Collaborative Optimization Allocation of Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Reactive Power Resources Considering Auxiliary Equipment Services

The large-scale integration of high-penetration distributed photovoltaic systems into distribution networks can result in significant grid voltage fluctuations within a short period. However, centralized regulation instructions for passive/reactive compensation, by themselves, are insufficient for e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE access 2023-01, Vol.11, p.1-1
Hauptverfasser: Xue, Shiwei, Zeng, Siming, Jia, Qingquan, Hu, Xuekai, Luo, Peng, Liang, Jifeng, Wang, Lei, Zhou, Wen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title IEEE access
container_volume 11
creator Xue, Shiwei
Zeng, Siming
Jia, Qingquan
Hu, Xuekai
Luo, Peng
Liang, Jifeng
Wang, Lei
Zhou, Wen
description The large-scale integration of high-penetration distributed photovoltaic systems into distribution networks can result in significant grid voltage fluctuations within a short period. However, centralized regulation instructions for passive/reactive compensation, by themselves, are insufficient for effectively suppressing these fluctuations. Thus, this study used the grid-forming and grid-following control characteristics of modern power electronic inverters to propose an optimal allocation strategy for reactive power compensation equipment. This strategy aimed to address the insufficient proactive support capacity in the reactive power equipment used to suppress short-time grid voltage fluctuations. After establishing uncertain operation scenarios for the distribution network, we analyzed the respective multi-timescale behavioral characteristics of traditional, grid-forming, and grid-following reactive power compensation devices. The primary and auxiliary objectives were to minimize the investment cost of the special equipment and voltage deviation of the entire network, respectively. To achieve these objectives, we established a collaborative optimal allocation model for grid-forming and grid-following reactive power equipment. A multi-timescale cooperative allocation strategy was proposed to decompose the total reactive power demand curves at the equipment installation nodes into reactive power curves for different response levels and then collaboratively allocate the multiple devices. A comparative analysis of the three schemes in IEEE 33-node and 69-node systems shows that the proposed strategy guarantees lower overall network voltages while reducing the cost by at least 20% compared to those of other schemes.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3308293
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2864343893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10229156</ieee_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_978534db1b9b48b2b5cadd1e5d09343a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2864343893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-faa80f5722939177d54dd34793935f689ba98d090e261426a3205f60269b815e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUctOwzAQjBBIIOAL4BCJc4ofcWIfq6gFJCQQhbPlxBvkKo2LnZbHJ_DVbAkgfPHOaHZ2V5MkZ5RMKCXqclpVs8ViwgjjE86JZIrvJUeMFirjghf7_-rD5DTGJcEnkRLlUfJZ-a4ztQ9mcFtI79aDW7kPBL5Pp13nm7H0bXoVnM3mPqxc_5ya3v4SKHrdUQ9gmm-Pe_8KAWH0m9BATCvfR2ch7ETTzZvrnAnv6exl49Yr6Id0AWHrUHiSHLSmi3D68x8nT_PZY3Wd3d5d3VTT26zJiRqy1hhJWlEyvFPRsrQit5bnJSIu2kKq2ihpiSLACpqzwnBGkCesULWkAvhxcjP6Wm-Weh3cCvfR3jj9TfjwrE0YXNOBVqUUPLc1rVWdy5rVojHWUhDoz3Nu0Oti9FoH_7KBOOglXt3j-prJIkeNVBxVfFQ1wccYoP2bSoneZajHDPUuQ_2TIXadj10OAP514OFUFPwLyCCZNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2864343893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Collaborative Optimization Allocation of Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Reactive Power Resources Considering Auxiliary Equipment Services</title><source>IEEE Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Xue, Shiwei ; Zeng, Siming ; Jia, Qingquan ; Hu, Xuekai ; Luo, Peng ; Liang, Jifeng ; Wang, Lei ; Zhou, Wen</creator><creatorcontrib>Xue, Shiwei ; Zeng, Siming ; Jia, Qingquan ; Hu, Xuekai ; Luo, Peng ; Liang, Jifeng ; Wang, Lei ; Zhou, Wen</creatorcontrib><description>The large-scale integration of high-penetration distributed photovoltaic systems into distribution networks can result in significant grid voltage fluctuations within a short period. However, centralized regulation instructions for passive/reactive compensation, by themselves, are insufficient for effectively suppressing these fluctuations. Thus, this study used the grid-forming and grid-following control characteristics of modern power electronic inverters to propose an optimal allocation strategy for reactive power compensation equipment. This strategy aimed to address the insufficient proactive support capacity in the reactive power equipment used to suppress short-time grid voltage fluctuations. After establishing uncertain operation scenarios for the distribution network, we analyzed the respective multi-timescale behavioral characteristics of traditional, grid-forming, and grid-following reactive power compensation devices. The primary and auxiliary objectives were to minimize the investment cost of the special equipment and voltage deviation of the entire network, respectively. To achieve these objectives, we established a collaborative optimal allocation model for grid-forming and grid-following reactive power equipment. A multi-timescale cooperative allocation strategy was proposed to decompose the total reactive power demand curves at the equipment installation nodes into reactive power curves for different response levels and then collaboratively allocate the multiple devices. A comparative analysis of the three schemes in IEEE 33-node and 69-node systems shows that the proposed strategy guarantees lower overall network voltages while reducing the cost by at least 20% compared to those of other schemes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3308293</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAECCG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Collaborative optimization allocation ; Compensation ; Costs ; Decomposition reactions ; Distribution networks ; Electric potential ; grid-forming control ; Investment ; Markov processes ; multi-time scale ; optimal reactive power ; Optimization ; Optimization methods ; photovoltaic inverter ; Power grids ; Reactive power ; Resource management ; Time ; Voltage</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2023-01, Vol.11, p.1-1</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-faa80f5722939177d54dd34793935f689ba98d090e261426a3205f60269b815e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-faa80f5722939177d54dd34793935f689ba98d090e261426a3205f60269b815e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2611-4164 ; 0000-0002-5078-0696</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10229156$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,865,2103,27638,27929,27930,54938</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xue, Shiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Siming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Qingquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xuekai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Jifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Wen</creatorcontrib><title>Collaborative Optimization Allocation of Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Reactive Power Resources Considering Auxiliary Equipment Services</title><title>IEEE access</title><addtitle>Access</addtitle><description>The large-scale integration of high-penetration distributed photovoltaic systems into distribution networks can result in significant grid voltage fluctuations within a short period. However, centralized regulation instructions for passive/reactive compensation, by themselves, are insufficient for effectively suppressing these fluctuations. Thus, this study used the grid-forming and grid-following control characteristics of modern power electronic inverters to propose an optimal allocation strategy for reactive power compensation equipment. This strategy aimed to address the insufficient proactive support capacity in the reactive power equipment used to suppress short-time grid voltage fluctuations. After establishing uncertain operation scenarios for the distribution network, we analyzed the respective multi-timescale behavioral characteristics of traditional, grid-forming, and grid-following reactive power compensation devices. The primary and auxiliary objectives were to minimize the investment cost of the special equipment and voltage deviation of the entire network, respectively. To achieve these objectives, we established a collaborative optimal allocation model for grid-forming and grid-following reactive power equipment. A multi-timescale cooperative allocation strategy was proposed to decompose the total reactive power demand curves at the equipment installation nodes into reactive power curves for different response levels and then collaboratively allocate the multiple devices. A comparative analysis of the three schemes in IEEE 33-node and 69-node systems shows that the proposed strategy guarantees lower overall network voltages while reducing the cost by at least 20% compared to those of other schemes.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Collaborative optimization allocation</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Decomposition reactions</subject><subject>Distribution networks</subject><subject>Electric potential</subject><subject>grid-forming control</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Markov processes</subject><subject>multi-time scale</subject><subject>optimal reactive power</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization methods</subject><subject>photovoltaic inverter</subject><subject>Power grids</subject><subject>Reactive power</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Voltage</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUctOwzAQjBBIIOAL4BCJc4ofcWIfq6gFJCQQhbPlxBvkKo2LnZbHJ_DVbAkgfPHOaHZ2V5MkZ5RMKCXqclpVs8ViwgjjE86JZIrvJUeMFirjghf7_-rD5DTGJcEnkRLlUfJZ-a4ztQ9mcFtI79aDW7kPBL5Pp13nm7H0bXoVnM3mPqxc_5ya3v4SKHrdUQ9gmm-Pe_8KAWH0m9BATCvfR2ch7ETTzZvrnAnv6exl49Yr6Id0AWHrUHiSHLSmi3D68x8nT_PZY3Wd3d5d3VTT26zJiRqy1hhJWlEyvFPRsrQit5bnJSIu2kKq2ihpiSLACpqzwnBGkCesULWkAvhxcjP6Wm-Weh3cCvfR3jj9TfjwrE0YXNOBVqUUPLc1rVWdy5rVojHWUhDoz3Nu0Oti9FoH_7KBOOglXt3j-prJIkeNVBxVfFQ1wccYoP2bSoneZajHDPUuQ_2TIXadj10OAP514OFUFPwLyCCZNQ</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Xue, Shiwei</creator><creator>Zeng, Siming</creator><creator>Jia, Qingquan</creator><creator>Hu, Xuekai</creator><creator>Luo, Peng</creator><creator>Liang, Jifeng</creator><creator>Wang, Lei</creator><creator>Zhou, Wen</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2611-4164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5078-0696</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Collaborative Optimization Allocation of Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Reactive