Kaolinite Deposition Dynamics and Streambed Clogging During Bedform Migration Under Losing and Gaining Flow Conditions

Clogging of streambeds due to clay deposition influences the stream‐subsurface exchange flux and thus directly modulates hyporheic ecological and biogeochemical processes. Clogging of sandy streambeds has previously been studied under losing and gaining flows and during streambed movement, but not w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 2023-09, Vol.59 (9)
Hauptverfasser: Shimony, T., Teitelbaum, Y., Cifuentes, E. Saavedra, Dallmann, J., Phillips, C. B., Packman, A. I., Arnon, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 59
creator Shimony, T.
Teitelbaum, Y.
Cifuentes, E. Saavedra
Dallmann, J.
Phillips, C. B.
Packman, A. I.
Arnon, S.
description Clogging of streambeds due to clay deposition influences the stream‐subsurface exchange flux and thus directly modulates hyporheic ecological and biogeochemical processes. Clogging of sandy streambeds has previously been studied under losing and gaining flows and during streambed movement, but not when these two flow conditions coincided. We conducted flume experiments to quantify the combined effect of moving bedforms and losing or gaining flows on kaolinite deposition and streambed clogging. The experiments were conducted by adding pulses of kaolinite in a flume packed with sand under a stream water velocity of 25 cm/s. We measured the deposition rates, dynamics of hyporheic exchange flux (HEF) and vertical hydraulic conductivity ( K v ), and the vertical distribution of kaolinite at the end of the experiments under two losing and two gaining flows (Darcy velocity of 10 and 20 cm/day). Kaolinite deposition led to clogging and reduction in K v and HEF under all flow conditions. Deposition occurred faster under losing flow conditions than under gaining flow conditions. However, the changes in K v and HEF were similar under losing and gaining flow conditions for similar kaolinite concentrations in the bed. Our results indicate that the deposition patterns of kaolinite were more influenced by bedform movement than by losing or gaining flow conditions, which is markedly different from the behavior observed under losing and gaining conditions for stationary bedforms. This implies that bedform morphodynamics control local‐scale clogging of sandy streambeds and should be accounted for when studying the hydrology of catchments at larger scales. Bed movement had a greater influence on kaolinite deposition patterns than either losing or gaining flow conditions Kaolinite accumulated in the bed much more quickly under losing conditions than gaining conditions, causing rapid clogging of the bed Hydraulic conductivity and hyporheic flux depended on kaolinite content in the bed and were similar under losing and gaining conditions
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2023WR034792
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2869241946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2869241946</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-8832baa42aa11cef56393652cd43420b1e4a666288c6921ea8ffd9e255f0bcf13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LwzAYx4MoOKc3P0DAq9W8NW2O2rkpTgR1eCxpm5SMNplJq-zbm20ePP0feP4v8APgEqMbjIi4JYjQzzdEWSbIEZhgwViSiYwegwlCjCaYiuwUnIWwRgizlGcT8P0sXWesGRScqY0LZjDOwtnWyt7UAUrbwPfBK9lXqoFF59rW2BbORr-Te9Vo53v4Ylov98GVbZSHy9gT37vwQsbyeM879wMLZ5v9QDgHJ1p2QV386RSs5g8fxWOyfF08FXfLpCZpPiR5TkklJSNSYlwrnXIqKE9J3TDKCKqwYpJzTvK85oJgJXOtG6FImmpU1RrTKbg69G68-xpVGMq1G72NkyXJY4RFRjy6rg-u2rsQvNLlxpte-m2JUbkjW_4nS38BTK5r8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869241946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Kaolinite Deposition Dynamics and Streambed Clogging During Bedform Migration Under Losing and Gaining Flow Conditions</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Shimony, T. ; Teitelbaum, Y. ; Cifuentes, E. Saavedra ; Dallmann, J. ; Phillips, C. B. ; Packman, A. I. ; Arnon, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shimony, T. ; Teitelbaum, Y. ; Cifuentes, E. Saavedra ; Dallmann, J. ; Phillips, C. B. ; Packman, A. I. ; Arnon, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Clogging of streambeds due to clay deposition influences the stream‐subsurface exchange flux and thus directly modulates hyporheic ecological and biogeochemical processes. Clogging of sandy streambeds has previously been studied under losing and gaining flows and during streambed movement, but not when these two flow conditions coincided. We conducted flume experiments to quantify the combined effect of moving bedforms and losing or gaining flows on kaolinite deposition and streambed clogging. The experiments were conducted by adding pulses of kaolinite in a flume packed with sand under a stream water velocity of 25 cm/s. We measured the deposition rates, dynamics of hyporheic exchange flux (HEF) and vertical hydraulic conductivity ( K v ), and the vertical distribution of kaolinite at the end of the experiments under two losing and two gaining flows (Darcy velocity of 10 and 20 cm/day). Kaolinite deposition led to clogging and reduction in K v and HEF under all flow conditions. Deposition occurred faster under losing flow conditions than under gaining flow conditions. However, the changes in K v and HEF were similar under losing and gaining flow conditions for similar kaolinite concentrations in the bed. Our results indicate that the deposition patterns of kaolinite were more influenced by bedform movement than by losing or gaining flow conditions, which is markedly different from the behavior observed under losing and gaining conditions for stationary bedforms. This implies that bedform morphodynamics control local‐scale clogging of sandy streambeds and should be accounted for when studying the hydrology of catchments at larger scales. Bed movement had a greater influence on kaolinite deposition patterns than either losing or gaining flow conditions Kaolinite accumulated in the bed much more quickly under losing conditions than gaining conditions, causing rapid clogging of the bed Hydraulic conductivity and hyporheic flux depended on kaolinite content in the bed and were similar under losing and gaining conditions</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2023WR034792</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bed forms ; Bedforms ; Catchment area ; Catchments ; Deposition ; Flow ; Flow control ; Flumes ; Hydraulic conductivity ; Hydrology ; Kaolinite ; Rivers ; Sedimentary structures ; Streambeds ; Velocity ; Vertical distribution ; Water velocity</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2023-09, Vol.59 (9)</ispartof><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-8832baa42aa11cef56393652cd43420b1e4a666288c6921ea8ffd9e255f0bcf13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3172-4549 ; 0000-0002-7109-8979 ; 0000-0001-9950-2497 ; 0000-0003-4871-8639 ; 0000-0003-1242-4815</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shimony, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teitelbaum, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cifuentes, E. Saavedra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dallmann, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, C. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packman, A. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnon, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Kaolinite Deposition Dynamics and Streambed Clogging During Bedform Migration Under Losing and Gaining Flow Conditions</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Clogging of streambeds due to clay deposition influences the stream‐subsurface exchange flux and thus directly modulates hyporheic ecological and biogeochemical processes. Clogging of sandy streambeds has previously been studied under losing and gaining flows and during streambed movement, but not when these two flow conditions coincided. We conducted flume experiments to quantify the combined effect of moving bedforms and losing or gaining flows on kaolinite deposition and streambed clogging. The experiments were conducted by adding pulses of kaolinite in a flume packed with sand under a stream water velocity of 25 cm/s. We measured the deposition rates, dynamics of hyporheic exchange flux (HEF) and vertical hydraulic conductivity ( K v ), and the vertical distribution of kaolinite at the end of the experiments under two losing and two gaining flows (Darcy velocity of 10 and 20 cm/day). Kaolinite deposition led to clogging and reduction in K v and HEF under all flow conditions. Deposition occurred faster under losing flow conditions than under gaining flow conditions. However, the changes in K v and HEF were similar under losing and gaining flow conditions for similar kaolinite concentrations in the bed. Our results indicate that the deposition patterns of kaolinite were more influenced by bedform movement than by losing or gaining flow conditions, which is markedly different from the behavior observed under losing and gaining conditions for stationary bedforms. This implies that bedform morphodynamics control local‐scale clogging of sandy streambeds and should be accounted for when studying the hydrology of catchments at larger scales. Bed movement had a greater influence on kaolinite deposition patterns than either losing or gaining flow conditions Kaolinite accumulated in the bed much more quickly under losing conditions than gaining conditions, causing rapid clogging of the bed Hydraulic conductivity and hyporheic flux depended on kaolinite content in the bed and were similar under losing and gaining conditions</description><subject>Bed forms</subject><subject>Bedforms</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Flow</subject><subject>Flow control</subject><subject>Flumes</subject><subject>Hydraulic conductivity</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Kaolinite</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sedimentary structures</subject><subject>Streambeds</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Vertical distribution</subject><subject>Water velocity</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1LwzAYx4MoOKc3P0DAq9W8NW2O2rkpTgR1eCxpm5SMNplJq-zbm20ePP0feP4v8APgEqMbjIi4JYjQzzdEWSbIEZhgwViSiYwegwlCjCaYiuwUnIWwRgizlGcT8P0sXWesGRScqY0LZjDOwtnWyt7UAUrbwPfBK9lXqoFF59rW2BbORr-Te9Vo53v4Ylov98GVbZSHy9gT37vwQsbyeM879wMLZ5v9QDgHJ1p2QV386RSs5g8fxWOyfF08FXfLpCZpPiR5TkklJSNSYlwrnXIqKE9J3TDKCKqwYpJzTvK85oJgJXOtG6FImmpU1RrTKbg69G68-xpVGMq1G72NkyXJY4RFRjy6rg-u2rsQvNLlxpte-m2JUbkjW_4nS38BTK5r8w</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Shimony, T.</creator><creator>Teitelbaum, Y.</creator><creator>Cifuentes, E. Saavedra</creator><creator>Dallmann, J.</creator><creator>Phillips, C. B.</creator><creator>Packman, A. I.</creator><creator>Arnon, S.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3172-4549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7109-8979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9950-2497</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4871-8639</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1242-4815</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Kaolinite Deposition Dynamics and Streambed Clogging During Bedform Migration Under Losing and Gaining Flow Conditions</title><author>Shimony, T. ; Teitelbaum, Y. ; Cifuentes, E. Saavedra ; Dallmann, J. ; Phillips, C. B. ; Packman, A. I. ; Arnon, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-8832baa42aa11cef56393652cd43420b1e4a666288c6921ea8ffd9e255f0bcf13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bed forms</topic><topic>Bedforms</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Flow</topic><topic>Flow control</topic><topic>Flumes</topic><topic>Hydraulic conductivity</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Kaolinite</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sedimentary structures</topic><topic>Streambeds</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Vertical distribution</topic><topic>Water velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shimony, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teitelbaum, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cifuentes, E. Saavedra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dallmann, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, C. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Packman, A. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnon, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shimony, T.</au><au>Teitelbaum, Y.</au><au>Cifuentes, E. Saavedra</au><au>Dallmann, J.</au><au>Phillips, C. B.</au><au>Packman, A. I.</au><au>Arnon, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Kaolinite Deposition Dynamics and Streambed Clogging During Bedform Migration Under Losing and Gaining Flow Conditions</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>9</issue><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Clogging of streambeds due to clay deposition influences the stream‐subsurface exchange flux and thus directly modulates hyporheic ecological and biogeochemical processes. Clogging of sandy streambeds has previously been studied under losing and gaining flows and during streambed movement, but not when these two flow conditions coincided. We conducted flume experiments to quantify the combined effect of moving bedforms and losing or gaining flows on kaolinite deposition and streambed clogging. The experiments were conducted by adding pulses of kaolinite in a flume packed with sand under a stream water velocity of 25 cm/s. We measured the deposition rates, dynamics of hyporheic exchange flux (HEF) and vertical hydraulic conductivity ( K v ), and the vertical distribution of kaolinite at the end of the experiments under two losing and two gaining flows (Darcy velocity of 10 and 20 cm/day). Kaolinite deposition led to clogging and reduction in K v and HEF under all flow conditions. Deposition occurred faster under losing flow conditions than under gaining flow conditions. However, the changes in K v and HEF were similar under losing and gaining flow conditions for similar kaolinite concentrations in the bed. Our results indicate that the deposition patterns of kaolinite were more influenced by bedform movement than by losing or gaining flow conditions, which is markedly different from the behavior observed under losing and gaining conditions for stationary bedforms. This implies that bedform morphodynamics control local‐scale clogging of sandy streambeds and should be accounted for when studying the hydrology of catchments at larger scales. Bed movement had a greater influence on kaolinite deposition patterns than either losing or gaining flow conditions Kaolinite accumulated in the bed much more quickly under losing conditions than gaining conditions, causing rapid clogging of the bed Hydraulic conductivity and hyporheic flux depended on kaolinite content in the bed and were similar under losing and gaining conditions</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2023WR034792</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3172-4549</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7109-8979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9950-2497</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4871-8639</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1242-4815</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 2023-09, Vol.59 (9)
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2869241946
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Bed forms
Bedforms
Catchment area
Catchments
Deposition
Flow
Flow control
Flumes
Hydraulic conductivity
Hydrology
Kaolinite
Rivers
Sedimentary structures
Streambeds
Velocity
Vertical distribution
Water velocity
title Kaolinite Deposition Dynamics and Streambed Clogging During Bedform Migration Under Losing and Gaining Flow Conditions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T21%3A31%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Kaolinite%20Deposition%20Dynamics%20and%20Streambed%20Clogging%20During%20Bedform%20Migration%20Under%20Losing%20and%20Gaining%20Flow%20Conditions&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Shimony,%20T.&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=9&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2023WR034792&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2869241946%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869241946&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true