Assessing the benefits of managed golden-winged warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) nesting habitat for breeding monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in the western Great Lakes
The monarch butterfly ( Danaus plexippus ) and golden-winged warbler ( Vermivora chrysoptera ) are two disturbance-dependent, migratory species that have both suffered from breeding habitat loss and degradation. Given the overlap in distribution and ecological needs, efforts to manage golden-winged...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of insect conservation 2023-12, Vol.27 (6), p.879-894 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 894 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 879 |
container_title | Journal of insect conservation |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Keele, Emma C. McNeil, Darin J. Duchamp, Joseph E. Bastidas, Eric Larkin, Jeffery L. |
description | The monarch butterfly (
Danaus plexippus
) and golden-winged warbler (
Vermivora chrysoptera
) are two disturbance-dependent, migratory species that have both suffered from breeding habitat loss and degradation. Given the overlap in distribution and ecological needs, efforts to manage golden-winged warbler habitat may also benefit monarchs. In 2021, we surveyed monarchs, milkweed (
Asclepias
spp.), nectar resources, and structural vegetation characteristics at 49 sites managed for golden-winged warblers (“GWWA sites”) in the western Great Lakes region. We compared our observations to data from nearby sites managed specifically for monarchs (“reference sites”) and assessed the influence of site and landscape characteristics on monarch (adult/immature) and milkweed presence within GWWA sites. Immature monarchs, adult monarchs, and milkweed were 22x, 5x, and 110x more abundant at reference sites compared to GWWA sites, respectively. At GWWA sites, the presence of immature monarchs was positively associated with floral abundance and the presence of immature monarchs and milkweed presence were both positively associated with proportion of emergent herbaceous wetland cover within 500 m and 1 km. Additionally at GWWA sites, immature monarch density increased with milkweed density. Lastly, the presence of adult monarchs was positively associated with size of treatment area.
Implications for insect conservation
: Our findings suggest that sites managed as golden-winged warbler habitat can contribute to monarch habitat goals. This will best be done by conducting conservation practices that increase milkweed and floral abundance (e.g., via supplemental plantings) and targeting sites with more semi-natural herbaceous cover (e.g., pastures, herbaceous wetlands), while still meeting golden-winged warbler land cover requirements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10841-023-00505-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2880581674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2880581674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-baf3558404003ec4efb9178e531e9da7607f2cadc4cc01f35d9506c222068d6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEEqXwApwscWkPLmM7TpxjVaBFWokLIG6W44x3U7J2GCcsfSmeEW8XiRsnj0ff_89o_qp6LeBKALRvswBTCw5ScQANmpsn1ZnQreRdq9XTUqum4Y0y355XL3K-B4DOaHNW_b7OGXMe45YtO2Q9RgzjklkKbO-i2-LAtmkaMPJDYcrv4KifkNjFV6T9-DORY35HDznNC5K7ZBHzcnTbuX5c3MJCItYT4nBs7lN05HesX5dCh2nEzC7elTlrZvOEv8Z5XvMlG-PjModihRTZLWEx2rjvmF9Wz4KbMr76-55XXz68_3xzxzefbj_eXG-4ly0svHdBaW1qqAEU-hpD34nWoFYCu8G1DbRBejf42nsQhR06DY2XUkJjhiao8-rNyXem9GMte9j7tFIsI600BrQRTVsXSp4oTylnwmBnGveOHqwAe8zFnnKxJRf7mIs1RaROolzgclL6Z_0f1R_wyZRH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2880581674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the benefits of managed golden-winged warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) nesting habitat for breeding monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in the western Great Lakes</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Keele, Emma C. ; McNeil, Darin J. ; Duchamp, Joseph E. ; Bastidas, Eric ; Larkin, Jeffery L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Keele, Emma C. ; McNeil, Darin J. ; Duchamp, Joseph E. ; Bastidas, Eric ; Larkin, Jeffery L.</creatorcontrib><description>The monarch butterfly (
Danaus plexippus
) and golden-winged warbler (
Vermivora chrysoptera
) are two disturbance-dependent, migratory species that have both suffered from breeding habitat loss and degradation. Given the overlap in distribution and ecological needs, efforts to manage golden-winged warbler habitat may also benefit monarchs. In 2021, we surveyed monarchs, milkweed (
Asclepias
spp.), nectar resources, and structural vegetation characteristics at 49 sites managed for golden-winged warblers (“GWWA sites”) in the western Great Lakes region. We compared our observations to data from nearby sites managed specifically for monarchs (“reference sites”) and assessed the influence of site and landscape characteristics on monarch (adult/immature) and milkweed presence within GWWA sites. Immature monarchs, adult monarchs, and milkweed were 22x, 5x, and 110x more abundant at reference sites compared to GWWA sites, respectively. At GWWA sites, the presence of immature monarchs was positively associated with floral abundance and the presence of immature monarchs and milkweed presence were both positively associated with proportion of emergent herbaceous wetland cover within 500 m and 1 km. Additionally at GWWA sites, immature monarch density increased with milkweed density. Lastly, the presence of adult monarchs was positively associated with size of treatment area.
Implications for insect conservation
: Our findings suggest that sites managed as golden-winged warbler habitat can contribute to monarch habitat goals. This will best be done by conducting conservation practices that increase milkweed and floral abundance (e.g., via supplemental plantings) and targeting sites with more semi-natural herbaceous cover (e.g., pastures, herbaceous wetlands), while still meeting golden-winged warbler land cover requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-638X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10841-023-00505-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Breeding ; Buffalo ; Butterflies & moths ; Conservation ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Conservation practices ; Danaus plexippus ; Density ; Endangered & extinct species ; Entomology ; Environmental protection ; Forests ; Habitat loss ; Habitats ; Insects ; Lakes ; Land cover ; Life Sciences ; Migratory species ; Natural resources ; Nectar ; Nesting ; Original Paper ; Pasture ; Pollinators ; Prescribed fire ; Timber ; Vegetation ; Vermivora chrysoptera ; Wetlands ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Journal of insect conservation, 2023-12, Vol.27 (6), p.879-894</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-baf3558404003ec4efb9178e531e9da7607f2cadc4cc01f35d9506c222068d6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8087-3087 ; 0000-0001-5592-6933 ; 0000-0003-4595-8354</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10841-023-00505-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10841-023-00505-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keele, Emma C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeil, Darin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duchamp, Joseph E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastidas, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larkin, Jeffery L.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the benefits of managed golden-winged warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) nesting habitat for breeding monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in the western Great Lakes</title><title>Journal of insect conservation</title><addtitle>J Insect Conserv</addtitle><description>The monarch butterfly (
Danaus plexippus
) and golden-winged warbler (
Vermivora chrysoptera
) are two disturbance-dependent, migratory species that have both suffered from breeding habitat loss and degradation. Given the overlap in distribution and ecological needs, efforts to manage golden-winged warbler habitat may also benefit monarchs. In 2021, we surveyed monarchs, milkweed (
Asclepias
spp.), nectar resources, and structural vegetation characteristics at 49 sites managed for golden-winged warblers (“GWWA sites”) in the western Great Lakes region. We compared our observations to data from nearby sites managed specifically for monarchs (“reference sites”) and assessed the influence of site and landscape characteristics on monarch (adult/immature) and milkweed presence within GWWA sites. Immature monarchs, adult monarchs, and milkweed were 22x, 5x, and 110x more abundant at reference sites compared to GWWA sites, respectively. At GWWA sites, the presence of immature monarchs was positively associated with floral abundance and the presence of immature monarchs and milkweed presence were both positively associated with proportion of emergent herbaceous wetland cover within 500 m and 1 km. Additionally at GWWA sites, immature monarch density increased with milkweed density. Lastly, the presence of adult monarchs was positively associated with size of treatment area.
Implications for insect conservation
: Our findings suggest that sites managed as golden-winged warbler habitat can contribute to monarch habitat goals. This will best be done by conducting conservation practices that increase milkweed and floral abundance (e.g., via supplemental plantings) and targeting sites with more semi-natural herbaceous cover (e.g., pastures, herbaceous wetlands), while still meeting golden-winged warbler land cover requirements.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Buffalo</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Conservation practices</subject><subject>Danaus plexippus</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Habitat loss</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Migratory species</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Nectar</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Prescribed fire</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vermivora chrysoptera</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1366-638X</issn><issn>1572-9753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEEqXwApwscWkPLmM7TpxjVaBFWokLIG6W44x3U7J2GCcsfSmeEW8XiRsnj0ff_89o_qp6LeBKALRvswBTCw5ScQANmpsn1ZnQreRdq9XTUqum4Y0y355XL3K-B4DOaHNW_b7OGXMe45YtO2Q9RgzjklkKbO-i2-LAtmkaMPJDYcrv4KifkNjFV6T9-DORY35HDznNC5K7ZBHzcnTbuX5c3MJCItYT4nBs7lN05HesX5dCh2nEzC7elTlrZvOEv8Z5XvMlG-PjModihRTZLWEx2rjvmF9Wz4KbMr76-55XXz68_3xzxzefbj_eXG-4ly0svHdBaW1qqAEU-hpD34nWoFYCu8G1DbRBejf42nsQhR06DY2XUkJjhiao8-rNyXem9GMte9j7tFIsI600BrQRTVsXSp4oTylnwmBnGveOHqwAe8zFnnKxJRf7mIs1RaROolzgclL6Z_0f1R_wyZRH</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Keele, Emma C.</creator><creator>McNeil, Darin J.</creator><creator>Duchamp, Joseph E.</creator><creator>Bastidas, Eric</creator><creator>Larkin, Jeffery L.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8087-3087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5592-6933</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4595-8354</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Assessing the benefits of managed golden-winged warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) nesting habitat for breeding monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in the western Great Lakes</title><author>Keele, Emma C. ; McNeil, Darin J. ; Duchamp, Joseph E. ; Bastidas, Eric ; Larkin, Jeffery L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-baf3558404003ec4efb9178e531e9da7607f2cadc4cc01f35d9506c222068d6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Buffalo</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Conservation practices</topic><topic>Danaus plexippus</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Habitat loss</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Migratory species</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Nectar</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Prescribed fire</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vermivora chrysoptera</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keele, Emma C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeil, Darin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duchamp, Joseph E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastidas, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larkin, Jeffery L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Journal of insect conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keele, Emma C.</au><au>McNeil, Darin J.</au><au>Duchamp, Joseph E.</au><au>Bastidas, Eric</au><au>Larkin, Jeffery L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the benefits of managed golden-winged warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) nesting habitat for breeding monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in the western Great Lakes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of insect conservation</jtitle><stitle>J Insect Conserv</stitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>879</spage><epage>894</epage><pages>879-894</pages><issn>1366-638X</issn><eissn>1572-9753</eissn><abstract>The monarch butterfly (
Danaus plexippus
) and golden-winged warbler (
Vermivora chrysoptera
) are two disturbance-dependent, migratory species that have both suffered from breeding habitat loss and degradation. Given the overlap in distribution and ecological needs, efforts to manage golden-winged warbler habitat may also benefit monarchs. In 2021, we surveyed monarchs, milkweed (
Asclepias
spp.), nectar resources, and structural vegetation characteristics at 49 sites managed for golden-winged warblers (“GWWA sites”) in the western Great Lakes region. We compared our observations to data from nearby sites managed specifically for monarchs (“reference sites”) and assessed the influence of site and landscape characteristics on monarch (adult/immature) and milkweed presence within GWWA sites. Immature monarchs, adult monarchs, and milkweed were 22x, 5x, and 110x more abundant at reference sites compared to GWWA sites, respectively. At GWWA sites, the presence of immature monarchs was positively associated with floral abundance and the presence of immature monarchs and milkweed presence were both positively associated with proportion of emergent herbaceous wetland cover within 500 m and 1 km. Additionally at GWWA sites, immature monarch density increased with milkweed density. Lastly, the presence of adult monarchs was positively associated with size of treatment area.
Implications for insect conservation
: Our findings suggest that sites managed as golden-winged warbler habitat can contribute to monarch habitat goals. This will best be done by conducting conservation practices that increase milkweed and floral abundance (e.g., via supplemental plantings) and targeting sites with more semi-natural herbaceous cover (e.g., pastures, herbaceous wetlands), while still meeting golden-winged warbler land cover requirements.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10841-023-00505-8</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8087-3087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5592-6933</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4595-8354</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-638X |
ispartof | Journal of insect conservation, 2023-12, Vol.27 (6), p.879-894 |
issn | 1366-638X 1572-9753 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2880581674 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animal Ecology Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Breeding Buffalo Butterflies & moths Conservation Conservation Biology/Ecology Conservation practices Danaus plexippus Density Endangered & extinct species Entomology Environmental protection Forests Habitat loss Habitats Insects Lakes Land cover Life Sciences Migratory species Natural resources Nectar Nesting Original Paper Pasture Pollinators Prescribed fire Timber Vegetation Vermivora chrysoptera Wetlands Wildlife conservation Wildlife management |
title | Assessing the benefits of managed golden-winged warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) nesting habitat for breeding monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in the western Great Lakes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A10%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20benefits%20of%20managed%20golden-winged%20warbler%20(Vermivora%20chrysoptera)%20nesting%20habitat%20for%20breeding%20monarch%20butterflies%20(Danaus%20plexippus)%20in%20the%20western%20Great%20Lakes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20insect%20conservation&rft.au=Keele,%20Emma%20C.&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=879&rft.epage=894&rft.pages=879-894&rft.issn=1366-638X&rft.eissn=1572-9753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10841-023-00505-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2880581674%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2880581674&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |