Short- and long-term effects of reminders on panellists’ survey participation in a probability-based panel study with a sequential mixed-mode design

In recent panel studies, besides other methods such as sequential mixed-mode design, push-to-web method, and prepaid monetary incentives, follow-up contacts such as personalised electronic mails (e-mails) or short message service are often used to motivate nonrespondents to complete the questionnair...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality & quantity 2023-10, Vol.57 (5), p.4095-4119
1. Verfasser: Becker, Rolf
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4119
container_issue 5
container_start_page 4095
container_title Quality & quantity
container_volume 57
creator Becker, Rolf
description In recent panel studies, besides other methods such as sequential mixed-mode design, push-to-web method, and prepaid monetary incentives, follow-up contacts such as personalised electronic mails (e-mails) or short message service are often used to motivate nonrespondents to complete the questionnaire, increase the response rate within a limited fieldwork period, and minimise panel attrition. Since it is still unclear when and how often non-complying panellists should be reminded to take part in a survey, this contribution analyses the short- and long-term effects of digital reminders across the fieldwork period. For this purpose, longitudinal data and statistical procedures of event history analysis are applied to reveal the effects of reminders on the likelihood, timing, and social structure of Swiss juveniles’ survey participation. On the one hand, there are short-term and long-term effects of multiple early reminders on the response of panellists receiving reminders. On the other hand, there are no cumulative effects across the fieldwork period or overlapping effects of reminders across the mixed survey modes. Considering the social structure of nonrespondents who receive reminders, it appears plausible that there may be a selective response in terms of the panellists’ social origin, educational level, and language proficiency.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11135-022-01554-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2867118681</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A766307547</galeid><sourcerecordid>A766307547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317y-7787b3224036d3b884b5dc051ccc6533455e68910231084d3d123f98875c68b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9qFTEUxoMoeG19AVcB16k5k8kkXZbiPyi4qF2HTHLmNmUmuSa56ux8ikJfzycxdQR3JYtDDt_vnI_zEfIG-Blwrt4VABCS8a5jHKTs2fqM7EAqwZTu5XOy41wIJkGpl-RVKXecN6xXO3J_fZtyZdRGT-cU96xiXihOE7paaJpoxiVEj7l9Ij3YiPMcSi2_fz3QcszfcW3NXIMLB1tDk4RILT3kNNoxzKGubLQF_UbSUo9-pT9CvW2igt-OGGuwM13CT_RsSR6pxxL28ZS8mOxc8PW_ekJuPrz_evmJXX35-Pny4oo5AWplSmk1iq7ruRi8GLXuR-kdl-CcG6QQvZQ46HPgnQCuey88dGI611pJN-hRiRPydpvbHDc3pZq7dMyxrTSdHhSAHjQ01dmm2tsZTYhTqtm69nw7jksRp9D6F2oYBFeyfxzbbYDLqZSMkznksNi8GuDmMTCzBWZaYOZvYGZtkNig0sRxj_m_lyeoP230m0M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2867118681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short- and long-term effects of reminders on panellists’ survey participation in a probability-based panel study with a sequential mixed-mode design</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Becker, Rolf</creator><creatorcontrib>Becker, Rolf</creatorcontrib><description>In recent panel studies, besides other methods such as sequential mixed-mode design, push-to-web method, and prepaid monetary incentives, follow-up contacts such as personalised electronic mails (e-mails) or short message service are often used to motivate nonrespondents to complete the questionnaire, increase the response rate within a limited fieldwork period, and minimise panel attrition. Since it is still unclear when and how often non-complying panellists should be reminded to take part in a survey, this contribution analyses the short- and long-term effects of digital reminders across the fieldwork period. For this purpose, longitudinal data and statistical procedures of event history analysis are applied to reveal the effects of reminders on the likelihood, timing, and social structure of Swiss juveniles’ survey participation. On the one hand, there are short-term and long-term effects of multiple early reminders on the response of panellists receiving reminders. On the other hand, there are no cumulative effects across the fieldwork period or overlapping effects of reminders across the mixed survey modes. Considering the social structure of nonrespondents who receive reminders, it appears plausible that there may be a selective response in terms of the panellists’ social origin, educational level, and language proficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-5177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7845</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11135-022-01554-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Attrition ; Competence ; Educational attainment ; Email ; Event history analysis ; Field study ; Fieldwork ; Language proficiency ; Long term ; Longitudinal studies ; Methodology of the Social Sciences ; Participation ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Reminders ; Responses ; Social Sciences ; Social structure</subject><ispartof>Quality &amp; quantity, 2023-10, Vol.57 (5), p.4095-4119</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317y-7787b3224036d3b884b5dc051ccc6533455e68910231084d3d123f98875c68b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c317y-7787b3224036d3b884b5dc051ccc6533455e68910231084d3d123f98875c68b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9574-1669</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11135-022-01554-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11135-022-01554-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27344,27924,27925,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becker, Rolf</creatorcontrib><title>Short- and long-term effects of reminders on panellists’ survey participation in a probability-based panel study with a sequential mixed-mode design</title><title>Quality &amp; quantity</title><addtitle>Qual Quant</addtitle><description>In recent panel studies, besides other methods such as sequential mixed-mode design, push-to-web method, and prepaid monetary incentives, follow-up contacts such as personalised electronic mails (e-mails) or short message service are often used to motivate nonrespondents to complete the questionnaire, increase the response rate within a limited fieldwork period, and minimise panel attrition. Since it is still unclear when and how often non-complying panellists should be reminded to take part in a survey, this contribution analyses the short- and long-term effects of digital reminders across the fieldwork period. For this purpose, longitudinal data and statistical procedures of event history analysis are applied to reveal the effects of reminders on the likelihood, timing, and social structure of Swiss juveniles’ survey participation. On the one hand, there are short-term and long-term effects of multiple early reminders on the response of panellists receiving reminders. On the other hand, there are no cumulative effects across the fieldwork period or overlapping effects of reminders across the mixed survey modes. Considering the social structure of nonrespondents who receive reminders, it appears plausible that there may be a selective response in terms of the panellists’ social origin, educational level, and language proficiency.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Attrition</subject><subject>Competence</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Email</subject><subject>Event history analysis</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>Language proficiency</subject><subject>Long term</subject><subject>Longitudinal studies</subject><subject>Methodology of the Social Sciences</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Reminders</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Social structure</subject><issn>0033-5177</issn><issn>1573-7845</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9qFTEUxoMoeG19AVcB16k5k8kkXZbiPyi4qF2HTHLmNmUmuSa56ux8ikJfzycxdQR3JYtDDt_vnI_zEfIG-Blwrt4VABCS8a5jHKTs2fqM7EAqwZTu5XOy41wIJkGpl-RVKXecN6xXO3J_fZtyZdRGT-cU96xiXihOE7paaJpoxiVEj7l9Ij3YiPMcSi2_fz3QcszfcW3NXIMLB1tDk4RILT3kNNoxzKGubLQF_UbSUo9-pT9CvW2igt-OGGuwM13CT_RsSR6pxxL28ZS8mOxc8PW_ekJuPrz_evmJXX35-Pny4oo5AWplSmk1iq7ruRi8GLXuR-kdl-CcG6QQvZQ46HPgnQCuey88dGI611pJN-hRiRPydpvbHDc3pZq7dMyxrTSdHhSAHjQ01dmm2tsZTYhTqtm69nw7jksRp9D6F2oYBFeyfxzbbYDLqZSMkznksNi8GuDmMTCzBWZaYOZvYGZtkNig0sRxj_m_lyeoP230m0M</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Becker, Rolf</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-1669</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Short- and long-term effects of reminders on panellists’ survey participation in a probability-based panel study with a sequential mixed-mode design</title><author>Becker, Rolf</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c317y-7787b3224036d3b884b5dc051ccc6533455e68910231084d3d123f98875c68b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Attrition</topic><topic>Competence</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Email</topic><topic>Event history analysis</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>Language proficiency</topic><topic>Long term</topic><topic>Longitudinal studies</topic><topic>Methodology of the Social Sciences</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Reminders</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Social structure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becker, Rolf</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Quality &amp; quantity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becker, Rolf</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short- and long-term effects of reminders on panellists’ survey participation in a probability-based panel study with a sequential mixed-mode design</atitle><jtitle>Quality &amp; quantity</jtitle><stitle>Qual Quant</stitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>4095</spage><epage>4119</epage><pages>4095-4119</pages><issn>0033-5177</issn><eissn>1573-7845</eissn><abstract>In recent panel studies, besides other methods such as sequential mixed-mode design, push-to-web method, and prepaid monetary incentives, follow-up contacts such as personalised electronic mails (e-mails) or short message service are often used to motivate nonrespondents to complete the questionnaire, increase the response rate within a limited fieldwork period, and minimise panel attrition. Since it is still unclear when and how often non-complying panellists should be reminded to take part in a survey, this contribution analyses the short- and long-term effects of digital reminders across the fieldwork period. For this purpose, longitudinal data and statistical procedures of event history analysis are applied to reveal the effects of reminders on the likelihood, timing, and social structure of Swiss juveniles’ survey participation. On the one hand, there are short-term and long-term effects of multiple early reminders on the response of panellists receiving reminders. On the other hand, there are no cumulative effects across the fieldwork period or overlapping effects of reminders across the mixed survey modes. Considering the social structure of nonrespondents who receive reminders, it appears plausible that there may be a selective response in terms of the panellists’ social origin, educational level, and language proficiency.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11135-022-01554-y</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-1669</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-5177
ispartof Quality & quantity, 2023-10, Vol.57 (5), p.4095-4119
issn 0033-5177
1573-7845
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2867118681
source SpringerLink Journals; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Academic achievement
Attrition
Competence
Educational attainment
Email
Event history analysis
Field study
Fieldwork
Language proficiency
Long term
Longitudinal studies
Methodology of the Social Sciences
Participation
Polls & surveys
Reminders
Responses
Social Sciences
Social structure
title Short- and long-term effects of reminders on panellists’ survey participation in a probability-based panel study with a sequential mixed-mode design
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T11%3A49%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short-%20and%20long-term%20effects%20of%20reminders%20on%20panellists%E2%80%99%20survey%20participation%20in%20a%20probability-based%20panel%20study%20with%20a%20sequential%20mixed-mode%20design&rft.jtitle=Quality%20&%20quantity&rft.au=Becker,%20Rolf&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=4095&rft.epage=4119&rft.pages=4095-4119&rft.issn=0033-5177&rft.eissn=1573-7845&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11135-022-01554-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA766307547%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2867118681&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A766307547&rfr_iscdi=true