On the potential for reconstructed wetlands to remediate fecal coliform loading in an agricultural watershed

Grand Lake St Marys (GLSM) is one of the most hypereutrophic lakes in North America and was officially declared distressed in 2011 as a result of excess nutrient runoff from primarily agricultural cropland and livestock facilities. Concurrently, the watershed has also struggled with excessive fecal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrobiologia 2023-10, Vol.850 (18), p.3879-3891
Hauptverfasser: Jacquemin, Stephen J., Birt, Jocelyn, Senger, Zachary, Axe, Bradley, Strang, Benjamin, Ewing, Conner, Kinney, Brittany, Newell, Silvia E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3891
container_issue 18
container_start_page 3879
container_title Hydrobiologia
container_volume 850
creator Jacquemin, Stephen J.
Birt, Jocelyn
Senger, Zachary
Axe, Bradley
Strang, Benjamin
Ewing, Conner
Kinney, Brittany
Newell, Silvia E.
description Grand Lake St Marys (GLSM) is one of the most hypereutrophic lakes in North America and was officially declared distressed in 2011 as a result of excess nutrient runoff from primarily agricultural cropland and livestock facilities. Concurrently, the watershed has also struggled with excessive fecal coliform loads most evident by the routine public warnings regarding colony counts in GLSM. This study evaluated in stream trends and the potential for reconstructed wetlands along Coldwater Creek to reduce coliforms in the watershed. Non- Escherichia coli coliforms in Coldwater Creek showed a seasonal pattern, with a winter low coincident with the distressed watershed winter ban on manure application. E. coli coliform loads did not show the same seasonal pattern, but may have been offset by wildlife fecal inputs. When water flowed into the wetland, concentrations of total coliforms were reduced by 40%, mainly driven by residence time. When the wetland was a net sink, it reduced E. coli by 71% and non- E. coli coliforms by 51%. Unfortunately, it also served as a source for total coliforms 4 weeks of the year. Treating all tributaries into GLSM would require the equivalent of ~ 20× the current wetland area in the watershed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10750-022-05078-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2861029577</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A763543676</galeid><sourcerecordid>A763543676</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-8df9443002e91f474f6985e9f15ab1c75a1d8c6e71b6480c87f2b1ae5affa8083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFqHSEUhqU00NvbvEBWQldZTHp0xtFZhpC0gUAgadbidY4Tw1y9VYckbx_bKZRsisKB4_fpkZ-QEwZnDEB-ywykgAY4b0CAVA3_QDZMyLYRjMmPZAPAVKOYUJ_I55yfoEoDhw2ZbwMtj0gPsWAo3szUxUQT2hhySYstONJnLLMJY6Yl1pM9jt4UpA5tpW2cfTX2dI5m9GGiPlBT95S8XeaypMo8VzzlRxy_kCNn5ozHf-uWPFxd_rz40dzcfr--OL9pbDvw0qjRDV3XAnAcmOtk5_pBCRwcE2bHrBSGjcr2KNmu7xRYJR3fMYPCOGcUqHZLvq73HlL8tWAu-ikuKdQnNVc9Az4IKSt1tlKTmVH74GJJxtY14t7X_6PztX8u-1Z0bV_Llpy-EypT8KVMZslZX9_fvWf5ytoUc07o9CH5vUmvmoH-HZleI9M1Mv0nMs2r1K5SrnCYMP2b-z_WG7tOmak</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2861029577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the potential for reconstructed wetlands to remediate fecal coliform loading in an agricultural watershed</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Jacquemin, Stephen J. ; Birt, Jocelyn ; Senger, Zachary ; Axe, Bradley ; Strang, Benjamin ; Ewing, Conner ; Kinney, Brittany ; Newell, Silvia E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacquemin, Stephen J. ; Birt, Jocelyn ; Senger, Zachary ; Axe, Bradley ; Strang, Benjamin ; Ewing, Conner ; Kinney, Brittany ; Newell, Silvia E.</creatorcontrib><description>Grand Lake St Marys (GLSM) is one of the most hypereutrophic lakes in North America and was officially declared distressed in 2011 as a result of excess nutrient runoff from primarily agricultural cropland and livestock facilities. Concurrently, the watershed has also struggled with excessive fecal coliform loads most evident by the routine public warnings regarding colony counts in GLSM. This study evaluated in stream trends and the potential for reconstructed wetlands along Coldwater Creek to reduce coliforms in the watershed. Non- Escherichia coli coliforms in Coldwater Creek showed a seasonal pattern, with a winter low coincident with the distressed watershed winter ban on manure application. E. coli coliform loads did not show the same seasonal pattern, but may have been offset by wildlife fecal inputs. When water flowed into the wetland, concentrations of total coliforms were reduced by 40%, mainly driven by residence time. When the wetland was a net sink, it reduced E. coli by 71% and non- E. coli coliforms by 51%. Unfortunately, it also served as a source for total coliforms 4 weeks of the year. Treating all tributaries into GLSM would require the equivalent of ~ 20× the current wetland area in the watershed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10750-022-05078-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural runoff ; Agricultural watersheds ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Coastal inlets ; Coliforms ; Colonies ; Creeks ; E coli ; Ecology ; Escherichia coli ; Eutrophication ; Feces ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Freshwater Wetlands Restoration ; Lakes ; Life Sciences ; Livestock ; Loads (forces) ; Residence time ; Runoff ; Seasonal variations ; Tributaries ; Water temperature ; Wetlands ; Wildlife ; Winter ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2023-10, Vol.850 (18), p.3879-3891</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-8df9443002e91f474f6985e9f15ab1c75a1d8c6e71b6480c87f2b1ae5affa8083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-8df9443002e91f474f6985e9f15ab1c75a1d8c6e71b6480c87f2b1ae5affa8083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10750-022-05078-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10750-022-05078-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacquemin, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birt, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senger, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axe, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strang, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewing, Conner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Brittany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Silvia E.</creatorcontrib><title>On the potential for reconstructed wetlands to remediate fecal coliform loading in an agricultural watershed</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><addtitle>Hydrobiologia</addtitle><description>Grand Lake St Marys (GLSM) is one of the most hypereutrophic lakes in North America and was officially declared distressed in 2011 as a result of excess nutrient runoff from primarily agricultural cropland and livestock facilities. Concurrently, the watershed has also struggled with excessive fecal coliform loads most evident by the routine public warnings regarding colony counts in GLSM. This study evaluated in stream trends and the potential for reconstructed wetlands along Coldwater Creek to reduce coliforms in the watershed. Non- Escherichia coli coliforms in Coldwater Creek showed a seasonal pattern, with a winter low coincident with the distressed watershed winter ban on manure application. E. coli coliform loads did not show the same seasonal pattern, but may have been offset by wildlife fecal inputs. When water flowed into the wetland, concentrations of total coliforms were reduced by 40%, mainly driven by residence time. When the wetland was a net sink, it reduced E. coli by 71% and non- E. coli coliforms by 51%. Unfortunately, it also served as a source for total coliforms 4 weeks of the year. Treating all tributaries into GLSM would require the equivalent of ~ 20× the current wetland area in the watershed.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural runoff</subject><subject>Agricultural watersheds</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Coastal inlets</subject><subject>Coliforms</subject><subject>Colonies</subject><subject>Creeks</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater Wetlands Restoration</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Residence time</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Tributaries</subject><subject>Water temperature</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Winter</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFqHSEUhqU00NvbvEBWQldZTHp0xtFZhpC0gUAgadbidY4Tw1y9VYckbx_bKZRsisKB4_fpkZ-QEwZnDEB-ywykgAY4b0CAVA3_QDZMyLYRjMmPZAPAVKOYUJ_I55yfoEoDhw2ZbwMtj0gPsWAo3szUxUQT2hhySYstONJnLLMJY6Yl1pM9jt4UpA5tpW2cfTX2dI5m9GGiPlBT95S8XeaypMo8VzzlRxy_kCNn5ozHf-uWPFxd_rz40dzcfr--OL9pbDvw0qjRDV3XAnAcmOtk5_pBCRwcE2bHrBSGjcr2KNmu7xRYJR3fMYPCOGcUqHZLvq73HlL8tWAu-ikuKdQnNVc9Az4IKSt1tlKTmVH74GJJxtY14t7X_6PztX8u-1Z0bV_Llpy-EypT8KVMZslZX9_fvWf5ytoUc07o9CH5vUmvmoH-HZleI9M1Mv0nMs2r1K5SrnCYMP2b-z_WG7tOmak</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Jacquemin, Stephen J.</creator><creator>Birt, Jocelyn</creator><creator>Senger, Zachary</creator><creator>Axe, Bradley</creator><creator>Strang, Benjamin</creator><creator>Ewing, Conner</creator><creator>Kinney, Brittany</creator><creator>Newell, Silvia E.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>On the potential for reconstructed wetlands to remediate fecal coliform loading in an agricultural watershed</title><author>Jacquemin, Stephen J. ; Birt, Jocelyn ; Senger, Zachary ; Axe, Bradley ; Strang, Benjamin ; Ewing, Conner ; Kinney, Brittany ; Newell, Silvia E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-8df9443002e91f474f6985e9f15ab1c75a1d8c6e71b6480c87f2b1ae5affa8083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural runoff</topic><topic>Agricultural watersheds</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Coastal inlets</topic><topic>Coliforms</topic><topic>Colonies</topic><topic>Creeks</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater Wetlands Restoration</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Residence time</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Tributaries</topic><topic>Water temperature</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Winter</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacquemin, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birt, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Senger, Zachary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Axe, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strang, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ewing, Conner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinney, Brittany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Silvia E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacquemin, Stephen J.</au><au>Birt, Jocelyn</au><au>Senger, Zachary</au><au>Axe, Bradley</au><au>Strang, Benjamin</au><au>Ewing, Conner</au><au>Kinney, Brittany</au><au>Newell, Silvia E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the potential for reconstructed wetlands to remediate fecal coliform loading in an agricultural watershed</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><stitle>Hydrobiologia</stitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>850</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>3879</spage><epage>3891</epage><pages>3879-3891</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><abstract>Grand Lake St Marys (GLSM) is one of the most hypereutrophic lakes in North America and was officially declared distressed in 2011 as a result of excess nutrient runoff from primarily agricultural cropland and livestock facilities. Concurrently, the watershed has also struggled with excessive fecal coliform loads most evident by the routine public warnings regarding colony counts in GLSM. This study evaluated in stream trends and the potential for reconstructed wetlands along Coldwater Creek to reduce coliforms in the watershed. Non- Escherichia coli coliforms in Coldwater Creek showed a seasonal pattern, with a winter low coincident with the distressed watershed winter ban on manure application. E. coli coliform loads did not show the same seasonal pattern, but may have been offset by wildlife fecal inputs. When water flowed into the wetland, concentrations of total coliforms were reduced by 40%, mainly driven by residence time. When the wetland was a net sink, it reduced E. coli by 71% and non- E. coli coliforms by 51%. Unfortunately, it also served as a source for total coliforms 4 weeks of the year. Treating all tributaries into GLSM would require the equivalent of ~ 20× the current wetland area in the watershed.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10750-022-05078-2</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-8158
ispartof Hydrobiologia, 2023-10, Vol.850 (18), p.3879-3891
issn 0018-8158
1573-5117
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2861029577
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Agricultural land
Agricultural runoff
Agricultural watersheds
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Coastal inlets
Coliforms
Colonies
Creeks
E coli
Ecology
Escherichia coli
Eutrophication
Feces
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Freshwater Wetlands Restoration
Lakes
Life Sciences
Livestock
Loads (forces)
Residence time
Runoff
Seasonal variations
Tributaries
Water temperature
Wetlands
Wildlife
Winter
Zoology
title On the potential for reconstructed wetlands to remediate fecal coliform loading in an agricultural watershed
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T11%3A52%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20potential%20for%20reconstructed%20wetlands%20to%20remediate%20fecal%20coliform%20loading%20in%20an%20agricultural%20watershed&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=Jacquemin,%20Stephen%20J.&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=850&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=3879&rft.epage=3891&rft.pages=3879-3891&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10750-022-05078-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA763543676%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2861029577&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A763543676&rfr_iscdi=true