The Social Equity of Urban Parks in High-Density Urban Areas: A Case Study in the Core Area of Beijing
Urban parks beautify the environment and promote urban public health, and their spatial allocation is significant in maintaining environmental justice. However, the current allocation of urban parks focuses on quantity fairness and pays insufficient attention to accessibility and quality fairness. T...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2023-09, Vol.15 (18), p.13849 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 13849 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Wang, Chang Wang, Siyuan Cao, Yilun Yan, Haojun Li, Yunyuan |
description | Urban parks beautify the environment and promote urban public health, and their spatial allocation is significant in maintaining environmental justice. However, the current allocation of urban parks focuses on quantity fairness and pays insufficient attention to accessibility and quality fairness. This study investigated the core area of Beijing and analyzed the fairness of urban park allocation based on park accessibility, area, and quality. We used big data crawling, the two-step floating catchment area method, comprehensive equity evaluation of parks, spatial autocorrelation, and non-parametric tests. The results showed inequality in terms of accessibility, area, and quality, with high spatial distribution in the north and low spatial distribution in the south. The accessibility, shortest distance, and total area of urban parks in high-income residential areas were 3.0, 2.1, and 1.8 times higher, respectively, than those of the low-income residential areas. This indicates that high-income groups have better accessibility, live closer to, and have access to larger urban parks. Middle-income and above groups had access to green space, whereas medium-to-low-income residential areas had poor access to parks, particularly high-quality parks. These findings provide decision-making and planning references for the optimal allocation and rational planning of urban parks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su151813849 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2869675082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A780022242</galeid><sourcerecordid>A780022242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b653452b80d55a552fbe5be0ed99a00fb10387afd80944075ee446070cb6375b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkcFOwkAQhhujiUQ5-QKbeDKmONvttl1viCgkJBqB82bbzsIitLDbJvL2tmIiJM4cZjL_N_8cxvNuKPQYE_DgasppQlkSijOvE0BMfQoczo_6S6_r3AqaYIwKGnU8PVsimZaZUWsy3NWm2pNSk7lNVUHelf10xBRkZBZL_xkL18oHrW9RuUfSJwPlGoOqzvctWTVug9Lij946PaFZmWJx7V1otXbY_a1X3vxlOBuM_Mnb63jQn_gZE6Ly04izkAdpAjnnivNAp8hTBMyFUAA6pcCSWOk8ARGGEHPEMIwghiyNWMxTduXdHny3ttzV6Cq5KmtbNCdlkEQiijkkwR-1UGuUptBlZVW2MS6T_TgBCIIgbKneP1STOW5MVhaoTTM_Wbg7WWiYCr-qhaqdk-Ppxyl7f2AzWzpnUcutNRtl95KCbN8pj97JvgEzx4x5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869675082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Social Equity of Urban Parks in High-Density Urban Areas: A Case Study in the Core Area of Beijing</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wang, Chang ; Wang, Siyuan ; Cao, Yilun ; Yan, Haojun ; Li, Yunyuan</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chang ; Wang, Siyuan ; Cao, Yilun ; Yan, Haojun ; Li, Yunyuan</creatorcontrib><description>Urban parks beautify the environment and promote urban public health, and their spatial allocation is significant in maintaining environmental justice. However, the current allocation of urban parks focuses on quantity fairness and pays insufficient attention to accessibility and quality fairness. This study investigated the core area of Beijing and analyzed the fairness of urban park allocation based on park accessibility, area, and quality. We used big data crawling, the two-step floating catchment area method, comprehensive equity evaluation of parks, spatial autocorrelation, and non-parametric tests. The results showed inequality in terms of accessibility, area, and quality, with high spatial distribution in the north and low spatial distribution in the south. The accessibility, shortest distance, and total area of urban parks in high-income residential areas were 3.0, 2.1, and 1.8 times higher, respectively, than those of the low-income residential areas. This indicates that high-income groups have better accessibility, live closer to, and have access to larger urban parks. Middle-income and above groups had access to green space, whereas medium-to-low-income residential areas had poor access to parks, particularly high-quality parks. These findings provide decision-making and planning references for the optimal allocation and rational planning of urban parks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su151813849</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Case studies ; China ; Cities ; Decision-making ; Environmental justice ; Ethnicity ; Geospatial data ; Outdoor air quality ; Parks ; Parks & recreation areas ; Population density ; Public health ; Rich ; Supply & demand ; Urban areas ; Urban health ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2023-09, Vol.15 (18), p.13849</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b653452b80d55a552fbe5be0ed99a00fb10387afd80944075ee446070cb6375b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b653452b80d55a552fbe5be0ed99a00fb10387afd80944075ee446070cb6375b3</cites><orcidid>0009-0000-5843-9911</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Siyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yilun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Haojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yunyuan</creatorcontrib><title>The Social Equity of Urban Parks in High-Density Urban Areas: A Case Study in the Core Area of Beijing</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Urban parks beautify the environment and promote urban public health, and their spatial allocation is significant in maintaining environmental justice. However, the current allocation of urban parks focuses on quantity fairness and pays insufficient attention to accessibility and quality fairness. This study investigated the core area of Beijing and analyzed the fairness of urban park allocation based on park accessibility, area, and quality. We used big data crawling, the two-step floating catchment area method, comprehensive equity evaluation of parks, spatial autocorrelation, and non-parametric tests. The results showed inequality in terms of accessibility, area, and quality, with high spatial distribution in the north and low spatial distribution in the south. The accessibility, shortest distance, and total area of urban parks in high-income residential areas were 3.0, 2.1, and 1.8 times higher, respectively, than those of the low-income residential areas. This indicates that high-income groups have better accessibility, live closer to, and have access to larger urban parks. Middle-income and above groups had access to green space, whereas medium-to-low-income residential areas had poor access to parks, particularly high-quality parks. These findings provide decision-making and planning references for the optimal allocation and rational planning of urban parks.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Decision-making</subject><subject>Environmental justice</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Geospatial data</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Parks</subject><subject>Parks & recreation areas</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Rich</subject><subject>Supply & demand</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban health</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkcFOwkAQhhujiUQ5-QKbeDKmONvttl1viCgkJBqB82bbzsIitLDbJvL2tmIiJM4cZjL_N_8cxvNuKPQYE_DgasppQlkSijOvE0BMfQoczo_6S6_r3AqaYIwKGnU8PVsimZaZUWsy3NWm2pNSk7lNVUHelf10xBRkZBZL_xkL18oHrW9RuUfSJwPlGoOqzvctWTVug9Lij946PaFZmWJx7V1otXbY_a1X3vxlOBuM_Mnb63jQn_gZE6Ly04izkAdpAjnnivNAp8hTBMyFUAA6pcCSWOk8ARGGEHPEMIwghiyNWMxTduXdHny3ttzV6Cq5KmtbNCdlkEQiijkkwR-1UGuUptBlZVW2MS6T_TgBCIIgbKneP1STOW5MVhaoTTM_Wbg7WWiYCr-qhaqdk-Ppxyl7f2AzWzpnUcutNRtl95KCbN8pj97JvgEzx4x5</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Wang, Chang</creator><creator>Wang, Siyuan</creator><creator>Cao, Yilun</creator><creator>Yan, Haojun</creator><creator>Li, Yunyuan</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5843-9911</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>The Social Equity of Urban Parks in High-Density Urban Areas: A Case Study in the Core Area of Beijing</title><author>Wang, Chang ; Wang, Siyuan ; Cao, Yilun ; Yan, Haojun ; Li, Yunyuan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-b653452b80d55a552fbe5be0ed99a00fb10387afd80944075ee446070cb6375b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Decision-making</topic><topic>Environmental justice</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Geospatial data</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Parks</topic><topic>Parks & recreation areas</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Rich</topic><topic>Supply & demand</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban health</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Siyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yilun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Haojun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yunyuan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Chang</au><au>Wang, Siyuan</au><au>Cao, Yilun</au><au>Yan, Haojun</au><au>Li, Yunyuan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Social Equity of Urban Parks in High-Density Urban Areas: A Case Study in the Core Area of Beijing</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>13849</spage><pages>13849-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Urban parks beautify the environment and promote urban public health, and their spatial allocation is significant in maintaining environmental justice. However, the current allocation of urban parks focuses on quantity fairness and pays insufficient attention to accessibility and quality fairness. This study investigated the core area of Beijing and analyzed the fairness of urban park allocation based on park accessibility, area, and quality. We used big data crawling, the two-step floating catchment area method, comprehensive equity evaluation of parks, spatial autocorrelation, and non-parametric tests. The results showed inequality in terms of accessibility, area, and quality, with high spatial distribution in the north and low spatial distribution in the south. The accessibility, shortest distance, and total area of urban parks in high-income residential areas were 3.0, 2.1, and 1.8 times higher, respectively, than those of the low-income residential areas. This indicates that high-income groups have better accessibility, live closer to, and have access to larger urban parks. Middle-income and above groups had access to green space, whereas medium-to-low-income residential areas had poor access to parks, particularly high-quality parks. These findings provide decision-making and planning references for the optimal allocation and rational planning of urban parks.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su151813849</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5843-9911</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2023-09, Vol.15 (18), p.13849 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2869675082 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Analysis Case studies China Cities Decision-making Environmental justice Ethnicity Geospatial data Outdoor air quality Parks Parks & recreation areas Population density Public health Rich Supply & demand Urban areas Urban health Walking |
title | The Social Equity of Urban Parks in High-Density Urban Areas: A Case Study in the Core Area of Beijing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A07%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Social%20Equity%20of%20Urban%20Parks%20in%20High-Density%20Urban%20Areas:%20A%20Case%20Study%20in%20the%20Core%20Area%20of%20Beijing&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Wang,%20Chang&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=13849&rft.pages=13849-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su151813849&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA780022242%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869675082&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A780022242&rfr_iscdi=true |