Frequency and period of pruning affect fodder production of Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp. and Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir. in the Sahel
Fodder collection from natural stands generates income in peri-urban areas in the Sahel. Fodder banks show financial and ecological benefits, as increased demand requires sustainable tree management. Fodder production from two commonly used species, Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp. and Pterocarpus er...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Agroforestry systems 2023-10, Vol.97 (7), p.1307-1321 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1321 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 1307 |
| container_title | Agroforestry systems |
| container_volume | 97 |
| creator | Bayala, Jules Ky-Dembele, Catherine Coe, Richard Binam, Joachim Nyemeck Kalinganire, Antoine Olivier, Alain |
| description | Fodder collection from natural stands generates income in peri-urban areas in the Sahel. Fodder banks show financial and ecological benefits, as increased demand requires sustainable tree management. Fodder production from two commonly used species,
Gliricidia sepium
(Jacq.) Walp. and
Pterocarpus erinaceus
Poir. was evaluated for combinations of variety, year, period, height, and frequency of pruning. In the first experiment (1997–2000) fodder production increased with tree age, but in the second period (2012–2015) fodder production was declining in all treatments. Overall, the data suggest that for marketable fodder production a 3-month pruning interval is maintained for
G. sepium
and a 4-month interval for
P. erinaceus
. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10457-022-00779-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2862679712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2862679712</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b3809ed5586b6cd71c7b13410edaffeedff022ce635cbd8627c3ebcc8f9fbd713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4CngRQ9bk91usnuUYqsiWFDxGLLJpE1pk22ye-gb-NimreDN02TC9_8z8yN0TcmIEsLvIyXjkmckz7PU8jrbnaABLXme1awip2hAKOPZuGDsHF3EuCKE1IxXA_Q9DbDtwakdlk7jFoL1GnuD29A76xZYGgOqw8ZrDSH9et2rznq3Z2ZrG6yy2kocobX9Bt--SLUd3eEvuW5HB8d5B8ErGdo-4mTupIL0mnsbRtg63C0Bv8slrC_RmZHrCFe_dYg-p48fk6fs9W32PHl4zVRB6y5riorUoMuyYg1TmlPFG1qMKQG93xS0MSkEBawoVaMrlnNVQKNUZWrTJLwYopujbzolHR47sfJ9cGmkyBPOeM1pnqj8SKngYwxgRBvsRoadoETsExfHxEUaJg6Ji10SFUdRTLBbQPiz_kf1Awq8htQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2862679712</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Frequency and period of pruning affect fodder production of Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp. and Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir. in the Sahel</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bayala, Jules ; Ky-Dembele, Catherine ; Coe, Richard ; Binam, Joachim Nyemeck ; Kalinganire, Antoine ; Olivier, Alain</creator><creatorcontrib>Bayala, Jules ; Ky-Dembele, Catherine ; Coe, Richard ; Binam, Joachim Nyemeck ; Kalinganire, Antoine ; Olivier, Alain</creatorcontrib><description>Fodder collection from natural stands generates income in peri-urban areas in the Sahel. Fodder banks show financial and ecological benefits, as increased demand requires sustainable tree management. Fodder production from two commonly used species,
Gliricidia sepium
(Jacq.) Walp. and
Pterocarpus erinaceus
Poir. was evaluated for combinations of variety, year, period, height, and frequency of pruning. In the first experiment (1997–2000) fodder production increased with tree age, but in the second period (2012–2015) fodder production was declining in all treatments. Overall, the data suggest that for marketable fodder production a 3-month pruning interval is maintained for
G. sepium
and a 4-month interval for
P. erinaceus
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4366</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9680</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10457-022-00779-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agroforestry ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Experiments ; Fodder ; Forage ; Forestry ; GDP ; Gliricidia sepium ; Gross Domestic Product ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Pruning ; Pterocarpus erinaceus ; Trees ; Urban areas ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Agroforestry systems, 2023-10, Vol.97 (7), p.1307-1321</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b3809ed5586b6cd71c7b13410edaffeedff022ce635cbd8627c3ebcc8f9fbd713</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b3809ed5586b6cd71c7b13410edaffeedff022ce635cbd8627c3ebcc8f9fbd713</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8579-1248</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10457-022-00779-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10457-022-00779-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bayala, Jules</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ky-Dembele, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coe, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binam, Joachim Nyemeck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalinganire, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivier, Alain</creatorcontrib><title>Frequency and period of pruning affect fodder production of Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp. and Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir. in the Sahel</title><title>Agroforestry systems</title><addtitle>Agroforest Syst</addtitle><description>Fodder collection from natural stands generates income in peri-urban areas in the Sahel. Fodder banks show financial and ecological benefits, as increased demand requires sustainable tree management. Fodder production from two commonly used species,
