FLORISTIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF FLORA IN NILGIRIS BIOSPHERE RESERVE, WESTERN GHATS OF SOUTHERN INDIA
The field survey was conducted from April 2021–December 2021in Mettupalyam forest range of Coimbatore forest division which is an integral part of Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve. A systematic random sampling method with 60 sample plots of 20 × 20 m and 8 transect line survey at 0.2% sampling intensity w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of tropical forest science 2023-01, Vol.35 (3), p.270-282 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 282 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 270 |
container_title | Journal of tropical forest science |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Packialakshmi, M Divya, MP Baranidharan, K Parthiban, KT Geetha, S Ganesan, KN Ravi, R |
description | The field survey was conducted from April 2021–December 2021in Mettupalyam forest range of Coimbatore forest division which is an integral part of Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve. A systematic random sampling method with 60 sample plots of 20 × 20 m and 8 transect line survey at 0.2% sampling intensity were laid out in the study area which recorded 54 trees, 25 shrubs, 22 herbs and 22 grasses. The result revealed that the maximum dominance was observed in Atlantia monophylla (32.20), Lantana camara (43.02), Abutilon indicum (54.87) and Oplismenus burmanii (19.34%) and minimum in Glycosmis pentaphylla (12.32), Euphorbia heterophylla (2.18), Mimosa pudica (2.82) and Melinis repens (0.18%) in tree, shrubs, herbs and grass layer, respectively. Furthermore, the highest Shannon D index (H = 3.08) observed in tree layer, followed by grass layer (H = 2.76), herb layer (H = 2.28) and shrub later (H = 2.25) along with Simpson index also higher in grass layer (1-D = 0.92), tree layer (1-D = 0.91), herb layer (1-D = 0.86) and shrub layer (1-D = 0.84), respectively. This study involving the cataloguing of flora in Mettupalayam Reserve Forest is the pioneer work which provided scientific and baseline information for conservation of flora in the forested area. |
doi_str_mv | 10.26525/jtfs2023.35.3.270 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2872354725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48737472</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48737472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-cceb8421af7ffdeda2ec00c9918af141f2d84be2ddf5dab3e7e5820a9d77eb653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKd_QBACvtqa3jRL9li7bg3UdjSt4lPo2gQcarXtHvz3dpv6cLncy_nOgYPQtUdcmDFg99vB9kCAupS51AVOTtAEGHjOXPj8FE2IB8IZh56ji77fEkIZ-HyCdssky6UqZIjD7HGdKVnILMVBusCqyMuwKPMgGc8geVFS4WyJ90CAZYpTmazkyOIHmal1HOURziMV5U_RHX6OVBHlKV7FQXGgVFYW8f4j04UMLtGZrd56c_W7p6hcRkUYO0m2kmGQODX4YnDq2myED15lubWNaSowNSH1fO6Jynq-Z6ER_sZA01jWVBtquGECSDVvODebGaNTdHv0_ezar53pB71td93HGKlBcKDM57BXwVFVd23fd8bqz-71veq-tUf0oV79V6-mTFM91jtCN0do2w9t90_4glM-utIfgChwBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2872354725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>FLORISTIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF FLORA IN NILGIRIS BIOSPHERE RESERVE, WESTERN GHATS OF SOUTHERN INDIA</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Packialakshmi, M ; Divya, MP ; Baranidharan, K ; Parthiban, KT ; Geetha, S ; Ganesan, KN ; Ravi, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Packialakshmi, M ; Divya, MP ; Baranidharan, K ; Parthiban, KT ; Geetha, S ; Ganesan, KN ; Ravi, R</creatorcontrib><description>The field survey was conducted from April 2021–December 2021in Mettupalyam forest range of Coimbatore forest division which is an integral part of Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve. A systematic random sampling method with 60 sample plots of 20 × 20 m and 8 transect line survey at 0.2% sampling intensity were laid out in the study area which recorded 54 trees, 25 shrubs, 22 herbs and 22 grasses. The result revealed that the maximum dominance was observed in Atlantia monophylla (32.20), Lantana camara (43.02), Abutilon indicum (54.87) and Oplismenus burmanii (19.34%) and minimum in Glycosmis pentaphylla (12.32), Euphorbia heterophylla (2.18), Mimosa pudica (2.82) and Melinis repens (0.18%) in tree, shrubs, herbs and grass layer, respectively. Furthermore, the highest Shannon D index (H = 3.08) observed in tree layer, followed by grass layer (H = 2.76), herb layer (H = 2.28) and shrub later (H = 2.25) along with Simpson index also higher in grass layer (1-D = 0.92), tree layer (1-D = 0.91), herb layer (1-D = 0.86) and shrub layer (1-D = 0.84), respectively. This study involving the cataloguing of flora in Mettupalayam Reserve Forest is the pioneer work which provided scientific and baseline information for conservation of flora in the forested area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0128-1283</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2521-9847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26525/jtfs2023.35.3.270</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kuala Lumpur: Forest Research Institute Malaysia</publisher><subject>Biosphere ; Deforestation ; Flora ; Flowers & plants ; Forest conservation ; Grasses ; Herbs ; Random sampling ; Sampling methods ; Shrubs ; Species composition ; Statistical sampling ; Structural analysis ; Surveys ; Trees ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Journal of tropical forest science, 2023-01, Vol.35 (3), p.270-282</ispartof><rights>Forest Research Institute Malaysia</rights><rights>Copyright Forest Research Institute Malaysia Jul 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48737472$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48737472$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Packialakshmi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Divya, MP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranidharan, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parthiban, KT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geetha, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganesan, KN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravi, R</creatorcontrib><title>FLORISTIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF FLORA IN NILGIRIS BIOSPHERE RESERVE, WESTERN GHATS OF SOUTHERN INDIA</title><title>Journal of tropical forest science</title><description>The field survey was conducted from April 2021–December 2021in Mettupalyam forest range of Coimbatore forest division which is an integral part of Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve. A systematic random sampling method with 60 sample plots of 20 × 20 m and 8 transect line survey at 0.2% sampling intensity were laid out in the study area which recorded 54 trees, 25 shrubs, 22 herbs and 22 grasses. The result revealed that the maximum dominance was observed in Atlantia monophylla (32.20), Lantana camara (43.02), Abutilon indicum (54.87) and Oplismenus burmanii (19.34%) and minimum in Glycosmis pentaphylla (12.32), Euphorbia heterophylla (2.18), Mimosa pudica (2.82) and Melinis repens (0.18%) in tree, shrubs, herbs and grass layer, respectively. Furthermore, the highest Shannon D index (H = 3.08) observed in tree layer, followed by grass layer (H = 2.76), herb layer (H = 2.28) and shrub later (H = 2.25) along with Simpson index also higher in grass layer (1-D = 0.92), tree layer (1-D = 0.91), herb layer (1-D = 0.86) and shrub layer (1-D = 0.84), respectively. This study involving the cataloguing of flora in Mettupalayam Reserve Forest is the pioneer work which provided scientific and baseline information for conservation of flora in the forested area.</description><subject>Biosphere</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Flora</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Forest conservation</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Herbs</subject><subject>Random sampling</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Shrubs</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Statistical sampling</subject><subject>Structural analysis</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0128-1283</issn><issn>2521-9847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kFFLwzAUhYMoOKd_QBACvtqa3jRL9li7bg3UdjSt4lPo2gQcarXtHvz3dpv6cLncy_nOgYPQtUdcmDFg99vB9kCAupS51AVOTtAEGHjOXPj8FE2IB8IZh56ji77fEkIZ-HyCdssky6UqZIjD7HGdKVnILMVBusCqyMuwKPMgGc8geVFS4WyJ90CAZYpTmazkyOIHmal1HOURziMV5U_RHX6OVBHlKV7FQXGgVFYW8f4j04UMLtGZrd56c_W7p6hcRkUYO0m2kmGQODX4YnDq2myED15lubWNaSowNSH1fO6Jynq-Z6ER_sZA01jWVBtquGECSDVvODebGaNTdHv0_ezar53pB71td93HGKlBcKDM57BXwVFVd23fd8bqz-71veq-tUf0oV79V6-mTFM91jtCN0do2w9t90_4glM-utIfgChwBQ</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Packialakshmi, M</creator><creator>Divya, MP</creator><creator>Baranidharan, K</creator><creator>Parthiban, KT</creator><creator>Geetha, S</creator><creator>Ganesan, KN</creator><creator>Ravi, R</creator><general>Forest Research Institute Malaysia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>FLORISTIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF FLORA IN NILGIRIS BIOSPHERE RESERVE, WESTERN GHATS