Arkansas’s Gun Regulation Laws: Suppressing the “Pistol Toter,” 1838-1925
ARKANSAS'S HISTORIC TRADITION OF HANDGUN REGULATION and decades-long efforts to strengthen penalties stand in contrast to the story that Justice Clarence Thomas told in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen in 2022. In a six-to-three decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Arkansas historical quarterly 2022-07, Vol.81 (2), p.103-126 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 126 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | The Arkansas historical quarterly |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Willis, James F. |
description | ARKANSAS'S HISTORIC TRADITION OF HANDGUN REGULATION and decades-long efforts to strengthen penalties stand in contrast to the story that Justice Clarence Thomas told in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen in 2022. In a six-to-three decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a century-old New York gun permit law violated the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment. "9 An important change in the law occurred in 1860 when the General Assembly, without explanation, repealed the penalty of imprisonment.10 Arkansas's Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the concealed weapons laws, both before and after the Civil War, in three important cases, State v. Buzzard (1842), Fife v. State (1876), and Wilson v. State (1878). State and federal judges and the U.S. Supreme Court generally accepted the militia view of the Second Amendment until 2008.11 Violence in many forms continued to plague the people of Arkansas after the Civil War. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2875139802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27252412</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27252412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j135t-76c9140d47905aa4aabc6d32decccdcba17b236553b2a6c1f867d55860c7dab43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjctKw0AUQAdRMFY_QQi4Hph77zySZSlahYAgug53ZlJprEmdSRB3_oa_55dYqKuzOZxzIgokdBIQ6FQUSiktoUI6Fxc590oB6hoKUS7TGw-Z8-_3Ty7X81A-da_zjqftOJQNf-ZLcbbhXe6u_rkQL3e3z6t72TyuH1bLRvZAZpLOhhq0itrVyjBrZh9sJIxdCCEGz-A8kjWGPLINsKmsi8ZUVgUX2WtaiJtjd5_Gj7nLU9uPcxoOyxYrZ4DqSuHBuj5afZ7G1O7T9p3TV4sODWpA-gO5UUT1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2875139802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Arkansas’s Gun Regulation Laws: Suppressing the “Pistol Toter,” 1838-1925</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Willis, James F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Willis, James F.</creatorcontrib><description>ARKANSAS'S HISTORIC TRADITION OF HANDGUN REGULATION and decades-long efforts to strengthen penalties stand in contrast to the story that Justice Clarence Thomas told in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen in 2022. In a six-to-three decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a century-old New York gun permit law violated the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment. "9 An important change in the law occurred in 1860 when the General Assembly, without explanation, repealed the penalty of imprisonment.10 Arkansas's Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the concealed weapons laws, both before and after the Civil War, in three important cases, State v. Buzzard (1842), Fife v. State (1876), and Wilson v. State (1878). State and federal judges and the U.S. Supreme Court generally accepted the militia view of the Second Amendment until 2008.11 Violence in many forms continued to plague the people of Arkansas after the Civil War.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-1823</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-1213</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fayetteville: Arkansas Historical Association</publisher><subject>Fines & penalties ; Firearm laws & regulations ; Firearms ; Violence ; War</subject><ispartof>The Arkansas historical quarterly, 2022-07, Vol.81 (2), p.103-126</ispartof><rights>Copyright Arkansas Historical Association, Department of History, University of Arkansas Summer 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27252412$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27252412$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Willis, James F.</creatorcontrib><title>Arkansas’s Gun Regulation Laws: Suppressing the “Pistol Toter,” 1838-1925</title><title>The Arkansas historical quarterly</title><description>ARKANSAS'S HISTORIC TRADITION OF HANDGUN REGULATION and decades-long efforts to strengthen penalties stand in contrast to the story that Justice Clarence Thomas told in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen in 2022. In a six-to-three decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a century-old New York gun permit law violated the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment. "9 An important change in the law occurred in 1860 when the General Assembly, without explanation, repealed the penalty of imprisonment.10 Arkansas's Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the concealed weapons laws, both before and after the Civil War, in three important cases, State v. Buzzard (1842), Fife v. State (1876), and Wilson v. State (1878). State and federal judges and the U.S. Supreme Court generally accepted the militia view of the Second Amendment until 2008.11 Violence in many forms continued to plague the people of Arkansas after the Civil War.</description><subject>Fines & penalties</subject><subject>Firearm laws & regulations</subject><subject>Firearms</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>War</subject><issn>0004-1823</issn><issn>2327-1213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>PQHSC</sourceid><recordid>eNotjctKw0AUQAdRMFY_QQi4Hph77zySZSlahYAgug53ZlJprEmdSRB3_oa_55dYqKuzOZxzIgokdBIQ6FQUSiktoUI6Fxc590oB6hoKUS7TGw-Z8-_3Ty7X81A-da_zjqftOJQNf-ZLcbbhXe6u_rkQL3e3z6t72TyuH1bLRvZAZpLOhhq0itrVyjBrZh9sJIxdCCEGz-A8kjWGPLINsKmsi8ZUVgUX2WtaiJtjd5_Gj7nLU9uPcxoOyxYrZ4DqSuHBuj5afZ7G1O7T9p3TV4sODWpA-gO5UUT1</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>Willis, James F.</creator><general>Arkansas Historical Association</general><general>Arkansas Historical Association, Department of History, University of Arkansas</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQHSC</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Arkansas’s Gun Regulation Laws</title><author>Willis, James F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j135t-76c9140d47905aa4aabc6d32decccdcba17b236553b2a6c1f867d55860c7dab43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Fines & penalties</topic><topic>Firearm laws & regulations</topic><topic>Firearms</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>War</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Willis, James F.</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>History Study Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Arkansas historical quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Willis, James F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Arkansas’s Gun Regulation Laws: Suppressing the “Pistol Toter,” 1838-1925</atitle><jtitle>The Arkansas historical quarterly</jtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>103-126</pages><issn>0004-1823</issn><eissn>2327-1213</eissn><abstract>ARKANSAS'S HISTORIC TRADITION OF HANDGUN REGULATION and decades-long efforts to strengthen penalties stand in contrast to the story that Justice Clarence Thomas told in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen in 2022. In a six-to-three decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a century-old New York gun permit law violated the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment. "9 An important change in the law occurred in 1860 when the General Assembly, without explanation, repealed the penalty of imprisonment.10 Arkansas's Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the concealed weapons laws, both before and after the Civil War, in three important cases, State v. Buzzard (1842), Fife v. State (1876), and Wilson v. State (1878). State and federal judges and the U.S. Supreme Court generally accepted the militia view of the Second Amendment until 2008.11 Violence in many forms continued to plague the people of Arkansas after the Civil War.</abstract><cop>Fayetteville</cop><pub>Arkansas Historical Association</pub><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-1823 |
ispartof | The Arkansas historical quarterly, 2022-07, Vol.81 (2), p.103-126 |
issn | 0004-1823 2327-1213 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2875139802 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Fines & penalties Firearm laws & regulations Firearms Violence War |
title | Arkansas’s Gun Regulation Laws: Suppressing the “Pistol Toter,” 1838-1925 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A04%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Arkansas%E2%80%99s%20Gun%20Regulation%20Laws:%20Suppressing%20the%20%E2%80%9CPistol%20Toter,%E2%80%9D%201838-1925&rft.jtitle=The%20Arkansas%20historical%20quarterly&rft.au=Willis,%20James%20F.&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=103-126&rft.issn=0004-1823&rft.eissn=2327-1213&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27252412%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2875139802&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27252412&rfr_iscdi=true |