Gliricidia sepium
(Jacq.) Walp. and
Pterocarpus erinaceus
Poir. was evaluated for combinations of variety, year, period, height, and frequency of pruning. In the first experiment (1997–2000) fodder production increased with tree age, but in the second period (2012–2015) fodder production was declining in all treatments. Overall, the data suggest that for marketable fodder production a 3-month pruning interval is maintained for
G. sepium
and a 4-month interval for
P. erinaceus
.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agroforestry</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Fodder</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gliricidia sepium</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Pruning</subject><subject>Pterocarpus erinaceus</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0167-4366</issn><issn>1572-9680</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4CngRQ9bk91usnuUYqsiWFDxGLLJpE1pk22ye-gb-NimreDN02TC9_8z8yN0TcmIEsLvIyXjkmckz7PU8jrbnaABLXme1awip2hAKOPZuGDsHF3EuCKE1IxXA_Q9DbDtwakdlk7jFoL1GnuD29A76xZYGgOqw8ZrDSH9et2rznq3Z2ZrG6yy2kocobX9Bt--SLUd3eEvuW5HB8d5B8ErGdo-4mTupIL0mnsbRtg63C0Bv8slrC_RmZHrCFe_dYg-p48fk6fs9W32PHl4zVRB6y5riorUoMuyYg1TmlPFG1qMKQG93xS0MSkEBawoVaMrlnNVQKNUZWrTJLwYopujbzolHR47sfJ9cGmkyBPOeM1pnqj8SKngYwxgRBvsRoadoETsExfHxEUaJg6Ji10SFUdRTLBbQPiz_kf1Awq8htQ</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Bayala, Jules</creator><creator>Ky-Dembele, Catherine</creator><creator>Coe, Richard</creator><creator>Binam, Joachim Nyemeck</creator><creator>Kalinganire, Antoine</creator><creator>Olivier, Alain</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8579-1248</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Frequency and period of pruning affect fodder production of Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp. and Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir. in the Sahel</title><author>Bayala, Jules ; Ky-Dembele, Catherine ; Coe, Richard ; Binam, Joachim Nyemeck ; Kalinganire, Antoine ; Olivier, Alain</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b3809ed5586b6cd71c7b13410edaffeedff022ce635cbd8627c3ebcc8f9fbd713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agroforestry</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Fodder</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gliricidia sepium</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Pruning</topic><topic>Pterocarpus erinaceus</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bayala, Jules</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ky-Dembele, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coe, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binam, Joachim Nyemeck</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalinganire, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivier, Alain</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bayala, Jules</au><au>Ky-Dembele, Catherine</au><au>Coe, Richard</au><au>Binam, Joachim Nyemeck</au><au>Kalinganire, Antoine</au><au>Olivier, Alain</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Frequency and period of pruning affect fodder production of Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp. and Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir. in the Sahel</atitle><jtitle>Agroforestry systems</jtitle><stitle>Agroforest Syst</stitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1307</spage><epage>1321</epage><pages>1307-1321</pages><issn>0167-4366</issn><eissn>1572-9680</eissn><abstract>Fodder collection from natural stands generates income in peri-urban areas in the Sahel. Fodder banks show financial and ecological benefits, as increased demand requires sustainable tree management. Fodder production from two commonly used species,
Gliricidia sepium
(Jacq.) Walp. and
Pterocarpus erinaceus
Poir. was evaluated for combinations of variety, year, period, height, and frequency of pruning. In the first experiment (1997–2000) fodder production increased with tree age, but in the second period (2012–2015) fodder production was declining in all treatments. Overall, the data suggest that for marketable fodder production a 3-month pruning interval is maintained for
G. sepium
and a 4-month interval for
P. erinaceus
.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10457-022-00779-y</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8579-1248</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-4366 |
| ispartof | Agroforestry systems, 2023-10, Vol.97 (7), p.1307-1321 |
| issn | 0167-4366 1572-9680 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2862679712 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Agriculture Agroforestry Biomass Biomedical and Life Sciences Experiments Fodder Forage Forestry GDP Gliricidia sepium Gross Domestic Product Life Sciences Livestock Pruning Pterocarpus erinaceus Trees Urban areas Variance analysis |
| title | Frequency and period of pruning affect fodder production of Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp. and Pterocarpus erinaceus Poir. in the Sahel |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T04%3A01%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Frequency%20and%20period%20of%20pruning%20affect%20fodder%20production%20of%20Gliricidia%20sepium%20(Jacq.)%20Walp.%20and%20Pterocarpus%20erinaceus%20Poir.%20in%20the%20Sahel&rft.jtitle=Agroforestry%20systems&rft.au=Bayala,%20Jules&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1307&rft.epage=1321&rft.pages=1307-1321&rft.issn=0167-4366&rft.eissn=1572-9680&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10457-022-00779-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2862679712%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2862679712&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |