Engaging stakeholders on TikTok: A multi‐level social media analysis of nonprofit Microvlogging
Nonprofits are slow adopters of new social media platforms, yet many have joined TikTok. Successful microvlogging on sites like TikTok, Instagram, and SnapChat requires different types of engagement than microblogging on sites like Facebook and Twitter. The authors conduct a mixed‐method social medi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Public administration (London) 2023-09, Vol.101 (3), p.822-842 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 842 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 822 |
| container_title | Public administration (London) |
| container_volume | 101 |
| creator | Wiley, Kimberly Schwoerer, Kayla Richardson, Micayla Espinosa, Marlen Barajas |
| description | Nonprofits are slow adopters of new social media platforms, yet many have joined TikTok. Successful microvlogging on sites like TikTok, Instagram, and SnapChat requires different types of engagement than microblogging on sites like Facebook and Twitter. The authors conduct a mixed‐method social media analysis to answer three questions: Do microvlogs support traditional social media functions? How are nonprofits engaging with stakeholders through microvlogging? Which function in the hierarchy of engagement framework best engages stakeholders? The authors qualitatively coded 1160 microvlogs on TikTok from 58 nonprofits. The qualitative dataset was merged with TikTok metadata to capture quantitative measures of user engagement. Findings indicate nonprofits employ community‐building strategies more than information‐sharing and action strategies. Users engage more often with the nonprofits' community‐building microvlogs. The authors conclude that nonprofits adapt their strategy to more effectively engage stakeholders when microvlogging, which suggests there may be a “new hierarchy” of engagement for microvlogging platforms. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/padm.12851 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2860263349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2860263349</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3011-cfe681dd776fbd566aa1da88963a5729f0285772885d46c92e1ff2288202522a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4QSW2CGl-CdxbHZVKT9SESzK2jKxHdw6cYnbou44AmfkJLiENbMZjfS9pzcPgHOMRjjN1UrpZoQJL_ABGOCclZkgQhyCAUKUZpQIfgxOYlwghHJW5AOgpm2tatfWMK7V0rwFr00XYWjh3C3nYXkNx7DZ-LX7_vzyZms8jKFyysPGaKegapXfRZcEFrahXXXBujV8dFUXtj7Ue-NTcGSVj-bsbw_By-10PrnPZk93D5PxLKsowjirrGEca12WzL7qgjGlsFacC0ZVURJhUfqqLAnnhc5ZJYjB1pJ0EkQKQhQdgoveN4V435i4louw6VK-KAlniDBKc5Goy55KCWPsjJWrzjWq20mM5L5Cua9Q_laYYNzDH86b3T-kfB7fPPaaH-OadII</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2860263349</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Engaging stakeholders on TikTok: A multi‐level social media analysis of nonprofit Microvlogging</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Wiley, Kimberly ; Schwoerer, Kayla ; Richardson, Micayla ; Espinosa, Marlen Barajas</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Kimberly ; Schwoerer, Kayla ; Richardson, Micayla ; Espinosa, Marlen Barajas</creatorcontrib><description>Nonprofits are slow adopters of new social media platforms, yet many have joined TikTok. Successful microvlogging on sites like TikTok, Instagram, and SnapChat requires different types of engagement than microblogging on sites like Facebook and Twitter. The authors conduct a mixed‐method social media analysis to answer three questions: Do microvlogs support traditional social media functions? How are nonprofits engaging with stakeholders through microvlogging? Which function in the hierarchy of engagement framework best engages stakeholders? The authors qualitatively coded 1160 microvlogs on TikTok from 58 nonprofits. The qualitative dataset was merged with TikTok metadata to capture quantitative measures of user engagement. Findings indicate nonprofits employ community‐building strategies more than information‐sharing and action strategies. Users engage more often with the nonprofits' community‐building microvlogs. The authors conclude that nonprofits adapt their strategy to more effectively engage stakeholders when microvlogging, which suggests there may be a “new hierarchy” of engagement for microvlogging platforms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9299</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/padm.12851</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Hierarchies ; Information dissemination ; Interest groups ; Mass media ; Nonprofit organizations ; Social media ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Public administration (London), 2023-09, Vol.101 (3), p.822-842</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3011-cfe681dd776fbd566aa1da88963a5729f0285772885d46c92e1ff2288202522a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3011-cfe681dd776fbd566aa1da88963a5729f0285772885d46c92e1ff2288202522a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5921-5837 ; 0000-0002-9856-7587</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fpadm.12851$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fpadm.12851$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwoerer, Kayla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Micayla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinosa, Marlen Barajas</creatorcontrib><title>Engaging stakeholders on TikTok: A multi‐level social media analysis of nonprofit Microvlogging</title><title>Public administration (London)</title><description>Nonprofits are slow adopters of new social media platforms, yet many have joined TikTok. Successful microvlogging on sites like TikTok, Instagram, and SnapChat requires different types of engagement than microblogging on sites like Facebook and Twitter. The authors conduct a mixed‐method social media analysis to answer three questions: Do microvlogs support traditional social media functions? How are nonprofits engaging with stakeholders through microvlogging? Which function in the hierarchy of engagement framework best engages stakeholders? The authors qualitatively coded 1160 microvlogs on TikTok from 58 nonprofits. The qualitative dataset was merged with TikTok metadata to capture quantitative measures of user engagement. Findings indicate nonprofits employ community‐building strategies more than information‐sharing and action strategies. Users engage more often with the nonprofits' community‐building microvlogs. The authors conclude that nonprofits adapt their strategy to more effectively engage stakeholders when microvlogging, which suggests there may be a “new hierarchy” of engagement for microvlogging platforms.</description><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Information dissemination</subject><subject>Interest groups</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>0033-3298</issn><issn>1467-9299</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4QSW2CGl-CdxbHZVKT9SESzK2jKxHdw6cYnbou44AmfkJLiENbMZjfS9pzcPgHOMRjjN1UrpZoQJL_ABGOCclZkgQhyCAUKUZpQIfgxOYlwghHJW5AOgpm2tatfWMK7V0rwFr00XYWjh3C3nYXkNx7DZ-LX7_vzyZms8jKFyysPGaKegapXfRZcEFrahXXXBujV8dFUXtj7Ue-NTcGSVj-bsbw_By-10PrnPZk93D5PxLKsowjirrGEca12WzL7qgjGlsFacC0ZVURJhUfqqLAnnhc5ZJYjB1pJ0EkQKQhQdgoveN4V435i4louw6VK-KAlniDBKc5Goy55KCWPsjJWrzjWq20mM5L5Cua9Q_laYYNzDH86b3T-kfB7fPPaaH-OadII</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Wiley, Kimberly</creator><creator>Schwoerer, Kayla</creator><creator>Richardson, Micayla</creator><creator>Espinosa, Marlen Barajas</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5921-5837</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9856-7587</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Engaging stakeholders on TikTok: A multi‐level social media analysis of nonprofit Microvlogging</title><author>Wiley, Kimberly ; Schwoerer, Kayla ; Richardson, Micayla ; Espinosa, Marlen Barajas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3011-cfe681dd776fbd566aa1da88963a5729f0285772885d46c92e1ff2288202522a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Information dissemination</topic><topic>Interest groups</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwoerer, Kayla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Micayla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Espinosa, Marlen Barajas</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Public administration (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiley, Kimberly</au><au>Schwoerer, Kayla</au><au>Richardson, Micayla</au><au>Espinosa, Marlen Barajas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Engaging stakeholders on TikTok: A multi‐level social media analysis of nonprofit Microvlogging</atitle><jtitle>Public administration (London)</jtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>822</spage><epage>842</epage><pages>822-842</pages><issn>0033-3298</issn><eissn>1467-9299</eissn><abstract>Nonprofits are slow adopters of new social media platforms, yet many have joined TikTok. Successful microvlogging on sites like TikTok, Instagram, and SnapChat requires different types of engagement than microblogging on sites like Facebook and Twitter. The authors conduct a mixed‐method social media analysis to answer three questions: Do microvlogs support traditional social media functions? How are nonprofits engaging with stakeholders through microvlogging? Which function in the hierarchy of engagement framework best engages stakeholders? The authors qualitatively coded 1160 microvlogs on TikTok from 58 nonprofits. The qualitative dataset was merged with TikTok metadata to capture quantitative measures of user engagement. Findings indicate nonprofits employ community‐building strategies more than information‐sharing and action strategies. Users engage more often with the nonprofits' community‐building microvlogs. The authors conclude that nonprofits adapt their strategy to more effectively engage stakeholders when microvlogging, which suggests there may be a “new hierarchy” of engagement for microvlogging platforms.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/padm.12851</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5921-5837</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9856-7587</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0033-3298 |
| ispartof | Public administration (London), 2023-09, Vol.101 (3), p.822-842 |
| issn | 0033-3298 1467-9299 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2860263349 |
| source | Political Science Complete; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Hierarchies Information dissemination Interest groups Mass media Nonprofit organizations Social media Stakeholders |
| title | Engaging stakeholders on TikTok: A multi‐level social media analysis of nonprofit Microvlogging |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T23%3A30%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Engaging%20stakeholders%20on%20TikTok:%20A%20multi%E2%80%90level%20social%20media%20analysis%20of%20nonprofit%20Microvlogging&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20(London)&rft.au=Wiley,%20Kimberly&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=822&rft.epage=842&rft.pages=822-842&rft.issn=0033-3298&rft.eissn=1467-9299&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/padm.12851&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2860263349%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2860263349&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |