Urban landscapes affect wild bee maternal investment and body size
Urbanization is considered one of the major threats to biodiversity worldwide, with a special concern for native species decline, including wild bees. Through the increase of impervious surfaces, urbanization diminishes, fragments, and warms city environments, significantly reducing nesting and fora...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urban ecosystems 2023-10, Vol.26 (5), p.1319-1329 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1329 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1319 |
container_title | Urban ecosystems |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Brasil, Sandara N. R. Khair, Merna M. R. Ayers, Anthony C. Huisken, Jesse L. Rehan, Sandra M. |
description | Urbanization is considered one of the major threats to biodiversity worldwide, with a special concern for native species decline, including wild bees. Through the increase of impervious surfaces, urbanization diminishes, fragments, and warms city environments, significantly reducing nesting and foraging resources for bees. Understanding the response of wildlife to urbanization in terms of reproduction, foraging efficiency, and offspring provisioning is important to species conservation in the face of continued urban development. In this study, we investigated how different levels of urbanization affect individual foraging effort, survival, brood productivity, and fitness in
Ceratina calcarata
. Our findings show that low urbanization levels favour larger-bodied adults, but foraging efforts (determined by wing wear) were higher at moderate disturbance levels. Larger-bodied mothers produced more numerous offspring (clutch size), mainly in medium disturbance sites. Likewise, larger-bodied mothers produced a larger-bodied offspring at low urbanization levels. Our results indicate that wild bees benefit from low and medium levels of urbanization indicated by maternal and offspring fitness in terms of body size and the number of brood, respectively. This suggests significant effects of urbanization on the fitness and stability of wild bee populations. This study provides novel insights into the impact of urban land use and highlights the importance of conserving and providing green spaces for pollinators. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11252-023-01378-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2871490243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2871490243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-e5270d8d3cbc5a421edb6e9fcd06593cf7a8fd24027abdfddd64cdc8031696bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8BL16ik6Rp06MufsGCF_cc0mQiXfqxNl1l_fVmrSB48DRzeJ6XmZeQcw5XHKC4jpwLJRgIyYDLQjM4IDOuCsl4nonDtIOWTHOljslJjGuApGk9I7erobIdbWzno7MbjNSGgG6kH3XjaYVIWzvi0NmG1t07xrHFbqSJplXvdzTWn3hKjoJtIp79zDlZ3d-9LB7Z8vnhaXGzZE4qMTJUogCvvXSVUzYTHH2VYxmch1yV0oXC6uBFBqKwlQ_e-zxz3mmQPC_zysk5uZxyN0P_tk2nmLaODpt0O_bbaCRXUkDyeUIv_qDrfrt_IhqhC56VIDKZKDFRbuhjHDCYzVC3dtgZDmZfq5lqNalW812rgSTJSYoJ7l5x-I3-x_oCeLB6Zg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2871490243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urban landscapes affect wild bee maternal investment and body size</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Brasil, Sandara N. R. ; Khair, Merna M. R. ; Ayers, Anthony C. ; Huisken, Jesse L. ; Rehan, Sandra M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brasil, Sandara N. R. ; Khair, Merna M. R. ; Ayers, Anthony C. ; Huisken, Jesse L. ; Rehan, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><description>Urbanization is considered one of the major threats to biodiversity worldwide, with a special concern for native species decline, including wild bees. Through the increase of impervious surfaces, urbanization diminishes, fragments, and warms city environments, significantly reducing nesting and foraging resources for bees. Understanding the response of wildlife to urbanization in terms of reproduction, foraging efficiency, and offspring provisioning is important to species conservation in the face of continued urban development. In this study, we investigated how different levels of urbanization affect individual foraging effort, survival, brood productivity, and fitness in
Ceratina calcarata
. Our findings show that low urbanization levels favour larger-bodied adults, but foraging efforts (determined by wing wear) were higher at moderate disturbance levels. Larger-bodied mothers produced more numerous offspring (clutch size), mainly in medium disturbance sites. Likewise, larger-bodied mothers produced a larger-bodied offspring at low urbanization levels. Our results indicate that wild bees benefit from low and medium levels of urbanization indicated by maternal and offspring fitness in terms of body size and the number of brood, respectively. This suggests significant effects of urbanization on the fitness and stability of wild bee populations. This study provides novel insights into the impact of urban land use and highlights the importance of conserving and providing green spaces for pollinators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-8155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11252-023-01378-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Bees ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Body size ; Ceratina calcarata ; Clutch size ; Ecology ; Environmental Management ; Fitness ; Green infrastructure ; Indigenous species ; Land use ; Life Sciences ; Nature Conservation ; Nesting ; Offspring ; Pollinators ; Population decline ; population dynamics ; Population studies ; progeny ; Provisioning ; Urban areas ; Urban development ; Urban Ecology ; Urban environments ; Urbanization ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Urban ecosystems, 2023-10, Vol.26 (5), p.1319-1329</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-e5270d8d3cbc5a421edb6e9fcd06593cf7a8fd24027abdfddd64cdc8031696bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-e5270d8d3cbc5a421edb6e9fcd06593cf7a8fd24027abdfddd64cdc8031696bc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11252-023-01378-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11252-023-01378-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brasil, Sandara N. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khair, Merna M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayers, Anthony C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huisken, Jesse L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rehan, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><title>Urban landscapes affect wild bee maternal investment and body size</title><title>Urban ecosystems</title><addtitle>Urban Ecosyst</addtitle><description>Urbanization is considered one of the major threats to biodiversity worldwide, with a special concern for native species decline, including wild bees. Through the increase of impervious surfaces, urbanization diminishes, fragments, and warms city environments, significantly reducing nesting and foraging resources for bees. Understanding the response of wildlife to urbanization in terms of reproduction, foraging efficiency, and offspring provisioning is important to species conservation in the face of continued urban development. In this study, we investigated how different levels of urbanization affect individual foraging effort, survival, brood productivity, and fitness in
Ceratina calcarata
. Our findings show that low urbanization levels favour larger-bodied adults, but foraging efforts (determined by wing wear) were higher at moderate disturbance levels. Larger-bodied mothers produced more numerous offspring (clutch size), mainly in medium disturbance sites. Likewise, larger-bodied mothers produced a larger-bodied offspring at low urbanization levels. Our results indicate that wild bees benefit from low and medium levels of urbanization indicated by maternal and offspring fitness in terms of body size and the number of brood, respectively. This suggests significant effects of urbanization on the fitness and stability of wild bee populations. This study provides novel insights into the impact of urban land use and highlights the importance of conserving and providing green spaces for pollinators.</description><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Ceratina calcarata</subject><subject>Clutch size</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Fitness</subject><subject>Green infrastructure</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>population dynamics</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>progeny</subject><subject>Provisioning</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban development</subject><subject>Urban Ecology</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1083-8155</issn><issn>1573-1642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8BL16ik6Rp06MufsGCF_cc0mQiXfqxNl1l_fVmrSB48DRzeJ6XmZeQcw5XHKC4jpwLJRgIyYDLQjM4IDOuCsl4nonDtIOWTHOljslJjGuApGk9I7erobIdbWzno7MbjNSGgG6kH3XjaYVIWzvi0NmG1t07xrHFbqSJplXvdzTWn3hKjoJtIp79zDlZ3d-9LB7Z8vnhaXGzZE4qMTJUogCvvXSVUzYTHH2VYxmch1yV0oXC6uBFBqKwlQ_e-zxz3mmQPC_zysk5uZxyN0P_tk2nmLaODpt0O_bbaCRXUkDyeUIv_qDrfrt_IhqhC56VIDKZKDFRbuhjHDCYzVC3dtgZDmZfq5lqNalW812rgSTJSYoJ7l5x-I3-x_oCeLB6Zg</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Brasil, Sandara N. R.</creator><creator>Khair, Merna M. R.</creator><creator>Ayers, Anthony C.</creator><creator>Huisken, Jesse L.</creator><creator>Rehan, Sandra M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Urban landscapes affect wild bee maternal investment and body size</title><author>Brasil, Sandara N. R. ; Khair, Merna M. R. ; Ayers, Anthony C. ; Huisken, Jesse L. ; Rehan, Sandra M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-e5270d8d3cbc5a421edb6e9fcd06593cf7a8fd24027abdfddd64cdc8031696bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Ceratina calcarata</topic><topic>Clutch size</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Fitness</topic><topic>Green infrastructure</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>population dynamics</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>progeny</topic><topic>Provisioning</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban development</topic><topic>Urban Ecology</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brasil, Sandara N. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khair, Merna M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayers, Anthony C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huisken, Jesse L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rehan, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urban ecosystems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brasil, Sandara N. R.</au><au>Khair, Merna M. R.</au><au>Ayers, Anthony C.</au><au>Huisken, Jesse L.</au><au>Rehan, Sandra M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urban landscapes affect wild bee maternal investment and body size</atitle><jtitle>Urban ecosystems</jtitle><stitle>Urban Ecosyst</stitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1319</spage><epage>1329</epage><pages>1319-1329</pages><issn>1083-8155</issn><eissn>1573-1642</eissn><abstract>Urbanization is considered one of the major threats to biodiversity worldwide, with a special concern for native species decline, including wild bees. Through the increase of impervious surfaces, urbanization diminishes, fragments, and warms city environments, significantly reducing nesting and foraging resources for bees. Understanding the response of wildlife to urbanization in terms of reproduction, foraging efficiency, and offspring provisioning is important to species conservation in the face of continued urban development. In this study, we investigated how different levels of urbanization affect individual foraging effort, survival, brood productivity, and fitness in
Ceratina calcarata
. Our findings show that low urbanization levels favour larger-bodied adults, but foraging efforts (determined by wing wear) were higher at moderate disturbance levels. Larger-bodied mothers produced more numerous offspring (clutch size), mainly in medium disturbance sites. Likewise, larger-bodied mothers produced a larger-bodied offspring at low urbanization levels. Our results indicate that wild bees benefit from low and medium levels of urbanization indicated by maternal and offspring fitness in terms of body size and the number of brood, respectively. This suggests significant effects of urbanization on the fitness and stability of wild bee populations. This study provides novel insights into the impact of urban land use and highlights the importance of conserving and providing green spaces for pollinators.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11252-023-01378-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1083-8155 |
ispartof | Urban ecosystems, 2023-10, Vol.26 (5), p.1319-1329 |
issn | 1083-8155 1573-1642 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2871490243 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Bees Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Body size Ceratina calcarata Clutch size Ecology Environmental Management Fitness Green infrastructure Indigenous species Land use Life Sciences Nature Conservation Nesting Offspring Pollinators Population decline population dynamics Population studies progeny Provisioning Urban areas Urban development Urban Ecology Urban environments Urbanization Wildlife Wildlife conservation |
title | Urban landscapes affect wild bee maternal investment and body size |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T17%3A09%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urban%20landscapes%20affect%20wild%20bee%20maternal%20investment%20and%20body%20size&rft.jtitle=Urban%20ecosystems&rft.au=Brasil,%20Sandara%20N.%20R.&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1319&rft.epage=1329&rft.pages=1319-1329&rft.issn=1083-8155&rft.eissn=1573-1642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11252-023-01378-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2871490243%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2871490243&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |