Can Archean Impact Structures Be Discovered? A Case Study From Earth's Largest, Most Deeply Eroded Impact Structure

The record of terrestrial impact events is incomplete with no Archean impact structures discovered, despite the expected abundance of collisions that must have occurred. Because no Archean impact structures have been identified, the necessary conditions to preserve an impact structure longer than 2 ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Planets 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Huber, M. S., Kovaleva, E., Rae, A. S. P., Tisato, N., Gulick, S. P. S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Planets
container_volume 128
creator Huber, M. S.
Kovaleva, E.
Rae, A. S. P.
Tisato, N.
Gulick, S. P. S.
description The record of terrestrial impact events is incomplete with no Archean impact structures discovered, despite the expected abundance of collisions that must have occurred. Because no Archean impact structures have been identified, the necessary conditions to preserve an impact structure longer than 2 Byr are unknown. One significant effect of shock metamorphism is that the physical properties of the target rocks change, resulting in distinctive geophysical signatures of impact structures. To evaluate the preservation potential of impact structures, we evaluate the deeply eroded Proterozoic Vredefort impact structure to examine the changes in physical properties and the remnant of the geophysical signature and compare the results with the well‐preserved Chicxulub impact structure. The major structural features of Vredefort are similar to the expected profile of the Chicxulub structure at a depth of 8–10 km. The Vredefort target rocks, while shocked, do not preserve measurable changes in their physical properties. The gravity signature of the impact structure is minor and is controlled by the remnant of the collapsed transient crater rim and the uplifted Moho surface. We anticipate that erosion of the Vredefort structure by an additional 1 km would remove evidence of impact, and regardless of initial size, erosion by >10 km would result in the removal of most of the evidence for any impact structure from the geological record. This study demonstrates that the identification of geologically old (i.e., Archean) impact structures is limited by a lack of geophysical signatures associated with deeply eroded craters. Plain Language Summary Meteorite collisions should have formed throughout the 4.5 billion‐year‐long history of Earth, but we have only found impact craters that are less than half of the age of the Earth (2 billion years) and younger. In order to understand how to find very old impact craters, we studied the largest of the oldest preserved impact craters. The 2 Byr old Vredefort structure in South Africa has been deeply eroded, and thus provides a good view of its deep roots. We collected a series of samples of the exposed rocks known to have evidence of shock effects and measured their physical properties. We found that the physical properties do not show evidence of the meteorite impact event. We also established that the gravity profile of the crater preserves a weak signal. When the Vredefort structure erodes a bit more, the geophysical characterist
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2022JE007721
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2857874920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2857874920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3252-3b03d00a0946e07c8ff5fbb9cac1b8a9ffcadebbbe5e90aadbf1bf4e435f96ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWGpv_gEBD15anWQ_c5K63daWiuDHeUmyE9vSdtdkV9n_3kgVBMG5vGH48ebxCDlncMWAi2sOnC9ygCTh7Ij0OIvFSDCA458dRHJKBs5twE_qTyzoEZfJPR1bvUKv810tdUOfGtvqprXo6C3Sydrp6h0tljd0TDPp0ANt2dGprXY0l7ZZXTq6lPYVXTOk95Vr6ASx3nY0t1WJ5R_bM3Ji5Nbh4Fv75GWaP2d3o-XDbJ6NlyMZ8IiPAgVBCSBBhDFColNjIqOU0FIzlUphjJYlKqUwQgFSlsowZUIMg8iIGE3QJxcH39pWb61PV2yq1u79y4KnUZImoeDgqeGB0rZyzqIparveSdsVDIqvZovfzXo8OOAf6y12_7LFYvaYc85jHnwCHyx6nA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857874920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can Archean Impact Structures Be Discovered? A Case Study From Earth's Largest, Most Deeply Eroded Impact Structure</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Huber, M. S. ; Kovaleva, E. ; Rae, A. S. P. ; Tisato, N. ; Gulick, S. P. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huber, M. S. ; Kovaleva, E. ; Rae, A. S. P. ; Tisato, N. ; Gulick, S. P. S.</creatorcontrib><description>The record of terrestrial impact events is incomplete with no Archean impact structures discovered, despite the expected abundance of collisions that must have occurred. Because no Archean impact structures have been identified, the necessary conditions to preserve an impact structure longer than 2 Byr are unknown. One significant effect of shock metamorphism is that the physical properties of the target rocks change, resulting in distinctive geophysical signatures of impact structures. To evaluate the preservation potential of impact structures, we evaluate the deeply eroded Proterozoic Vredefort impact structure to examine the changes in physical properties and the remnant of the geophysical signature and compare the results with the well‐preserved Chicxulub impact structure. The major structural features of Vredefort are similar to the expected profile of the Chicxulub structure at a depth of 8–10 km. The Vredefort target rocks, while shocked, do not preserve measurable changes in their physical properties. The gravity signature of the impact structure is minor and is controlled by the remnant of the collapsed transient crater rim and the uplifted Moho surface. We anticipate that erosion of the Vredefort structure by an additional 1 km would remove evidence of impact, and regardless of initial size, erosion by &gt;10 km would result in the removal of most of the evidence for any impact structure from the geological record. This study demonstrates that the identification of geologically old (i.e., Archean) impact structures is limited by a lack of geophysical signatures associated with deeply eroded craters. Plain Language Summary Meteorite collisions should have formed throughout the 4.5 billion‐year‐long history of Earth, but we have only found impact craters that are less than half of the age of the Earth (2 billion years) and younger. In order to understand how to find very old impact craters, we studied the largest of the oldest preserved impact craters. The 2 Byr old Vredefort structure in South Africa has been deeply eroded, and thus provides a good view of its deep roots. We collected a series of samples of the exposed rocks known to have evidence of shock effects and measured their physical properties. We found that the physical properties do not show evidence of the meteorite impact event. We also established that the gravity profile of the crater preserves a weak signal. When the Vredefort structure erodes a bit more, the geophysical characteristics that make it identifiable will be gone. We expect that signatures of ancient impact structures even larger than Vredefort would be completely removed by erosion by now. Therefore, to find very old impact craters, we need to look in areas that have experienced unusually little erosion. Key Points The target rocks exposed on the surface of the central core of the Vredefort structure do not preserve changes in physical properties Regardless of initial size, changes in the physical properties of impact structures on Earth might be unidentifiable if they are eroded by more than 10 km Archean impact structures on Earth can only be identified if extraordinary preservation takes place</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9097</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9100</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2022JE007721</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Craters ; Earth ; erosion ; Evaluation ; Geophysics ; Historical structures ; impact crater ; Metamorphism ; Meteorite collisions ; Meteorite craters ; Meteorite impacts ; Meteorites ; Meteors &amp; meteorites ; Physical properties ; Rocks ; Shock metamorphism ; Signatures ; Vredefort</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Planets, 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023. The Authors.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3252-3b03d00a0946e07c8ff5fbb9cac1b8a9ffcadebbbe5e90aadbf1bf4e435f96ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9978-3513 ; 0000-0003-4740-9068 ; 0000-0002-3221-3444 ; 0000-0002-8428-7584 ; 0000-0003-3420-4135</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2022JE007721$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2022JE007721$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huber, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovaleva, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rae, A. S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tisato, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulick, S. P. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Can Archean Impact Structures Be Discovered? A Case Study From Earth's Largest, Most Deeply Eroded Impact Structure</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Planets</title><description>The record of terrestrial impact events is incomplete with no Archean impact structures discovered, despite the expected abundance of collisions that must have occurred. Because no Archean impact structures have been identified, the necessary conditions to preserve an impact structure longer than 2 Byr are unknown. One significant effect of shock metamorphism is that the physical properties of the target rocks change, resulting in distinctive geophysical signatures of impact structures. To evaluate the preservation potential of impact structures, we evaluate the deeply eroded Proterozoic Vredefort impact structure to examine the changes in physical properties and the remnant of the geophysical signature and compare the results with the well‐preserved Chicxulub impact structure. The major structural features of Vredefort are similar to the expected profile of the Chicxulub structure at a depth of 8–10 km. The Vredefort target rocks, while shocked, do not preserve measurable changes in their physical properties. The