Examining the Impact of Task Difficulty on Student Engagement and Learning Rates
Interventions that match demands to ability can enhance both academic performance and behavioral performance. However, it is unknown whether the instructional match or subsequent increases in engagement with the instructional material differentially impacts learning. The current study evaluated the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of behavioral education 2023-09, Vol.32 (3), p.527-542 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 542 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 527 |
container_title | Journal of behavioral education |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Pavlov, Alexis Duhon, Gary Dawes, Jillian |
description | Interventions that match demands to ability can enhance both academic performance and behavioral performance. However, it is unknown whether the instructional match or subsequent increases in engagement with the instructional material differentially impacts learning. The current study evaluated the effect of task difficulty on on-task behavior and responding rate across two studies. In Study 1, participants were assigned easy and difficult math probes following results of curriculum-based assessment. Data were collected on digits correct per min (DCPM) and percentage of on-task behavior during a 5-min observation period. Results from Study 1 indicated that participants responded, on average, 1.16 DCPM more per session in the easy probe condition, responded more over time at faster rate than in the difficult probe condition, and were engaged significantly more in the easy probe condition. In Study 2, the same data were collected for participants completing easy probes during a truncated observation period and compared across results from in Study 1. Rate of responding in Study 2 was substantially less than in Study 1. The interaction between task difficulty and DCPM was not significant which suggests that engagement was a substantial contributor to the growth differences in Study 1. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10864-021-09465-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2863627728</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A764863966</galeid><ericid>EJ1391997</ericid><sourcerecordid>A764863966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-5488667795e653fe39d4a30e778db8d6839f2bc6579b2b40671436d33068e5e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxQdRsLZ-AUEY8MmH1GTy_7HUbV1ZqLT1OWRnbsbUncyaZKD77ZvtiGVhkftwL7m_cwL3VNUHgs8JxvJLIlgJhnBDENZMcLR7VZ0QLiminNDXZcacIqyIflu9S-kBY6xVw06qH4tHO_jgQ1_nX1Avh61tcz26-t6m3_VX75xvp03e1WOo7_LUQcj1IvS2h2E_2tDVK7Dx2eDWZkhn1RtnNwne_-2n1c-rxf3lN7S6uV5eXqxQyxTOiDOlhJBScxCcOqC6Y5ZikFJ1a9UJRbVr1q3gUq-bNcNCEkZFRykWCjhIelp9mn23cfwzQcrmYZxiKF-aRgkqGikb9UL1dgPGBzfmaNvBp9ZcSMEKqIUoFDpC9RAg2s0YwPnyfMCfH-FLdTD49qjg84GgMBkec2-nlMzy7vaQbWa2jWNKEZzZRj_YuDMEm33YZg7blLDNc9hmV0QfZxFE3_4TLL4TqonW-2vReZ_KLvQQX671H9cnEsKyBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2863627728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining the Impact of Task Difficulty on Student Engagement and Learning Rates</title><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Pavlov, Alexis ; Duhon, Gary ; Dawes, Jillian</creator><creatorcontrib>Pavlov, Alexis ; Duhon, Gary ; Dawes, Jillian</creatorcontrib><description>Interventions that match demands to ability can enhance both academic performance and behavioral performance. However, it is unknown whether the instructional match or subsequent increases in engagement with the instructional material differentially impacts learning. The current study evaluated the effect of task difficulty on on-task behavior and responding rate across two studies. In Study 1, participants were assigned easy and difficult math probes following results of curriculum-based assessment. Data were collected on digits correct per min (DCPM) and percentage of on-task behavior during a 5-min observation period. Results from Study 1 indicated that participants responded, on average, 1.16 DCPM more per session in the easy probe condition, responded more over time at faster rate than in the difficult probe condition, and were engaged significantly more in the easy probe condition. In Study 2, the same data were collected for participants completing easy probes during a truncated observation period and compared across results from in Study 1. Rate of responding in Study 2 was substantially less than in Study 1. The interaction between task difficulty and DCPM was not significant which suggests that engagement was a substantial contributor to the growth differences in Study 1.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-0819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-3513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10864-021-09465-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Behavior ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Child and School Psychology ; Curricula ; Curriculum based assessment ; Difficulty Level ; Education ; Educational Media ; Instructional Materials ; Learner Engagement ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Methods ; Observation ; Original Paper ; Psychology ; Student Behavior ; Student participation ; Students ; Time Factors (Learning)</subject><ispartof>Journal of behavioral education, 2023-09, Vol.32 (3), p.527-542</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-5488667795e653fe39d4a30e778db8d6839f2bc6579b2b40671436d33068e5e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-5488667795e653fe39d4a30e778db8d6839f2bc6579b2b40671436d33068e5e73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9754-7149</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10864-021-09465-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10864-021-09465-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1391997$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pavlov, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duhon, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawes, Jillian</creatorcontrib><title>Examining the Impact of Task Difficulty on Student Engagement and Learning Rates</title><title>Journal of behavioral education</title><addtitle>J Behav Educ</addtitle><description>Interventions that match demands to ability can enhance both academic performance and behavioral performance. However, it is unknown whether the instructional match or subsequent increases in engagement with the instructional material differentially impacts learning. The current study evaluated the effect of task difficulty on on-task behavior and responding rate across two studies. In Study 1, participants were assigned easy and difficult math probes following results of curriculum-based assessment. Data were collected on digits correct per min (DCPM) and percentage of on-task behavior during a 5-min observation period. Results from Study 1 indicated that participants responded, on average, 1.16 DCPM more per session in the easy probe condition, responded more over time at faster rate than in the difficult probe condition, and were engaged significantly more in the easy probe condition. In Study 2, the same data were collected for participants completing easy probes during a truncated observation period and compared across results from in Study 1. Rate of responding in Study 2 was substantially less than in Study 1. The interaction between task difficulty and DCPM was not significant which suggests that engagement was a substantial contributor to the growth differences in Study 1.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum based assessment</subject><subject>Difficulty Level</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Media</subject><subject>Instructional Materials</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Student participation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Time Factors (Learning)</subject><issn>1053-0819</issn><issn>1573-3513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxQdRsLZ-AUEY8MmH1GTy_7HUbV1ZqLT1OWRnbsbUncyaZKD77ZvtiGVhkftwL7m_cwL3VNUHgs8JxvJLIlgJhnBDENZMcLR7VZ0QLiminNDXZcacIqyIflu9S-kBY6xVw06qH4tHO_jgQ1_nX1Avh61tcz26-t6m3_VX75xvp03e1WOo7_LUQcj1IvS2h2E_2tDVK7Dx2eDWZkhn1RtnNwne_-2n1c-rxf3lN7S6uV5eXqxQyxTOiDOlhJBScxCcOqC6Y5ZikFJ1a9UJRbVr1q3gUq-bNcNCEkZFRykWCjhIelp9mn23cfwzQcrmYZxiKF-aRgkqGikb9UL1dgPGBzfmaNvBp9ZcSMEKqIUoFDpC9RAg2s0YwPnyfMCfH-FLdTD49qjg84GgMBkec2-nlMzy7vaQbWa2jWNKEZzZRj_YuDMEm33YZg7blLDNc9hmV0QfZxFE3_4TLL4TqonW-2vReZ_KLvQQX671H9cnEsKyBw</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Pavlov, Alexis</creator><creator>Duhon, Gary</creator><creator>Dawes, Jillian</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9754-7149</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Examining the Impact of Task Difficulty on Student Engagement and Learning Rates</title><author>Pavlov, Alexis ; Duhon, Gary ; Dawes, Jillian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-5488667795e653fe39d4a30e778db8d6839f2bc6579b2b40671436d33068e5e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum based assessment</topic><topic>Difficulty Level</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Media</topic><topic>Instructional Materials</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Student participation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Time Factors (Learning)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pavlov, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duhon, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawes, Jillian</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of behavioral education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pavlov, Alexis</au><au>Duhon, Gary</au><au>Dawes, Jillian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1391997</ericid><atitle>Examining the Impact of Task Difficulty on Student Engagement and Learning Rates</atitle><jtitle>Journal of behavioral education</jtitle><stitle>J Behav Educ</stitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>527</spage><epage>542</epage><pages>527-542</pages><issn>1053-0819</issn><eissn>1573-3513</eissn><abstract>Interventions that match demands to ability can enhance both academic performance and behavioral performance. However, it is unknown whether the instructional match or subsequent increases in engagement with the instructional material differentially impacts learning. The current study evaluated the effect of task difficulty on on-task behavior and responding rate across two studies. In Study 1, participants were assigned easy and difficult math probes following results of curriculum-based assessment. Data were collected on digits correct per min (DCPM) and percentage of on-task behavior during a 5-min observation period. Results from Study 1 indicated that participants responded, on average, 1.16 DCPM more per session in the easy probe condition, responded more over time at faster rate than in the difficult probe condition, and were engaged significantly more in the easy probe condition. In Study 2, the same data were collected for participants completing easy probes during a truncated observation period and compared across results from in Study 1. Rate of responding in Study 2 was substantially less than in Study 1. The interaction between task difficulty and DCPM was not significant which suggests that engagement was a substantial contributor to the growth differences in Study 1.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10864-021-09465-y</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9754-7149</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-0819 |
ispartof | Journal of behavioral education, 2023-09, Vol.32 (3), p.527-542 |
issn | 1053-0819 1573-3513 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2863627728 |
source | EBSCOhost Education Source; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Academic achievement Behavior Behavioral Science and Psychology Child and School Psychology Curricula Curriculum based assessment Difficulty Level Education Educational Media Instructional Materials Learner Engagement Learning Learning and Instruction Methods Observation Original Paper Psychology Student Behavior Student participation Students Time Factors (Learning) |
title | Examining the Impact of Task Difficulty on Student Engagement and Learning Rates |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T00%3A30%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20the%20Impact%20of%20Task%20Difficulty%20on%20Student%20Engagement%20and%20Learning%20Rates&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20behavioral%20education&rft.au=Pavlov,%20Alexis&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=527&rft.epage=542&rft.pages=527-542&rft.issn=1053-0819&rft.eissn=1573-3513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10864-021-09465-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA764863966%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2863627728&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A764863966&rft_ericid=EJ1391997&rfr_iscdi=true |