An Institutional Perspective: How Gatekeepers on a Higher Education Interact for the Organization of Access
There is growing research on how collaborative systems could support equity in shaping access for marginalized communities in different contexts. Higher education institutions are essential contexts for examining issues around equity-based organization of access for diverse populations, including pe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computer supported cooperative work 2023-09, Vol.32 (3), p.713-744 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 744 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 713 |
container_title | Computer supported cooperative work |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Yıldız, Zeynep Subaşı, Özge |
description | There is growing research on how collaborative systems could support equity in shaping access for marginalized communities in different contexts. Higher education institutions are essential contexts for examining issues around equity-based organization of access for diverse populations, including people with disabilities. However, there is a shortage of research in CSCW investigating equal access in higher education settings. To address this gap, in this case study, we aim to have a closer look at how gatekeepers (people who are responsible for accessibility) in a higher education institution organize access for members with disabilities. Gatekeeping has long been discussed in disability justice to examine systemic and institutional barriers for people with disabilities. We reveal how gatekeepers interact and collaborate around existing institutional communication channels to collect access-related requests and distribute access in the higher education setting. Our data shows that existing practices come with institutional challenges hindering equity and inclusion for members with disabilities. Key issues revealed through our findings are (1) communication tools and non-shared definitions around access, (2) lack of tools for experience documentation, (3) ineffective feedback loops around access requests, (4) impact-based prioritization for access requests. We discuss how our analysis contributes to equity-oriented system design for future collaboration around organizing higher education access at the institutional level. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10606-023-09471-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2862641393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2862641393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-c923192e87ab9b1046d2e0bd7f44d28f4ee42ab57614af8d86451e71fc7346fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_gKcFz9H9ym7irZTaFgr1oOdls5lt09Yk7m4s-utNjeDN08DM-7wwD0K3lNxTQtRDoEQSmRDGE5ILRZPjGRrRVPFEpSk9RyOSszTJFROX6CqEHSEkFVKO0H5S42UdYhW7WDW1OeBn8KEFG6sPeMSL5ojnJsIeoO33uKmxwYtqswWPZ2VnzQnqCyJ4YyN2jcdxC3jtN6auvoZr4_DEWgjhGl04cwhw8zvH6PVp9jJdJKv1fDmdrBLLFImJzRmnOYNMmSIvKBGyZECKUjkhSpY5ASCYKVIlqTAuKzMpUgqKOqu4kM7wMbobelvfvHcQot41ne9_C5plkklBec77FBtS1jcheHC69dWb8Z-aEn2Sqgepupeqf6TqYw_xAQp9uN6A_6v-h_oGsCV7Ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2862641393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Institutional Perspective: How Gatekeepers on a Higher Education Interact for the Organization of Access</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Yıldız, Zeynep ; Subaşı, Özge</creator><creatorcontrib>Yıldız, Zeynep ; Subaşı, Özge</creatorcontrib><description>There is growing research on how collaborative systems could support equity in shaping access for marginalized communities in different contexts. Higher education institutions are essential contexts for examining issues around equity-based organization of access for diverse populations, including people with disabilities. However, there is a shortage of research in CSCW investigating equal access in higher education settings. To address this gap, in this case study, we aim to have a closer look at how gatekeepers (people who are responsible for accessibility) in a higher education institution organize access for members with disabilities. Gatekeeping has long been discussed in disability justice to examine systemic and institutional barriers for people with disabilities. We reveal how gatekeepers interact and collaborate around existing institutional communication channels to collect access-related requests and distribute access in the higher education setting. Our data shows that existing practices come with institutional challenges hindering equity and inclusion for members with disabilities. Key issues revealed through our findings are (1) communication tools and non-shared definitions around access, (2) lack of tools for experience documentation, (3) ineffective feedback loops around access requests, (4) impact-based prioritization for access requests. We discuss how our analysis contributes to equity-oriented system design for future collaboration around organizing higher education access at the institutional level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-9724</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7551</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10606-023-09471-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Computer Science ; ECSCW Contribution ; Feedback loops ; Higher education ; Higher education institutions ; People with disabilities ; Psychology ; Social Sciences ; Systems design ; User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><ispartof>Computer supported cooperative work, 2023-09, Vol.32 (3), p.713-744</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-c923192e87ab9b1046d2e0bd7f44d28f4ee42ab57614af8d86451e71fc7346fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2264-3408</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10606-023-09471-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10606-023-09471-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yıldız, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subaşı, Özge</creatorcontrib><title>An Institutional Perspective: How Gatekeepers on a Higher Education Interact for the Organization of Access</title><title>Computer supported cooperative work</title><addtitle>Comput Supported Coop Work</addtitle><description>There is growing research on how collaborative systems could support equity in shaping access for marginalized communities in different contexts. Higher education institutions are essential contexts for examining issues around equity-based organization of access for diverse populations, including people with disabilities. However, there is a shortage of research in CSCW investigating equal access in higher education settings. To address this gap, in this case study, we aim to have a closer look at how gatekeepers (people who are responsible for accessibility) in a higher education institution organize access for members with disabilities. Gatekeeping has long been discussed in disability justice to examine systemic and institutional barriers for people with disabilities. We reveal how gatekeepers interact and collaborate around existing institutional communication channels to collect access-related requests and distribute access in the higher education setting. Our data shows that existing practices come with institutional challenges hindering equity and inclusion for members with disabilities. Key issues revealed through our findings are (1) communication tools and non-shared definitions around access, (2) lack of tools for experience documentation, (3) ineffective feedback loops around access requests, (4) impact-based prioritization for access requests. We discuss how our analysis contributes to equity-oriented system design for future collaboration around organizing higher education access at the institutional level.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>ECSCW Contribution</subject><subject>Feedback loops</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Higher education institutions</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Systems design</subject><subject>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><issn>0925-9724</issn><issn>1573-7551</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb_gKcFz9H9ym7irZTaFgr1oOdls5lt09Yk7m4s-utNjeDN08DM-7wwD0K3lNxTQtRDoEQSmRDGE5ILRZPjGRrRVPFEpSk9RyOSszTJFROX6CqEHSEkFVKO0H5S42UdYhW7WDW1OeBn8KEFG6sPeMSL5ojnJsIeoO33uKmxwYtqswWPZ2VnzQnqCyJ4YyN2jcdxC3jtN6auvoZr4_DEWgjhGl04cwhw8zvH6PVp9jJdJKv1fDmdrBLLFImJzRmnOYNMmSIvKBGyZECKUjkhSpY5ASCYKVIlqTAuKzMpUgqKOqu4kM7wMbobelvfvHcQot41ne9_C5plkklBec77FBtS1jcheHC69dWb8Z-aEn2Sqgepupeqf6TqYw_xAQp9uN6A_6v-h_oGsCV7Ng</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Yıldız, Zeynep</creator><creator>Subaşı, Özge</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2264-3408</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>An Institutional Perspective: How Gatekeepers on a Higher Education Interact for the Organization of Access</title><author>Yıldız, Zeynep ; Subaşı, Özge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-c923192e87ab9b1046d2e0bd7f44d28f4ee42ab57614af8d86451e71fc7346fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>ECSCW Contribution</topic><topic>Feedback loops</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Higher education institutions</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Systems design</topic><topic>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yıldız, Zeynep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subaşı, Özge</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Computer supported cooperative work</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yıldız, Zeynep</au><au>Subaşı, Özge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Institutional Perspective: How Gatekeepers on a Higher Education Interact for the Organization of Access</atitle><jtitle>Computer supported cooperative work</jtitle><stitle>Comput Supported Coop Work</stitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>713</spage><epage>744</epage><pages>713-744</pages><issn>0925-9724</issn><eissn>1573-7551</eissn><abstract>There is growing research on how collaborative systems could support equity in shaping access for marginalized communities in different contexts. Higher education institutions are essential contexts for examining issues around equity-based organization of access for diverse populations, including people with disabilities. However, there is a shortage of research in CSCW investigating equal access in higher education settings. To address this gap, in this case study, we aim to have a closer look at how gatekeepers (people who are responsible for accessibility) in a higher education institution organize access for members with disabilities. Gatekeeping has long been discussed in disability justice to examine systemic and institutional barriers for people with disabilities. We reveal how gatekeepers interact and collaborate around existing institutional communication channels to collect access-related requests and distribute access in the higher education setting. Our data shows that existing practices come with institutional challenges hindering equity and inclusion for members with disabilities. Key issues revealed through our findings are (1) communication tools and non-shared definitions around access, (2) lack of tools for experience documentation, (3) ineffective feedback loops around access requests, (4) impact-based prioritization for access requests. We discuss how our analysis contributes to equity-oriented system design for future collaboration around organizing higher education access at the institutional level.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10606-023-09471-w</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2264-3408</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-9724 |
ispartof | Computer supported cooperative work, 2023-09, Vol.32 (3), p.713-744 |
issn | 0925-9724 1573-7551 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2862641393 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Collaboration Computer Science ECSCW Contribution Feedback loops Higher education Higher education institutions People with disabilities Psychology Social Sciences Systems design User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction |
title | An Institutional Perspective: How Gatekeepers on a Higher Education Interact for the Organization of Access |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T19%3A59%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Institutional%20Perspective:%20How%20Gatekeepers%20on%20a%20Higher%20Education%20Interact%20for%20the%20Organization%20of%20Access&rft.jtitle=Computer%20supported%20cooperative%20work&rft.au=Y%C4%B1ld%C4%B1z,%20Zeynep&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=713&rft.epage=744&rft.pages=713-744&rft.issn=0925-9724&rft.eissn=1573-7551&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10606-023-09471-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2862641393%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2862641393&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |