A fragmented and heavily privatized dispute resolution system: the United States
The United States possesses a highly fragmented and decentralized set of mechanisms addressing work‐related conflicts and disputes. There are consequential differences in how workplace conflicts are resolved across the following settings—union and nonunion or collective and individual, public and pr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Industrial relations journal 2023-07, Vol.54 (4/5), p.304-320 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 320 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4/5 |
| container_start_page | 304 |
| container_title | Industrial relations journal |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Avgar, Ariel C |
| description | The United States possesses a highly fragmented and decentralized set of mechanisms addressing work‐related conflicts and disputes. There are consequential differences in how workplace conflicts are resolved across the following settings—union and nonunion or collective and individual, public and private sectors, traditional and nonstandard employment models, and public and private forums. An important trend is the growing influence in the nonunion sector of ‘private justice’ provided in employment arbitration and conflict management systems as a replacement for ‘public justice’, and in the union sector, private neutrals also play a key role. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/irj.12409 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2861030210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2861030210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-b149f5cab3a019a1c41b91df18376d8f9b750c6286f0c1dc109b96d873167fe73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLAzEQx4MoWKsHv0HAk4etM8k2j4OHIr6g4EXPSzabaEq7W5NsoX56oxWcwwzM_Ob1J-QSYYbFbkJczZDVoI_IBGuhKsa5OiYTANSVEpqdkrOUVgDAOZMTcrugPpr3jeuz66jpO_rhzC6s93Qbw87k8FXSXUjbMTsaXRrWYw5DT9M-Zbc5JyferJO7-ItT8vZw_3r3VC1fHp_vFsvKctC5arHWfm5Ny005w6CtsdXYeVRcik553co5WMGU8GCxswi61aUgOQrpneRTcnWYu43D5-hSblbDGPuysilNCBxYcVNyfaBsHFKKzjflh42J-wah-VGnKeo0v-oUlh5YZ4c-pH9SibkEYEW2b8DuYW8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2861030210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A fragmented and heavily privatized dispute resolution system: the United States</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Avgar, Ariel C</creator><creatorcontrib>Avgar, Ariel C</creatorcontrib><description>The United States possesses a highly fragmented and decentralized set of mechanisms addressing work‐related conflicts and disputes. There are consequential differences in how workplace conflicts are resolved across the following settings—union and nonunion or collective and individual, public and private sectors, traditional and nonstandard employment models, and public and private forums. An important trend is the growing influence in the nonunion sector of ‘private justice’ provided in employment arbitration and conflict management systems as a replacement for ‘public justice’, and in the union sector, private neutrals also play a key role.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-8692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/irj.12409</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Arbeitsgericht ; Arbitration ; Conflict management ; Decentralization ; Disputes ; Employment ; Gewerkschaft ; Justice ; Konfliktregelung ; Organizational conflict ; Privatization ; USA ; Workplaces ; Öffentliche Einrichtung</subject><ispartof>Industrial relations journal, 2023-07, Vol.54 (4/5), p.304-320</ispartof><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-b149f5cab3a019a1c41b91df18376d8f9b750c6286f0c1dc109b96d873167fe73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Avgar, Ariel C</creatorcontrib><title>A fragmented and heavily privatized dispute resolution system: the United States</title><title>Industrial relations journal</title><description>The United States possesses a highly fragmented and decentralized set of mechanisms addressing work‐related conflicts and disputes. There are consequential differences in how workplace conflicts are resolved across the following settings—union and nonunion or collective and individual, public and private sectors, traditional and nonstandard employment models, and public and private forums. An important trend is the growing influence in the nonunion sector of ‘private justice’ provided in employment arbitration and conflict management systems as a replacement for ‘public justice’, and in the union sector, private neutrals also play a key role.</description><subject>Arbeitsgericht</subject><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Conflict management</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Gewerkschaft</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Konfliktregelung</subject><subject>Organizational conflict</subject><subject>Privatization</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><subject>Öffentliche Einrichtung</subject><issn>0019-8692</issn><issn>1468-2338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtLAzEQx4MoWKsHv0HAk4etM8k2j4OHIr6g4EXPSzabaEq7W5NsoX56oxWcwwzM_Ob1J-QSYYbFbkJczZDVoI_IBGuhKsa5OiYTANSVEpqdkrOUVgDAOZMTcrugPpr3jeuz66jpO_rhzC6s93Qbw87k8FXSXUjbMTsaXRrWYw5DT9M-Zbc5JyferJO7-ItT8vZw_3r3VC1fHp_vFsvKctC5arHWfm5Ny005w6CtsdXYeVRcik553co5WMGU8GCxswi61aUgOQrpneRTcnWYu43D5-hSblbDGPuysilNCBxYcVNyfaBsHFKKzjflh42J-wah-VGnKeo0v-oUlh5YZ4c-pH9SibkEYEW2b8DuYW8</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Avgar, Ariel C</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>A fragmented and heavily privatized dispute resolution system</title><author>Avgar, Ariel C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-b149f5cab3a019a1c41b91df18376d8f9b750c6286f0c1dc109b96d873167fe73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Arbeitsgericht</topic><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Conflict management</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Gewerkschaft</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Konfliktregelung</topic><topic>Organizational conflict</topic><topic>Privatization</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><topic>Öffentliche Einrichtung</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Avgar, Ariel C</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Industrial relations journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Avgar, Ariel C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A fragmented and heavily privatized dispute resolution system: the United States</atitle><jtitle>Industrial relations journal</jtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>4/5</issue><spage>304</spage><epage>320</epage><pages>304-320</pages><issn>0019-8692</issn><eissn>1468-2338</eissn><abstract>The United States possesses a highly fragmented and decentralized set of mechanisms addressing work‐related conflicts and disputes. There are consequential differences in how workplace conflicts are resolved across the following settings—union and nonunion or collective and individual, public and private sectors, traditional and nonstandard employment models, and public and private forums. An important trend is the growing influence in the nonunion sector of ‘private justice’ provided in employment arbitration and conflict management systems as a replacement for ‘public justice’, and in the union sector, private neutrals also play a key role.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/irj.12409</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0019-8692 |
| ispartof | Industrial relations journal, 2023-07, Vol.54 (4/5), p.304-320 |
| issn | 0019-8692 1468-2338 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2861030210 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Arbeitsgericht Arbitration Conflict management Decentralization Disputes Employment Gewerkschaft Justice Konfliktregelung Organizational conflict Privatization USA Workplaces Öffentliche Einrichtung |
| title | A fragmented and heavily privatized dispute resolution system: the United States |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T03%3A19%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20fragmented%20and%20heavily%20privatized%20dispute%20resolution%20system:%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20relations%20journal&rft.au=Avgar,%20Ariel%20C&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=4/5&rft.spage=304&rft.epage=320&rft.pages=304-320&rft.issn=0019-8692&rft.eissn=1468-2338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/irj.12409&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2861030210%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2861030210&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |