Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Membrane Contactor for CO2 Separation: Two Types of Membrane Evaluation
Two different types of hollow‐fiber membrane contactors were used for CO2 separation from the gas stream with monoethanolamine (MEA) absorbent and numerically investigated. After the model validation with experimental data, CO2 removal efficiency, MEA concentration, and pressure drop variation were...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Chemical engineering & technology 2023-10, Vol.46 (10), p.2034-2045 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2045 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 2034 |
| container_title | Chemical engineering & technology |
| container_volume | 46 |
| creator | Alborzi, Zahra Sayyah Amini, Younes Amirabedi, Parya Saba Raveshiyan Amin Hassanvand |
| description | Two different types of hollow‐fiber membrane contactors were used for CO2 separation from the gas stream with monoethanolamine (MEA) absorbent and numerically investigated. After the model validation with experimental data, CO2 removal efficiency, MEA concentration, and pressure drop variation were examined under different conditions by variation of some effective parameters such as gas stream velocity, absorption solution velocity, membrane porosity, and membrane tortuosity. Membrane tortuosity and porosity enhancement led to light decrease and light increase in CO2 removal efficiency, respectively, but gas stream velocity enhancement significantly reduced the CO2 removal efficiency. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ceat.202300102 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2866555410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2866555410</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-ec1dc74d9d244081a7116d584682b81e07ddb3459fc17b0ebea56e0d7a5ce4763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j01Lw0AQhhdRsFavnhc8p85s9iP1JrFVodJD67lsdjeQkmRjdqP03xujeBhehvd5BoaQW4QFArB743RcMGApAAI7IzMUDBOOTJyTGSxTSJRAeUmuQjjCyIzLjMTcN90Qdax8q2u6rofK0qdTq5vKBLqrmqGeOupLqumba4pet47mvo3aRN_Tcpx8y-jOdbqf0Ae6__J0f-pc-LH-ndWnroeJuCYXpa6Du_nLOXlfr_b5S7LZPr_mj5ukwyyNiTNojeJ2aRnnkKFWiNKKjMuMFRk6UNYWKRfL0qAqwBVOC-nAKi2M40qmc3L3e7fr_cfgQjwc_dCPf4YDy6QUQnCE9Bt8Y131</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2866555410</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Membrane Contactor for CO2 Separation: Two Types of Membrane Evaluation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Alborzi, Zahra Sayyah ; Amini, Younes ; Amirabedi, Parya ; Saba Raveshiyan ; Amin Hassanvand</creator><creatorcontrib>Alborzi, Zahra Sayyah ; Amini, Younes ; Amirabedi, Parya ; Saba Raveshiyan ; Amin Hassanvand</creatorcontrib><description>Two different types of hollow‐fiber membrane contactors were used for CO2 separation from the gas stream with monoethanolamine (MEA) absorbent and numerically investigated. After the model validation with experimental data, CO2 removal efficiency, MEA concentration, and pressure drop variation were examined under different conditions by variation of some effective parameters such as gas stream velocity, absorption solution velocity, membrane porosity, and membrane tortuosity. Membrane tortuosity and porosity enhancement led to light decrease and light increase in CO2 removal efficiency, respectively, but gas stream velocity enhancement significantly reduced the CO2 removal efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-7516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-4125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ceat.202300102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frankfurt: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Contactors ; Efficiency ; Gas streams ; Membranes ; Monoethanolamine (MEA) ; Porosity ; Pressure drop ; Separation ; Tortuosity</subject><ispartof>Chemical engineering & technology, 2023-10, Vol.46 (10), p.2034-2045</ispartof><rights>2023 Wiley‐VCH GmbH</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alborzi, Zahra Sayyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amini, Younes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amirabedi, Parya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saba Raveshiyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amin Hassanvand</creatorcontrib><title>Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Membrane Contactor for CO2 Separation: Two Types of Membrane Evaluation</title><title>Chemical engineering & technology</title><description>Two different types of hollow‐fiber membrane contactors were used for CO2 separation from the gas stream with monoethanolamine (MEA) absorbent and numerically investigated. After the model validation with experimental data, CO2 removal efficiency, MEA concentration, and pressure drop variation were examined under different conditions by variation of some effective parameters such as gas stream velocity, absorption solution velocity, membrane porosity, and membrane tortuosity. Membrane tortuosity and porosity enhancement led to light decrease and light increase in CO2 removal efficiency, respectively, but gas stream velocity enhancement significantly reduced the CO2 removal efficiency.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Contactors</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Gas streams</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Monoethanolamine (MEA)</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Pressure drop</subject><subject>Separation</subject><subject>Tortuosity</subject><issn>0930-7516</issn><issn>1521-4125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9j01Lw0AQhhdRsFavnhc8p85s9iP1JrFVodJD67lsdjeQkmRjdqP03xujeBhehvd5BoaQW4QFArB743RcMGApAAI7IzMUDBOOTJyTGSxTSJRAeUmuQjjCyIzLjMTcN90Qdax8q2u6rofK0qdTq5vKBLqrmqGeOupLqumba4pet47mvo3aRN_Tcpx8y-jOdbqf0Ae6__J0f-pc-LH-ndWnroeJuCYXpa6Du_nLOXlfr_b5S7LZPr_mj5ukwyyNiTNojeJ2aRnnkKFWiNKKjMuMFRk6UNYWKRfL0qAqwBVOC-nAKi2M40qmc3L3e7fr_cfgQjwc_dCPf4YDy6QUQnCE9Bt8Y131</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Alborzi, Zahra Sayyah</creator><creator>Amini, Younes</creator><creator>Amirabedi, Parya</creator><creator>Saba Raveshiyan</creator><creator>Amin Hassanvand</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Membrane Contactor for CO2 Separation: Two Types of Membrane Evaluation</title><author>Alborzi, Zahra Sayyah ; Amini, Younes ; Amirabedi, Parya ; Saba Raveshiyan ; Amin Hassanvand</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-ec1dc74d9d244081a7116d584682b81e07ddb3459fc17b0ebea56e0d7a5ce4763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Contactors</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Gas streams</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Monoethanolamine (MEA)</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Pressure drop</topic><topic>Separation</topic><topic>Tortuosity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alborzi, Zahra Sayyah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amini, Younes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amirabedi, Parya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saba Raveshiyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amin Hassanvand</creatorcontrib><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Chemical engineering & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alborzi, Zahra Sayyah</au><au>Amini, Younes</au><au>Amirabedi, Parya</au><au>Saba Raveshiyan</au><au>Amin Hassanvand</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Membrane Contactor for CO2 Separation: Two Types of Membrane Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Chemical engineering & technology</jtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2034</spage><epage>2045</epage><pages>2034-2045</pages><issn>0930-7516</issn><eissn>1521-4125</eissn><abstract>Two different types of hollow‐fiber membrane contactors were used for CO2 separation from the gas stream with monoethanolamine (MEA) absorbent and numerically investigated. After the model validation with experimental data, CO2 removal efficiency, MEA concentration, and pressure drop variation were examined under different conditions by variation of some effective parameters such as gas stream velocity, absorption solution velocity, membrane porosity, and membrane tortuosity. Membrane tortuosity and porosity enhancement led to light decrease and light increase in CO2 removal efficiency, respectively, but gas stream velocity enhancement significantly reduced the CO2 removal efficiency.</abstract><cop>Frankfurt</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ceat.202300102</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0930-7516 |
| ispartof | Chemical engineering & technology, 2023-10, Vol.46 (10), p.2034-2045 |
| issn | 0930-7516 1521-4125 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2866555410 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Carbon dioxide Computational fluid dynamics Contactors Efficiency Gas streams Membranes Monoethanolamine (MEA) Porosity Pressure drop Separation Tortuosity |
| title | Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of a Membrane Contactor for CO2 Separation: Two Types of Membrane Evaluation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T00%3A41%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20Fluid%20Dynamics%20Simulation%20of%20a%20Membrane%20Contactor%20for%20CO2%20Separation:%20Two%20Types%20of%20Membrane%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Chemical%20engineering%20&%20technology&rft.au=Alborzi,%20Zahra%20Sayyah&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2034&rft.epage=2045&rft.pages=2034-2045&rft.issn=0930-7516&rft.eissn=1521-4125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ceat.202300102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2866555410%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2866555410&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |