Inequitable Gains and Losses from Conservation in a Global Biodiversity Hotspot

A billion rural people live near tropical forests. Urban populations need them for water, energy and timber. Global society benefits from climate regulation and knowledge embodied in tropical biodiversity. Ecosystem service valuations can incentivise conservation, but determining costs and benefits...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Environmental & resource economics 2023-11, Vol.86 (3), p.381-405
Hauptverfasser:	Platts, Philip J., Schaafsma, Marije, Turner, R. Kerry, Burgess, Neil D., Fisher, Brendan, Mbilinyi, Boniface P., Munishi, Pantaleo K. T., Ricketts, Taylor H., Swetnam, Ruth D., Ahrends, Antje, Ashagre, Biniam B., Bayliss, Julian, Gereau, Roy E., Green, Jonathan M. H., Green, Rhys E., Jeha, Lena, Lewis, Simon L., Marchant, Rob, Marshall, Andrew R., Morse-Jones, Sian, Mwakalila, Shadrack, Njana, Marco A., Shirima, Deo D., Willcock, Simon, Balmford, Andrew
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Biodiversity Biodiversity hot spots Conservation Depletion Drinking water Economic Policy Economics Economics and Finance Ecosystem services Ecosystems Environmental Economics Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice Environmental Management Forest conservation Forest management Forests Logging Mountains Present value Rural areas Rural communities Stakeholders Tourism Tropical forests Urban populations Wildlife conservation Woodlands
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!