gravity signature of the impact structure is minor and is controlled by the remnant of the collapsed transient crater rim and the uplifted Moho surface. We anticipate that erosion of the Vredefort structure by an additional 1 km would remove evidence of impact, and regardless of initial size, erosion by &gt;10 km would result in the removal of most of the evidence for any impact structure from the geological record. This study demonstrates that the identification of geologically old (i.e., Archean) impact structures is limited by a lack of geophysical signatures associated with deeply eroded craters. Plain Language Summary Meteorite collisions should have formed throughout the 4.5 billion‐year‐long history of Earth, but we have only found impact craters that are less than half of the age of the Earth (2 billion years) and younger. In order to understand how to find very old impact craters, we studied the largest of the oldest preserved impact craters. The 2 Byr old Vredefort structure in South Africa has been deeply eroded, and thus provides a good view of its deep roots. We collected a series of samples of the exposed rocks known to have evidence of shock effects and measured their physical properties. We found that the physical properties do not show evidence of the meteorite impact event. We also established that the gravity profile of the crater preserves a weak signal. When the Vredefort structure erodes a bit more, the geophysical characteristics that make it identifiable will be gone. We expect that signatures of ancient impact structures even larger than Vredefort would be completely removed by erosion by now. Therefore, to find very old impact craters, we need to look in areas that have experienced unusually little erosion. Key Points The target rocks exposed on the surface of the central core of the Vredefort structure do not preserve changes in physical properties Regardless of initial size, changes in the physical properties of impact structures on Earth might be unidentifiable if they are eroded by more than 10 km Archean impact structures on Earth can only be identified if extraordinary preservation takes place</description><subject>Craters</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>erosion</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Historical structures</subject><subject>impact crater</subject><subject>Metamorphism</subject><subject>Meteorite collisions</subject><subject>Meteorite craters</subject><subject>Meteorite impacts</subject><subject>Meteorites</subject><subject>Meteors &amp; meteorites</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Shock metamorphism</subject><subject>Signatures</subject><subject>Vredefort</subject><issn>2169-9097</issn><issn>2169-9100</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWGpv_gEBD15anWQ_c5K63daWiuDHeUmyE9vSdtdkV9n_3kgVBMG5vGH48ebxCDlncMWAi2sOnC9ygCTh7Ij0OIvFSDCA458dRHJKBs5twE_qTyzoEZfJPR1bvUKv810tdUOfGtvqprXo6C3Sydrp6h0tljd0TDPp0ANt2dGprXY0l7ZZXTq6lPYVXTOk95Vr6ASx3nY0t1WJ5R_bM3Ji5Nbh4Fv75GWaP2d3o-XDbJ6NlyMZ8IiPAgVBCSBBhDFColNjIqOU0FIzlUphjJYlKqUwQgFSlsowZUIMg8iIGE3QJxcH39pWb61PV2yq1u79y4KnUZImoeDgqeGB0rZyzqIparveSdsVDIqvZovfzXo8OOAf6y12_7LFYvaYc85jHnwCHyx6nA</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Huber, M. S.</creator><creator>Kovaleva, E.</creator><creator>Rae, A. S. P.</creator><creator>Tisato, N.</creator><creator>Gulick, S. P. S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9978-3513</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4740-9068</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3221-3444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8428-7584</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3420-4135</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Can Archean Impact Structures Be Discovered? A Case Study From Earth's Largest, Most Deeply Eroded Impact Structure</title><author>Huber, M. S. ; Kovaleva, E. ; Rae, A. S. P. ; Tisato, N. ; Gulick, S. P. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3252-3b03d00a0946e07c8ff5fbb9cac1b8a9ffcadebbbe5e90aadbf1bf4e435f96ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Craters</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>erosion</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Historical structures</topic><topic>impact crater</topic><topic>Metamorphism</topic><topic>Meteorite collisions</topic><topic>Meteorite craters</topic><topic>Meteorite impacts</topic><topic>Meteorites</topic><topic>Meteors &amp; meteorites</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Shock metamorphism</topic><topic>Signatures</topic><topic>Vredefort</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huber, M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovaleva, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rae, A. S. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tisato, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulick, S. P. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Planets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huber, M. S.</au><au>Kovaleva, E.</au><au>Rae, A. S. P.</au><au>Tisato, N.</au><au>Gulick, S. P. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can Archean Impact Structures Be Discovered? A Case Study From Earth's Largest, Most Deeply Eroded Impact Structure</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Planets</jtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9097</issn><eissn>2169-9100</eissn><abstract>The record of terrestrial impact events is incomplete with no Archean impact structures discovered, despite the expected abundance of collisions that must have occurred. Because no Archean impact structures have been identified, the necessary conditions to preserve an impact structure longer than 2 Byr are unknown. One significant effect of shock metamorphism is that the physical properties of the target rocks change, resulting in distinctive geophysical signatures of impact structures. To evaluate the preservation potential of impact structures, we evaluate the deeply eroded Proterozoic Vredefort impact structure to examine the changes in physical properties and the remnant of the geophysical signature and compare the results with the well‐preserved Chicxulub impact structure. The major structural features of Vredefort are similar to the expected profile of the Chicxulub structure at a depth of 8–10 km. The Vredefort target rocks, while shocked, do not preserve measurable changes in their physical properties. The gravity signature of the impact structure is minor and is controlled by the remnant of the collapsed transient crater rim and the uplifted Moho surface. We anticipate that erosion of the Vredefort structure by an additional 1 km would remove evidence of impact, and regardless of initial size, erosion by &gt;10 km would result in the removal of most of the evidence for any impact structure from the geological record. This study demonstrates that the identification of geologically old (i.e., Archean) impact structures is limited by a lack of geophysical signatures associated with deeply eroded craters. Plain Language Summary Meteorite collisions should have formed throughout the 4.5 billion‐year‐long history of Earth, but we have only found impact craters that are less than half of the age of the Earth (2 billion years) and younger. In order to understand how to find very old impact craters, we studied the largest of the oldest preserved impact craters. The 2 Byr old Vredefort structure in South Africa has been deeply eroded, and thus provides a good view of its deep roots. We collected a series of samples of the exposed rocks known to have evidence of shock effects and measured their physical properties. We found that the physical properties do not show evidence of the meteorite impact event. We also established that the gravity profile of the crater preserves a weak signal. When the Vredefort structure erodes a bit more, the geophysical characteristics that make it identifiable will be gone. We expect that signatures of ancient impact structures even larger than Vredefort would be completely removed by erosion by now. Therefore, to find very old impact craters, we need to look in areas that have experienced unusually little erosion. Key Points The target rocks exposed on the surface of the central core of the Vredefort structure do not preserve changes in physical properties Regardless of initial size, changes in the physical properties of impact structures on Earth might be unidentifiable if they are eroded by more than 10 km Archean impact structures on Earth can only be identified if extraordinary preservation takes place</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2022JE007721</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9978-3513</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4740-9068</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3221-3444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8428-7584</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3420-4135</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9097
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Planets, 2023-08, Vol.128 (8), p.n/a
issn 2169-9097
2169-9100
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2857874920
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Craters
Earth
erosion
Evaluation
Geophysics
Historical structures
impact crater
Metamorphism
Meteorite collisions
Meteorite craters
Meteorite impacts
Meteorites
Meteors & meteorites
Physical properties
Rocks
Shock metamorphism
Signatures
Vredefort
title Can Archean Impact Structures Be Discovered? A Case Study From Earth's Largest, Most Deeply Eroded Impact Structure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A49%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20Archean%20Impact%20Structures%20Be%20Discovered?%20A%20Case%20Study%20From%20Earth's%20Largest,%20Most%20Deeply%20Eroded%20Impact%20Structure&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Planets&rft.au=Huber,%20M.%20S.&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9097&rft.eissn=2169-9100&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2022JE007721&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2857874920%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857874920&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true