On the potential for reconstructed wetlands to remediate fecal coliform loading in an agricultural watershed
Grand Lake St Marys (GLSM) is one of the most hypereutrophic lakes in North America and was officially declared distressed in 2011 as a result of excess nutrient runoff from primarily agricultural cropland and livestock facilities. Concurrently, the watershed has also struggled with excessive fecal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrobiologia 2023-10, Vol.850 (18), p.3879-3891 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3891 |
---|---|
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 3879 |
container_title | Hydrobiologia |
container_volume | 850 |
creator | Jacquemin, Stephen J. Birt, Jocelyn Senger, Zachary Axe, Bradley Strang, Benjamin Ewing, Conner Kinney, Brittany Newell, Silvia E. |
description | Grand Lake St Marys (GLSM) is one of the most hypereutrophic lakes in North America and was officially declared distressed in 2011 as a result of excess nutrient runoff from primarily agricultural cropland and livestock facilities. Concurrently, the watershed has also struggled with excessive fecal coliform loads most evident by the routine public warnings regarding colony counts in GLSM. This study evaluated in stream trends and the potential for reconstructed wetlands along Coldwater Creek to reduce coliforms in the watershed. Non-
Escherichia coli
coliforms in Coldwater Creek showed a seasonal pattern, with a winter low coincident with the distressed watershed winter ban on manure application.
E. coli
coliform loads did not show the same seasonal pattern, but may have been offset by wildlife fecal inputs. When water flowed into the wetland, concentrations of total coliforms were reduced by 40%, mainly driven by residence time. When the wetland was a net sink, it reduced
E. coli
by 71% and non-
E. coli
coliforms by 51%. Unfortunately, it also served as a source for total coliforms 4 weeks of the year. Treating all tributaries into GLSM would require the equivalent of ~ 20× the current wetland area in the watershed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10750-022-05078-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2861029577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A763543676</galeid><sourcerecordid>A763543676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-8df9443002e91f474f6985e9f15ab1c75a1d8c6e71b6480c87f2b1ae5affa8083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFqHSEUhqU00NvbvEBWQldZTHp0xtFZhpC0gUAgadbidY4Tw1y9VYckbx_bKZRsisKB4_fpkZ-QEwZnDEB-ywykgAY4b0CAVA3_QDZMyLYRjMmPZAPAVKOYUJ_I55yfoEoDhw2ZbwMtj0gPsWAo3szUxUQT2hhySYstONJnLLMJY6Yl1pM9jt4UpA5tpW2cfTX2dI5m9GGiPlBT95S8XeaypMo8VzzlRxy_kCNn5ozHf-uWPFxd_rz40dzcfr--OL9pbDvw0qjRDV3XAnAcmOtk5_pBCRwcE2bHrBSGjcr2KNmu7xRYJR3fMYPCOGcUqHZLvq73HlL8tWAu-ikuKdQnNVc9Az4IKSt1tlKTmVH74GJJxtY14t7X_6PztX8u-1Z0bV_Llpy-EypT8KVMZslZX9_fvWf5ytoUc07o9CH5vUmvmoH-HZleI9M1Mv0nMs2r1K5SrnCYMP2b-z_WG7tOmak</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2861029577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the potential for reconstructed wetlands to remediate fecal coliform loading in an agricultural watershed</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Jacquemin, Stephen J. ; Birt, Jocelyn ; Senger, Zachary ; Axe, Bradley ; Strang, Benjamin ; Ewing, Conner ; Kinney, Brittany ; Newell, Silvia E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacquemin, Stephen J. ; Birt, Jocelyn ; Senger, Zachary ; Axe, Bradley ; Strang, Benjamin ; Ewing, Conner ; Kinney, Brittany ; Newell, Silvia E.</creatorcontrib><description>Grand Lake St Marys (GLSM) is one of the most hypereutrophic lakes in North America and was officially declared distressed in 2011 as a result of excess nutrient runoff from primarily agricultural cropland and livestock facilities. Concurrently, the watershed has also struggled with excessive fecal coliform loads most evident by the routine public warnings regarding colony counts in GLSM. This study evaluated in stream trends and the potential for reconstructed wetlands along Coldwater Creek to reduce coliforms in the watershed. Non-
Escherichia coli
coliforms in Coldwater Creek showed a seasonal pattern, with a winter low coincident with the distressed watershed winter ban on manure application.
E. coli
coliform loads did not show the same seasonal pattern, but may have been offset by wildlife fecal inputs. When water flowed into the wetland, concentrations of total coliforms were reduced by 40%, mainly driven by residence time. When the wetland was a net sink, it reduced
E. coli
by 71% and non-
E. coli
coliforms by 51%. Unfortunately, it also served as a source for total coliforms 4 weeks of the year. Treating all tributaries into GLSM would require the equivalent of ~ 20× the current wetland area in the watershed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-022-05078-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural runoff ; Agricultural watersheds ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Coastal inlets ; Coliforms ; Colonies ; Creeks ; E coli ; Ecology ; Escherichia coli ; Eutrophication ; Feces ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Freshwater Wetlands Restoration ; Lakes ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Loads (forces) ; Residence time ; Runoff ; Seasonal variations ; Tributaries ; Water temperature ; Wetlands ; Wildlife ; Winter ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2023-10, Vol.850 (18), p.3879-3891</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-8df9443002e91f474f6985e9f15ab1c75a1d8c6e71b6480c87f2b1ae5affa8083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-8df9443002e91f474f6985e9f15ab1c75a1d8c6e71b6480c87f2b1ae5affa8083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10750-022-05078-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10750-022-05078-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacquemin, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birt, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senger, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axe, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strang, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewing, Conner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Brittany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Silvia E.</creatorcontrib><title>On the potential for reconstructed wetlands to remediate fecal coliform loading in an agricultural watershed</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>Grand Lake St Marys (GLSM) is one of the most hypereutrophic lakes in North America and was officially declared distressed in 2011 as a result of excess nutrient runoff from primarily agricultural cropland and livestock facilities. Concurrently, the watershed has also struggled with excessive fecal coliform loads most evident by the routine public warnings regarding colony counts in GLSM. This study evaluated in stream trends and the potential for reconstructed wetlands along Coldwater Creek to reduce coliforms in the watershed. Non-
Escherichia coli
coliforms in Coldwater Creek showed a seasonal pattern, with a winter low coincident with the distressed watershed winter ban on manure application.
E. coli
coliform loads did not show the same seasonal pattern, but may have been offset by wildlife fecal inputs. When water flowed into the wetland, concentrations of total coliforms were reduced by 40%, mainly driven by residence time. When the wetland was a net sink, it reduced
E. coli
by 71% and non-
E. coli
coliforms by 51%. Unfortunately, it also served as a source for total coliforms 4 weeks of the year. Treating all tributaries into GLSM would require the equivalent of ~ 20× the current wetland area in the watershed.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural runoff</subject><subject>Agricultural watersheds</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coastal inlets</subject><subject>Coliforms</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>Creeks</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater Wetlands Restoration</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Residence time</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Tributaries</subject><subject>Water temperature</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Winter</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFqHSEUhqU00NvbvEBWQldZTHp0xtFZhpC0gUAgadbidY4Tw1y9VYckbx_bKZRsisKB4_fpkZ-QEwZnDEB-ywykgAY4b0CAVA3_QDZMyLYRjMmPZAPAVKOYUJ_I55yfoEoDhw2ZbwMtj0gPsWAo3szUxUQT2hhySYstONJnLLMJY6Yl1pM9jt4UpA5tpW2cfTX2dI5m9GGiPlBT95S8XeaypMo8VzzlRxy_kCNn5ozHf-uWPFxd_rz40dzcfr--OL9pbDvw0qjRDV3XAnAcmOtk5_pBCRwcE2bHrBSGjcr2KNmu7xRYJR3fMYPCOGcUqHZLvq73HlL8tWAu-ikuKdQnNVc9Az4IKSt1tlKTmVH74GJJxtY14t7X_6PztX8u-1Z0bV_Llpy-EypT8KVMZslZX9_fvWf5ytoUc07o9CH5vUmvmoH-HZleI9M1Mv0nMs2r1K5SrnCYMP2b-z_WG7tOmak</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Jacquemin, Stephen J.</creator><creator>Birt, Jocelyn</creator><creator>Senger, Zachary</creator><creator>Axe, Bradley</creator><creator>Strang, Benjamin</creator><creator>Ewing, Conner</creator><creator>Kinney, Brittany</creator><creator>Newell, Silvia E.