Power Resources Considering Auxiliary Equipment Services</title><author>Xue, Shiwei ; Zeng, Siming ; Jia, Qingquan ; Hu, Xuekai ; Luo, Peng ; Liang, Jifeng ; Wang, Lei ; Zhou, Wen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-faa80f5722939177d54dd34793935f689ba98d090e261426a3205f60269b815e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Collaborative optimization allocation</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Decomposition reactions</topic><topic>Distribution networks</topic><topic>Electric potential</topic><topic>grid-forming control</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Markov processes</topic><topic>multi-time scale</topic><topic>optimal reactive power</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization methods</topic><topic>photovoltaic inverter</topic><topic>Power grids</topic><topic>Reactive power</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Voltage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xue, Shiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Siming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Qingquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xuekai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Peng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Jifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Wen</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xue, Shiwei</au><au>Zeng, Siming</au><au>Jia, Qingquan</au><au>Hu, Xuekai</au><au>Luo, Peng</au><au>Liang, Jifeng</au><au>Wang, Lei</au><au>Zhou, Wen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Collaborative Optimization Allocation of Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Reactive Power Resources Considering Auxiliary Equipment Services</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><stitle>Access</stitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>1</epage><pages>1-1</pages><issn>2169-3536</issn><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><coden>IAECCG</coden><abstract>The large-scale integration of high-penetration distributed photovoltaic systems into distribution networks can result in significant grid voltage fluctuations within a short period. However, centralized regulation instructions for passive/reactive compensation, by themselves, are insufficient for effectively suppressing these fluctuations. Thus, this study used the grid-forming and grid-following control characteristics of modern power electronic inverters to propose an optimal allocation strategy for reactive power compensation equipment. This strategy aimed to address the insufficient proactive support capacity in the reactive power equipment used to suppress short-time grid voltage fluctuations. After establishing uncertain operation scenarios for the distribution network, we analyzed the respective multi-timescale behavioral characteristics of traditional, grid-forming, and grid-following reactive power compensation devices. The primary and auxiliary objectives were to minimize the investment cost of the special equipment and voltage deviation of the entire network, respectively. To achieve these objectives, we established a collaborative optimal allocation model for grid-forming and grid-following reactive power equipment. A multi-timescale cooperative allocation strategy was proposed to decompose the total reactive power demand curves at the equipment installation nodes into reactive power curves for different response levels and then collaboratively allocate the multiple devices. A comparative analysis of the three schemes in IEEE 33-node and 69-node systems shows that the proposed strategy guarantees lower overall network voltages while reducing the cost by at least 20% compared to those of other schemes.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3308293</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2611-4164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5078-0696</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-3536
ispartof IEEE access, 2023-01, Vol.11, p.1-1
issn 2169-3536
2169-3536
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2864343893
source IEEE Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Collaboration
Collaborative optimization allocation
Compensation
Costs
Decomposition reactions
Distribution networks
Electric potential
grid-forming control
Investment
Markov processes
multi-time scale
optimal reactive power
Optimization
Optimization methods
photovoltaic inverter
Power grids
Reactive power
Resource management
Time
Voltage
title Collaborative Optimization Allocation of Grid-Forming and Grid-Following Reactive Power Resources Considering Auxiliary Equipment Services
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T13%3A00%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Collaborative%20Optimization%20Allocation%20of%20Grid-Forming%20and%20Grid-Following%20Reactive%20Power%20Resources%20Considering%20Auxiliary%20Equipment%20Services&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Xue,%20Shiwei&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=1&rft.pages=1-1&rft.issn=2169-3536&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft.coden=IAECCG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3308293&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E2864343893%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2864343893&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10229156&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_978534db1b9b48b2b5cadd1e5d09343a&rfr_iscdi=true