Measurement and Calibration of Regulatory Credit Risk Asset Correlations
Vasicek’s asymptotic single risk factor (ASRF) model is employed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in its internal ratings-based (IRB) approach for estimating credit losses and regulatory credit risk capital. This methodology requires estimates of asset correlations; these are pre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of risk and financial management 2023-09, Vol.16 (9), p.402 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 402 |
container_title | Journal of risk and financial management |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | van Dyk, Anton van Vuuren, Gary |
description | Vasicek’s asymptotic single risk factor (ASRF) model is employed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in its internal ratings-based (IRB) approach for estimating credit losses and regulatory credit risk capital. This methodology requires estimates of asset correlations; these are prescribed by the BCBS. Practitioners are interested to know market-implied asset correlations since these influence economic capital and lending behavior. These may be backed out from ASRF loan loss distributions using ex post loan losses. Prescribed asset correlations have been neither updated nor recalibrated since their introduction in 2008 with the implementation of the Basel II accord. The market milieu has undergone significant alterations and adaptations since then; it is unlikely that these remain relevant. Loan loss data from a developed (US) and developing (South Africa) economy spanning at least two business cycles for each region were used to explore the relevance of the BCBS calibration. Results obtained from three alternative methodologies are compared with prescribed BCBS values, and the latter were found to be countercyclical to empirical loan loss experience, resulting in less punitive credit risk capital requirements than required in market crises and more punitive requirements than required in calm conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jrfm16090402 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2869388743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A771806443</galeid><sourcerecordid>A771806443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2122-48c68a2af112dfa22b4333626ee29a3a57f1e799cdc79c71193ad5cc03a68e023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9LAzEQxYMoWGpvfoCAV7fmz3aTHMuiVqgIRc_LNDspqbubmuwe-u1dWw9lDjMM7_eGeYTcczaX0rCnfXQtL5hhORNXZMIN55lmKr--mG_JLKU9Y4yzkZF6QlbvCGmI2GLXU-hqWkLjtxF6HzoaHN3gbmigD_FIy4i17-nGp2-6TAl7WoYYsTlp0x25cdAknP33Kfl6ef4sV9n64_WtXK4zK7gQWa5toUGA41zUDoTY5lLKQhSIwoCEhXIclTG2tspYxbmRUC-sZRIKjUzIKXk4-x5i-Bkw9dU-DLEbT1ZCF-NPWo2OUzI_q3bQYOU7F_oIdqwaW29Dh86P-6VSXLMiPwGPZ8DGkFJEVx2ibyEeK86qv3yry3zlL3R_bKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869388743</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement and Calibration of Regulatory Credit Risk Asset Correlations</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>van Dyk, Anton ; van Vuuren, Gary</creator><creatorcontrib>van Dyk, Anton ; van Vuuren, Gary</creatorcontrib><description>Vasicek’s asymptotic single risk factor (ASRF) model is employed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in its internal ratings-based (IRB) approach for estimating credit losses and regulatory credit risk capital. This methodology requires estimates of asset correlations; these are prescribed by the BCBS. Practitioners are interested to know market-implied asset correlations since these influence economic capital and lending behavior. These may be backed out from ASRF loan loss distributions using ex post loan losses. Prescribed asset correlations have been neither updated nor recalibrated since their introduction in 2008 with the implementation of the Basel II accord. The market milieu has undergone significant alterations and adaptations since then; it is unlikely that these remain relevant. Loan loss data from a developed (US) and developing (South Africa) economy spanning at least two business cycles for each region were used to explore the relevance of the BCBS calibration. Results obtained from three alternative methodologies are compared with prescribed BCBS values, and the latter were found to be countercyclical to empirical loan loss experience, resulting in less punitive credit risk capital requirements than required in market crises and more punitive requirements than required in calm conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1911-8074</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1911-8066</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1911-8074</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jrfm16090402</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Banks ; Banks (Finance) ; Business cycles ; Credit risk ; Default ; Economic aspects ; Equity ; Measurement ; Probability ; Risk factors ; Stock prices ; Survival analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of risk and financial management, 2023-09, Vol.16 (9), p.402</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2122-48c68a2af112dfa22b4333626ee29a3a57f1e799cdc79c71193ad5cc03a68e023</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6811-0538 ; 0009-0000-0828-2848</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Dyk, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Gary</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement and Calibration of Regulatory Credit Risk Asset Correlations</title><title>Journal of risk and financial management</title><description>Vasicek’s asymptotic single risk factor (ASRF) model is employed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in its internal ratings-based (IRB) approach for estimating credit losses and regulatory credit risk capital. This methodology requires estimates of asset correlations; these are prescribed by the BCBS. Practitioners are interested to know market-implied asset correlations since these influence economic capital and lending behavior. These may be backed out from ASRF loan loss distributions using ex post loan losses. Prescribed asset correlations have been neither updated nor recalibrated since their introduction in 2008 with the implementation of the Basel II accord. The market milieu has undergone significant alterations and adaptations since then; it is unlikely that these remain relevant. Loan loss data from a developed (US) and developing (South Africa) economy spanning at least two business cycles for each region were used to explore the relevance of the BCBS calibration. Results obtained from three alternative methodologies are compared with prescribed BCBS values, and the latter were found to be countercyclical to empirical loan loss experience, resulting in less punitive credit risk capital requirements than required in market crises and more punitive requirements than required in calm conditions.</description><subject>Banks</subject><subject>Banks (Finance)</subject><subject>Business cycles</subject><subject>Credit risk</subject><subject>Default</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Stock prices</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><issn>1911-8074</issn><issn>1911-8066</issn><issn>1911-8074</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9LAzEQxYMoWGpvfoCAV7fmz3aTHMuiVqgIRc_LNDspqbubmuwe-u1dWw9lDjMM7_eGeYTcczaX0rCnfXQtL5hhORNXZMIN55lmKr--mG_JLKU9Y4yzkZF6QlbvCGmI2GLXU-hqWkLjtxF6HzoaHN3gbmigD_FIy4i17-nGp2-6TAl7WoYYsTlp0x25cdAknP33Kfl6ef4sV9n64_WtXK4zK7gQWa5toUGA41zUDoTY5lLKQhSIwoCEhXIclTG2tspYxbmRUC-sZRIKjUzIKXk4-x5i-Bkw9dU-DLEbT1ZCF-NPWo2OUzI_q3bQYOU7F_oIdqwaW29Dh86P-6VSXLMiPwGPZ8DGkFJEVx2ibyEeK86qv3yry3zlL3R_bKQ</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>van Dyk, Anton</creator><creator>van Vuuren, Gary</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6811-0538</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0828-2848</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Measurement and Calibration of Regulatory Credit Risk Asset Correlations</title><author>van Dyk, Anton ; van Vuuren, Gary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2122-48c68a2af112dfa22b4333626ee29a3a57f1e799cdc79c71193ad5cc03a68e023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Banks</topic><topic>Banks (Finance)</topic><topic>Business cycles</topic><topic>Credit risk</topic><topic>Default</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Stock prices</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Dyk, Anton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Vuuren, Gary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of risk and financial management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Dyk, Anton</au><au>van Vuuren, Gary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurement and Calibration of Regulatory Credit Risk Asset Correlations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of risk and financial management</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>402</spage><pages>402-</pages><issn>1911-8074</issn><issn>1911-8066</issn><eissn>1911-8074</eissn><abstract>Vasicek’s asymptotic single risk factor (ASRF) model is employed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) in its internal ratings-based (IRB) approach for estimating credit losses and regulatory credit risk capital. This methodology requires estimates of asset correlations; these are prescribed by the BCBS. Practitioners are interested to know market-implied asset correlations since these influence economic capital and lending behavior. These may be backed out from ASRF loan loss distributions using ex post loan losses. Prescribed asset correlations have been neither updated nor recalibrated since their introduction in 2008 with the implementation of the Basel II accord. The market milieu has undergone significant alterations and adaptations since then; it is unlikely that these remain relevant. Loan loss data from a developed (US) and developing (South Africa) economy spanning at least two business cycles for each region were used to explore the relevance of the BCBS calibration. Results obtained from three alternative methodologies are compared with prescribed BCBS values, and the latter were found to be countercyclical to empirical loan loss experience, resulting in less punitive credit risk capital requirements than required in market crises and more punitive requirements than required in calm conditions.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/jrfm16090402</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6811-0538</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-0828-2848</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1911-8074 |
ispartof | Journal of risk and financial management, 2023-09, Vol.16 (9), p.402 |
issn | 1911-8074 1911-8066 1911-8074 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2869388743 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Banks Banks (Finance) Business cycles Credit risk Default Economic aspects Equity Measurement Probability Risk factors Stock prices Survival analysis |
title | Measurement and Calibration of Regulatory Credit Risk Asset Correlations |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A29%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20and%20Calibration%20of%20Regulatory%20Credit%20Risk%20Asset%20Correlations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20risk%20and%20financial%20management&rft.au=van%20Dyk,%20Anton&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=402&rft.pages=402-&rft.issn=1911-8074&rft.eissn=1911-8074&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jrfm16090402&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA771806443%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869388743&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A771806443&rfr_iscdi=true |