The Carbon Transfer From Plant to Soil Is More Efficient in Less Productive Ecosystems

The organic carbon (C) in soil is mainly from plants via litter decomposition. Here, we developed a new litter decomposition submodel incorporating the microbial biomass effect on the decomposition rate based on the Michaelis‐Menten kinetics. This new submodel was coupled with the existing plant and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global biogeochemical cycles 2023-08, Vol.37 (8), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Fan, Xianlei, Bai, Edith, Zhang, Jing, Wang, Xuhui, Yuan, Wenping, Piao, Shilong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Global biogeochemical cycles
container_volume 37
creator Fan, Xianlei
Bai, Edith
Zhang, Jing
Wang, Xuhui
Yuan, Wenping
Piao, Shilong
description The organic carbon (C) in soil is mainly from plants via litter decomposition. Here, we developed a new litter decomposition submodel incorporating the microbial biomass effect on the decomposition rate based on the Michaelis‐Menten kinetics. This new submodel was coupled with the existing plant and soil submodels to simulate C cycling in natural ecosystems in the continental United States. The C transfer efficiency (EFF), defined as the percentage of C transferred to the next layer in the plant‐litter‐soil continuum, was quantified in different types of natural ecosystems. We estimated that on average 48.1% of gross primary productivity (GPP) was transferred from plant to litter and 15.1% of litterfall was transferred from litter to soil, meaning that the C that finally enters soil was on average approximately 7.3% of GPP. Ecosystems with a drier climate and lower GPP had higher EFF from plant to soil. The EFF concept we proposed provides an empirical proxy for diagnosing ecosystem C cycling and a framework for projecting the change of C fluxes and C pool sizes in response to climate change. If C transfer can represent energy transfer analogous to Lindeman Efficiency, our results suggest a pattern of resource and energy transfer in nature: higher resource or energy availability usually means lower resource or energy transfer efficiency. Plain Language Summary Carbon sequestration by ecosystems is important for mitigating global warming. During the transfer of carbon from atmospheric CO2 to plants, then to litter, and then to soil, carbon is continuously lost to the atmosphere via CO2. Here, we adopted the idea of Lindeman Efficiency to express this efficiency of carbon transfer between different layers in the plant‐litter‐soil systems in the continental US. We found that ecosystems with higher productivity have lower carbon transfer efficiency, indicating the tradeoff between the two. Therefore, it is hard to find an ecosystem with both high productivity and high carbon transfer efficiency to soil for carbon sequestration. Our attempt to understand carbon transfer efficiency provides an intuitive proxy of C cycling and a framework for future research on ecosystem carbon sequestration and global warming. Key Points The transfer of carbon from plant to litter than to soil is more efficient in ecosystems with higher productivity Our litter submodel can directly simulate carbon input fluxes into soil, has intermediate complexity, and shows good performance Th
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2023GB007727
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2857863009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2857863009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3062-402788cd55ae0498b7d7312434a66023067d6deb7f2c8307c5451ebb1b5d25e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AURQdRsFZ3_oABt0bfvPnM0oa2FioWrG5DMplgSpqpM6nSf2-kLly5uot7eI97CLlmcMcA03sE5PMJgNaoT8iIpUIkKaI4JSMwRiUKuTonFzFuAJiQMh2Rt_W7o1kRSt_RdSi6WLtAZ8Fv6aotup72nr74pqWLSJ98cHRa141t3NA0HV26GOkq-Gpv--ZzKK2Ph9i7bbwkZ3XRRnf1m2PyOpuus8dk-TxfZA_LxHJQmAhAbYytpCwciNSUutKcoeCiUGoYA0pXqnKlrtEaDtpKIZkrS1bKCqVjfExujnd3wX_sXezzjd-HbniZo5HaKA6QDtTtkbLBxxhcne9Csy3CIWeQ_5jL_5obcDziX03rDv-y-XyS4aAS-Tfp82yS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857863009</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Carbon Transfer From Plant to Soil Is More Efficient in Less Productive Ecosystems</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Fan, Xianlei ; Bai, Edith ; Zhang, Jing ; Wang, Xuhui ; Yuan, Wenping ; Piao, Shilong</creator><creatorcontrib>Fan, Xianlei ; Bai, Edith ; Zhang, Jing ; Wang, Xuhui ; Yuan, Wenping ; Piao, Shilong</creatorcontrib><description>The organic carbon (C) in soil is mainly from plants via litter decomposition. Here, we developed a new litter decomposition submodel incorporating the microbial biomass effect on the decomposition rate based on the Michaelis‐Menten kinetics. This new submodel was coupled with the existing plant and soil submodels to simulate C cycling in natural ecosystems in the continental United States. The C transfer efficiency (EFF), defined as the percentage of C transferred to the next layer in the plant‐litter‐soil continuum, was quantified in different types of natural ecosystems. We estimated that on average 48.1% of gross primary productivity (GPP) was transferred from plant to litter and 15.1% of litterfall was transferred from litter to soil, meaning that the C that finally enters soil was on average approximately 7.3% of GPP. Ecosystems with a drier climate and lower GPP had higher EFF from plant to soil. The EFF concept we proposed provides an empirical proxy for diagnosing ecosystem C cycling and a framework for projecting the change of C fluxes and C pool sizes in response to climate change. If C transfer can represent energy transfer analogous to Lindeman Efficiency, our results suggest a pattern of resource and energy transfer in nature: higher resource or energy availability usually means lower resource or energy transfer efficiency. Plain Language Summary Carbon sequestration by ecosystems is important for mitigating global warming. During the transfer of carbon from atmospheric CO2 to plants, then to litter, and then to soil, carbon is continuously lost to the atmosphere via CO2. Here, we adopted the idea of Lindeman Efficiency to express this efficiency of carbon transfer between different layers in the plant‐litter‐soil systems in the continental US. We found that ecosystems with higher productivity have lower carbon transfer efficiency, indicating the tradeoff between the two. Therefore, it is hard to find an ecosystem with both high productivity and high carbon transfer efficiency to soil for carbon sequestration. Our attempt to understand carbon transfer efficiency provides an intuitive proxy of C cycling and a framework for future research on ecosystem carbon sequestration and global warming. Key Points The transfer of carbon from plant to litter than to soil is more efficient in ecosystems with higher productivity Our litter submodel can directly simulate carbon input fluxes into soil, has intermediate complexity, and shows good performance The C transfer efficiency concept we proposed provides an empirical proxy for diagnosing ecosystem C cycling</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-6236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2023GB007727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Carbon sequestration ; carbon transfer efficiency ; Climate change ; Cycles ; Decomposition ; Ecosystems ; Efficiency ; Energy transfer ; Global warming ; Kinetics ; Litter ; litter decomposition ; Litter fall ; Microorganisms ; Organic carbon ; Organic soils ; Plants ; Primary production ; process‐based models ; Productivity ; respiration ; Soil ; Soils</subject><ispartof>Global biogeochemical cycles, 2023-08, Vol.37 (8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3062-402788cd55ae0498b7d7312434a66023067d6deb7f2c8307c5451ebb1b5d25e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3062-402788cd55ae0498b7d7312434a66023067d6deb7f2c8307c5451ebb1b5d25e13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8057-2292 ; 0000-0002-1469-4395 ; 0000-0003-0495-6504 ; 0000-0001-8124-2260 ; 0000-0003-0818-9816 ; 0000-0001-5001-2542</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2023GB007727$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2023GB007727$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46443,46867</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fan, Xianlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Edith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xuhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Wenping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piao, Shilong</creatorcontrib><title>The Carbon Transfer From Plant to Soil Is More Efficient in Less Productive Ecosystems</title><title>Global biogeochemical cycles</title><description>The organic carbon (C) in soil is mainly from plants via litter decomposition. Here, we developed a new litter decomposition submodel incorporating the microbial biomass effect on the decomposition rate based on the Michaelis‐Menten kinetics. This new submodel was coupled with the existing plant and soil submodels to simulate C cycling in natural ecosystems in the continental United States. The C transfer efficiency (EFF), defined as the percentage of C transferred to the next layer in the plant‐litter‐soil continuum, was quantified in different types of natural ecosystems. We estimated that on average 48.1% of gross primary productivity (GPP) was transferred from plant to litter and 15.1% of litterfall was