OF SOUTHERN INDIA</title><author>Packialakshmi, M ; Divya, MP ; Baranidharan, K ; Parthiban, KT ; Geetha, S ; Ganesan, KN ; Ravi, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-cceb8421af7ffdeda2ec00c9918af141f2d84be2ddf5dab3e7e5820a9d77eb653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biosphere</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Flora</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Forest conservation</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Herbs</topic><topic>Random sampling</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Shrubs</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Statistical sampling</topic><topic>Structural analysis</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Packialakshmi, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Divya, MP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranidharan, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parthiban, KT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geetha, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganesan, KN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravi, R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of tropical forest science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Packialakshmi, M</au><au>Divya, MP</au><au>Baranidharan, K</au><au>Parthiban, KT</au><au>Geetha, S</au><au>Ganesan, KN</au><au>Ravi, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>FLORISTIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF FLORA IN NILGIRIS BIOSPHERE RESERVE, WESTERN GHATS OF SOUTHERN INDIA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of tropical forest science</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>270</spage><epage>282</epage><pages>270-282</pages><issn>0128-1283</issn><eissn>2521-9847</eissn><abstract>The field survey was conducted from April 2021–December 2021in Mettupalyam forest range of Coimbatore forest division which is an integral part of Nilgiris Biosphere Reserve. A systematic random sampling method with 60 sample plots of 20 × 20 m and 8 transect line survey at 0.2% sampling intensity were laid out in the study area which recorded 54 trees, 25 shrubs, 22 herbs and 22 grasses. The result revealed that the maximum dominance was observed in Atlantia monophylla (32.20), Lantana camara (43.02), Abutilon indicum (54.87) and Oplismenus burmanii (19.34%) and minimum in Glycosmis pentaphylla (12.32), Euphorbia heterophylla (2.18), Mimosa pudica (2.82) and Melinis repens (0.18%) in tree, shrubs, herbs and grass layer, respectively. Furthermore, the highest Shannon D index (H = 3.08) observed in tree layer, followed by grass layer (H = 2.76), herb layer (H = 2.28) and shrub later (H = 2.25) along with Simpson index also higher in grass layer (1-D = 0.92), tree layer (1-D = 0.91), herb layer (1-D = 0.86) and shrub layer (1-D = 0.84), respectively. This study involving the cataloguing of flora in Mettupalayam Reserve Forest is the pioneer work which provided scientific and baseline information for conservation of flora in the forested area.</abstract><cop>Kuala Lumpur</cop><pub>Forest Research Institute Malaysia</pub><doi>10.26525/jtfs2023.35.3.270</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0128-1283 |
ispartof | Journal of tropical forest science, 2023-01, Vol.35 (3), p.270-282 |
issn | 0128-1283 2521-9847 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2872354725 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Biosphere Deforestation Flora Flowers & plants Forest conservation Grasses Herbs Random sampling Sampling methods Shrubs Species composition Statistical sampling Structural analysis Surveys Trees Wildlife conservation |
title | FLORISTIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF FLORA IN NILGIRIS BIOSPHERE RESERVE, WESTERN GHATS OF SOUTHERN INDIA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T05%3A26%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=FLORISTIC%20COMPOSITION%20AND%20STRUCTURAL%20ANALYSIS%20OF%20FLORA%20IN%20NILGIRIS%20BIOSPHERE%20RESERVE,%20WESTERN%20GHATS%20OF%20SOUTHERN%20INDIA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20tropical%20forest%20science&rft.au=Packialakshmi,%20M&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=270&rft.epage=282&rft.pages=270-282&rft.issn=0128-1283&rft.eissn=2521-9847&rft_id=info:doi/10.26525/jtfs2023.35.3.270&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48737472%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2872354725&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48737472&rfr_iscdi=true |