UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN AND THE NEED FOR LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN IMMIGRATION PROCEEDINGS

INTRODUCTION An unaccompanied child is defined as someone who enters the United States under the age of eighteen, without lawful status, and without an accompanying parent or legal guardian.1 Despite the term's implication, many children do not enter the country alone but are either separated f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:St. John's law review 2022-01, Vol.96 (4), p.959-978
1. Verfasser: Singh, Sejal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 978
container_issue 4
container_start_page 959
container_title St. John's law review
container_volume 96
creator Singh, Sejal
description INTRODUCTION An unaccompanied child is defined as someone who enters the United States under the age of eighteen, without lawful status, and without an accompanying parent or legal guardian.1 Despite the term's implication, many children do not enter the country alone but are either separated from their family members at the border or leftby smugglers or other migrants near the border.2 The number of unaccompanied minors plunged in early 2020 due to border closures and restrictions amid the COVID-19 pandemic; however, a recent surge has led to a strain on government resources and a backlog of cases in immigration courts.3 Each year, thousands of children travel to the southern border from the Northern Triangle region of Central America. In fiscal year 2021, 47% of children were from Guatemala, 32% were from Honduras, and 13% were from El Salvador.4 Many children are escaping deadly gang violence, poverty, devastating hurricanes, and the pandemic.5 Most others are coming from Mexico, where violence continues to escalate amid the government's war against drug cartels.6 Despite the dangerous journey, children are fleeing to the U.S. border to either be reunited with family members already here or escape dangerous conditions in their home countries.7 Unfortunately, once children arrive at the U.S. border, they continue to face difficult challenges including navigating a complex immigration system to stay in the United States, often by themselves.8 While unaccompanied minors are afforded certain protections and have a statutory right to counsel at their own expense, they are not entitled to any form of government-funded, appointed counsel to assist them.9 Thus, many children are forced to represent themselves in complex immigration proceedings with little or no knowledge of the legal system and limited English skills.10 As Syracuse's TRAC Immigration analysis indicates, "the single most important factor" in determining the outcome of a case is whether the child had an attorney.11 In about 73% of cases where the child had representation, the judge "allowed the child to remain in the United States. "20 It also guaranteed several rights to detained children, including the right to be held in "the least restrictive setting appropriate," the right to be released from government custody without delay to parents, family members, or appropriate guardians, and the right to a certain standard of care in immigration detention such as food, water, and medical assistance.21
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2866113827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2866113827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_28661138273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNit8KgjAchUcUZH_eYdC1sM2c83LMXzrQTabRpXRhFxJZmu-fUA8QHDic73wL5DHKhS-imC-RR0jAfRaTcI0249gRQik7hh66nI1UyhalNBoSrDKdJw4MlibBdQbYwExP1uEcUpljB6WDCkwta20N1nOKQqfuO0tn1exrk1Y7tLpd72O7__UWHU5Qq8x_Dv1rasd30_XT8JivhgnOKQ0Ei4L_rA-ykDoS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2866113827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN AND THE NEED FOR LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN IMMIGRATION PROCEEDINGS</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Singh, Sejal</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Sejal</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTION An unaccompanied child is defined as someone who enters the United States under the age of eighteen, without lawful status, and without an accompanying parent or legal guardian.1 Despite the term's implication, many children do not enter the country alone but are either separated from their family members at the border or leftby smugglers or other migrants near the border.2 The number of unaccompanied minors plunged in early 2020 due to border closures and restrictions amid the COVID-19 pandemic; however, a recent surge has led to a strain on government resources and a backlog of cases in immigration courts.3 Each year, thousands of children travel to the southern border from the Northern Triangle region of Central America. In fiscal year 2021, 47% of children were from Guatemala, 32% were from Honduras, and 13% were from El Salvador.4 Many children are escaping deadly gang violence, poverty, devastating hurricanes, and the pandemic.5 Most others are coming from Mexico, where violence continues to escalate amid the government's war against drug cartels.6 Despite the dangerous journey, children are fleeing to the U.S. border to either be reunited with family members already here or escape dangerous conditions in their home countries.7 Unfortunately, once children arrive at the U.S. border, they continue to face difficult challenges including navigating a complex immigration system to stay in the United States, often by themselves.8 While unaccompanied minors are afforded certain protections and have a statutory right to counsel at their own expense, they are not entitled to any form of government-funded, appointed counsel to assist them.9 Thus, many children are forced to represent themselves in complex immigration proceedings with little or no knowledge of the legal system and limited English skills.10 As Syracuse's TRAC Immigration analysis indicates, "the single most important factor" in determining the outcome of a case is whether the child had an attorney.11 In about 73% of cases where the child had representation, the judge "allowed the child to remain in the United States. "20 It also guaranteed several rights to detained children, including the right to be held in "the least restrictive setting appropriate," the right to be released from government custody without delay to parents, family members, or appropriate guardians, and the right to a certain standard of care in immigration detention such as food, water, and medical assistance.21 After Flores, however, INS faced criticism for failing to meet their obligations and for their conflicting role in