transferred from litter to soil, meaning that the C that finally enters soil was on average approximately 7.3% of GPP. Ecosystems with a drier climate and lower GPP had higher EFF from plant to soil. The EFF concept we proposed provides an empirical proxy for diagnosing ecosystem C cycling and a framework for projecting the change of C fluxes and C pool sizes in response to climate change. If C transfer can represent energy transfer analogous to Lindeman Efficiency, our results suggest a pattern of resource and energy transfer in nature: higher resource or energy availability usually means lower resource or energy transfer efficiency. Plain Language Summary Carbon sequestration by ecosystems is important for mitigating global warming. During the transfer of carbon from atmospheric CO2 to plants, then to litter, and then to soil, carbon is continuously lost to the atmosphere via CO2. Here, we adopted the idea of Lindeman Efficiency to express this efficiency of carbon transfer between different layers in the plant‐litter‐soil systems in the continental US. We found that ecosystems with higher productivity have lower carbon transfer efficiency, indicating the tradeoff between the two. Therefore, it is hard to find an ecosystem with both high productivity and high carbon transfer efficiency to soil for carbon sequestration. Our attempt to understand carbon transfer efficiency provides an intuitive proxy of C cycling and a framework for future research on ecosystem carbon sequestration and global warming. Key Points The transfer of carbon from plant to litter than to soil is more efficient in ecosystems with higher productivity Our litter submodel can directly simulate carbon input fluxes into soil, has intermediate complexity, and shows good performance The C transfer efficiency concept we proposed provides an empirical proxy for diagnosing ecosystem C cycling</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>carbon transfer efficiency</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Cycles</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Energy transfer</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>litter decomposition</subject><subject>Litter fall</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>process‐based models</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>respiration</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soils</subject><issn>0886-6236</issn><issn>1944-9224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AURQdRsFZ3_oABt0bfvPnM0oa2FioWrG5DMplgSpqpM6nSf2-kLly5uot7eI97CLlmcMcA03sE5PMJgNaoT8iIpUIkKaI4JSMwRiUKuTonFzFuAJiQMh2Rt_W7o1kRSt_RdSi6WLtAZ8Fv6aotup72nr74pqWLSJ98cHRa141t3NA0HV26GOkq-Gpv--ZzKK2Ph9i7bbwkZ3XRRnf1m2PyOpuus8dk-TxfZA_LxHJQmAhAbYytpCwciNSUutKcoeCiUGoYA0pXqnKlrtEaDtpKIZkrS1bKCqVjfExujnd3wX_sXezzjd-HbniZo5HaKA6QDtTtkbLBxxhcne9Csy3CIWeQ_5jL_5obcDziX03rDv-y-XyS4aAS-Tfp82yS</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Fan, Xianlei</creator><creator>Bai, Edith</creator><creator>Zhang, Jing</creator><creator>Wang, Xuhui</creator><creator>Yuan, Wenping</creator><creator>Piao, Shilong</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8057-2292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1469-4395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0495-6504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8124-2260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0818-9816</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5001-2542</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>The Carbon Transfer From Plant to Soil Is More Efficient in Less Productive Ecosystems</title><author>Fan, Xianlei ; Bai, Edith ; Zhang, Jing ; Wang, Xuhui ; Yuan, Wenping ; Piao, Shilong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3062-402788cd55ae0498b7d7312434a66023067d6deb7f2c8307c5451ebb1b5d25e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>carbon transfer efficiency</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Cycles</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Energy transfer</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>litter decomposition</topic><topic>Litter fall</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>process‐based models</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>respiration</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soils</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fan, Xianlei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Edith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xuhui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Wenping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piao, Shilong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Global biogeochemical