The role of procedural justice and risk preference-based mechanisms in acceptance of public policy

The role of procedural justice and risk preference-based mechanisms in acceptance of public policy

The current study examines the relationship between procedural justice and acceptance of public policy, the mediating effect of uncertainty as well as the moderating effect of risk preference in this relationship. Study 1 conducted a questionnaire survey on 154 residents from Beijing. The results sh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PsyCh journal 2023-10, Vol.12 (5), p.714-726
Hauptverfasser: Xuan-Na, Wu, Mengzhen, Tang, Xue, Wu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 726
container_issue 5
container_start_page 714
container_title PsyCh journal
container_volume 12
creator Xuan-Na, Wu
Mengzhen, Tang
Xue, Wu
description The current study examines the relationship between procedural justice and acceptance of public policy, the mediating effect of uncertainty as well as the moderating effect of risk preference in this relationship. Study 1 conducted a questionnaire survey on 154 residents from Beijing. The results showed that risk preference moderated the effect of procedural justice on acceptance of public policy. Accordingly, Study 2 conducted a scenario experiment on 136 college students from Beijing to examine the mediating role of uncertainty, while retesting the moderating mechanism of risk preference in more detail. Results showed that risk preference significantly moderated the effect of procedural justice on acceptance of public policy. Specifically, uncertainty was more negatively associated with acceptance of public policy among the risk-averse individuals than risk-seeking individuals. Risk preference indirectly moderated the relationship between procedural justice and acceptance of public policy by moderating the relationship between uncertainty and acceptance of public policy.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pchj.660
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2877234912</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2877234912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-f095a04a92adc89878cca5d04a7a80b192dc7eb45afd608b2a3165484ecd376f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBCIVqUSX4AsceGS4tiJ7RxRRQGpEpdyjpz1Rk3ICzs59O9xaekedlc7o1nNEHIfs1XMGH8eYF-vpGRXZM5ZIiPGJbu-7CmfkaX3NQulY6mFviUzoYSWKuFzUuz2SF3fIO1LOrge0E7ONLSe_FgBUtNZ6ir_HTAs0WEHGBXGo6Utwt50lW89rTpqAHAYTYD_hKaiqYAOfeiHO3JTmsbj8jwX5Gvzulu_R9vPt4_1yzYCrvgYlSxLDUtMxo0FnWmlAUxqw0UZzYo44xYUFklqSiuZLrgRsUwTnSBYoWQpFuTxpBts_Ezox7zuJ9eFlznXSnGRZDEPrKcTC1zvfTCVD65qjTvkMcuPeebHPPOQZ6A-nAWnokV7If6nJ34BXiRw-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2877234912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of procedural justice and risk preference-based mechanisms in acceptance of public policy</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Xuan-Na, Wu ; Mengzhen, Tang ; Xue, Wu</creator><creatorcontrib>Xuan-Na, Wu ; Mengzhen, Tang ; Xue, Wu</creatorcontrib><description>The current study examines the relationship between procedural justice and acceptance of public policy, the mediating effect of uncertainty as well as the moderating effect of risk preference in this relationship. Study 1 conducted a questionnaire survey on 154 residents from Beijing. The results showed that risk preference moderated the effect of procedural justice on acceptance of public policy. Accordingly, Study 2 conducted a scenario experiment on 136 college students from Beijing to examine the mediating role of uncertainty, while retesting the moderating mechanism of risk preference in more detail. Results showed that risk preference significantly moderated the effect of procedural justice on acceptance of public policy. Specifically, uncertainty was more negatively associated with acceptance of public policy among the risk-averse individuals than risk-seeking individuals. Risk preference indirectly moderated the relationship between procedural justice and acceptance of public policy by moderating the relationship between uncertainty and acceptance of public policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-0252</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pchj.660</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37386742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><ispartof>PsyCh journal, 2023-10, Vol.12 (5), p.714-726</ispartof><rights>2023 Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-f095a04a92adc89878cca5d04a7a80b192dc7eb45afd608b2a3165484ecd376f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8040-5707 ; 0000-0003-4498-5609 ; 0000-0001-7407-5257</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37386742$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xuan-Na, Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mengzhen, Tang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Wu</creatorcontrib><title>The role of procedural justice and risk preference-based mechanisms in acceptance of public policy</title><title>PsyCh journal</title><addtitle>Psych J</addtitle><description>The current study examines the relationship between procedural