Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation
Background. A nursing work method is the base for the organization and implementation of nursing care to patients based on nurses’ skills. Nurses’ work methods are consensually organized into two groups: task-oriented work methods (functional method) and client-centered work methods (teamwork method...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Nursing forum (Hillsdale) 2023, Vol.2023, p.1-7 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 7 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Nursing forum (Hillsdale) |
| container_volume | 2023 |
| creator | Ventura-Silva, J. M. Martins, M. M. Trindade, L. L. Faria, A. C. Barros, S. C. Melo, R. M. Oliveira, I. J. Castro, S. F. Ribeiro, O. M. |
| description | Background. A nursing work method is the base for the organization and implementation of nursing care to patients based on nurses’ skills. Nurses’ work methods are consensually organized into two groups: task-oriented work methods (functional method) and client-centered work methods (teamwork method, individual work method, and work method per reference nurse). As for the impact of the work method on clients, we highlight the interference in the quality of care provided and, regarding nurses, the impact on workload and job satisfaction. Therefore, the existence of tools that allow identifying the organizational methodologies of nursing care is relevant. Aim. The aim of the study is to test the validity and reliability of the nurses work methods assessment scale (NWMAS). Methods. The methodological study followed the recommendations of the EQUATOR network. The NWMAS was previously developed as a self-completion questionnaire. To determine construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. Results. 325 participants were enrolled in this study. In exploratory factor analysis, the 25 items comprising NWMAS were distributed in five dimensions, contemplating the work methods. Cronbach’s alpha of the total scale was 0.846. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit. Conclusion. The NWMAS is a valid and reliable tool. Implications for Nursing Practice. The NWMAS identifies the work methods adopted by nurses in hospital settings, is a valuable tool for nursing management, and contributes to the definition of strategies that promote the quality of nursing care and the safety of patients. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2023/8884183 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2867838254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2867838254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2383-ca49ea2a10bce248c3fe5ddc2ee7554f56175d6fd4698cbed878cfecaa3172233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtKAzEUBuAgCtbqzgcY0J2OzT0ZN1KKN6i68LYMaXKGTm1najKjuPM1fD2fxJR27dkcOHz8B36EDgk-I0SIAcWUDbTWnGi2hXpEcZ5LUuht1MOYFrnkiu2ivRhnOA1Tuocu7rsQIf5-_2SvTXjL7qCdNj5mw5iucQF1mz06O4fzbJiNmjq2oXNt9mLnlbdt1dT7aKe08wgHm91Hz1eXT6ObfPxwfTsajnNHmWa5s7wASy3BEweUa8dKEN47CqCE4KWQRAkvS89lod0EvFbaleCsZURRylgfHa1zl6F57yC2ZtZ0oU4vDdVSaaap4EmdrpULTYwBSrMM1cKGL0OwWVVkVhWZTUWJH695SI-WJsBHFVsbE-YYGyoNl5qJxE7WbFrV3n5W_4f-AT-ScYY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2867838254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Ventura-Silva, J. M. ; Martins, M. M. ; Trindade, L. L. ; Faria, A. C. ; Barros, S. C. ; Melo, R. M. ; Oliveira, I. J. ; Castro, S. F. ; Ribeiro, O. M.</creator><contributor>Atashzadeh-Shoorideh, Foroozan ; Foroozan Atashzadeh-Shoorideh</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ventura-Silva, J. M. ; Martins, M. M. ; Trindade, L. L. ; Faria, A. C. ; Barros, S. C. ; Melo, R. M. ; Oliveira, I. J. ; Castro, S. F. ; Ribeiro, O. M. ; Atashzadeh-Shoorideh, Foroozan ; Foroozan Atashzadeh-Shoorideh</creatorcontrib><description>Background. A nursing work method is the base for the organization and implementation of nursing care to patients based on nurses’ skills. Nurses’ work methods are consensually organized into two groups: task-oriented work methods (functional method) and client-centered work methods (teamwork method, individual work method, and work method per reference nurse). As for the impact of the work method on clients, we highlight the interference in the quality of care provided and, regarding nurses, the impact on workload and job satisfaction. Therefore, the existence of tools that allow identifying the organizational methodologies of nursing care is relevant. Aim. The aim of the study is to test the validity and reliability of the nurses work methods assessment scale (NWMAS). Methods. The methodological study followed the recommendations of the EQUATOR network. The NWMAS was previously developed as a self-completion questionnaire. To determine construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. Results. 325 participants were enrolled in this study. In exploratory factor analysis, the 25 items comprising NWMAS were distributed in five dimensions, contemplating the work methods. Cronbach’s alpha of the total scale was 0.846. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit. Conclusion. The NWMAS is a valid and reliable tool. Implications for Nursing Practice. The NWMAS identifies the work methods adopted by nurses in hospital settings, is a valuable tool for nursing management, and contributes to the definition of strategies that promote the quality of nursing care and the safety of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-6473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-6198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2023/8884183</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Hindawi</publisher><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis ; Data collection ; Decision making ; Exploratory factor analysis ; Informed consent ; Job satisfaction ; Measures ; Medical personnel ; Methods ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Nursing work method ; Patient safety ; Patient satisfaction ; Patient-centered care ; Patients ; Professional practice ; Professionals ; Quality improvement ; Quality of care ; Reliability ; Work ; Work methods</subject><ispartof>Nursing forum (Hillsdale), 2023, Vol.2023, p.1-7</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 J. M. Ventura-Silva et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 J. M. Ventura-Silva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2383-ca49ea2a10bce248c3fe5ddc2ee7554f56175d6fd4698cbed878cfecaa3172233</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8794-528X ; 0000-0001-9982-9537 ; 0000-0002-5065-7815 ; 0000-0001-6627-3907 ; 0000-0001-8864-8634 ; 0000-0003-1527-9940</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,12825,27900,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Atashzadeh-Shoorideh, Foroozan</contributor><contributor>Foroozan Atashzadeh-Shoorideh</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ventura-Silva, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trindade, L. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faria, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, S. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, I. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, S. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, O. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation</title><title>Nursing forum (Hillsdale)</title><description>Background. A nursing work method is the base for the organization and implementation of nursing care to patients based on nurses’ skills. Nurses’ work methods are consensually organized into two groups: task-oriented work methods (functional method) and client-centered work methods (teamwork method, individual work method, and work method per reference nurse). As for the impact of the work method on clients, we highlight the interference in the quality of care provided and, regarding nurses, the impact on workload and job satisfaction. Therefore, the existence of tools that allow identifying the organizational methodologies of nursing care is relevant. Aim. The aim of the study is to test the validity and reliability of the nurses work methods assessment scale (NWMAS). Methods. The methodological study followed the recommendations of the EQUATOR network. The NWMAS was previously developed as a self-completion questionnaire. To determine construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. Results. 325 participants were enrolled in this study. In exploratory factor analysis, the 25 items comprising NWMAS were distributed in five dimensions, contemplating the work methods. Cronbach’s alpha of the total scale was 0.846. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit. Conclusion. The NWMAS is a valid and reliable tool. Implications for Nursing Practice. The NWMAS identifies the work methods adopted by nurses in hospital settings, is a valuable tool for nursing management, and contributes to the definition of strategies that promote the quality of nursing care and the safety of patients.</description><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Exploratory factor analysis</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Measures</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Nursing work method</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patient-centered care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Work</subject><subject>Work methods</subject><issn>0029-6473</issn><issn>1744-6198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MtKAzEUBuAgCtbqzgcY0J2OzT0ZN1KKN6i68LYMaXKGTm1najKjuPM1fD2fxJR27dkcOHz8B36EDgk-I0SIAcWUDbTWnGi2hXpEcZ5LUuht1MOYFrnkiu2ivRhnOA1Tuocu7rsQIf5-_2SvTXjL7qCdNj5mw5iucQF1mz06O4fzbJiNmjq2oXNt9mLnlbdt1dT7aKe08wgHm91Hz1eXT6ObfPxwfTsajnNHmWa5s7wASy3BEweUa8dKEN47CqCE4KWQRAkvS89lod0EvFbaleCsZURRylgfHa1zl6F57yC2ZtZ0oU4vDdVSaaap4EmdrpULTYwBSrMM1cKGL0OwWVVkVhWZTUWJH695SI-WJsBHFVsbE-YYGyoNl5qJxE7WbFrV3n5W_4f-AT-ScYY</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Ventura-Silva, J. M.</creator><creator>Martins, M. M.</creator><creator>Trindade, L. L.</creator><creator>Faria, A. C.</creator><creator>Barros, S. C.</creator><creator>Melo, R. M.</creator><creator>Oliveira, I. J.</creator><creator>Castro, S. F.</creator><creator>Ribeiro, O. M.</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi and Wiley</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>RCLKO</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8794-528X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9982-9537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5065-7815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6627-3907</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8864-8634</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-9940</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation</title><author>Ventura-Silva, J. M. ; Martins, M. M. ; Trindade, L. L. ; Faria, A. C. ; Barros, S. C. ; Melo, R. M. ; Oliveira, I. J. ; Castro, S. F. ; Ribeiro, O. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2383-ca49ea2a10bce248c3fe5ddc2ee7554f56175d6fd4698cbed878cfecaa3172233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Exploratory factor analysis</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Measures</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Nursing work method</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patient-centered care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Work</topic><topic>Work methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ventura-Silva, J. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, M. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trindade, L. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faria, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barros, S. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, I. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, S. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, O. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>RCAAP open access repository</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Nursing forum (Hillsdale)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ventura-Silva, J. M.</au><au>Martins, M. M.</au><au>Trindade, L. L.</au><au>Faria, A. C.</au><au>Barros, S. C.</au><au>Melo, R. M.</au><au>Oliveira, I. J.</au><au>Castro, S. F.</au><au>Ribeiro, O. M.</au><au>Atashzadeh-Shoorideh, Foroozan</au><au>Foroozan Atashzadeh-Shoorideh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation</atitle><jtitle>Nursing forum (Hillsdale)</jtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2023</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>0029-6473</issn><eissn>1744-6198</eissn><abstract>Background. A nursing work method is the base for the organization and implementation of nursing care to patients based on nurses’ skills. Nurses’ work methods are consensually organized into two groups: task-oriented work methods (functional method) and client-centered work methods (teamwork method, individual work method, and work method per reference nurse). As for the impact of the work method on clients, we highlight the interference in the quality of care provided and, regarding nurses, the impact on workload and job satisfaction. Therefore, the existence of tools that allow identifying the organizational methodologies of nursing care is relevant. Aim. The aim of the study is to test the validity and reliability of the nurses work methods assessment scale (NWMAS). Methods. The methodological study followed the recommendations of the EQUATOR network. The NWMAS was previously developed as a self-completion questionnaire. To determine construct validity, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. Results. 325 participants were enrolled in this study. In exploratory factor analysis, the 25 items comprising NWMAS were distributed in five dimensions, contemplating the work methods. Cronbach’s alpha of the total scale was 0.846. The confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good fit. Conclusion. The NWMAS is a valid and reliable tool. Implications for Nursing Practice. The NWMAS identifies the work methods adopted by nurses in hospital settings, is a valuable tool for nursing management, and contributes to the definition of strategies that promote the quality of nursing care and the safety of patients.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><doi>10.1155/2023/8884183</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8794-528X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9982-9537</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5065-7815</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6627-3907</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8864-8634</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1527-9940</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0029-6473 |
| ispartof | Nursing forum (Hillsdale), 2023, Vol.2023, p.1-7 |
| issn | 0029-6473 1744-6198 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2867838254 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Open Access |
| subjects | Confirmatory factor analysis Data collection Decision making Exploratory factor analysis Informed consent Job satisfaction Measures Medical personnel Methods Nurses Nursing Nursing care Nursing work method Patient safety Patient satisfaction Patient-centered care Patients Professional practice Professionals Quality improvement Quality of care Reliability Work Work methods |
| title | Nurses’ Work Methods Assessment Scale: A Construct Validation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A05%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nurses%E2%80%99%20Work%20Methods%20Assessment%20Scale:%20A%20Construct%20Validation&rft.jtitle=Nursing%20forum%20(Hillsdale)&rft.au=Ventura-Silva,%20J.%20M.&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=2023&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=0029-6473&rft.eissn=1744-6198&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2023/8884183&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2867838254%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2867838254&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |