Measurement and Calibration of Regulatory Credit Risk Asset Correlations

Vasicek’s asymptotic single risk factor (ASRF) model is employed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in its internal ratings-based (IRB) approach for estimating credit losses and regulatory credit risk capital. This methodology requires estimates of asset correlations; these are pre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of risk and financial management 2023-09, Vol.16 (9), p.402
Hauptverfasser: van Dyk, Anton, van Vuuren, Gary
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 402
container_title Journal of risk and financial management
container_volume 16
creator van Dyk, Anton
van Vuuren, Gary
description Vasicek’s asymptotic single risk factor (ASRF) model is employed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in its internal ratings-based (IRB) approach for estimating credit losses and regulatory credit risk capital. This methodology requires estimates of asset correlations; these are prescribed by the BCBS. Practitioners are interested to know market-implied asset correlations since these influence economic capital and lending behavior. These may be backed out from ASRF loan loss distributions using ex post loan losses. Prescribed asset correlations have been neither updated nor recalibrated since their introduction in 2008 with the implementation of the Basel II accord. The market milieu has undergone significant alterations and adaptations since then; it is unlikely that these remain relevant. Loan loss data from a developed (US) and developing (South Africa) economy spanning at least two business cycles for each region were used to explore the relevance of the BCBS calibration. Results obtained from three alternative methodologies are compared with prescribed BCBS values, and the latter were found to be countercyclical to empirical loan loss experience, resulting in less punitive credit risk capital requirements than required in market crises and more punitive requirements than required in calm conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jrfm16090402
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2869388743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A771806443</galeid><sourcerecordid>A771806443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2122-48c68a2af112dfa22b4333626ee29a3a57f1e799cdc79c71193ad5cc03a68e023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9LAzEQxYMoWGpvfoCAV7fmz3aTHMuiVqgIRc_LNDspqbubmuwe-u1dWw9lDjMM7_eGeYTcczaX0rCnfXQtL5hhORNXZMIN55lmKr--mG_JLKU9Y4yzkZF6QlbvCGmI2GLXU-hqWkLjtxF6HzoaHN3gbmigD_FIy4i17-nGp2-6TAl7WoYYsTlp0x25cdAknP33Kfl6ef4sV9n64_WtXK4zK7gQWa5toUGA41zUDoTY5lLKQhSIwoCEhXIclTG2tspYxbmRUC-sZRIKjUzIKXk4-x5i-Bkw9dU-DLEbT1ZCF-NPWo2OUzI_q3bQYOU7F_oIdqwaW29Dh86P-6VSXLMiPwGPZ8DGkFJEVx2ibyEeK86qv3yry3zlL3R_bKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869388743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement and Calibration of Regulatory Credit Risk Asset Correlations</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>van Dyk, Anton ; van Vuuren, Gary</creator><creatorcontrib>van Dyk, Anton ; van Vuuren, Gary</creatorcontrib><description>Vasicek’s asymptotic single risk factor (ASRF) model is employed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in its internal ratings-based (IRB) approach for estimating credit losses and regulatory credit risk capital. This methodology requires estimates of asset correlations; these are prescribed by the BCBS. Practitioners are interested to know market-implied asset correlations since these influence economic capital and lending behavior. These may be backed out from ASRF loan loss distributions using ex post loan losses. Prescribed asset correlations have been neither updated nor recalibrated since their introduction in 2008 with the implementation of the Basel II accord. The market milieu has undergone significant alterations and adaptations since then; it is unlikely that these remain relevant. Loan loss data from a developed (US) and developing (South Africa) economy spanning at least two business cycles for each region were used to explore the relevance of the BCBS calibration. Results obtained from three alternative methodologies are compared with prescribed BCBS values, and the latter were found to be countercyclical to empirical loan loss experience, resulting in less punitive credit risk capital requirements than required in market crises and more punitive requirements than required in calm conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1911-8074</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1911-8066</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1911-8074</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jrfm16090402</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Banks ; Banks (Finance) ; Business cycles ; Credit risk ; Default ; Economic aspects ; Equity ; Measurement ; Probability ; Risk factors ; Stock prices ; Survival analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of risk and financial management, 2023-09, Vol.16 (9), p.402</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2122-48c68a2af112dfa22b4333626ee29a3a57f1e799cdc79c71193ad5cc03a68e023</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6811-0538 ; 0009-0000-0828-2848</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Dyk, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Gary</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement and Calibration of Regulatory Credit Risk Asset Correlations</title><title>Journal of risk and financial management</title><description>Vasicek’s asymptotic single risk factor (ASRF) model is employed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in its internal ratings-based (IRB) approach for estimating credit losses and regulatory credit risk capital. This methodology requires estimates of asset correlations; these are prescribed by the BCBS. Practitioners are interested to know market-implied asset correlations since these influence economic capital and lending behavior. These may be backed out from ASRF loan loss distributions using ex post loan losses. Prescribed asset correlations have been neither updated nor recalibrated since their introduction in 2008 with the implementation of the Basel II accord. The market milieu has undergone significant alterations and adaptations since then; it is unlikely that these remain relevant. Loan loss data from a developed (US) and developing (South Africa) economy spanning at least two business cycles for each region were used to explore the relevance of the BCBS calibration. Results obtained from three alternative methodologies are compared with prescribed BCBS values, and the latter were found to be countercyclical to empirical loan loss experience, resulting in less punitive credit risk capital requirements than required in market crises and more punitive requirements than required in calm conditions.</description><subject>Banks</subject><subject>Banks (Finance)</subject><subject>Business cycles</subject><subject>Credit risk</subject><subject>Default</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><issn>1911-8074</issn><issn>1911-8066</issn><issn>1911-8074</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9LAzEQxYMoWGpvfoCAV7fmz3aTHMuiVqgIRc_LNDspqbubmuwe-u1dWw9lDjMM7_eGeYTcczaX0rCnfXQtL5hhORNXZMIN55lmKr--mG_JLKU9Y4yzkZF6QlbvCGmI2GLXU-hqWkLjtxF6HzoaHN3gbmigD_FIy4i17-nGp2-6TAl7WoYYsTlp0x25cdAknP33Kfl6ef4sV9n64_WtXK4zK7gQWa5toUGA41zUDoTY5lLKQhSIwoCEhXIclTG2tspYxbmRUC-sZRIKjUzIKXk4-x5i-Bkw9dU-DLEbT1ZCF-NPWo2OUzI_q3bQYOU7F_oIdqwaW29Dh86P-6VSXLMiPwGPZ8DGkFJEVx2ibyEeK86qv3yry3zlL3R_bKQ</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>van Dyk, Anton</creator><creator>van Vuuren, Gary</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6811-0538</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0828-2848</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Measurement and Calibration of Regulatory Credit Risk Asset Correlations</title><author>van Dyk, Anton ; van Vuuren, Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2122-48c68a2af112dfa22b4333626ee29a3a57f1e799cdc79c71193ad5cc03a68e023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Banks</topic><topic>Banks (Finance)</topic><topic>Business cycles</topic><topic>Credit risk</topic><topic>Default</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Dyk, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of risk and financial management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Dyk, Anton</au><au>van Vuuren, Gary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurement and Calibration of Regulatory Credit Risk Asset Correlations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of risk and financial management</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>402</spage><pages>402-</pages><issn>1911-8074</issn><issn>1911-8066</issn><eissn>1911-8074</eissn><abstract>Vasicek’s asymptotic single risk factor (ASRF) model is employed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in its internal ratings-based (IRB) approach for estimating credit losses and regulatory credit risk capital. This methodology requires estimates of asset correlations; these are prescribed by the BCBS. Practitioners are interested to know market-implied asset correlations since these influence economic capital and lending behavior. These may be backed out from ASRF loan loss distributions using ex post loan losses. Prescribed asset correlations have been neither updated nor recalibrated since their introduction in 2008 with the implementation of the Basel II accord. The market milieu has undergone significant alterations and adaptations since then; it is unlikely that these remain relevant. Loan loss data from a developed (US) and developing (South Africa) economy spanning at least two business cycles for each region were used to explore the relevance of the BCBS calibration. Results obtained from three alternative methodologies are compared with prescribed BCBS values, and the latter were found to be countercyclical to empirical loan loss experience, resulting in less punitive credit risk capital requirements than required in market crises and more punitive requirements than required in calm conditions.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/jrfm16090402</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6811-0538</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0828-2848</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1911-8074
ispartof Journal of risk and financial management, 2023-09, Vol.16 (9), p.402
issn 1911-8074
1911-8066
1911-8074
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2869388743
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Banks
Banks (Finance)
Business cycles
Credit risk
Default
Economic aspects
Equity
Measurement
Probability
Risk factors
Stock prices
Survival analysis
title Measurement and Calibration of Regulatory Credit Risk Asset Correlations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A29%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20and%20Calibration%20of%20Regulatory%20Credit%20Risk%20Asset%20Correlations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20risk%20and%20financial%20management&rft.au=van%20Dyk,%20Anton&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=402&rft.pages=402-&rft.issn=1911-8074&rft.eissn=1911-8074&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jrfm16090402&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA771806443%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869388743&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A771806443&rfr_iscdi=true