The Effect of Standing Versus Sitting on Creativity in Adolescents—A Crossover Randomized Trial: The PHIT2LEARN Study

Creativity is important for school performance. As several brain mechanisms involved in creativity are stimulated by low‐intensity physical activity, standing might influence creativity. Few studies on the relationship between standing and creativity have been executed, and none among vocational edu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mind, brain and education brain and education, 2023-08, Vol.17 (3), p.209-218
Hauptverfasser: Luteijn, Petra J., Wurff, Inge S. M., Tuijl, Piet, Singh, Amika S., Savelberg, Hans H. C. M., Groot, Renate H. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 218
container_issue 3
container_start_page 209
container_title Mind, brain and education
container_volume 17
creator Luteijn, Petra J.
Wurff, Inge S. M.
Tuijl, Piet
Singh, Amika S.
Savelberg, Hans H. C. M.
Groot, Renate H. M.
description Creativity is important for school performance. As several brain mechanisms involved in creativity are stimulated by low‐intensity physical activity, standing might influence creativity. Few studies on the relationship between standing and creativity have been executed, and none among vocational education and training (VET) students. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether standing influences creativity in VET students. In a randomized crossover study, 192 VET students were randomly allocated to standing or sitting (i.e., control) for 30 min. After 15 min, they performed two creativity tests: Guilford's Alternative Uses Test (divergent thinking) and Remote Associates Test (convergent thinking). Subsequently, conditions were switched, and the procedure was repeated. Multilevel analyses showed no significant effect of standing on divergent or convergent thinking test performance. Our results show that 30 min of standing does not affect creativity in VET students. LAY ABSTRACT Creativity is important for school performance. Furthermore, research suggests that creativity may be stimulated by low‐intensity physical activity. Therefore, we investigated the influence of standing on creativity in vocational education and training students. The results show that there was no significant effect of standing on divergent or convergent thinking test performance. The findings indicate that 30 min of standing does not affect creativity in vocational education and training students.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/mbe.12381
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2859609539</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1391184</ericid><sourcerecordid>2859609539</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3141-ffeb41a13cbd598f8aaffbd867f20f22cf47413b648346a40cbb23b76ab280133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAUhCMEEqWw4ABIllixaJtn58dhF6pAi8qP2oLYRXZig6s2KXbaqqw4BCfkJDgEdYc3z9Z8mvEbxzkFtwv29BZcdAETCntOC0IfOhjTl_3dPYRD58iYmev6vh9Ay9lM3wRKpBRZhUqJJhUrclW8omehzcqgiaqq-lkWqK8Fq9RaVVukChTn5VyYTBSV-f78iq1aGlOuhUZj61Au1IfI0VQrNr9EdcTjYDjFoyQe39uMVb49dg4kmxtx8jfbztN1Mu0POqOHm2E_HnUyAh507Me4BwxIxnM_opIyJiXPaRBK7EqMM-mFHhAeeJR4AfPcjHNMeBgwjqkLhLSd88Z3qcv3lTBVOitXurCRKaZ-FLiRTyJLXTRUVq-hhUyXWi2Y3qbgpnWvqe01_e3VsmcNK7TKdlxyCyQCoJ7Ve42-UXOx_d8ovbtKGscfbQ-Dmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2859609539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Standing Versus Sitting on Creativity in Adolescents—A Crossover Randomized Trial: The PHIT2LEARN Study</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Luteijn, Petra J. ; Wurff, Inge S. M. ; Tuijl, Piet ; Singh, Amika S. ; Savelberg, Hans H. C. M. ; Groot, Renate H. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Luteijn, Petra J. ; Wurff, Inge S. M. ; Tuijl, Piet ; Singh, Amika S. ; Savelberg, Hans H. C. M. ; Groot, Renate H. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Creativity is important for school performance. As several brain mechanisms involved in creativity are stimulated by low‐intensity physical activity, standing might influence creativity. Few studies on the relationship between standing and creativity have been executed, and none among vocational education and training (VET) students. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether standing influences creativity in VET students. In a randomized crossover study, 192 VET students were randomly allocated to standing or sitting (i.e., control) for 30 min. After 15 min, they performed two creativity tests: Guilford's Alternative Uses Test (divergent thinking) and Remote Associates Test (convergent thinking). Subsequently, conditions were switched, and the procedure was repeated. Multilevel analyses showed no significant effect of standing on divergent or convergent thinking test performance. Our results show that 30 min of standing does not affect creativity in VET students. LAY ABSTRACT Creativity is important for school performance. Furthermore, research suggests that creativity may be stimulated by low‐intensity physical activity. Therefore, we investigated the influence of standing on creativity in vocational education and training students. The results show that there was no significant effect of standing on divergent or convergent thinking test performance. The findings indicate that 30 min of standing does not affect creativity in vocational education and training students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-2271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-228X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/mbe.12381</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescents ; Creativity ; Human Body ; Physical Activities ; Physical activity ; Physical Activity Level ; Students ; Vocational Education</subject><ispartof>Mind, brain and education, 2023-08, Vol.17 (3), p.209-218</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by International Mind, Brain, and Education Society and Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3141-ffeb41a13cbd598f8aaffbd867f20f22cf47413b648346a40cbb23b76ab280133</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4798-3337</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fmbe.12381$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fmbe.12381$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1391184$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Luteijn, Petra J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wurff, Inge S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuijl, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Amika S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savelberg, Hans H. C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groot, Renate H. M.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Standing Versus Sitting on Creativity in Adolescents—A Crossover Randomized Trial: The PHIT2LEARN Study</title><title>Mind, brain and education</title><description>Creativity is important for school performance. As several brain mechanisms involved in creativity are stimulated by low‐intensity physical activity, standing might influence creativity. Few studies on the relationship between standing and creativity have been executed, and none among vocational education and training (VET) students. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether standing influences creativity in VET students. In a randomized crossover study, 192 VET students were randomly allocated to standing or sitting (i.e., control) for 30 min. After 15 min, they performed two creativity tests: Guilford's Alternative Uses Test (divergent thinking) and Remote Associates Test (convergent thinking). Subsequently, conditions were switched, and the procedure was repeated. Multilevel analyses showed no significant effect of standing on divergent or convergent thinking test performance. Our results show that 30 min of standing does not affect creativity in VET students. LAY ABSTRACT Creativity is important for school performance. Furthermore, research suggests that creativity may be stimulated by low‐intensity physical activity. Therefore, we investigated the influence of standing on creativity in vocational education and training students. The results show that there was no significant effect of standing on divergent or convergent thinking test performance. The findings indicate that 30 min of standing does not affect creativity in vocational education and training students.</description><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Human Body</subject><subject>Physical Activities</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Physical Activity Level</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Vocational Education</subject><issn>1751-2271</issn><issn>1751-228X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAUhCMEEqWw4ABIllixaJtn58dhF6pAi8qP2oLYRXZig6s2KXbaqqw4BCfkJDgEdYc3z9Z8mvEbxzkFtwv29BZcdAETCntOC0IfOhjTl_3dPYRD58iYmev6vh9Ay9lM3wRKpBRZhUqJJhUrclW8omehzcqgiaqq-lkWqK8Fq9RaVVukChTn5VyYTBSV-f78iq1aGlOuhUZj61Au1IfI0VQrNr9EdcTjYDjFoyQe39uMVb49dg4kmxtx8jfbztN1Mu0POqOHm2E_HnUyAh507Me4BwxIxnM_opIyJiXPaRBK7EqMM-mFHhAeeJR4AfPcjHNMeBgwjqkLhLSd88Z3qcv3lTBVOitXurCRKaZ-FLiRTyJLXTRUVq-hhUyXWi2Y3qbgpnWvqe01_e3VsmcNK7TKdlxyCyQCoJ7Ve42-UXOx_d8ovbtKGscfbQ-Dmg</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Luteijn, Petra J.</creator><creator>Wurff, Inge S. M.</creator><creator>Tuijl, Piet</creator><creator>Singh, Amika S.</creator><creator>Savelberg, Hans H. C. M.</creator><creator>Groot, Renate H. M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4798-3337</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>The Effect of Standing Versus Sitting on Creativity in Adolescents—A Crossover Randomized Trial: The PHIT2LEARN Study</title><author>Luteijn, Petra J. ; Wurff, Inge S. M. ; Tuijl, Piet ; Singh, Amika S. ; Savelberg, Hans H. C. M. ; Groot, Renate H. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3141-ffeb41a13cbd598f8aaffbd867f20f22cf47413b648346a40cbb23b76ab280133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Human Body</topic><topic>Physical Activities</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Physical Activity Level</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Vocational Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Luteijn, Petra J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wurff, Inge S. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuijl, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Amika S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savelberg, Hans H. C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groot, Renate H. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Mind, brain and education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Luteijn, Petra J.</au><au>Wurff, Inge S. M.</au><au>Tuijl, Piet</au><au>Singh, Amika S.</au><au>Savelberg, Hans H. C. M.</au><au>Groot, Renate H. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1391184</ericid><atitle>The Effect of Standing Versus Sitting on Creativity in Adolescents—A Crossover Randomized Trial: The PHIT2LEARN Study</atitle><jtitle>Mind, brain and education</jtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>209-218</pages><issn>1751-2271</issn><eissn>1751-228X</eissn><abstract>Creativity is important for school performance. As several brain mechanisms involved in creativity are stimulated by low‐intensity physical activity, standing might influence creativity. Few studies on the relationship between standing and creativity have been executed, and none among vocational education and training (VET) students. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether standing influences creativity in VET students. In a randomized crossover study, 192 VET students were randomly allocated to standing or sitting (i.e., control) for 30 min. After 15 min, they performed two creativity tests: Guilford's Alternative Uses Test (divergent thinking) and Remote Associates Test (convergent thinking). Subsequently, conditions were switched, and the procedure was repeated. Multilevel analyses showed no significant effect of standing on divergent or convergent thinking test performance. Our results show that 30 min of standing does not affect creativity in VET students. LAY ABSTRACT Creativity is important for school performance. Furthermore, research suggests that creativity may be stimulated by low‐intensity physical activity. Therefore, we investigated the influence of standing on creativity in vocational education and training students. The results show that there was no significant effect of standing on divergent or convergent thinking test performance. The findings indicate that 30 min of standing does not affect creativity in vocational education and training students.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/mbe.12381</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4798-3337</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-2271
ispartof Mind, brain and education, 2023-08, Vol.17 (3), p.209-218
issn 1751-2271
1751-228X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2859609539
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Adolescents
Creativity
Human Body
Physical Activities
Physical activity
Physical Activity Level
Students
Vocational Education
title The Effect of Standing Versus Sitting on Creativity in Adolescents—A Crossover Randomized Trial: The PHIT2LEARN Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A44%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Standing%20Versus%20Sitting%20on%20Creativity%20in%20Adolescents%E2%80%94A%20Crossover%20Randomized%20Trial:%20The%20PHIT2LEARN%20Study&rft.jtitle=Mind,%20brain%20and%20education&rft.au=Luteijn,%20Petra%20J.&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=209-218&rft.issn=1751-2271&rft.eissn=1751-228X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/mbe.12381&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2859609539%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2859609539&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1391184&rfr_iscdi=true