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>On the potential for reconstructed wetlands to remediate fecal coliform loading in an agricultural watershed</title><author>Jacquemin, Stephen J. ; Birt, Jocelyn ; Senger, Zachary ; Axe, Bradley ; Strang, Benjamin ; Ewing, Conner ; Kinney, Brittany ; Newell, Silvia E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-8df9443002e91f474f6985e9f15ab1c75a1d8c6e71b6480c87f2b1ae5affa8083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural runoff</topic><topic>Agricultural watersheds</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coastal inlets</topic><topic>Coliforms</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>Creeks</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater Wetlands Restoration</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Residence time</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Tributaries</topic><topic>Water temperature</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Winter</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacquemin, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birt, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senger, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axe, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strang, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewing, Conner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Brittany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Silvia E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacquemin, Stephen J.</au><au>Birt, Jocelyn</au><au>Senger, Zachary</au><au>Axe, Bradley</au><au>Strang, Benjamin</au><au>Ewing, Conner</au><au>Kinney, Brittany</au><au>Newell, Silvia E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the potential for reconstructed wetlands to remediate fecal coliform loading in an agricultural watershed</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>850</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>3879</spage><epage>3891</epage><pages>3879-3891</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>Grand Lake St Marys (GLSM) is one of the most hypereutrophic lakes in North America and was officially declared distressed in 2011 as a result of excess nutrient runoff from primarily agricultural cropland and livestock facilities. Concurrently, the watershed has also struggled with excessive fecal coliform loads most evident by the routine public warnings regarding colony counts in GLSM. This study evaluated in stream trends and the potential for reconstructed wetlands along Coldwater Creek to reduce coliforms in the watershed. Non-
Escherichia coli
coliforms in Coldwater Creek showed a seasonal pattern, with a winter low coincident with the distressed watershed winter ban on manure application.
E. coli
coliform loads did not show the same seasonal pattern, but may have been offset by wildlife fecal inputs. When water flowed into the wetland, concentrations of total coliforms were reduced by 40%, mainly driven by residence time. When the wetland was a net sink, it reduced
E. coli
by 71% and non-
E. coli
coliforms by 51%. Unfortunately, it also served as a source for total coliforms 4 weeks of the year. Treating all tributaries into GLSM would require the equivalent of ~ 20× the current wetland area in the watershed.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-022-05078-2</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-8158 |
ispartof | Hydrobiologia, 2023-10, Vol.850 (18), p.3879-3891 |
issn | 0018-8158 1573-5117 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2861029577 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Agricultural land Agricultural runoff Agricultural watersheds Biomedical and Life Sciences Coastal inlets Coliforms Colonies Creeks E coli Ecology Escherichia coli Eutrophication Feces Freshwater & Marine Ecology Freshwater Wetlands Restoration Lakes Life Sciences Livestock Loads (forces) Residence time Runoff Seasonal variations Tributaries Water temperature Wetlands Wildlife Winter Zoology |
title | On the potential for reconstructed wetlands to remediate fecal coliform loading in an agricultural watershed |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T11%3A52%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20potential%20for%20reconstructed%20wetlands%20to%20remediate%20fecal%20coliform%20loading%20in%20an%20agricultural%20watershed&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Jacquemin,%20Stephen%20J.&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=850&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=3879&rft.epage=3891&rft.pages=3879-3891&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-022-05078-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA763543676%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2861029577&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A763543676&rfr_iscdi=true |