Assessing the benefits of managed golden-winged warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) nesting habitat for breeding monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in the western Great Lakes

The monarch butterfly ( Danaus plexippus ) and golden-winged warbler ( Vermivora chrysoptera ) are two disturbance-dependent, migratory species that have both suffered from breeding habitat loss and degradation. Given the overlap in distribution and ecological needs, efforts to manage golden-winged...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of insect conservation 2023-12, Vol.27 (6), p.879-894
Hauptverfasser: Keele, Emma C., McNeil, Darin J., Duchamp, Joseph E., Bastidas, Eric, Larkin, Jeffery L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 894
container_issue 6
container_start_page 879
container_title Journal of insect conservation
container_volume 27
creator Keele, Emma C.
McNeil, Darin J.
Duchamp, Joseph E.
Bastidas, Eric
Larkin, Jeffery L.
description The monarch butterfly ( Danaus plexippus ) and golden-winged warbler ( Vermivora chrysoptera ) are two disturbance-dependent, migratory species that have both suffered from breeding habitat loss and degradation. Given the overlap in distribution and ecological needs, efforts to manage golden-winged warbler habitat may also benefit monarchs. In 2021, we surveyed monarchs, milkweed ( Asclepias spp.), nectar resources, and structural vegetation characteristics at 49 sites managed for golden-winged warblers (“GWWA sites”) in the western Great Lakes region. We compared our observations to data from nearby sites managed specifically for monarchs (“reference sites”) and assessed the influence of site and landscape characteristics on monarch (adult/immature) and milkweed presence within GWWA sites. Immature monarchs, adult monarchs, and milkweed were 22x, 5x, and 110x more abundant at reference sites compared to GWWA sites, respectively. At GWWA sites, the presence of immature monarchs was positively associated with floral abundance and the presence of immature monarchs and milkweed presence were both positively associated with proportion of emergent herbaceous wetland cover within 500 m and 1 km. Additionally at GWWA sites, immature monarch density increased with milkweed density. Lastly, the presence of adult monarchs was positively associated with size of treatment area. Implications for insect conservation : Our findings suggest that sites managed as golden-winged warbler habitat can contribute to monarch habitat goals. This will best be done by conducting conservation practices that increase milkweed and floral abundance (e.g., via supplemental plantings) and targeting sites with more semi-natural herbaceous cover (e.g., pastures, herbaceous wetlands), while still meeting golden-winged warbler land cover requirements.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10841-023-00505-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2880581674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2880581674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-baf3558404003ec4efb9178e531e9da7607f2cadc4cc01f35d9506c222068d6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEEqXwApwscWkPLmM7TpxjVaBFWokLIG6W44x3U7J2GCcsfSmeEW8XiRsnj0ff_89o_qp6LeBKALRvswBTCw5ScQANmpsn1ZnQreRdq9XTUqum4Y0y355XL3K-B4DOaHNW_b7OGXMe45YtO2Q9RgzjklkKbO-i2-LAtmkaMPJDYcrv4KifkNjFV6T9-DORY35HDznNC5K7ZBHzcnTbuX5c3MJCItYT4nBs7lN05HesX5dCh2nEzC7elTlrZvOEv8Z5XvMlG-PjModihRTZLWEx2rjvmF9Wz4KbMr76-55XXz68_3xzxzefbj_eXG-4ly0svHdBaW1qqAEU-hpD34nWoFYCu8G1DbRBejf42nsQhR06DY2XUkJjhiao8-rNyXem9GMte9j7tFIsI600BrQRTVsXSp4oTylnwmBnGveOHqwAe8zFnnKxJRf7mIs1RaROolzgclL6Z_0f1R_wyZRH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2880581674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the benefits of managed golden-winged warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) nesting habitat for breeding monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in the western Great Lakes</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Keele, Emma C. ; McNeil, Darin J. ; Duchamp, Joseph E. ; Bastidas, Eric ; Larkin, Jeffery L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Keele, Emma C. ; McNeil, Darin J. ; Duchamp, Joseph E. ; Bastidas, Eric ; Larkin, Jeffery L.</creatorcontrib><description>The monarch butterfly ( Danaus plexippus ) and golden-winged warbler ( Vermivora chrysoptera ) are two disturbance-dependent, migratory species that have both suffered from breeding habitat loss and degradation. Given the overlap in distribution and ecological needs, efforts to manage golden-winged warbler habitat may also benefit monarchs. In 2021, we surveyed monarchs, milkweed ( Asclepias spp.), nectar resources, and structural vegetation characteristics at 49 sites managed for golden-winged warblers (“GWWA sites”) in the western Great Lakes region. We compared our observations to data from nearby sites managed specifically for monarchs (“reference sites”) and assessed the influence of site and landscape characteristics on monarch (adult/immature) and milkweed presence within GWWA sites. Immature monarchs, adult monarchs, and milkweed were 22x, 5x, and 110x more abundant at reference sites compared to GWWA sites, respectively. At GWWA sites, the presence of immature monarchs was positively associated with floral abundance and the presence of immature monarchs and milkweed presence were both positively associated with proportion of emergent herbaceous wetland cover within 500 m and 1 km. Additionally at GWWA sites, immature monarch density increased with milkweed density. Lastly, the presence of adult monarchs was positively associated with size of treatment area. Implications for insect conservation : Our findings suggest that sites managed as golden-winged warbler habitat can contribute to monarch habitat goals. This will best be done by conducting conservation practices that increase milkweed and floral abundance (e.g., via supplemental plantings) and targeting sites with more semi-natural herbaceous cover (e.g., pastures, herbaceous wetlands), while still meeting golden-winged warbler land cover requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-638X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10841-023-00505-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Breeding ; Buffalo ; Butterflies &amp; moths ; Conservation ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Conservation practices ; Danaus plexippus ; Density ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Entomology ; Environmental protection ; Forests ; Habitat loss ; Habitats ; Insects ; Lakes ; Land cover ; Life Sciences ; Migratory species ; Natural resources ; Nectar ; Nesting ; Original Paper ; Pasture ; Pollinators ; Prescribed fire ; Timber ; Vegetation ; Vermivora chrysoptera ; Wetlands ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Journal of insect conservation, 2023-12, Vol.27 (6), p.879-894</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-baf3558404003ec4efb9178e531e9da7607f2cadc4cc01f35d9506c222068d6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8087-3087 ; 0000-0001-5592-6933 ; 0000-0003-4595-8354</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10841-023-00505-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10841-023-00505-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keele, Emma C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeil, Darin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duchamp, Joseph E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastidas, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larkin, Jeffery L.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the benefits of managed golden-winged warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) nesting habitat for breeding monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in the western Great Lakes</title><title>Journal of insect conservation</title><addtitle>J Insect Conserv</addtitle><description>The monarch butterfly ( Danaus plexippus ) and golden-winged warbler ( Vermivora chrysoptera ) are two disturbance-dependent, migratory species that have both suffered from breeding habitat loss and degradation. Given the overlap in distribution and ecological needs, efforts to manage golden-winged warbler habitat may also benefit monarchs. In 2021, we surveyed monarchs, milkweed ( Asclepias spp.), nectar resources, and structural vegetation characteristics at 49 sites managed for golden-winged warblers (“GWWA sites”) in the western Great Lakes region. We compared our observations to data from nearby sites managed specifically for monarchs (“reference sites”) and assessed the influence of site and landscape characteristics on monarch (adult/immature) and milkweed presence within GWWA sites. Immature monarchs, adult monarchs, and milkweed were 22x, 5x, and 110x more abundant at reference sites compared to GWWA sites, respectively. At GWWA sites, the presence of immature monarchs was positively associated with floral abundance and the presence of immature monarchs and milkweed presence were both positively associated with proportion of emergent herbaceous wetland cover within 500 m and 1 km. Additionally at GWWA sites, immature monarch density increased with milkweed density. Lastly, the presence of adult monarchs was positively associated with size of treatment area. Implications for insect conservation : Our findings suggest that sites managed as golden-winged warbler habitat can contribute to monarch habitat goals. This will best be done by conducting conservation practices that increase milkweed and floral abundance (e.g., via supplemental plantings) and targeting sites with more semi-natural herbaceous cover (e.g., pastures, herbaceous wetlands), while still meeting golden-winged warbler land cover requirements.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Buffalo</subject><subject>Butterflies &amp; moths</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Conservation practices</subject><subject>Danaus plexippus</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Habitat loss</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Migratory species</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Nectar</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Prescribed fire</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vermivora chrysoptera</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1366-638X</issn><issn>1572-9753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhiMEEqXwApwscWkPLmM7TpxjVaBFWokLIG6W44x3U7J2GCcsfSmeEW8XiRsnj0ff_89o_qp6LeBKALRvswBTCw5ScQANmpsn1ZnQreRdq9XTUqum4Y0y355XL3K-B4DOaHNW_b7OGXMe45YtO2Q9RgzjklkKbO-i2-LAtmkaMPJDYcrv4KifkNjFV6T9-DORY35HDznNC5K7ZBHzcnTbuX5c3MJCItYT4nBs7lN05HesX5dCh2nEzC7elTlrZvOEv8Z5XvMlG-PjModihRTZLWEx2rjvmF9Wz4KbMr76-55XXz68_3xzxzefbj_eXG-4ly0svHdBaW1qqAEU-hpD34nWoFYCu8G1DbRBejf42nsQhR06DY2XUkJjhiao8-rNyXem9GMte9j7tFIsI600BrQRTVsXSp4oTylnwmBnGveOHqwAe8zFnnKxJRf7mIs1RaROolzgclL6Z_0f1R_wyZRH</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Keele, Emma C.</creator><creator>McNeil, Darin J.</creator><creator>Duchamp, Joseph E.</creator><creator>Bastidas, Eric</creator><creator>Larkin, Jeffery L.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8087-3087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5592-6933</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4595-8354</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Assessing the benefits of managed golden-winged warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) nesting habitat for breeding monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in the western Great Lakes</title><author>Keele, Emma C. ; McNeil, Darin J. ; Duchamp, Joseph E. ; Bastidas, Eric ; Larkin, Jeffery L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-baf3558404003ec4efb9178e531e9da7607f2cadc4cc01f35d9506c222068d6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Buffalo</topic><topic>Butterflies &amp; moths</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Conservation practices</topic><topic>Danaus plexippus</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Habitat loss</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Migratory species</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Nectar</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Prescribed fire</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vermivora chrysoptera</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keele, Emma C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeil, Darin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duchamp, Joseph E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastidas, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larkin, Jeffery L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Journal of insect conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keele, Emma C.</au><au>McNeil, Darin J.</au><au>Duchamp, Joseph E.</au><au>Bastidas, Eric</au><au>Larkin, Jeffery L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the benefits of managed golden-winged warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) nesting habitat for breeding monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in the western Great Lakes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of insect conservation</jtitle><stitle>J Insect Conserv</stitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>879</spage><epage>894</epage><pages>879-894</pages><issn>1366-638X</issn><eissn>1572-9753</eissn><abstract>The monarch butterfly ( Danaus plexippus ) and golden-winged warbler ( Vermivora chrysoptera ) are two disturbance-dependent, migratory species that have both suffered from breeding habitat loss and degradation. Given the overlap in distribution and ecological needs, efforts to manage golden-winged warbler habitat may also benefit monarchs. In 2021, we surveyed monarchs, milkweed ( Asclepias spp.), nectar resources, and structural vegetation characteristics at 49 sites managed for golden-winged warblers (“GWWA sites”) in the western Great Lakes region. We compared our observations to data from nearby sites managed specifically for monarchs (“reference sites”) and assessed the influence of site and landscape characteristics on monarch (adult/immature) and milkweed presence within GWWA sites. Immature monarchs, adult monarchs, and milkweed were 22x, 5x, and 110x more abundant at reference sites compared to GWWA sites, respectively. At GWWA sites, the presence of immature monarchs was positively associated with floral abundance and the presence of immature monarchs and milkweed presence were both positively associated with proportion of emergent herbaceous wetland cover within 500 m and 1 km. Additionally at GWWA sites, immature monarch density increased with milkweed density. Lastly, the presence of adult monarchs was positively associated with size of treatment area. Implications for insect conservation : Our findings suggest that sites managed as golden-winged warbler habitat can contribute to monarch habitat goals. This will best be done by conducting conservation practices that increase milkweed and floral abundance (e.g., via supplemental plantings) and targeting sites with more semi-natural herbaceous cover (e.g., pastures, herbaceous wetlands), while still meeting golden-winged warbler land cover requirements.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10841-023-00505-8</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8087-3087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5592-6933</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4595-8354</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1366-638X
ispartof Journal of insect conservation, 2023-12, Vol.27 (6), p.879-894
issn 1366-638X
1572-9753
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2880581674
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animal Ecology
Biodiversity
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Breeding
Buffalo
Butterflies & moths
Conservation
Conservation Biology/Ecology
Conservation practices
Danaus plexippus
Density
Endangered & extinct species
Entomology
Environmental protection
Forests
Habitat loss
Habitats
Insects
Lakes
Land cover
Life Sciences
Migratory species
Natural resources
Nectar
Nesting
Original Paper
Pasture
Pollinators
Prescribed fire
Timber
Vegetation
Vermivora chrysoptera
Wetlands
Wildlife conservation
Wildlife management
title Assessing the benefits of managed golden-winged warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) nesting habitat for breeding monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) in the western Great Lakes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T16%3A10%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20benefits%20of%20managed%20golden-winged%20warbler%20(Vermivora%20chrysoptera)%20nesting%20habitat%20for%20breeding%20monarch%20butterflies%20(Danaus%20plexippus)%20in%20the%20western%20Great%20Lakes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20insect%20conservation&rft.au=Keele,%20Emma%20C.&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=879&rft.epage=894&rft.pages=879-894&rft.issn=1366-638X&rft.eissn=1572-9753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10841-023-00505-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2880581674%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2880581674&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true