Influences of no‐tillage on the yield and silage fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass

It is common in southern China that rice (Oryza sativa L.) fields are sown with a cover crop like Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) following autumn harvest. The objective of the present research was to compare the effects of different no‐tillage methods on the yield, nutritive composition an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Grassland science 2023-10, Vol.69 (4), p.239-252
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Liuxing, Li, Xinqin, Tian, Jing, Wu, Dan, Zhang, Jianguo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 252
container_issue 4
container_start_page 239
container_title Grassland science
container_volume 69
creator Xu, Liuxing
Li, Xinqin
Tian, Jing
Wu, Dan
Zhang, Jianguo
description It is common in southern China that rice (Oryza sativa L.) fields are sown with a cover crop like Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) following autumn harvest. The objective of the present research was to compare the effects of different no‐tillage methods on the yield, nutritive composition and silage fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass. Italian ryegrass was planted in winter fallow paddy fields on 9 days (NT9) and 5 days (NT5) prior to rice harvest and on 1 day after rice harvest for 2 years. Sowing prior to harvest was no‐tillage, and sowing after rice harvest was either no‐tillage (NT1) or conventional tillage (CK). The grass was harvested and ensiled two times each year. The growing year had no significant effects on the yield and most nutrition components, while it had significant effects on pH value, butyric acid and NH3‐N contents of silage. There were no differences in the yield, nutritional composition and silage fermentation quality among sowing methods. The neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber of NT1 decreased slightly compared with NT9, NT5 and CK (p > .05). There was no difference in silage fermentation quality among the four treatments. The best sowing method for Italian ryegrass with second cut in winter fallow paddy was no‐tillage sowing after rice harvest.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/grs.12403
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2870847910</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2870847910</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2573-ca8d7aa606fb881b6062da27ba6e2977264e769ca21761859dc3f583fecc40743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsL3yDgysW0SWaaZJZStBYKgj8guAhp5qZOmWbaZAaZnY_gM_okph1x593cw-U798BB6JKSEY0zXvkwoiwj6REaUJFlCc_F6_Gf5vQUnYWwJiSVhJMBeps7W7XgDARcW-zq78-vpqwqvQJcO9y8A-5KqAqsXYFDebhb8BtwjW7KSOxaXZVNtzfPmyi1w76DldchnKMTq6sAF797iF7ubp-n98niYTaf3iwSwyYiTYyWhdCaE26XUtJlFKzQTCw1B5YLwXgGgudGMyo4lZO8MKmdyNSCMRkRWTpEV_3fra93LYRGrevWuxipmBREZiKnJFLXPWV8HYIHq7a-3GjfKUrUvjsVu1OH7iI77tmPsoLuf1DNHp96xw9SCXGS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2870847910</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influences of no‐tillage on the yield and silage fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Xu, Liuxing ; Li, Xinqin ; Tian, Jing ; Wu, Dan ; Zhang, Jianguo</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Liuxing ; Li, Xinqin ; Tian, Jing ; Wu, Dan ; Zhang, Jianguo</creatorcontrib><description>It is common in southern China that rice (Oryza sativa L.) fields are sown with a cover crop like Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) following autumn harvest. The objective of the present research was to compare the effects of different no‐tillage methods on the yield, nutritive composition and silage fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass. Italian ryegrass was planted in winter fallow paddy fields on 9 days (NT9) and 5 days (NT5) prior to rice harvest and on 1 day after rice harvest for 2 years. Sowing prior to harvest was no‐tillage, and sowing after rice harvest was either no‐tillage (NT1) or conventional tillage (CK). The grass was harvested and ensiled two times each year. The growing year had no significant effects on the yield and most nutrition components, while it had significant effects on pH value, butyric acid and NH3‐N contents of silage. There were no differences in the yield, nutritional composition and silage fermentation quality among sowing methods. The neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber of NT1 decreased slightly compared with NT9, NT5 and CK (p &gt; .05). There was no difference in silage fermentation quality among the four treatments. The best sowing method for Italian ryegrass with second cut in winter fallow paddy was no‐tillage sowing after rice harvest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1744-6961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-697X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/grs.12403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Ammonia ; Butyric acid ; Cereal crops ; Composition ; Cover crops ; Fermentation ; Harvesting ; Italian ryegrass ; Lolium perenne ; Neurotrophin 1 ; Neurotrophin 5 ; no‐tillage ; Rice ; Rice fields ; Silage ; Tillage ; Winter ; yield</subject><ispartof>Grassland science, 2023-10, Vol.69 (4), p.239-252</ispartof><rights>2023 Japanese Society of Grassland Science.</rights><rights>2023 Japanese Society of Grassland Science</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2573-ca8d7aa606fb881b6062da27ba6e2977264e769ca21761859dc3f583fecc40743</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9704-2594 ; 0000-0003-0126-0069 ; 0000-0003-0772-7432</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgrs.12403$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgrs.12403$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27933,27934,45583,45584</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Liuxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jianguo</creatorcontrib><title>Influences of no‐tillage on the yield and silage fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass</title><title>Grassland science</title><description>It is common in southern China that rice (Oryza sativa L.) fields are sown with a cover crop like Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) following autumn harvest. The objective of the present research was to compare the effects of different no‐tillage methods on the yield, nutritive composition and silage fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass. Italian ryegrass was planted in winter fallow paddy fields on 9 days (NT9) and 5 days (NT5) prior to rice harvest and on 1 day after rice harvest for 2 years. Sowing prior to harvest was no‐tillage, and sowing after rice harvest was either no‐tillage (NT1) or conventional tillage (CK). The grass was harvested and ensiled two times each year. The growing year had no significant effects on the yield and most nutrition components, while it had significant effects on pH value, butyric acid and NH3‐N contents of silage. There were no differences in the yield, nutritional composition and silage fermentation quality among sowing methods. The neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber of NT1 decreased slightly compared with NT9, NT5 and CK (p &gt; .05). There was no difference in silage fermentation quality among the four treatments. The best sowing method for Italian ryegrass with second cut in winter fallow paddy was no‐tillage sowing after rice harvest.