enforcing immigration laws on the one hand, while caring for unaccompanied minors on the other.22 Eventually, the HSA transferred immigration and enforcement responsibilities to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ("CIS"), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"), and U.S. Customs and Border Protection ("CBP").23 It also transferred the care of unaccompanied children to the Office of Refugee Resettlement ("ORR") within the Department of Health and Human Services.24 Despite these developments, there were "ongoing concerns that CBP was not adequately screening apprehended [unaccompanied children] for evidence of human trafficking or persecution. "48 They also coordinate and approve the reunification of the child with relatives or other qualified sponsors, pending resolution of the child's immigration proceedings.49 However, outstanding problems with the ORR program include insufficient facilities for children requiring mental health services and prolonged periods of detention.50 For example, in fiscal year 2020, children were in ORR custody for approximately 102 days.51 In addition, the influx of children during the Biden administration has further inundated the ORR, resulting in many children living in CPB facilities for longer than the three-day limit outlined in</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-2905</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8796</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brooklyn: St. John's Law Review Association</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Child welfare ; Court hearings &amp; proceedings ; Due process of law ; Families &amp; family life ; Gangs ; Guardians ; Human trafficking ; Immigration policy ; Judges &amp; magistrates ; Pandemics ; Right to counsel ; Violent crime</subject><ispartof>St. John's law review, 2022-01, Vol.96 (4), p.959-978</ispartof><rights>Copyright St. John's Law Review Association 2022</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Sejal</creatorcontrib><title>UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN AND THE NEED FOR LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN IMMIGRATION PROCEEDINGS</title><title>St. John's law review</title><description>INTRODUCTION An unaccompanied child is defined as someone who enters the United States under the age of eighteen, without lawful status, and without an accompanying parent or legal guardian.1 Despite the term's implication, many children do not enter the country alone but are either separated from their family members at the border or leftby smugglers or other migrants near the border.2 The number of unaccompanied minors plunged in early 2020 due to border closures and restrictions amid the COVID-19 pandemic; however, a recent surge has led to a strain on government resources and a backlog of cases in immigration courts.3 Each year, thousands of children travel to the southern border from the Northern Triangle region of Central America. In fiscal year 2021, 47% of children were from Guatemala, 32% were from Honduras, and 13% were from El Salvador.4 Many children are escaping deadly gang violence, poverty, devastating hurricanes, and the pandemic.5 Most others are coming from Mexico, where violence continues to escalate amid the government's war against drug cartels.6 Despite the dangerous journey, children are fleeing to the U.S. border to either be reunited with family members already here or escape dangerous conditions in their home countries.7 Unfortunately, once children arrive at the U.S. border, they continue to face difficult challenges including navigating a complex immigration system to stay in the United States, often by themselves.8 While unaccompanied minors are afforded certain protections and have a statutory right to counsel at their own expense, they are not entitled to any form of government-funded, appointed counsel to assist them.9 Thus, many children are forced to represent themselves in complex immigration proceedings with little or no knowledge of the legal system and limited English skills.10 As Syracuse's TRAC Immigration analysis indicates, "the single most important factor" in determining the outcome of a case is whether the child had an attorney.11 In about 73% of cases where the child had representation, the judge "allowed the child to remain in the United States. "20 It also guaranteed several rights to detained children, including the right to be held in "the least restrictive setting appropriate," the right to be released from government custody without delay to parents, family members, or appropriate guardians, and the right to a certain standard of care in immigration detention such as food, water, and medical assistance.21 After Flores, however, INS faced criticism for failing to meet their obligations and for their conflicting role in enforcing immigration laws on the one hand, while caring for unaccompanied minors on the other.22 Eventually, the HSA transferred immigration and enforcement responsibilities to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ("CIS"), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"), and U.S. Customs and Border Protection ("CBP").23 It also transferred the care of unaccompanied children to the Office of Refugee Resettlement ("ORR") within the Department of Health and Human Services.24 Despite these developments, there were "ongoing concerns that CBP was not adequately screening apprehended [unaccompanied children] for evidence of human trafficking or persecution. "48 They also coordinate and approve the reunification of the child with relatives or other qualified sponsors, pending resolution of the child's immigration proceedings.49 However, outstanding problems with the ORR program include insufficient facilities for children requiring mental health services and prolonged periods of detention.50 For example, in fiscal year 2020, children were in ORR custody for approximately 102 days.51 In addition, the influx of children during the Biden administration has further inundated the ORR, resulting in many children living in CPB facilities for longer than the three-day limit outlined in</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Child welfare</subject><subject>Court hearings &amp; proceedings</subject><subject>Due process of law</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Gangs</subject><subject>Guardians</subject><subject>Human trafficking</subject><subject>Immigration policy</subject><subject>Judges &amp; magistrates</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Right to counsel</subject><subject>Violent crime</subject><issn>0036-2905</issn><issn>2168-8796</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNit8KgjAchUcUZH_eYdC1sM2c83LMXzrQTabRpXRhFxJZmu-fUA8QHDic73wL5DHKhS-imC-RR0jAfRaTcI0249gRQik7hh66nI1UyhalNBoSrDKdJw4MlibBdQbYwExP1uEcUpljB6WDCkwta20N1nOKQqfuO0tn1exrk1Y7tLpd72O7__UWHU5Qq8x_Dv1rasd30_XT8JivhgnOKQ0Ei4L_rA-ykDoS</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Singh, Sejal</creator><general>St. John's Law Review Association</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN AND THE NEED FOR LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN IMMIGRATION PROCEEDINGS</title><author>Singh, Sejal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28661138273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Child welfare</topic><topic>Court hearings &amp; proceedings</topic><topic>Due process of law</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Gangs</topic><topic>Guardians</topic><topic>Human trafficking</topic><topic>Immigration policy</topic><topic>Judges &amp; magistrates</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Right to counsel</topic><topic>Violent crime</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Sejal</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>St. John's law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Sejal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN AND THE NEED FOR LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN IMMIGRATION PROCEEDINGS</atitle><jtitle>St. John's law review</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>959</spage><epage>978</epage><pages>959-978</pages><issn>0036-2905</issn><eissn>2168-8796</eissn><abstract>INTRODUCTION An unaccompanied child is defined as someone who enters the United States under the age of eighteen, without lawful status, and without an accompanying parent or legal guardian.1 Despite the term's implication, many children do not enter the country alone but are either separated from their family members at the border or leftby smugglers or other migrants near the border.2 The number of unaccompanied minors plunged in early 2020 due to border closures and restrictions amid the COVID-19 pandemic; however, a recent surge has led to a strain on government resources and a backlog of cases in immigration courts.3 Each year, thousands of children travel to the southern border from the Northern Triangle region of Central America. In fiscal year 2021, 47% of children were from Guatemala, 32% were from Honduras, and 13% were from El Salvador.4 Many children are escaping deadly gang violence, poverty, devastating hurricanes, and the pandemic.5 Most others are coming from Mexico, where violence continues to escalate amid the government's war against drug cartels.6 Despite the dangerous journey, children are fleeing to the U.S. border to either be reunited with family members already here or escape dangerous conditions in their home countries.7 Unfortunately, once children arrive at the U.S. border, they continue to face difficult challenges including navigating a complex immigration system to stay in the United States, often by themselves.8 While unaccompanied minors are afforded certain protections and have a statutory right to counsel at their own expense, they are not entitled to any form of government-funded, appointed counsel to assist them.9 Thus, many children are forced to represent themselves in complex immigration proceedings with little or no knowledge of the legal system and limited English skills.10 As Syracuse's TRAC Immigration analysis indicates, "the single most important factor" in determining the outcome of a case is whether the child had an attorney.11 In about 73% of cases where the child had representation, the judge "allowed the child to remain in the United States. "20 It also guaranteed several rights to detained children, including the right to be held in "the least restrictive setting appropriate," the right to be released from government custody without delay to parents, family members, or appropriate guardians, and the right to a certain standard of care in immigration detention such as food, water, and medical assistance.21 After Flores, however, INS faced criticism for failing to meet their obligations and for their conflicting role in enforcing immigration laws on the one hand, while caring for unaccompanied minors on the other.22 Eventually, the HSA transferred immigration and enforcement responsibilities to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services ("CIS"), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE"), and U.S. Customs and Border Protection ("CBP").23 It also transferred the care of unaccompanied children to the Office of Refugee Resettlement ("ORR") within the Department of Health and Human Services.24 Despite these developments, there were "ongoing concerns that CBP was not adequately screening apprehended [unaccompanied children] for evidence of human trafficking or persecution. "48 They also coordinate and approve the reunification of the child with relatives or other qualified sponsors, pending resolution of the child's immigration proceedings.49 However, outstanding problems with the ORR program include insufficient facilities for children requiring mental health services and prolonged periods of detention.50 For example, in fiscal year 2020, children were in ORR custody for approximately 102 days.51 In addition, the influx of children during the Biden administration has further inundated the ORR, resulting in many children living in CPB facilities for longer than the three-day limit outlined in</abstract><cop>Brooklyn</cop><pub>St. John's Law Review Association</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-2905
ispartof St. John's law review, 2022-01, Vol.96 (4), p.959-978
issn 0036-2905
2168-8796
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2866113827
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agreements
Child welfare
Court hearings & proceedings
Due process of law
Families & family life
Gangs
Guardians
Human trafficking
Immigration policy
Judges & magistrates
Pandemics
Right to counsel
Violent crime
title UNACCOMPANIED CHILDREN AND THE NEED FOR LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN IMMIGRATION PROCEEDINGS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A09%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=UNACCOMPANIED%20CHILDREN%20AND%20THE%20NEED%20FOR%20LEGAL%20REPRESENTATION%20IN%20IMMIGRATION%20PROCEEDINGS&rft.jtitle=St.%20John's%20law%20review&rft.au=Singh,%20Sejal&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=959&rft.epage=978&rft.pages=959-978&rft.issn=0036-2905&rft.eissn=2168-8796&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2866113827%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2866113827&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true