Federated Learning in Competitive EV Charging Market

Federated Learning (FL) has demonstrated a significant potential to improve the quality of service (QoS) of EV charging stations. While existing studies have primarily focused on developing FL algorithms, the effect of FL on the charging stations' operation in terms of price competition has yet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2023-10
Hauptverfasser: Sun, Chenxi, Huang, Chao, Shou, Biying, Huang, Jianwei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Sun, Chenxi
Huang, Chao
Shou, Biying
Huang, Jianwei
description Federated Learning (FL) has demonstrated a significant potential to improve the quality of service (QoS) of EV charging stations. While existing studies have primarily focused on developing FL algorithms, the effect of FL on the charging stations' operation in terms of price competition has yet to be fully understood. This paper aims to fill this gap by modeling the strategic interactions between two charging stations and EV owners as a multi-stage game. Each station first decides its FL participation strategy and charging price, and then individual EV owners decide their charging strategies. The game analysis involves solving a non-concave problem and by decomposing it into a piece-wise concave program we manage to fully characterize the equilibrium. Based on real-world datasets, our numerical results reveal an interesting insight: even if FL improves QoS, it can lead to smaller profits for both stations. The key reason is that FL intensifies the price competition between charging stations by improving stations' QoS to a similar level. We further show that the stations will participate in FL when their data distributions are mildly dissimilar.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2878322925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2878322925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_28783229253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mQwcUtNSS1KLElNUfBJTSzKy8xLV8jMU3DOzy1ILcksySxLVXANU3DOSCxKB0n5JhZlp5bwMLCmJeYUp_JCaW4GZTfXEGcP3YKi_MLS1OKS-Kz80qI8oFS8kYW5hbGRkaWRqTFxqgAT9TQP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2878322925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Federated Learning in Competitive EV Charging Market</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Sun, Chenxi ; Huang, Chao ; Shou, Biying ; Huang, Jianwei</creator><creatorcontrib>Sun, Chenxi ; Huang, Chao ; Shou, Biying ; Huang, Jianwei</creatorcontrib><description>Federated Learning (FL) has demonstrated a significant potential to improve the quality of service (QoS) of EV charging stations. While existing studies have primarily focused on developing FL algorithms, the effect of FL on the charging stations' operation in terms of price competition has yet to be fully understood. This paper aims to fill this gap by modeling the strategic interactions between two charging stations and EV owners as a multi-stage game. Each station first decides its FL participation strategy and charging price, and then individual EV owners decide their charging strategies. The game analysis involves solving a non-concave problem and by decomposing it into a piece-wise concave program we manage to fully characterize the equilibrium. Based on real-world datasets, our numerical results reveal an interesting insight: even if FL improves QoS, it can lead to smaller profits for both stations. The key reason is that FL intensifies the price competition between charging stations by improving stations' QoS to a similar level. We further show that the stations will participate in FL when their data distributions are mildly dissimilar.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Electric vehicle charging ; Game theory ; Quality of service</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2023-10</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sun, Chenxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shou, Biying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jianwei</creatorcontrib><title>Federated Learning in Competitive EV Charging Market</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Federated Learning (FL) has demonstrated a significant potential to improve the quality of service (QoS) of EV charging stations. While existing studies have primarily focused on developing FL algorithms, the effect of FL on the charging stations' operation in terms of price competition has yet to be fully understood. This paper aims to fill this gap by modeling the strategic interactions between two charging stations and EV owners as a multi-stage game. Each station first decides its FL participation strategy and charging price, and then individual EV owners decide their charging strategies. The game analysis involves solving a non-concave problem and by decomposing it into a piece-wise concave program we manage to fully characterize the equilibrium. Based on real-world datasets, our numerical results reveal an interesting insight: even if FL improves QoS, it can lead to smaller profits for both stations. The key reason is that FL intensifies the price competition between charging stations by improving stations' QoS to a similar level. We further show that the stations will participate in FL when their data distributions are mildly dissimilar.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Electric vehicle charging</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Quality of service</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjY21LUwMTLiYOAtLs4yMDAwMjM3MjU15mQwcUtNSS1KLElNUfBJTSzKy8xLV8jMU3DOzy1ILcksySxLVXANU3DOSCxKB0n5JhZlp5bwMLCmJeYUp_JCaW4GZTfXEGcP3YKi_MLS1OKS-Kz80qI8oFS8kYW5hbGRkaWRqTFxqgAT9TQP</recordid><startdate>20231013</startdate><enddate>20231013</enddate><creator>Sun, Chenxi</creator><creator>Huang, Chao</creator><creator>Shou, Biying</creator><creator>Huang, Jianwei</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231013</creationdate><title>Federated Learning in Competitive EV Charging Market</title><author>Sun, Chenxi ; Huang, Chao ; Shou, Biying ; Huang, Jianwei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28783229253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Electric vehicle charging</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Quality of service</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sun, Chenxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shou, Biying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jianwei</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sun, Chenxi</au><au>Huang, Chao</au><au>Shou, Biying</au><au>Huang, Jianwei</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Federated Learning in Competitive EV Charging Market</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2023-10-13</date><risdate>2023</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Federated Learning (FL) has demonstrated a significant potential to improve the quality of service (QoS) of EV charging stations. While existing studies have primarily focused on developing FL algorithms, the effect of FL on the charging stations' operation in terms of price competition has yet to be fully understood. This paper aims to fill this gap by modeling the strategic interactions between two charging stations and EV owners as a multi-stage game. Each station first decides its FL participation strategy and charging price, and then individual EV owners decide their charging strategies. The game analysis involves solving a non-concave problem and by decomposing it into a piece-wise concave program we manage to fully characterize the equilibrium. Based on real-world datasets, our numerical results reveal an interesting insight: even if FL improves QoS, it can lead to smaller profits for both stations. The key reason is that FL intensifies the price competition between charging stations by improving stations' QoS to a similar level. We further show that the stations will participate in FL when their data distributions are mildly dissimilar.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2023-10
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2878322925
source Free E- Journals
subjects Algorithms
Electric vehicle charging
Game theory
Quality of service
title Federated Learning in Competitive EV Charging Market
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A10%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Federated%20Learning%20in%20Competitive%20EV%20Charging%20Market&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Sun,%20Chenxi&rft.date=2023-10-13&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2878322925%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2878322925&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true