cycles</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fan, Xianlei</au><au>Bai, Edith</au><au>Zhang, Jing</au><au>Wang, Xuhui</au><au>Yuan, Wenping</au><au>Piao, Shilong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Carbon Transfer From Plant to Soil Is More Efficient in Less Productive Ecosystems</atitle><jtitle>Global biogeochemical cycles</jtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0886-6236</issn><eissn>1944-9224</eissn><abstract>The organic carbon (C) in soil is mainly from plants via litter decomposition. Here, we developed a new litter decomposition submodel incorporating the microbial biomass effect on the decomposition rate based on the Michaelis‐Menten kinetics. This new submodel was coupled with the existing plant and soil submodels to simulate C cycling in natural ecosystems in the continental United States. The C transfer efficiency (EFF), defined as the percentage of C transferred to the next layer in the plant‐litter‐soil continuum, was quantified in different types of natural ecosystems. We estimated that on average 48.1% of gross primary productivity (GPP) was transferred from plant to litter and 15.1% of litterfall was transferred from litter to soil, meaning that the C that finally enters soil was on average approximately 7.3% of GPP. Ecosystems with a drier climate and lower GPP had higher EFF from plant to soil. The EFF concept we proposed provides an empirical proxy for diagnosing ecosystem C cycling and a framework for projecting the change of C fluxes and C pool sizes in response to climate change. If C transfer can represent energy transfer analogous to Lindeman Efficiency, our results suggest a pattern of resource and energy transfer in nature: higher resource or energy availability usually means lower resource or energy transfer efficiency. Plain Language Summary Carbon sequestration by ecosystems is important for mitigating global warming. During the transfer of carbon from atmospheric CO2 to plants, then to litter, and then to soil, carbon is continuously lost to the atmosphere via CO2. Here, we adopted the idea of Lindeman Efficiency to express this efficiency of carbon transfer between different layers in the plant‐litter‐soil systems in the continental US. We found that ecosystems with higher productivity have lower carbon transfer efficiency, indicating the tradeoff between the two. Therefore, it is hard to find an ecosystem with both high productivity and high carbon transfer efficiency to soil for carbon sequestration. Our attempt to understand carbon transfer efficiency provides an intuitive proxy of C cycling and a framework for future research on ecosystem carbon sequestration and global warming. Key Points The transfer of carbon from plant to litter than to soil is more efficient in ecosystems with higher productivity Our litter submodel can directly simulate carbon input fluxes into soil, has intermediate complexity, and shows good performance The C transfer efficiency concept we proposed provides an empirical proxy for diagnosing ecosystem C cycling</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2023GB007727</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8057-2292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1469-4395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0495-6504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8124-2260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0818-9816</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5001-2542</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-6236
ispartof Global biogeochemical cycles, 2023-08, Vol.37 (8), p.n/a
issn 0886-6236
1944-9224
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2857863009
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Carbon dioxide
Carbon sequestration
carbon transfer efficiency
Climate change
Cycles
Decomposition
Ecosystems
Efficiency
Energy transfer
Global warming
Kinetics
Litter
litter decomposition
Litter fall
Microorganisms
Organic carbon
Organic soils
Plants
Primary production
process‐based models
Productivity
respiration
Soil
Soils
title The Carbon Transfer From Plant to Soil Is More Efficient in Less Productive Ecosystems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T23%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Carbon%20Transfer%20From%20Plant%20to%20Soil%20Is%20More%20Efficient%20in%20Less%20Productive%20Ecosystems&rft.jtitle=Global%20biogeochemical%20cycles&rft.au=Fan,%20Xianlei&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0886-6236&rft.eissn=1944-9224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2023GB007727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2857863009%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857863009&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true