Practitioner-oriented recommendations for advancing I-O technological research
Unfortunately, when these questions broach topics related to technology, there is often frustratingly little substantive research we can share. [...]we couldn’t be more thrilled with this urgent call for timelier, more productive research on the intersection of technology and the workplace. [...]it...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Industrial and organizational psychology 2022-09, Vol.15 (3), p.491-494 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 494 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 491 |
| container_title | Industrial and organizational psychology |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Borneman, Matthew J. Mansfield, Amie |
| description | Unfortunately, when these questions broach topics related to technology, there is often frustratingly little substantive research we can share. [...]we couldn’t be more thrilled with this urgent call for timelier, more productive research on the intersection of technology and the workplace. [...]it was a remarkably frustrating experience in the early part of 2020 to seek out research on remote work and come up with surprisingly little. (1994) because the analysis was scoped differently and focused on interview length. [...]only studies reporting interview length were included in the meta-analysis. [...]this leads to some second-order sampling error, as there are small k/N values reported for some of those relationships. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/iop.2022.56 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2878543290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_iop_2022_56</cupid><sourcerecordid>2878543290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-6efbf1136907d6196d57471dd96589474ab99e92ef7daeb372c0bea3a41405753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqyT-w4FFSk2w-NkcpWgvFetBzyCazbUp3U5Ot4L93S4tePM3APLwDL0K3lEwooeohxN2EEcYmQp6hEVWCY81Lfv67M3mJrnLeECJLRvgIvb4l6_rQh9hBwjEF6HrwRQIX2xY6bw-XXDQxFdZ_2c6FblXM8bLowa27uI2r4Ox28BlscutrdNHYbYab0xyjj-en9-kLXixn8-njAjtaqR5LaOqG0lJqorykWnqhuKLeaykqzRW3tdagGTTKW6hLxRypwZaWU06EEuUY3R1zdyl-7iH3ZhP3qRteGlapSvCSaTKo-6NyKeacoDG7FFqbvg0l5lCYGQozh8KMkIPGJ23bOgW_gr_Q__wPvkJtfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2878543290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practitioner-oriented recommendations for advancing I-O technological research</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Borneman, Matthew J. ; Mansfield, Amie</creator><creatorcontrib>Borneman, Matthew J. ; Mansfield, Amie</creatorcontrib><description>Unfortunately, when these questions broach topics related to technology, there is often frustratingly little substantive research we can share. [...]we couldn’t be more thrilled with this urgent call for timelier, more productive research on the intersection of technology and the workplace. [...]it was a remarkably frustrating experience in the early part of 2020 to seek out research on remote work and come up with surprisingly little. (1994) because the analysis was scoped differently and focused on interview length. [...]only studies reporting interview length were included in the meta-analysis. [...]this leads to some second-order sampling error, as there are small k/N values reported for some of those relationships.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-9426</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-9434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/iop.2022.56</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Commentaries ; Employment ; Employment interviews ; Meta-analysis ; Pandemics ; Sampling error ; Search engines ; Technology ; Validity ; Work at home</subject><ispartof>Industrial and organizational psychology, 2022-09, Vol.15 (3), p.491-494</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-6efbf1136907d6196d57471dd96589474ab99e92ef7daeb372c0bea3a41405753</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3648-0774</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942622000566/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borneman, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansfield, Amie</creatorcontrib><title>Practitioner-oriented recommendations for advancing I-O technological research</title><title>Industrial and organizational psychology</title><addtitle>Ind. Organ. Psychol</addtitle><description>Unfortunately, when these questions broach topics related to technology, there is often frustratingly little substantive research we can share. [...]we couldn’t be more thrilled with this urgent call for timelier, more productive research on the intersection of technology and the workplace. [...]it was a remarkably frustrating experience in the early part of 2020 to seek out research on remote work and come up with surprisingly little. (1994) because the analysis was scoped differently and focused on interview length. [...]only studies reporting interview length were included in the meta-analysis. [...]this leads to some second-order sampling error, as there are small k/N values reported for some of those relationships.</description><subject>Commentaries</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment interviews</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Sampling error</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Work at home</subject><issn>1754-9426</issn><issn>1754-9434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0E1LAzEQBuAgCtbqyT-w4FFSk2w-NkcpWgvFetBzyCazbUp3U5Ot4L93S4tePM3APLwDL0K3lEwooeohxN2EEcYmQp6hEVWCY81Lfv67M3mJrnLeECJLRvgIvb4l6_rQh9hBwjEF6HrwRQIX2xY6bw-XXDQxFdZ_2c6FblXM8bLowa27uI2r4Ox28BlscutrdNHYbYab0xyjj-en9-kLXixn8-njAjtaqR5LaOqG0lJqorykWnqhuKLeaykqzRW3tdagGTTKW6hLxRypwZaWU06EEuUY3R1zdyl-7iH3ZhP3qRteGlapSvCSaTKo-6NyKeacoDG7FFqbvg0l5lCYGQozh8KMkIPGJ23bOgW_gr_Q__wPvkJtfw</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Borneman, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Mansfield, Amie</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3648-0774</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Practitioner-oriented recommendations for advancing I-O technological research</title><author>Borneman, Matthew J. ; Mansfield, Amie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c187t-6efbf1136907d6196d57471dd96589474ab99e92ef7daeb372c0bea3a41405753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Commentaries</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment interviews</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Sampling error</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Work at home</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borneman, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansfield, Amie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Industrial and organizational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borneman, Matthew J.</au><au>Mansfield, Amie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practitioner-oriented recommendations for advancing I-O technological research</atitle><jtitle>Industrial and organizational psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Ind. Organ. Psychol</addtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>491</spage><epage>494</epage><pages>491-494</pages><issn>1754-9426</issn><eissn>1754-9434</eissn><abstract>Unfortunately, when these questions broach topics related to technology, there is often frustratingly little substantive research we can share. [...]we couldn’t be more thrilled with this urgent call for timelier, more productive research on the intersection of technology and the workplace. [...]it was a remarkably frustrating experience in the early part of 2020 to seek out research on remote work and come up with surprisingly little. (1994) because the analysis was scoped differently and focused on interview length. [...]only studies reporting interview length were included in the meta-analysis. [...]this leads to some second-order sampling error, as there are small k/N values reported for some of those relationships.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/iop.2022.56</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3648-0774</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1754-9426 |
| ispartof | Industrial and organizational psychology, 2022-09, Vol.15 (3), p.491-494 |
| issn | 1754-9426 1754-9434 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2878543290 |
| source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Commentaries Employment Employment interviews Meta-analysis Pandemics Sampling error Search engines Technology Validity Work at home |
| title | Practitioner-oriented recommendations for advancing I-O technological research |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T13%3A34%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practitioner-oriented%20recommendations%20for%20advancing%20I-O%20technological%20research&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20and%20organizational%20psychology&rft.au=Borneman,%20Matthew%20J.&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=491&rft.epage=494&rft.pages=491-494&rft.issn=1754-9426&rft.eissn=1754-9434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/iop.2022.56&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2878543290%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2878543290&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_iop_2022_56&rfr_iscdi=true |