Short-Term Forecasting of Daily Pan Evaporation Using Corrected Numerical Weather Forecasts Products

Numerical weather prediction (NWP) can provide vital information for pan evaporation (Ep) forecasts for the 16 days ahead, which is of great help to water resources management. However, the information for forecasting Ep usually requires bias corrections. This study was based on three bias correctio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrologic engineering 2023-11, Vol.28 (11)
Hauptverfasser: Yao, Li, Gu, Xinqin, Wu, Lifeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page
container_title Journal of hydrologic engineering
container_volume 28
creator Yao, Li
Gu, Xinqin
Wu, Lifeng
description Numerical weather prediction (NWP) can provide vital information for pan evaporation (Ep) forecasts for the 16 days ahead, which is of great help to water resources management. However, the information for forecasting Ep usually requires bias corrections. This study was based on three bias correction methods [the equidistant cumulative distribution function method (EDCDFm; M1), XGBoost (XGB) with a single meteorological factor input (M2), and XGB with multiple meteorological factor input (M3)] and the meteorological data from 18 weather stations in southern China, the bias correction of meteorological factors forecasted by the second-generation Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFSv2) was carried out. The results indicated the bias correction ability of the M3 method for GEFSv2 outputs was better than that of the M1 and M2 methods. It was a model-data error between GEFSv2 outputs and the corresponding observation data. Solar radiation exhibited the lowest error, whereas minimum temperature exhibited the highest. However, the M3 method decreased the forecast model-data error. In addition, this study compared the ability of three tree-based models to forecast Ep, namely, M5Tree (M5T), random forest (RF), and XGB. The XGB model had the highest forecasting accuracy for Ep. When the NWP outputs corrected by M1, M2, and M3 methods were used as the input of the XGB model, the averages of mean absolute errors (MAEs) at the 18 stations during the 1–16 day period ranged at 0.99–1.69, 0.78–1.14, and 0.78–1.07  mm/day, respectively. EP forecast showed the most significant error in the summer. Further, the relative humidity contributed the most to the Ep forecasting error. By addressing the issue of NWP outputs applied to Ep forecast, this study improves understanding of the bias correction method of NWP outputs and tree-based models to forecast Ep. It also improves understanding of the seasonal performance of Ep forecast and the impact of meteorological factors on forecast error that can inform future studies and models.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-5966
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2864824845</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2864824845</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-ba5edf0026764fecb6c8704cb31e62eee2ba5768839e17f5d594ecce94e8e7603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLuA19GkTdL0Uma7KWMO3BCvQpaeuo6tmUkq7N_bOfHmfHAe3gMPQreM3jMq2cPL5KMoy_tJUczGRORSnqEBy3lKhFD8vJ-p4oTKPL9EVyFsKGW8Xwaoels7H8kC_A6XzoM1ITbtJ3Y1fjLN9oDnpsXFt9k7b2LjWrwMx_PI-Z6NUOFZtwPfWLPF72DiGvx_TMBz76rOxnCNLmqzDXDz14doWRaL0YRMX8fPo8cpsUkiIlkZAVVNaSIzyWuwK2lVRrldpQxkAgBJT2RSqTQHltWiEjkHa6GvCjJJ0yG6O-XuvfvqIES9cZ1v-5c6UZKrhCsueoqdKOtdCB5qvffNzviDZlQfZeqTTP0rUx9lpj-fGmn7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2864824845</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short-Term Forecasting of Daily Pan Evaporation Using Corrected Numerical Weather Forecasts Products</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Yao, Li ; Gu, Xinqin ; Wu, Lifeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Yao, Li ; Gu, Xinqin ; Wu, Lifeng</creatorcontrib><description>Numerical weather prediction (NWP) can provide vital information for pan evaporation (Ep) forecasts for the 16 days ahead, which is of great help to water resources management. However, the information for forecasting Ep usually requires bias corrections. This study was based on three bias correction methods [the equidistant cumulative distribution function method (EDCDFm; M1), XGBoost (XGB) with a single meteorological factor input (M2), and XGB with multiple meteorological factor input (M3)] and the meteorological data from 18 weather stations in southern China, the bias correction of meteorological factors forecasted by the second-generation Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFSv2) was carried out. The results indicated the bias correction ability of the M3 method for GEFSv2 outputs was better than that of the M1 and M2 methods. It was a model-data error between GEFSv2 outputs and the corresponding observation data. Solar radiation exhibited the lowest error, whereas minimum temperature exhibited the highest. However, the M3 method decreased the forecast model-data error. In addition, this study compared the ability of three tree-based models to forecast Ep, namely, M5Tree (M5T), random forest (RF), and XGB. The XGB model had the highest forecasting accuracy for Ep. When the NWP outputs corrected by M1, M2, and M3 methods were used as the input of the XGB model, the averages of mean absolute errors (MAEs) at the 18 stations during the 1–16 day period ranged at 0.99–1.69, 0.78–1.14, and 0.78–1.07  mm/day, respectively. EP forecast showed the most significant error in the summer. Further, the relative humidity contributed the most to the Ep forecasting error. By addressing the issue of NWP outputs applied to Ep forecast, this study improves understanding of the bias correction method of NWP outputs and tree-based models to forecast Ep. It also improves understanding of the seasonal performance of Ep forecast and the impact of meteorological factors on forecast error that can inform future studies and models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1084-0699</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-5966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Bias ; Civil engineering ; Daily forecasts ; Distribution functions ; Ensemble forecasting ; Error analysis ; Evaporation ; Forecast accuracy ; Forecast errors ; Forecasting models ; Hydrology ; Mathematical models ; Meteorological data ; Minimum temperatures ; Modelling ; Numerical prediction ; Numerical weather forecasting ; Pan evaporation ; Relative humidity ; Solar radiation ; Water resources ; Water resources management ; Weather ; Weather forecasting ; Weather stations</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrologic engineering, 2023-11, Vol.28 (11)</ispartof><rights>2023 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-ba5edf0026764fecb6c8704cb31e62eee2ba5768839e17f5d594ecce94e8e7603</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8647-5661</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yao, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Xinqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Lifeng</creatorcontrib><title>Short-Term Forecasting of Daily Pan Evaporation Using Corrected Numerical Weather Forecasts Products</title><title>Journal of hydrologic engineering</title><description>Numerical weather prediction (NWP) can provide vital information for pan evaporation (Ep) forecasts for the 16 days ahead, which is of great help to water resources management. However, the information for forecasting Ep usually requires bias corrections. This study was based on three bias correction methods [the equidistant cumulative distribution function method (EDCDFm; M1), XGBoost (XGB) with a single meteorological factor input (M2), and XGB with multiple meteorological factor input (M3)] and the meteorological data from 18 weather stations in southern China, the bias correction of meteorological factors forecasted by the second-generation Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFSv2) was carried out. The results indicated the bias correction ability of the M3 method for GEFSv2 outputs was better than that of the M1 and M2 methods. It was a model-data error between GEFSv2 outputs and the corresponding observation data. Solar radiation exhibited the lowest error, whereas minimum temperature exhibited the highest. However, the M3 method decreased the forecast model-data error. In addition, this study compared the ability of three tree-based models to forecast Ep, namely, M5Tree (M5T), random forest (RF), and XGB. The XGB model had the highest forecasting accuracy for Ep. When the NWP outputs corrected by M1, M2, and M3 methods were used as the input of the XGB model, the averages of mean absolute errors (MAEs) at the 18 stations during the 1–16 day period ranged at 0.99–1.69, 0.78–1.14, and 0.78–1.07  mm/day, respectively. EP forecast showed the most significant error in the summer. Further, the relative humidity contributed the most to the Ep forecasting error. By addressing the issue of NWP outputs applied to Ep forecast, this study improves understanding of the bias correction method of NWP outputs and tree-based models to forecast Ep. It also improves understanding of the seasonal performance of Ep forecast and the impact of meteorological factors on forecast error that can inform future studies and models.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Civil engineering</subject><subject>Daily forecasts</subject><subject>Distribution functions</subject><subject>Ensemble forecasting</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Forecast accuracy</subject><subject>Forecast errors</subject><subject>Forecasting models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Meteorological data</subject><subject>Minimum temperatures</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Numerical prediction</subject><subject>Numerical weather forecasting</subject><subject>Pan evaporation</subject><subject>Relative humidity</subject><subject>Solar radiation</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><subject>Weather stations</subject><issn>1084-0699</issn><issn>1943-5584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_wLuA19GkTdL0Uma7KWMO3BCvQpaeuo6tmUkq7N_bOfHmfHAe3gMPQreM3jMq2cPL5KMoy_tJUczGRORSnqEBy3lKhFD8vJ-p4oTKPL9EVyFsKGW8Xwaoels7H8kC_A6XzoM1ITbtJ3Y1fjLN9oDnpsXFt9k7b2LjWrwMx_PI-Z6NUOFZtwPfWLPF72DiGvx_TMBz76rOxnCNLmqzDXDz14doWRaL0YRMX8fPo8cpsUkiIlkZAVVNaSIzyWuwK2lVRrldpQxkAgBJT2RSqTQHltWiEjkHa6GvCjJJ0yG6O-XuvfvqIES9cZ1v-5c6UZKrhCsueoqdKOtdCB5qvffNzviDZlQfZeqTTP0rUx9lpj-fGmn7</recordid><startdate>202311</startdate><enddate>202311</enddate><creator>Yao, Li</creator><creator>Gu, Xinqin</creator><creator>Wu, Lifeng</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8647-5661</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202311</creationdate><title>Short-Term