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Butyric acid</subject><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Cover crops</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Italian ryegrass</subject><subject>Lolium perenne</subject><subject>Neurotrophin 1</subject><subject>Neurotrophin 5</subject><subject>no‐tillage</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Rice fields</subject><subject>Silage</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Winter</subject><subject>yield</subject><issn>1744-6961</issn><issn>1744-697X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKsL3yDgysW0SWaaZJZStBYKgj8guAhp5qZOmWbaZAaZnY_gM_okph1x593cw-U798BB6JKSEY0zXvkwoiwj6REaUJFlCc_F6_Gf5vQUnYWwJiSVhJMBeps7W7XgDARcW-zq78-vpqwqvQJcO9y8A-5KqAqsXYFDebhb8BtwjW7KSOxaXZVNtzfPmyi1w76DldchnKMTq6sAF797iF7ubp-n98niYTaf3iwSwyYiTYyWhdCaE26XUtJlFKzQTCw1B5YLwXgGgudGMyo4lZO8MKmdyNSCMRkRWTpEV_3fra93LYRGrevWuxipmBREZiKnJFLXPWV8HYIHq7a-3GjfKUrUvjsVu1OH7iI77tmPsoLuf1DNHp96xw9SCXGS</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Xu, Liuxing</creator><creator>Li, Xinqin</creator><creator>Tian, Jing</creator><creator>Wu, Dan</creator><creator>Zhang, Jianguo</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9704-2594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0126-0069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0772-7432</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Influences of no‐tillage on the yield and silage fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass</title><author>Xu, Liuxing ; Li, Xinqin ; Tian, Jing ; Wu, Dan ; Zhang, Jianguo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2573-ca8d7aa606fb881b6062da27ba6e2977264e769ca21761859dc3f583fecc40743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Butyric acid</topic><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Cover crops</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Italian ryegrass</topic><topic>Lolium perenne</topic><topic>Neurotrophin 1</topic><topic>Neurotrophin 5</topic><topic>no‐tillage</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Rice fields</topic><topic>Silage</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Winter</topic><topic>yield</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Liuxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xinqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jianguo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Grassland science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Liuxing</au><au>Li, Xinqin</au><au>Tian, Jing</au><au>Wu, Dan</au><au>Zhang, Jianguo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influences of no‐tillage on the yield and silage fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass</atitle><jtitle>Grassland science</jtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>239-252</pages><issn>1744-6961</issn><eissn>1744-697X</eissn><abstract>It is common in southern China that rice (Oryza sativa L.) fields are sown with a cover crop like Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) following autumn harvest. The objective of the present research was to compare the effects of different no‐tillage methods on the yield, nutritive composition and silage fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass. Italian ryegrass was planted in winter fallow paddy fields on 9 days (NT9) and 5 days (NT5) prior to rice harvest and on 1 day after rice harvest for 2 years. Sowing prior to harvest was no‐tillage, and sowing after rice harvest was either no‐tillage (NT1) or conventional tillage (CK). The grass was harvested and ensiled two times each year. The growing year had no significant effects on the yield and most nutrition components, while it had significant effects on pH value, butyric acid and NH3‐N contents of silage. There were no differences in the yield, nutritional composition and silage fermentation quality among sowing methods. The neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber of NT1 decreased slightly compared with NT9, NT5 and CK (p &gt; .05). There was no difference in silage fermentation quality among the four treatments. The best sowing method for Italian ryegrass with second cut in winter fallow paddy was no‐tillage sowing after rice harvest.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/grs.12403</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9704-2594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0126-0069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0772-7432</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1744-6961
ispartof Grassland science, 2023-10, Vol.69 (4), p.239-252
issn 1744-6961
1744-697X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2870847910
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Agricultural practices
Ammonia
Butyric acid
Cereal crops
Composition
Cover crops
Fermentation
Harvesting
Italian ryegrass
Lolium perenne
Neurotrophin 1
Neurotrophin 5
no‐tillage
Rice
Rice fields
Silage
Tillage
Winter
yield
title Influences of no‐tillage on the yield and silage fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-01T23%3A55%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influences%20of%20no%E2%80%90tillage%20on%20the%20yield%20and%20silage%20fermentation%20quality%20of%20Italian%20ryegrass&rft.jtitle=Grassland%20science&rft.au=Xu,%20Liuxing&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=239-252&rft.issn=1744-6961&rft.eissn=1744-697X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/grs.12403&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2870847910%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2870847910&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true