and adhesive content. In summary, it was thus demonstrated that common reed is a highly suitable raw material for bio-based load-bearing structural materials. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10853-023-08996-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2884486066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A771071658</galeid><sourcerecordid>A771071658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-36543c776e96e0a78ca3e8f2ed6dc1a0454875bae3866c5215cf21247cf8b6b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9rFTEQgIMo-Kz-A54CXvSwdfI771iKrYWCHtpTDyGbnbym7G6eye6h_715XcFbGYaBzHyT5CPkM4NzBmC-VwZWiQ54S7vf6469ITumjOikBfGW7AA477jU7D35UOsTACjD2Y483D0irWtafJ_GtDzTHGnI05RnWhAH-vX3Y_GHKS1YqV_rUvyY6jcac6Fj9kPXoy9pPtDWWcOytjad_IIl-bF-JO9iK_jpXz0j91c_7i5_dre_rm8uL267IIEvndBKimCMxr1G8MYGL9BGjoMeAvMglbRG9R6F1ToozlSInHFpQrS97rU4I1-2vceS_6xYF_eU1zK3Kx23VkqrQZ-mzrepgx_RpTnm9pnQYsAphTxjTO38whgGhmllG8A3IJRca8HojiVNvjw7Bu5k3W3WXbPuXqw71iCxQfV48oLl_1teof4CrxCFEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2884486066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The suitability of common reed (Phragmites australis) for load-bearing structural materials</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Albrecht, Kaspar ; Neudecker, Felix ; Veigel, Stefan ; Bodner, Sabine ; Keckes, Jozef ; Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang</creator><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Kaspar ; Neudecker, Felix ; Veigel, Stefan ; Bodner, Sabine ; Keckes, Jozef ; Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><description>Besides wood, the most widely used natural structural material, dicotyledonous fibre plants such as flax or hemp, and monocotyledonous grasses such as cereal straw or bamboo have been shown to be suitable for application in materials. Common reed is a less well-characterised plant resource in this regard. Therefore, common reed stems were characterised in uniaxial tension in the present study, aiming at acquiring basic information about the mechanical characteristics of this material. Furthermore, laboratory-scale composite beams were manufactured and tested in bending. Compared to wood species with similar density, common reed stem walls showed a comparable average modulus of elasticity of 8 GPa and a very good average tensile strength of 150 MPa. After a mild alkali pre-treatment, reed showed excellent adhesive bonding, enabling the manufacture of high-density composite beams with roughly 130 MPa bending strength and 12–13 GPa modulus of elasticity. Same as untreated common reed stem walls, also reed biocomposite beams compared very favourably with established wood-based materials of similar structure, density, and adhesive content. In summary, it was thus demonstrated that common reed is a highly suitable raw material for bio-based load-bearing structural materials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2461</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-4803</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10853-023-08996-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adhesive bonding ; Adhesives ; Bamboo ; Bend strength ; Building materials industry ; Cellulose ; Characterization and Evaluation of Materials ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Classical Mechanics ; Composite beams ; Composite materials ; Composites & Nanocomposites ; Crystallography and Scattering Methods ; Density ; Flax ; Load ; Load bearing elements ; Materials Science ; Mechanical properties ; Microscopy ; Modulus of elasticity ; Polymer Sciences ; Raw materials ; Solid Mechanics ; Stems ; Tensile strength</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials science, 2023-10, Vol.58 (39), p.15411-15420</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-36543c776e96e0a78ca3e8f2ed6dc1a0454875bae3866c5215cf21247cf8b6b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-36543c776e96e0a78ca3e8f2ed6dc1a0454875bae3866c5215cf21247cf8b6b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8224-6762</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10853-023-08996-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10853-023-08996-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Kaspar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neudecker, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veigel, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodner, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keckes, Jozef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><title>The suitability of common reed (Phragmites australis) for load-bearing structural materials</title><title>Journal of materials science</title><addtitle>J Mater Sci</addtitle><description>Besides wood, the most widely used natural structural material, dicotyledonous fibre plants such as flax or hemp, and monocotyledonous grasses such as cereal straw or bamboo have been shown to be suitable for application in materials. Common reed is a less well-characterised plant resource in this regard. Therefore, common reed stems were characterised in uniaxial tension in the present study, aiming at acquiring basic information about the mechanical characteristics of this material. Furthermore, laboratory-scale composite beams were manufactured and tested in bending. Compared to wood species with similar density, common reed stem walls showed a comparable average modulus of elasticity of 8 GPa and a very good average tensile strength of 150 MPa. After a mild alkali pre-treatment, reed showed excellent adhesive bonding, enabling the manufacture of high-density composite beams with roughly 130 MPa bending strength and 12–13 GPa modulus of elasticity. Same as untreated common reed stem walls, also reed biocomposite beams compared very favourably with established wood-based materials of similar structure, density, and adhesive content. In summary, it was thus demonstrated that common reed is a highly suitable raw material for bio-based load-bearing structural materials.</description><subject>Adhesive bonding</subject><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Bamboo</subject><subject>Bend strength</subject><subject>Building materials industry</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Classical Mechanics</subject><subject>Composite beams</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Composites & Nanocomposites</subject><subject>Crystallography and Scattering Methods</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Flax</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Load bearing elements</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Polymer Sciences</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Solid Mechanics</subject><subject>Stems</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><issn>0022-2461</issn><issn>1573-4803</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9rFTEQgIMo-Kz-A54CXvSwdfI771iKrYWCHtpTDyGbnbym7G6eye6h_715XcFbGYaBzHyT5CPkM4NzBmC-VwZWiQ54S7vf6469ITumjOikBfGW7AA477jU7D35UOsTACjD2Y483D0irWtafJ_GtDzTHGnI05RnWhAH-vX3Y_GHKS1YqV_rUvyY6jcac6Fj9kPXoy9pPtDWWcOytjad_IIl-bF-JO9iK_jpXz0j91c_7i5_dre_rm8uL267IIEvndBKimCMxr1G8MYGL9BGjoMeAvMglbRG9R6F1ToozlSInHFpQrS97rU4I1-2vceS_6xYF_eU1zK3Kx23VkqrQZ-mzrepgx_RpTnm9pnQYsAphTxjTO38whgGhmllG8A3IJRca8HojiVNvjw7Bu5k3W3WXbPuXqw71iCxQfV48oLl_1teof4CrxCFEA</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Albrecht, Kaspar</creator><creator>Neudecker, Felix</creator><creator>Veigel, Stefan</creator><creator>Bodner, Sabine</creator><creator>Keckes, Jozef</creator><creator>Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8224-6762</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>The suitability of common reed (Phragmites australis) for load-bearing structural materials</title><author>Albrecht, Kaspar ; Neudecker, Felix ; Veigel, Stefan ; Bodner, Sabine ; Keckes, Jozef ; Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-36543c776e96e0a78ca3e8f2ed6dc1a0454875bae3866c5215cf21247cf8b6b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adhesive bonding</topic><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Bamboo</topic><topic>Bend strength</topic><topic>Building materials industry</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Characterization and Evaluation of Materials</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Classical Mechanics</topic><topic>Composite beams</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Composites & Nanocomposites</topic><topic>Crystallography and Scattering Methods</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Flax</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Load bearing elements</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Polymer Sciences</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Solid Mechanics</topic><topic>Stems</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, Kaspar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neudecker, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veigel, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodner, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keckes, Jozef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Albrecht, Kaspar</au><au>Neudecker, Felix</au><au>Veigel, Stefan</au><au>Bodner, Sabine</au><au>Keckes, Jozef</au><au>Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The suitability of common reed (Phragmites australis) for load-bearing structural materials</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials science</jtitle><stitle>J Mater Sci</stitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>39</issue><spage>15411</spage><epage>15420</epage><pages>15411-15420</pages><issn>0022-2461</issn><eissn>1573-4803</eissn><abstract>Besides wood, the most widely used natural structural material, dicotyledonous fibre plants such as flax or hemp, and monocotyledonous grasses such as cereal straw or bamboo have been shown to be suitable for application in materials. Common reed is a less well-characterised plant resource in this regard. Therefore, common reed stems were characterised in uniaxial tension in the present study, aiming at acquiring basic information about the mechanical characteristics of this material. Furthermore, laboratory-scale composite beams were manufactured and tested in bending. Compared to wood species with similar density, common reed stem walls showed a comparable average modulus of elasticity of 8 GPa and a very good average tensile strength of 150 MPa. After a mild alkali pre-treatment, reed showed excellent adhesive bonding, enabling the manufacture of high-density composite beams with roughly 130 MPa bending strength and 12–13 GPa modulus of elasticity. Same as untreated common reed stem walls, also reed biocomposite beams compared very favourably with established wood-based materials of similar structure, density, and adhesive content. In summary, it was thus demonstrated that common reed is a highly suitable raw material for bio-based load-bearing structural materials.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10853-023-08996-1</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8224-6762</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-2461 |
| ispartof | Journal of materials science, 2023-10, Vol.58 (39), p.15411-15420 |
| issn | 0022-2461 1573-4803 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2884486066 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Adhesive bonding Adhesives Bamboo Bend strength Building materials industry Cellulose Characterization and Evaluation of Materials Chemistry and Materials Science Classical Mechanics Composite beams Composite materials Composites & Nanocomposites Crystallography and Scattering Methods Density Flax Load Load bearing elements Materials Science Mechanical properties Microscopy Modulus of elasticity Polymer Sciences Raw materials Solid Mechanics Stems Tensile strength |
| title | The suitability of common reed (Phragmites australis) for load-bearing structural materials |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T15%3A19%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20suitability%20of%20common%20reed%20(Phragmites%20australis)%20for%20load-bearing%20structural%20materials&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20science&rft.au=Albrecht,%20Kaspar&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=39&rft.spage=15411&rft.epage=15420&rft.pages=15411-15420&rft.issn=0022-2461&rft.eissn=1573-4803&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10853-023-08996-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA771071658%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2884486066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A771071658&rfr_iscdi=true |