The distribution of conflict and attention across energy infrastructure

Across the world, public administration and policy decisions are related to diverse levels of conflict and attention. However, the degree and variance of conflict and attention remain largely unspecified. This article examines how types of energy infrastructure and characteristics of project locatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public administration (London) 2023-09, Vol.101 (3), p.1033-1054
Hauptverfasser: You, Jongeun, Heikkila, Tanya, Weible, Christopher M., Kim, Serena, Park, Kyudong, Yordy, Jill, Smolinski, Sharon L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1054
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1033
container_title Public administration (London)
container_volume 101
creator You, Jongeun
Heikkila, Tanya
Weible, Christopher M.
Kim, Serena
Park, Kyudong
Yordy, Jill
Smolinski, Sharon L.
description Across the world, public administration and policy decisions are related to diverse levels of conflict and attention. However, the degree and variance of conflict and attention remain largely unspecified. This article examines how types of energy infrastructure and characteristics of project location are associated with the distribution of conflict and attention around the energy infrastructure siting process. Our empirical focus is on gas pipelines, electricity transmission lines, solar power projects, and wind power projects across the United States in 2018. Primarily relying on regression analysis and interviews, this article finds differences in the distribution of conflict and attention intensity within and between these energy infrastructure types, with gas pipelines and wind power projects presenting relatively higher conflict and attention intensities. However, conflict and attention are skewed to low intensities across infrastructure types. Characteristics of project locations that are positively associated with high conflict and attention intensity include the proportion of Democratic voters and the level of urbanization in the places where projects are sited. In contrast, the proportion of Black or Hispanic residents is negatively associated with high conflict and attention intensity.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/padm.12842
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2860263494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2860263494</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3012-60e81306b5c02b2b3ce51ac7c011f2f24dc97a955edb790d8fd244d79b3789ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLlOAzEQhi0EEuFoeAJLdEgbxsceLqMAASkIilBbXh_gKPEG2yuUt2eTpWaaKeb7Z0YfQjcEpmSo-50y2ymhDacnaEJ4VReCCnGKJgCMFYyK5hxdpLQGAF6VfIIWqy-LjU85-rbPvgu4c1h3wW28zlgFg1XONhwnSscuJWyDjZ977IOLasj1OvfRXqEzpzbJXv_1S_Tx9LiaPxfLt8XLfLYsNANCiwpsQxhUbamBtrRl2pZE6VoDIY46yo0WtRJlaU1bCzCNM5RzU4uW1Y1Qhl2i23HvLnbfvU1Zrrs-huGkpE0FtGJc8IG6G6njx9E6uYt-q-JeEpAHUfIgSh5FDTAZ4R-_sft_SPk-e3gdM7-PyGtp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2860263494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The distribution of conflict and attention across energy infrastructure</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>You, Jongeun ; Heikkila, Tanya ; Weible, Christopher M. ; Kim, Serena ; Park, Kyudong ; Yordy, Jill ; Smolinski, Sharon L.</creator><creatorcontrib>You, Jongeun ; Heikkila, Tanya ; Weible, Christopher M. ; Kim, Serena ; Park, Kyudong ; Yordy, Jill ; Smolinski, Sharon L.</creatorcontrib><description>Across the world, public administration and policy decisions are related to diverse levels of conflict and attention. However, the degree and variance of conflict and attention remain largely unspecified. This article examines how types of energy infrastructure and characteristics of project location are associated with the distribution of conflict and attention around the energy infrastructure siting process. Our empirical focus is on gas pipelines, electricity transmission lines, solar power projects, and wind power projects across the United States in 2018. Primarily relying on regression analysis and interviews, this article finds differences in the distribution of conflict and attention intensity within and between these energy infrastructure types, with gas pipelines and wind power projects presenting relatively higher conflict and attention intensities. However, conflict and attention are skewed to low intensities across infrastructure types. Characteristics of project locations that are positively associated with high conflict and attention intensity include the proportion of Democratic voters and the level of urbanization in the places where projects are sited. In contrast, the proportion of Black or Hispanic residents is negatively associated with high conflict and attention intensity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/padm.12842</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Attention ; Conflict ; Distribution ; Electricity ; Infrastructure ; Pipelines ; Power ; Public administration ; Public works ; Residents ; Siting ; Solar energy ; Urbanization ; Wind power</subject><ispartof>Public administration (London), 2023-09, Vol.101 (3), p.1033-1054</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3012-60e81306b5c02b2b3ce51ac7c011f2f24dc97a955edb790d8fd244d79b3789ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3012-60e81306b5c02b2b3ce51ac7c011f2f24dc97a955edb790d8fd244d79b3789ad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3839-3674 ; 0000-0003-2579-9843 ; 0000-0002-2619-4320 ; 0000-0003-2241-5891 ; 0000-0002-4817-3651</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpadm.12842$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpadm.12842$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>You, Jongeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heikkila, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weible, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyudong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yordy, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolinski, Sharon L.</creatorcontrib><title>The distribution of conflict and attention across energy infrastructure</title><title>Public administration (London)</title><description>Across the world, public administration and policy decisions are related to diverse levels of conflict and attention. However, the degree and variance of conflict and attention remain largely unspecified. This article examines how types of energy infrastructure and characteristics of project location are associated with the distribution of conflict and attention around the energy infrastructure siting process. Our empirical focus is on gas pipelines, electricity transmission lines, solar power projects, and wind power projects across the United States in 2018. Primarily relying on regression analysis and interviews, this article finds differences in the distribution of conflict and attention intensity within and between these energy infrastructure types, with gas pipelines and wind power projects presenting relatively higher conflict and attention intensities. However, conflict and attention are skewed to low intensities across infrastructure types. Characteristics of project locations that are positively associated with high conflict and attention intensity include the proportion of Democratic voters and the level of urbanization in the places where projects are sited. In contrast, the proportion of Black or Hispanic residents is negatively associated with high conflict and attention intensity.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Public works</subject><subject>Residents</subject><subject>Siting</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><issn>0033-3298</issn><issn>1467-9299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLlOAzEQhi0EEuFoeAJLdEgbxsceLqMAASkIilBbXh_gKPEG2yuUt2eTpWaaKeb7Z0YfQjcEpmSo-50y2ymhDacnaEJ4VReCCnGKJgCMFYyK5hxdpLQGAF6VfIIWqy-LjU85-rbPvgu4c1h3wW28zlgFg1XONhwnSscuJWyDjZ977IOLasj1OvfRXqEzpzbJXv_1S_Tx9LiaPxfLt8XLfLYsNANCiwpsQxhUbamBtrRl2pZE6VoDIY46yo0WtRJlaU1bCzCNM5RzU4uW1Y1Qhl2i23HvLnbfvU1Zrrs-huGkpE0FtGJc8IG6G6njx9E6uYt-q-JeEpAHUfIgSh5FDTAZ4R-_sft_SPk-e3gdM7-PyGtp</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>You, Jongeun</creator><creator>Heikkila, Tanya</creator><creator>Weible, Christopher M.</creator><creator>Kim, Serena</creator><creator>Park, Kyudong</creator><creator>Yordy, Jill</creator><creator>Smolinski, Sharon L.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3839-3674</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2579-9843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2619-4320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2241-5891</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4817-3651</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>The distribution of conflict and attention across energy infrastructure</title><author>You, Jongeun ; Heikkila, Tanya ; Weible, Christopher M. ; Kim, Serena ; Park, Kyudong ; Yordy, Jill ; Smolinski, Sharon L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3012-60e81306b5c02b2b3ce51ac7c011f2f24dc97a955edb790d8fd244d79b3789ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Public works</topic><topic>Residents</topic><topic>Siting</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>You, Jongeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heikkila, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weible, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Kyudong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yordy, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolinski, Sharon L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Public administration (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>You, Jongeun</au><au>Heikkila, Tanya</au><au>Weible, Christopher M.</au><au>Kim, Serena</au><au>Park, Kyudong</au><au>Yordy, Jill</au><au>Smolinski, Sharon L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The distribution of conflict and attention across energy infrastructure</atitle><jtitle>Public administration (London)</jtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1033</spage><epage>1054</epage><pages>1033-1054</pages><issn>0033-3298</issn><eissn>1467-9299</eissn><abstract>Across the world, public administration and policy decisions are related to diverse levels of conflict and attention. However, the degree and variance of conflict and attention remain largely unspecified. This article examines how types of energy infrastructure and characteristics of project location are associated with the distribution of conflict and attention around the energy infrastructure siting process. Our empirical focus is on gas pipelines, electricity transmission lines, solar power projects, and wind power projects across the United States in 2018. Primarily relying on regression analysis and interviews, this article finds differences in the distribution of conflict and attention intensity within and between these energy infrastructure types, with gas pipelines and wind power projects presenting relatively higher conflict and attention intensities. However, conflict and attention are skewed to low intensities across infrastructure types. Characteristics of project locations that are positively associated with high conflict and attention intensity include the proportion of Democratic voters and the level of urbanization in the places where projects are sited. In contrast, the proportion of Black or Hispanic residents is negatively associated with high conflict and attention intensity.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/padm.12842</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3839-3674</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2579-9843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2619-4320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2241-5891</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4817-3651</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3298
ispartof Public administration (London), 2023-09, Vol.101 (3), p.1033-1054
issn 0033-3298
1467-9299
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2860263494
source Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete
subjects Attention
Conflict
Distribution
Electricity
Infrastructure
Pipelines
Power
Public administration
Public works
Residents
Siting
Solar energy
Urbanization
Wind power
title The distribution of conflict and attention across energy infrastructure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T18%3A02%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20distribution%20of%20conflict%20and%20attention%20across%20energy%20infrastructure&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20(London)&rft.au=You,%20Jongeun&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1033&rft.epage=1054&rft.pages=1033-1054&rft.issn=0033-3298&rft.eissn=1467-9299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/padm.12842&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2860263494%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2860263494&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true