Forecasting of Daily Pan Evaporation Using Corrected Numerical Weather Forecasts Products</title><author>Yao, Li ; Gu, Xinqin ; Wu, Lifeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-ba5edf0026764fecb6c8704cb31e62eee2ba5768839e17f5d594ecce94e8e7603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Civil engineering</topic><topic>Daily forecasts</topic><topic>Distribution functions</topic><topic>Ensemble forecasting</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Forecast accuracy</topic><topic>Forecast errors</topic><topic>Forecasting models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Meteorological data</topic><topic>Minimum temperatures</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Numerical prediction</topic><topic>Numerical weather forecasting</topic><topic>Pan evaporation</topic><topic>Relative humidity</topic><topic>Solar radiation</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><topic>Weather stations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yao, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Xinqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Lifeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrologic engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yao, Li</au><au>Gu, Xinqin</au><au>Wu, Lifeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short-Term Forecasting of Daily Pan Evaporation Using Corrected Numerical Weather Forecasts Products</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrologic engineering</jtitle><date>2023-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>11</issue><issn>1084-0699</issn><eissn>1943-5584</eissn><abstract>Numerical weather prediction (NWP) can provide vital information for pan evaporation (Ep) forecasts for the 16 days ahead, which is of great help to water resources management. However, the information for forecasting Ep usually requires bias corrections. This study was based on three bias correction methods [the equidistant cumulative distribution function method (EDCDFm; M1), XGBoost (XGB) with a single meteorological factor input (M2), and XGB with multiple meteorological factor input (M3)] and the meteorological data from 18 weather stations in southern China, the bias correction of meteorological factors forecasted by the second-generation Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFSv2) was carried out. The results indicated the bias correction ability of the M3 method for GEFSv2 outputs was better than that of the M1 and M2 methods. It was a model-data error between GEFSv2 outputs and the corresponding observation data. Solar radiation exhibited the lowest error, whereas minimum temperature exhibited the highest. However, the M3 method decreased the forecast model-data error. In addition, this study compared the ability of three tree-based models to forecast Ep, namely, M5Tree (M5T), random forest (RF), and XGB. The XGB model had the highest forecasting accuracy for Ep. When the NWP outputs corrected by M1, M2, and M3 methods were used as the input of the XGB model, the averages of mean absolute errors (MAEs) at the 18 stations during the 1–16 day period ranged at 0.99–1.69, 0.78–1.14, and 0.78–1.07  mm/day, respectively. EP forecast showed the most significant error in the summer. Further, the relative humidity contributed the most to the Ep forecasting error. By addressing the issue of NWP outputs applied to Ep forecast, this study improves understanding of the bias correction method of NWP outputs and tree-based models to forecast Ep. It also improves understanding of the seasonal performance of Ep forecast and the impact of meteorological factors on forecast error that can inform future studies and models.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-5966</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8647-5661</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1084-0699
ispartof Journal of hydrologic engineering, 2023-11, Vol.28 (11)
issn 1084-0699
1943-5584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2864824845
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Bias
Civil engineering
Daily forecasts
Distribution functions
Ensemble forecasting
Error analysis
Evaporation
Forecast accuracy
Forecast errors
Forecasting models
Hydrology
Mathematical models
Meteorological data
Minimum temperatures
Modelling
Numerical prediction
Numerical weather forecasting
Pan evaporation
Relative humidity
Solar radiation
Water resources
Water resources management
Weather
Weather forecasting
Weather stations
title Short-Term Forecasting of Daily Pan Evaporation Using Corrected Numerical Weather Forecasts Products
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A04%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short-Term%20Forecasting%20of%20Daily%20Pan%20Evaporation%20Using%20Corrected%20Numerical%20Weather%20Forecasts%20Products&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrologic%20engineering&rft.au=Yao,%20Li&rft.date=2023-11&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=11&rft.issn=1084-0699&rft.eissn=1943-5584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/JHYEFF.HEENG-5966&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2864824845%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2864824845&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true