Assessing Global Waste Management: Alternatives to Landfilling in Different Waste Streams—A Scoping Review

This scoping review examines global strategies and enterprises for sustainable solid waste management, with a focus on alternative landfilling approaches. The study collected and analyzed a significant number of documents from different regions, revealing Asia as the major contributor (for the colle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2023-09, Vol.15 (18), p.13290
1. Verfasser: Karimi, Nima
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 18
container_start_page 13290
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 15
creator Karimi, Nima
description This scoping review examines global strategies and enterprises for sustainable solid waste management, with a focus on alternative landfilling approaches. The study collected and analyzed a significant number of documents from different regions, revealing Asia as the major contributor (for the collected documents) (48.7%), followed by North America (24.3%) and Europe (15.8%). Recycling emerged as the most effective alternative waste treatment method, representing 52.3% of the documented approaches, with industrial recycling (22.6%) and residential/nonresidential recycling (20.2%) as prominent categories. Food waste was a significant concern across regions, constituting 21.4% of the collected documents. Composting was widely adopted (15.4%) due to its simplicity and benefits for gardening and soil improvement. Other methods like biogas extraction, reusing, raising awareness, incinerating, redistributing, reducing, and fermentation accounted for 13.1% cumulatively. The study highlights the need for adopted waste management solutions based on regional challenges and successful practices. Promoting recycling infrastructure, composting, and waste reduction approaches are crucial to achieving sustainable waste management aligned with SDGs. Collaboration and knowledge sharing between regions are essential to improve inefficient waste management mechanisms. Integrating the findings into policymaking and industry practices can lead to a more sustainable future with reduced environmental impact.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su151813290
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2869679843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A780021683</galeid><sourcerecordid>A780021683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f185034109665e041743971db81a06e4eccfffe7fcfd1e408b0a059d8489c2773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcFO3DAQhiPUSiDKqS8QiVOFls7ESWz3FtEWkLaqxLbiaHmd8crImyweLy03HoIn7JM0q-UAM4eZw_fP6NdfFB8RzoXQ8Jm32KBCUWk4KI4qkDhDaODdq_2wOGG-g6mEQI3tURE7ZmIOw6q8jOPSxvLWcqbyhx3sitY05C9lFzOlwebwQFzmsZzbofchxp0oDOXX4D2liXyRLnIiu-Z_T89duXDjZofd0EOgPx-K995GppOXeVz8_v7t18XVbP7z8vqim8-ckJhnHlUDokbQbdsQ1ChroSX2S4UWWqrJOT-9lN75HqkGtQQLje5VrbSrpBTHxen-7iaN91vibO7G7eQgsqlUq1upVS0m6nxPrWwkEwY_5mTd1D2tgxsHmjyS6aQCqLBVO8GnN4KJyfQ3r-yW2Vwvbt6yZ3vWpZE5kTebFNY2PRoEs4vLvIpL_AdhbYbr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869679843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Global Waste Management: Alternatives to Landfilling in Different Waste Streams—A Scoping Review</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Karimi, Nima</creator><creatorcontrib>Karimi, Nima</creatorcontrib><description>This scoping review examines global strategies and enterprises for sustainable solid waste management, with a focus on alternative landfilling approaches. The study collected and analyzed a significant number of documents from different regions, revealing Asia as the major contributor (for the collected documents) (48.7%), followed by North America (24.3%) and Europe (15.8%). Recycling emerged as the most effective alternative waste treatment method, representing 52.3% of the documented approaches, with industrial recycling (22.6%) and residential/nonresidential recycling (20.2%) as prominent categories. Food waste was a significant concern across regions, constituting 21.4% of the collected documents. Composting was widely adopted (15.4%) due to its simplicity and benefits for gardening and soil improvement. Other methods like biogas extraction, reusing, raising awareness, incinerating, redistributing, reducing, and fermentation accounted for 13.1% cumulatively. The study highlights the need for adopted waste management solutions based on regional challenges and successful practices. Promoting recycling infrastructure, composting, and waste reduction approaches are crucial to achieving sustainable waste management aligned with SDGs. Collaboration and knowledge sharing between regions are essential to improve inefficient waste management mechanisms. Integrating the findings into policymaking and industry practices can lead to a more sustainable future with reduced environmental impact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su151813290</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Africa ; Biogas ; Boolean ; Brazil ; Canada ; China ; Climate change ; Composting ; Grey literature ; Landfill ; Methods ; Natural resources ; North America ; Outdoor air quality ; Recycling ; Refuse and refuse disposal ; Science ; Search engines ; Soil sciences ; South America ; Startups ; Strategic management ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-09, Vol.15 (18), p.13290</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f185034109665e041743971db81a06e4eccfffe7fcfd1e408b0a059d8489c2773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f185034109665e041743971db81a06e4eccfffe7fcfd1e408b0a059d8489c2773</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7690-6894</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karimi, Nima</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Global Waste Management: Alternatives to Landfilling in Different Waste Streams—A Scoping Review</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>This scoping review examines global strategies and enterprises for sustainable solid waste management, with a focus on alternative landfilling approaches. The study collected and analyzed a significant number of documents from different regions, revealing Asia as the major contributor (for the collected documents) (48.7%), followed by North America (24.3%) and Europe (15.8%). Recycling emerged as the most effective alternative waste treatment method, representing 52.3% of the documented approaches, with industrial recycling (22.6%) and residential/nonresidential recycling (20.2%) as prominent categories. Food waste was a significant concern across regions, constituting 21.4% of the collected documents. Composting was widely adopted (15.4%) due to its simplicity and benefits for gardening and soil improvement. Other methods like biogas extraction, reusing, raising awareness, incinerating, redistributing, reducing, and fermentation accounted for 13.1% cumulatively. The study highlights the need for adopted waste management solutions based on regional challenges and successful practices. Promoting recycling infrastructure, composting, and waste reduction approaches are crucial to achieving sustainable waste management aligned with SDGs. Collaboration and knowledge sharing between regions are essential to improve inefficient waste management mechanisms. Integrating the findings into policymaking and industry practices can lead to a more sustainable future with reduced environmental impact.</description><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Boolean</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Composting</subject><subject>Grey literature</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>Refuse and refuse disposal</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>South America</subject><subject>Startups</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkcFO3DAQhiPUSiDKqS8QiVOFls7ESWz3FtEWkLaqxLbiaHmd8crImyweLy03HoIn7JM0q-UAM4eZw_fP6NdfFB8RzoXQ8Jm32KBCUWk4KI4qkDhDaODdq_2wOGG-g6mEQI3tURE7ZmIOw6q8jOPSxvLWcqbyhx3sitY05C9lFzOlwebwQFzmsZzbofchxp0oDOXX4D2liXyRLnIiu-Z_T89duXDjZofd0EOgPx-K995GppOXeVz8_v7t18XVbP7z8vqim8-ckJhnHlUDokbQbdsQ1ChroSX2S4UWWqrJOT-9lN75HqkGtQQLje5VrbSrpBTHxen-7iaN91vibO7G7eQgsqlUq1upVS0m6nxPrWwkEwY_5mTd1D2tgxsHmjyS6aQCqLBVO8GnN4KJyfQ3r-yW2Vwvbt6yZ3vWpZE5kTebFNY2PRoEs4vLvIpL_AdhbYbr</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Karimi, Nima</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7690-6894</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Assessing Global Waste Management: Alternatives to Landfilling in Different Waste Streams—A Scoping Review</title><author>Karimi, Nima</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f185034109665e041743971db81a06e4eccfffe7fcfd1e408b0a059d8489c2773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Boolean</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Composting</topic><topic>Grey literature</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>Refuse and refuse disposal</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>South America</topic><topic>Startups</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karimi, Nima</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karimi, Nima</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Global Waste Management: Alternatives to Landfilling in Different Waste Streams—A Scoping Review</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>13290</spage><pages>13290-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>This scoping review examines global strategies and enterprises for sustainable solid waste management, with a focus on alternative landfilling approaches. The study collected and analyzed a significant number of documents from different regions, revealing Asia as the major contributor (for the collected documents) (48.7%), followed by North America (24.3%) and Europe (15.8%). Recycling emerged as the most effective alternative waste treatment method, representing 52.3% of the documented approaches, with industrial recycling (22.6%) and residential/nonresidential recycling (20.2%) as prominent categories. Food waste was a significant concern across regions, constituting 21.4% of the collected documents. Composting was widely adopted (15.4%) due to its simplicity and benefits for gardening and soil improvement. Other methods like biogas extraction, reusing, raising awareness, incinerating, redistributing, reducing, and fermentation accounted for 13.1% cumulatively. The study highlights the need for adopted waste management solutions based on regional challenges and successful practices. Promoting recycling infrastructure, composting, and waste reduction approaches are crucial to achieving sustainable waste management aligned with SDGs. Collaboration and knowledge sharing between regions are essential to improve inefficient waste management mechanisms. Integrating the findings into policymaking and industry practices can lead to a more sustainable future with reduced environmental impact.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su151813290</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7690-6894</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2023-09, Vol.15 (18), p.13290
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2869679843
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Africa
Biogas
Boolean
Brazil
Canada
China
Climate change
Composting
Grey literature
Landfill
Methods
Natural resources
North America
Outdoor air quality
Recycling
Refuse and refuse disposal
Science
Search engines
Soil sciences
South America
Startups
Strategic management
Sustainability
Sustainable development
Vegetation
title Assessing Global Waste Management: Alternatives to Landfilling in Different Waste Streams—A Scoping Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T05%3A29%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Global%20Waste%20Management:%20Alternatives%20to%20Landfilling%20in%20Different%20Waste%20Streams%E2%80%94A%20Scoping%20Review&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Karimi,%20Nima&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=13290&rft.pages=13290-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su151813290&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA780021683%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869679843&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A780021683&rfr_iscdi=true