justice and acceptance of public policy, the mediating effect of uncertainty as well as the moderating effect of risk preference in this relationship. Study 1 conducted a questionnaire survey on 154 residents from Beijing. The results showed that risk preference moderated the effect of procedural justice on acceptance of public policy. Accordingly, Study 2 conducted a scenario experiment on 136 college students from Beijing to examine the mediating role of uncertainty, while retesting the moderating mechanism of risk preference in more detail. Results showed that risk preference significantly moderated the effect of procedural justice on acceptance of public policy. Specifically, uncertainty was more negatively associated with acceptance of public policy among the risk-averse individuals than risk-seeking individuals. Risk preference indirectly moderated the relationship between procedural justice and acceptance of public policy by moderating the relationship between uncertainty and acceptance of public policy.</description><issn>2046-0252</issn><issn>2046-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UMtOwzAQtBCIVqUSX4AsceGS4tiJ7RxRRQGpEpdyjpz1Rk3ICzs59O9xaekedlc7o1nNEHIfs1XMGH8eYF-vpGRXZM5ZIiPGJbu-7CmfkaX3NQulY6mFviUzoYSWKuFzUuz2SF3fIO1LOrge0E7ONLSe_FgBUtNZ6ir_HTAs0WEHGBXGo6Utwt50lW89rTpqAHAYTYD_hKaiqYAOfeiHO3JTmsbj8jwX5Gvzulu_R9vPt4_1yzYCrvgYlSxLDUtMxo0FnWmlAUxqw0UZzYo44xYUFklqSiuZLrgRsUwTnSBYoWQpFuTxpBts_Ezox7zuJ9eFlznXSnGRZDEPrKcTC1zvfTCVD65qjTvkMcuPeebHPPOQZ6A-nAWnokV7If6nJ34BXiRw-w</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Xuan-Na, Wu</creator><creator>Mengzhen, Tang</creator><creator>Xue, Wu</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8040-5707</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4498-5609</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-5257</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>The role of procedural justice and risk preference-based mechanisms in acceptance of public policy</title><author>Xuan-Na, Wu ; Mengzhen, Tang ; Xue, Wu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-f095a04a92adc89878cca5d04a7a80b192dc7eb45afd608b2a3165484ecd376f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xuan-Na, Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mengzhen, Tang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Wu</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>PsyCh journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xuan-Na, Wu</au><au>Mengzhen, Tang</au><au>Xue, Wu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of procedural justice and risk preference-based mechanisms in acceptance of public policy</atitle><jtitle>PsyCh journal</jtitle><addtitle>Psych J</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>714</spage><epage>726</epage><pages>714-726</pages><issn>2046-0252</issn><eissn>2046-0260</eissn><abstract>The current study examines the relationship between procedural justice and acceptance of public policy, the mediating effect of uncertainty as well as the moderating effect of risk preference in this relationship. Study 1 conducted a questionnaire survey on 154 residents from Beijing. The results showed that risk preference moderated the effect of procedural justice on acceptance of public policy. Accordingly, Study 2 conducted a scenario experiment on 136 college students from Beijing to examine the mediating role of uncertainty, while retesting the moderating mechanism of risk preference in more detail. Results showed that risk preference significantly moderated the effect of procedural justice on acceptance of public policy. Specifically, uncertainty was more negatively associated with acceptance of public policy among the risk-averse individuals than risk-seeking individuals. Risk preference indirectly moderated the relationship between procedural justice and acceptance of public policy by moderating the relationship between uncertainty and acceptance of public policy.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37386742</pmid><doi>10.1002/pchj.660</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8040-5707</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4498-5609</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-5257</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2046-0252
ispartof PsyCh journal, 2023-10, Vol.12 (5), p.714-726
issn 2046-0252
2046-0260
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2877234912
source Access via Wiley Online Library
title The role of procedural justice and risk preference-based mechanisms in acceptance of public policy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T12%3A07%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20procedural%20justice%20and%20risk%20preference-based%20mechanisms%20in%20acceptance%20of%20public%20policy&rft.jtitle=PsyCh%20journal&rft.au=Xuan-Na,%20Wu&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=714&rft.epage=726&rft.pages=714-726&rft.issn=2046-0252&rft.eissn=2046-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pchj.660&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2877234912%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2877234912&rft_id=info:pmid/37386742&rfr_iscdi=true