Reception of Emil Lask’s philosophy in Russia
The acquaintance with significant philosophical doctrines emerging in the West has been a systematic process in the leading Russian-language philosophical journals, collections of articles, monographs and translations. Practically all the most important Western philosophical doctrines have been subj...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Studies in East European thought 2023-09, Vol.75 (3), p.505-524 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 524 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 505 |
container_title | Studies in East European thought |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Kornilaev, Leonid |
description | The acquaintance with significant philosophical doctrines emerging in the West has been a systematic process in the leading Russian-language philosophical journals, collections of articles, monographs and translations. Practically all the most important Western philosophical doctrines have been subjected to scrutiny by Russian philosophers. One of the most vivid Neo-Kantian projects of the early twentieth century, Emil Lask’s
Logic of Philosophy
, has not gone unnoticed either. Reaction to Lask’s works were far from being homogeneous. His project received several different evaluations, including the critical ones. The project was criticized for the unsolved ontological potential of philosophy, the dogmatic immobility of logic of philosophy, inconsistency of material–form relation, etc. The article considers the first reviews and critical assessments of Lask’s works in Russia as well as the texts of Russian religious philosophers and Russian Neo-Kantians which contain constructive criticism. The range of reviews allows us to reconstruct the reception of Lask’s ideas in Russia and provides a significant supplement to the overall picture of the reception of Neo-Kantianism in Russia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11212-021-09461-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2858504293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2858504293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-7a70ccb85d1c602f1afbaf92b17f1a0809fed27a45c69dcc12f0272a63976fd03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQh4MoWKsv4GnBc-zMpLvZHKXUP1AQRM8hzSZ2a7tZk_awN1_D1_NJ3LqCN08zA9_vN_AxdolwjQBykhAJiQMhBzUtkHdHbIS5FIezPGYjUJRzJRSdsrOU1gCIhZAjNnly1rW7OjRZ8Nl8W2-yhUlvXx-fKWtX9Sak0K66rG6yp31KtTlnJ95skrv4nWP2cjt_nt3zxePdw-xmwS1J2HFpJFi7LPMKbQHk0fil8YqWKPsdSlDeVSTNNLeFqqxF8kCSTCGULHwFYsyuht42hve9Szu9DvvY9C81lXmZw5SU6CkaKBtDStF53cZ6a2KnEfRBjB7E6F6M_hGjuz4khlDq4ebVxb_qf1Lfx_xmYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2858504293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reception of Emil Lask’s philosophy in Russia</title><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kornilaev, Leonid</creator><creatorcontrib>Kornilaev, Leonid</creatorcontrib><description>The acquaintance with significant philosophical doctrines emerging in the West has been a systematic process in the leading Russian-language philosophical journals, collections of articles, monographs and translations. Practically all the most important Western philosophical doctrines have been subjected to scrutiny by Russian philosophers. One of the most vivid Neo-Kantian projects of the early twentieth century, Emil Lask’s
Logic of Philosophy
, has not gone unnoticed either. Reaction to Lask’s works were far from being homogeneous. His project received several different evaluations, including the critical ones. The project was criticized for the unsolved ontological potential of philosophy, the dogmatic immobility of logic of philosophy, inconsistency of material–form relation, etc. The article considers the first reviews and critical assessments of Lask’s works in Russia as well as the texts of Russian religious philosophers and Russian Neo-Kantians which contain constructive criticism. The range of reviews allows us to reconstruct the reception of Lask’s ideas in Russia and provides a significant supplement to the overall picture of the reception of Neo-Kantianism in Russia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-9392</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11212-021-09461-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>20th century ; Acquaintances ; Criticism ; Education ; History ; Inconsistency ; Logic ; Philosophers ; Philosophical doctrines ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of language ; Political Philosophy ; Political Science ; Russian language ; Scrutiny</subject><ispartof>Studies in East European thought, 2023-09, Vol.75 (3), p.505-524</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-7a70ccb85d1c602f1afbaf92b17f1a0809fed27a45c69dcc12f0272a63976fd03</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4520-3218</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11212-021-09461-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11212-021-09461-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kornilaev, Leonid</creatorcontrib><title>Reception of Emil Lask’s philosophy in Russia</title><title>Studies in East European thought</title><addtitle>Stud East Eur Thought</addtitle><description>The acquaintance with significant philosophical doctrines emerging in the West has been a systematic process in the leading Russian-language philosophical journals, collections of articles, monographs and translations. Practically all the most important Western philosophical doctrines have been subjected to scrutiny by Russian philosophers. One of the most vivid Neo-Kantian projects of the early twentieth century, Emil Lask’s
Logic of Philosophy
, has not gone unnoticed either. Reaction to Lask’s works were far from being homogeneous. His project received several different evaluations, including the critical ones. The project was criticized for the unsolved ontological potential of philosophy, the dogmatic immobility of logic of philosophy, inconsistency of material–form relation, etc. The article considers the first reviews and critical assessments of Lask’s works in Russia as well as the texts of Russian religious philosophers and Russian Neo-Kantians which contain constructive criticism. The range of reviews allows us to reconstruct the reception of Lask’s ideas in Russia and provides a significant supplement to the overall picture of the reception of Neo-Kantianism in Russia.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Acquaintances</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Inconsistency</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Philosophical doctrines</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of language</subject><subject>Political Philosophy</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Russian language</subject><subject>Scrutiny</subject><issn>0925-9392</issn><issn>1573-0948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQh4MoWKsv4GnBc-zMpLvZHKXUP1AQRM8hzSZ2a7tZk_awN1_D1_NJ3LqCN08zA9_vN_AxdolwjQBykhAJiQMhBzUtkHdHbIS5FIezPGYjUJRzJRSdsrOU1gCIhZAjNnly1rW7OjRZ8Nl8W2-yhUlvXx-fKWtX9Sak0K66rG6yp31KtTlnJ95skrv4nWP2cjt_nt3zxePdw-xmwS1J2HFpJFi7LPMKbQHk0fil8YqWKPsdSlDeVSTNNLeFqqxF8kCSTCGULHwFYsyuht42hve9Szu9DvvY9C81lXmZw5SU6CkaKBtDStF53cZ6a2KnEfRBjB7E6F6M_hGjuz4khlDq4ebVxb_qf1Lfx_xmYw</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Kornilaev, Leonid</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4520-3218</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Reception of Emil Lask’s philosophy in Russia</title><author>Kornilaev, Leonid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-7a70ccb85d1c602f1afbaf92b17f1a0809fed27a45c69dcc12f0272a63976fd03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Acquaintances</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Inconsistency</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Philosophical doctrines</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of language</topic><topic>Political Philosophy</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Russian language</topic><topic>Scrutiny</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kornilaev, Leonid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Studies in East European thought</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kornilaev, Leonid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reception of Emil Lask’s philosophy in Russia</atitle><jtitle>Studies in East European thought</jtitle><stitle>Stud East Eur Thought</stitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>505</spage><epage>524</epage><pages>505-524</pages><issn>0925-9392</issn><eissn>1573-0948</eissn><abstract>The acquaintance with significant philosophical doctrines emerging in the West has been a systematic process in the leading Russian-language philosophical journals, collections of articles, monographs and translations. Practically all the most important Western philosophical doctrines have been subjected to scrutiny by Russian philosophers. One of the most vivid Neo-Kantian projects of the early twentieth century, Emil Lask’s
Logic of Philosophy
, has not gone unnoticed either. Reaction to Lask’s works were far from being homogeneous. His project received several different evaluations, including the critical ones. The project was criticized for the unsolved ontological potential of philosophy, the dogmatic immobility of logic of philosophy, inconsistency of material–form relation, etc. The article considers the first reviews and critical assessments of Lask’s works in Russia as well as the texts of Russian religious philosophers and Russian Neo-Kantians which contain constructive criticism. The range of reviews allows us to reconstruct the reception of Lask’s ideas in Russia and provides a significant supplement to the overall picture of the reception of Neo-Kantianism in Russia.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11212-021-09461-y</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4520-3218</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-9392 |
ispartof | Studies in East European thought, 2023-09, Vol.75 (3), p.505-524 |
issn | 0925-9392 1573-0948 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2858504293 |
source | EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | 20th century Acquaintances Criticism Education History Inconsistency Logic Philosophers Philosophical doctrines Philosophy Philosophy of language Political Philosophy Political Science Russian language Scrutiny |
title | Reception of Emil Lask’s philosophy in Russia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T00%3A31%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reception%20of%20Emil%20Lask%E2%80%99s%20philosophy%20in%20Russia&rft.jtitle=Studies%20in%20East%20European%20thought&rft.au=Kornilaev,%20Leonid&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=505&rft.epage=524&rft.pages=505-524&rft.issn=0925-9392&rft.eissn=1573-0948&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11212-021-09461-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2858504293%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2858504293&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |